In post 1277, Merlyn wrote: Hmm, time to play the who on my wagon is scum game I see
At this point (Aureal, Abnegation, usesPython, Radical Rat) seems pretty likely to contain zero scum. I suggest you put effort into looking elsewhere.
In post 1277, Merlyn wrote: Hmm, time to play the who on my wagon is scum game I see
why do you have to post the exact thing i was going to post?In post 1350, Aureal wrote:In post 1277, Merlyn wrote: Hmm, time to play the who on my wagon is scum game I see
At this point (Aureal, Abnegation, usesPython, Radical Rat) seems pretty likely to contain zero scum. I suggest you put effort into looking elsewhere.
Yeah, alright you can stay for now.In post 1351, Save The Dragons wrote: here's a town wall i posted that helped solve the game
viewtopic.php?p=13751825#p13751825
Don't play my paranoia like this, I already have a problem being an easy pocketIn post 1346, Abnegation wrote:what if...WhAt If YoU tWo ArE sCuMpArTnErS!?!?!?In post 1344, Aureal wrote:In post 1272, Radical Rat wrote: My main stipulation is Not Ranger, and not Rauth. I'd also still prefer we boot out Drew, but no one else really seems to care so I'm probably not getting my way on that one
Yeah, pretty much this exactly. It's kinda scary how much Rat has been on the same page as me this game.
I feel like the difference between those two games was the scum!StD walled in like the first 10 pages and town!StD walled after 150 pages but we're too lazy to go check your other games to see if the pattern holds so you can be town for nowIn post 1351, Save The Dragons wrote: here's a town wall i posted that helped solve the game
viewtopic.php?p=13751825#p13751825
I actually don't get the town vibes from AurealIn post 1356, Abnegation wrote: anyway someone, think it was sheep, wasn't sure why i was townreading aureal.
it's a vibe. can't really explain it. i just look at her posts and let the towniness wash over me.
OH NO HE'S DOING THIS WEIRD POCKET AGAIN AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAIn post 1278, sheepsaysmeep wrote: like let's focus in on aureal for fun. aureal has done nothing wolfy to me and I could totally see her as town. but like, I know she's physically capable of being insanely towny. the second she subbed into the last game I played with her, she immediately made posts that were like wow that's some of the most pure in-depth stuff ive read.
so the fact that she hasn't done that here is like slightly >rand wolf by poe, even if that's an unfair expectation. she also apparently hasn't wolfed before which makes it feel valid to be like "she's wolf struggling to get into the game!” is my best guess rn. I dont rly support her inclusion in the current proposal altho I havent seen why abnegation townreads her
I feel like merlyn fits that “lackluster” description enough as well meh
Personally, I think changing their mind on you for the nightmare despite already having a compromise available is what pushed Python from probably Town to lockTown, if that helps.In post 1348, Save The Dragons wrote: i think my paranoid brain wants to scum read python
In post 1291, Flea The Magician wrote:Any time "town" is said, its amended with stuff like "which I am" - its brute forcing that narrative into peoples minds which is an interesting approach from her.In post 1226, Titus wrote:What os a reinforcive statement?In post 1159, Flea The Magician wrote: Ranger as usual youre screaming town and using a lot of reinforcive statements.
Who isnt town in your PoV?
In post 1315, Random Nurse wrote:That's a tough question because all I have are gut vibes and gutreads. It's Day 1; I don't have any tangible evidence to start making associations. Typically once Day 2 begins is when I start to find my feet and can better make state of the game terrain. So currently, no, not really. Chances are high that someone I'm reading as Town could be Scum, but that's not saying much. I do have prior experience with Titus on my main, so that one does kind of scare me because it's really hard to tell Scum/Town Titus apart. I'm half-tempted to pressure Merlyn over ignoring my posts but I'm thinking I'd just be spinning me wheels.In post 1313, Radical Rat wrote: Is there anyone you think might be scum so far?
nvm the vibes are backIn post 1357, usesPython wrote:I actually don't get the town vibes from AurealIn post 1356, Abnegation wrote: anyway someone, think it was sheep, wasn't sure why i was townreading aureal.
it's a vibe. can't really explain it. i just look at her posts and let the towniness wash over me.
nvm the nvm this feels pretty performativeIn post 1358, Aureal wrote:OH NO HE'S DOING THIS WEIRD POCKET AGAIN AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAIn post 1278, sheepsaysmeep wrote: like let's focus in on aureal for fun. aureal has done nothing wolfy to me and I could totally see her as town. but like, I know she's physically capable of being insanely towny. the second she subbed into the last game I played with her, she immediately made posts that were like wow that's some of the most pure in-depth stuff ive read.
srsly wut
I was so insanely towny they would've gotten me miseliminated instead of scumsheep if scum hadn't decided to bus. x_X
sheep isn't playing at all like he did that game so I'm not feeling him scum here at the moment but I dunno where this comes from.
so the fact that she hasn't done that here is like slightly >rand wolf by poe, even if that's an unfair expectation. she also apparently hasn't wolfed before which makes it feel valid to be like "she's wolf struggling to get into the game!” is my best guess rn. I dont rly support her inclusion in the current proposal altho I havent seen why abnegation townreads her
I feel like merlyn fits that “lackluster” description enough as well meh
And yes we went over my lack of proper scum meta already too so I dunno where this comes from. I have precisely one non-ancient scum game and it was multiball. So I have been wolf but have fun trying to figure out my scum meta from that when I was playing 95% the same as I would if town.
In post 1332, Abnegation wrote:yeah, the timing is what i was going to look at and forgot to.In post 1330, Aureal wrote:In post 1213, Abnegation wrote:^In post 1212, Abnegation wrote: for all we know, scum could have noticed that ranger was makingdrewpuns and put him in there to cast suspicion. idk.
that might implicate kirigiri if true but it's just a theory.
This would be the other possible explanation if Ranger didn't do it. But like, scum are on the ball enough to immediately pick up on Ranger making weird Drew jokes for no reason and decide to set up a frame... and then just sit around for days hoping town picks up on the hints to go after the Ranger/Drew thing? The timing doesn't make sense. Rat started prodding Ranger about it right away but that was just because of the timing and Ranger's view on Drew. If scum wanted heat on Ranger/Drew for it, doesn't it seem like they would point out the supposed crumbing sooner?
what i don't get is why those two things are necessarily connected. if anti-town!ranger needs drew in the nightmare or thinks she might want to use that ability on him, making puns about specifically him doesn't seem like a smart idea because it connects them. am i wrong to think that's something that was bound to get read into?
Oh, actually. We need to vote for at least four (because five is the minimum and Drew is already in) but I don't see why we can't do another proposal afterwards to add more people to get to seven. Since we seem to be struggling to get a consensus after the first few consensus townreads, it might be easier to work with that way- get more consensus people confirmed then scrap over the last couple.In post 1304, Radical Rat wrote: We really should be voting for at least seven people, as that's the requirement for Normal Invention, which most everyone agrees is the best option
Because WhAt If wE tWo ArE sCuMpArTnErS!?!?!?In post 1352, Abnegation wrote:why do you have to post the exact thing i was going to post?In post 1350, Aureal wrote:In post 1277, Merlyn wrote: Hmm, time to play the who on my wagon is scum game I see
At this point (Aureal, Abnegation, usesPython, Radical Rat) seems pretty likely to contain zero scum. I suggest you put effort into looking elsewhere.
I would rather have a 7-8 person proposal get passed through plurality rules just in case scum have a hammerer. Can we just pretend we passed a 5 person proposal without actually doing it?In post 1366, Aureal wrote:Oh, actually. We need to vote for at least four (because five is the minimum and Drew is already in) but I don't see why we can't do another proposal afterwards to add more people to get to seven. Since we seem to be struggling to get a consensus after the first few consensus townreads, it might be easier to work with that way- get more consensus people confirmed then scrap over the last couple.In post 1304, Radical Rat wrote: We really should be voting for at least seven people, as that's the requirement for Normal Invention, which most everyone agrees is the best option
hmm, i don't think i scumread ranger but the hindsight thing is a good point.In post 1365, Aureal wrote:In post 1332, Abnegation wrote:yeah, the timing is what i was going to look at and forgot to.In post 1330, Aureal wrote:In post 1213, Abnegation wrote:^In post 1212, Abnegation wrote: for all we know, scum could have noticed that ranger was makingdrewpuns and put him in there to cast suspicion. idk.
that might implicate kirigiri if true but it's just a theory.
This would be the other possible explanation if Ranger didn't do it. But like, scum are on the ball enough to immediately pick up on Ranger making weird Drew jokes for no reason and decide to set up a frame... and then just sit around for days hoping town picks up on the hints to go after the Ranger/Drew thing? The timing doesn't make sense. Rat started prodding Ranger about it right away but that was just because of the timing and Ranger's view on Drew. If scum wanted heat on Ranger/Drew for it, doesn't it seem like they would point out the supposed crumbing sooner?
what i don't get is why those two things are necessarily connected. if anti-town!ranger needs drew in the nightmare or thinks she might want to use that ability on him, making puns about specifically him doesn't seem like a smart idea because it connects them. am i wrong to think that's something that was bound to get read into?
Well that would be where the traitor or somesuch speculation comes in. If they were just regular scum together obviously dropping crumbs is silly, unless they're going for some galaxy-brain convoluted gambit. The crumbs would mean Ranger was wanting Drew to be able to figure out who did it, while not being too obvious to the others who perhaps don't care so much.
People are saying "well it's too obvious" but is it really? It took days for the crumbs to be connected, by Kyoko who was doing catchup. I feel like that's hindsight talking. It's obviousonce you've seen itbut if it was that obvious we'd all have seen it right away without Kyoko needing to point it out. That's why I'm thinking Kyoko town. I don't know why scum would want to point out crumbs that town has missed, except if they were setting up a frame, but I've already talked about how that doesn't seem at all likely.
I mean 'viable lim' means I would support a Ranger lim.....or even lime.In post 1331, Aureal wrote:In post 1237, Doctor Drew wrote:She probably isn't too bad as a lemon as well.In post 1236, Doctor Drew wrote: I can assure everyone that unless it is unknown to me, that I am not a savior or lawyer or any of that.
I don't know what Ranger's role is, but whatever their intent is it is independent of my role(again, unless some wackadoo bastard shit).
IDrewfeel that Ranger is a viable lime today though.
*viable lim
Do you? What exactly do you mean by that? Do you mean you wouldsupporta Ranger elimination? Or just that you think it's possible?
In post 1364, usesPython wrote: nvm the nvm this feels pretty performative
In post 1368, usesPython wrote:I would rather have a 7-8 person proposal get passed through plurality rules just in case scum have a hammerer. Can we just pretend we passed a 5 person proposal without actually doing it?In post 1366, Aureal wrote:Oh, actually. We need to vote for at least four (because five is the minimum and Drew is already in) but I don't see why we can't do another proposal afterwards to add more people to get to seven. Since we seem to be struggling to get a consensus after the first few consensus townreads, it might be easier to work with that way- get more consensus people confirmed then scrap over the last couple.In post 1304, Radical Rat wrote: We really should be voting for at least seven people, as that's the requirement for Normal Invention, which most everyone agrees is the best option