Flashwagons will never not be funnyIn post 273, Cometbright wrote: Was that a hammer? I literally just wrote a post saying we need proper discussion so we have valuable VCA
If VIP's town he can write down his final thoughts or something I guess
Flashwagons will never not be funnyIn post 273, Cometbright wrote: Was that a hammer? I literally just wrote a post saying we need proper discussion so we have valuable VCA
Too late pal, it's already hammered
ngl we thought you were playing alongIn post 280, Black wrote: Oh I'm an idiot
kinda hate this post tbhIn post 279, Gimli wrote: okay I'll play along
Erm... it may be only me, but that literally doesn't add up.In post 249, Gimli wrote: yes let me think about this
I have you and DE as townies, let's hope I'm right.
7 players to parse through, clear 3 for the win
(checks the playerlist)
Im pretty sure I'm just gonna be null on everyone but I'm doing ISOs now I guess.
Why exactly?In post 250, Gimli wrote: I decided I like Black this game
Can I get an answer for this?
Yet you gave him a townread.In post 251, DragonEater70 wrote: I feel so frustrated because I know town!Comet pretty well and I know Comet knows me pretty well so I just don't get how Comet could ever reach the first conclusion instead of the second one.
For me, it was clear that Gimli meant he'd agreed with Knott that the game was hard.
TheyIn post 286, Aneninen wrote: No, it's just Python trolling. He'd been voting for me before the "hammer".
Normally I would but it was kinda rude of you to try this before I've had coffeeIn post 281, usesPython wrote:ngl we thought you were playing alongIn post 280, Black wrote: Oh I'm an idiot
These two posts are made 50 seconds apartIn post 286, Aneninen wrote: No, it's just Python trolling. He'd been voting for me before the "hammer".
kinda hate your test tbhIn post 284, usesPython wrote:kinda hate this post tbhIn post 279, Gimli wrote: okay I'll play along
I'm not sure I agree with this. If I'm flashwagoned I'm going to make sure I'm actually faded before I do anythingIn post 292, usesPython wrote: VIP gets -town points for prioritizing double checking the votes instead of writing down final thoughts
Gimli this confuses me. If you thought Python hammered then your unvote doesn't do anything. You seemed fine putting VIP at e-1 so why the sudden fear over a fake hammer test?
^I was thinking this but you've put it into coherent words.In post 295, Black wrote: Gimli this confuses me. If you thought Python hammered then your unvote doesn't do anything. You seemed fine putting VIP at e-1 so why the sudden fear over a fake hammer test?
Well you are town so it doesn't surprise me we're on the same wavelengthIn post 296, Cometbright wrote:^I was thinking this but you've put it into coherent words.In post 295, Black wrote: Gimli this confuses me. If you thought Python hammered then your unvote doesn't do anything. You seemed fine putting VIP at e-1 so why the sudden fear over a fake hammer test?
So, technically it's scummy if I don't put a wall-quote in my post when the quote would be way too long in itself? What the actual fork! But then, I'm double-scummy since I did the same with your post, too...In post 257, DragonEater70 wrote: ON THE OTHER HAND, I think VIP sounds kinda crazy for thinking that the ordering of the posts kittie quoted in 157 is suspicious in any way, and makes me think that maybe VIP hasn't even read that post because the thought process there does explain the ordering of those posts. And shading a post (and btw VIP put some serious effort into shading 157) without reading it is, well...
How about sending an Investigate PR on that which you don't understand? (If there's any.)
I'm not sure whether this is alignment indicative (scum can post this, too, to get town-cred), but I like this attitude.In post 270, Cometbright wrote:Not impossible - but either way a passive town is a dead town. My worry right now is that the game keeps chugging along all slow and then we just do a compromise last minute execute at the end of the day and get very little info from it as a result. If we discuss out the executions then if we execute scum, great - and if we execute a townie then we'll have some meat (posts and discussion) to work with for the vote-count analysis afterwards if that makes sense.In post 266, Aneninen wrote: Your idea's valid, but what if it's passive because neither of the scum is remotely in danger now? I know it's speculative, but it's a possibility.
It's only gut, but this gave me exactly the "here's an opportunity to get some town-cred" vibe I was talking about right above.In post 273, Cometbright wrote: Was that a hammer? I literally just wrote a post saying we need proper discussion so we have valuable VCA
See above, Dragon's vote was clearly opportunistic.In post 274, Black wrote: I think it was yeah. He didn't even get the chance to claim lol
If VIP flips town I think DE70 and Python have the worst votes on the wagon
I just don't get this.
And this sounded weird, after Python admitted the trolling.In post 279, Gimli wrote: okay I'll play along
Why?In post 287, usesPython wrote: I think Black was pretty townie during that hammer test
Why?In post 292, usesPython wrote: VIP gets -town points for prioritizing double checking the votes instead of writing down final thoughts