UNVOTE: Skygazer
Not feeling scum from this content in all. If Project flips town down the line it's looking worse for them but I still wouldn't go ahead with any locking just yet.
Now that the activity's sorted. Going to be looking at the backlog for individual posts here.
567: What I'm asking for is whether you have a logical thought process not just in regards to how you've read your srs, but what the further implications of those specific players being scum would have meant during the game. The comment about 'fanfiction' is obfuscating to this and accomplishes nothing. I'll take that Titus has reasoned this out from
723 but the lack of insight here is something to make note of IMO, depending on how the vote plays out it could be an easy target to be buried. Not liking Titus from
727 exhibiting this.
568: Referring to
223 as the discussion the conclusion was taken from, not
247. Admittedly I could have missed that post. From later posts I'm assuming
569 is on the above.
580 is fairly NAI as I see it. Don't know why this has been seeded in discussion.
In post 592, Black wrote:
Looking further it doesn't seem like T3 ever answered the question? And Kurt never asked him for a follow up either. Kurt was gone for a couple of days and T3 has been non-existent lately but regardless I think the lack of follow up from either of them supports your theory a little
I honestly just forgot about that but fairly enough to it I don't view it as relevant anymore. Bella hasn't scanned as scum in any following post, I doubt going for a push again will turn up much more than we've already seen and T3 remains null. Not helped by the lack of recent activity granted but he's by far squarely been orbiting around having any posts or argument that would construe as AI.
I haven't liked anything from Afrayed Knott at all. Can't find a solid line of organic reasoning from his posts and
601 would appear especially bad in this department. Tunnel and the protraction of the meta argument feels like scum feeling the need to lock into a push after being pointed out in
612. The last two pages aren't pinging as townie reaction most of all.
605 is towny and I'm not feeling shaddowez lim here, makes me think team is outside him. Thinking about scenarios for Afrayed Knott.
622 feels like it's jumping onto the same line of reasoning, with Project presenting as a potential third. Could be scum with T3 or Aisa depending on flip but neither have said anything in response. Nono is also possible and feels likely.
The entirety of Project's argument against Skygazer, and looking at potential deliberacy on his part in
663 (perhaps more so Project's
684 in response, cited again as the last paragraph in
726) makes me extremely interested in Afrayed's flip. ISO mainly has neither make mention of each other other than to reiterate points and potentially preemptively to emphasise on Project's defence of unfamiliarity.
632 feels like something of an absurd conclusion to come to considering VC and the relative trajectory of the thread not undergoing a major change since then but I don't think there's scum in this anyway. The response as quoted in
707 is giving the opposite impression with Project's assumption just looking bad.
Tentative on Jupiter but their engagement with the Skygazer situation has been giving a slight tr and I'm in agreement with
695 on the mentioned posts.
in adhd, noted sky seemed incredibly unconcerned and then now that sky has used this exact defense it's a little bit less credible in my mind, especially since they currently seem to be arguing with black(?)
