With 17 alive, it takes 9 votes to flip!
Deadline: (expired on 2023-12-25 01:44:07)
Notes:
I have seized control of the game in a coup d'etat. When Alisae is no longer sick they will return to their rightful place.
Please alert me of any votecount errors you notice!
No matter what happens, I'll be right there with you.
In post 1173, Naerys wrote:
Aristea-Feeling a genuine solving attempts, even if i disagree with some of her opinions - i dont really care how i appear in this game also i dont think Black is scum, in 1085 fgot to write her opinion about Gob
Bella- 7 posts so far, idk what to think
Black- having fun and chilling, i like this attitude
Dragon-towny, lets see where the pocketmaster will lead us
Firebringer-idk he feels charming but in diff way than Black, like there is hidden motive under all of that acting, possible scum
furtive- idk yet
Gamma- solving townie
Gob- fluffy pillow under my head
Hu Tao-Suspicious but needs to post more
Meuh-null
RCE-null
Titus-null
THS-idk yet
Theta-feels like solving town
Python- they are quite hard for me to read -> they are rather good as scum so i am wary
yessiree- still dont like his posting, i can see him as scum
i dont like the way yessiree posts and i dont find him doing much tbh
In post 1401, RCEnigma wrote:
It’s gonna be kinda out there but yessirs play is a violent 180 from the townplay I’m used to seeing out of them, I’ve only played against them as scum though. So much so that I don’t see such a drastic play difference as coming from scum. I’d expect some kind of emulation of their town game if they were. So that’s where I’m at.
Yeah basically
I am just giving scum yess less credit than you are, I guess, because to me the solution to this conundrum is that he's just scum
But actually I feel maybe the sample size I'm using is too small
Maybe I should also meta dive yess.
We've only played with yesscum but he's pretty good at giving off the "just vibin" vibe that he's giving off this game so we assumed that's his towngame too
In post 237, Aisa wrote:
VOTE: yessiree
Serious vote. I don't really like his pushes on either KittyTacky or RCEnigma.
In post 195, yessiree wrote:
i would buy that if it was like page 2 or 3, even then i still disagree with that assessment
i dont like ur implication that people posted nothing but fluff for the past 8 pages
I personally don't really have any well-developed reads yet. I know that with the way I play I'm likely to change my mind later so sometimes on page 10 it's just easier not to talk about how I think not_mafia is towny because he posted twice in a row (not a real read).
this wasn't a push so much as an attempt to sort RCE, out of respect for his scum game (he's a slippery weasel, ask Aureal ).
If i wanted to push him I would've cased him instead of trying to have a dialog, but i feel RCE isn't interested in having it - he is good at anticipating pushes on him and defusing it beforehand (fitting his scum meta)
this is also not real reason, explained here 219
In post 195, yessiree wrote:
i would buy that if it was like page 2 or 3, even then i still disagree with that assessment
i dont like ur implication that people posted nothing but fluff for the past 8 pages
Not what I said. I said I didn’t find any of it town indicative.
echoing DE's sentiment
it seems like you're more interested in getting bogged down with "I said this, I didn't say that" arguments, than to have dialog that's more useful in helping to read you better
I don't like how in the first post yessiree says
implication
(which, well, implies it's not something that RCE said but an inference that yessiree is trying to draw), but when RCE tries to correct what he meant it becomes "now you're getting bogged down in meaningless arguments". I think corrections like this are fine?
it should be more self explanatory given the full context
In post 163, RCEnigma wrote:
Gth the only reads I have right now are aureal prob town enchant prob town.
How do u have a read on Aureal and not on a slot with way more content
In post 193, RCEnigma wrote:
Well you’re assuming all content can generate a read. Which isn’t the case.
Aureal slamming the policy vote seemed townie to me and no one else did a townie thing. Enchant is townie for the emoji thing and a byproduct of celebs posting but emojis can only take him so far so that’s more of a quicksand read.
In post 195, yessiree wrote:
i would buy that if it was like page 2 or 3, even then i still disagree with that assessment
i dont like ur implication that people posted nothing but fluff for the past 8 pages
In post 195, yessiree wrote:
i would buy that if it was like page 2 or 3, even then i still disagree with that assessment
i dont like ur implication that people posted nothing but fluff for the past 8 pages
Not what I said. I said I didn’t find any of it town indicative.
i probe him to see if his aureal and him only having 2 probtowns reads at that point was authentic or fabricated out of necessity for getting out of a jam
he responds that not all content can generate a read, but later changes this to say he didn't find any content town indicative. I felt he was using not finding anything town indicative as a justification to not having any reads
his explanation about how Aureal could've done this or that was all conjecture and i felt both replies were engineered to lead to nowhere (which, again fits his scum meta)
can you clarify if your scumread of Kitty is because he cannot justify his read on RCE or because he is posting in short bursts in general?
both kitty and RCE were both individually scummy players, and i was tryna see if i could draw some sort of associative between the 2, i dont plan on using this right way but it'll be useful later on
the kitty read i already explained in more details in our back and forth, i dont feel like regurgitating it again. Is there anything u don't agree with? or you have reasons to townread him?
he doesn't really feel that different compared to here
Plural | Nameless (They/He) and Alice (She/Her) and C (They/Them) and more
Like can people actually be specific instead of just going "here read this game with no context for what to look for" or "he's different compared to an unspecified game I played"
Plural | Nameless (They/He) and Alice (She/Her) and C (They/Them) and more
In post 1442, usesPython wrote:
Like can people actually be specific instead of just going "here read this game with no context for what to look for" or "he's different compared to an unspecified game I played"
I played with Firebringer as scum and he has jokey non serious pop ins all the time. This game he is playing pretty similar.
Fuethermore the way the wagon died just now makes me think he is scum for sure
"You are the Joker of mafia players" - Oversoul
"last time I was scum with Firebringer
his first post in the scum PT was "yes I rolled scum!"
I decided to post "haha just don't post that in the main thread", but to get up to date on the main thread first.
His first post in the main thread was "yes I rolled scum!" -popsofctown
).