In post 2570, Psyche wrote: ohh nas is bulletproof-immune. that just means he ignores bulletproofs when he NKs, right?
There's no way in hell all 3 Scum don't have that modifier.
In post 2570, Psyche wrote: ohh nas is bulletproof-immune. that just means he ignores bulletproofs when he NKs, right?
In post 2572, Hu Tao wrote: I was gonna ask that. I thought that meant he couldn't be vigged after n3? Confused.
I think NAS's role makes it pretty unlikely that geraintm's role is real because it seems like a huge fu to the mafia if they have to wait till night three before they can kill the IC and then oops there was actually a doctor all along?In post 2571, Psyche wrote: NAS's role is pretty weak in context. even that part only kicks in N3+? lame
I’m not allowed to copy word for word right? I’ll just paraphrase it because I don’t want to break the rules. Basically, I was told I would be given info on the second night about some aspect of the game. The second part says I don’t have any active ability.In post 2581, Aristeia wrote: kay how does your role work?
like are you paired to a player pregame and then on night two you learn they are town
or is it like on night two the mod rands an alive player and tells you they are town out of all the town players
or like on night two you get a random result on a player in the game?
If you’re asking if it said which player I was going to get info on originally, it did not. If there was something going on behind the scenes to detail what info I was given, I was not aware of it.In post 2581, Aristeia wrote: kay how does your role work?
like are you paired to a player pregame and then on night two you learn they are town
or is it like on night two the mod rands an alive player and tells you they are town out of all the town players
or like on night two you get a random result on a player in the game?
Okay the answers I got were:In post 2586, Aristeia wrote: I'm not trying to get you to break the rules I'm trying to gauge how powerful your claimed role is and whether it can exist in this game.
You're allowed to paraphrase or relay moderator answers about your role as long as you do it in a way that doesn't prove that the moderator said something to you by like copying it word for word.
relaying simple yes or no answers doesn't apply because it's just yes or no and it doesn't actually prove anything.
Well I know it’s not PC, RN is cleared, psych seems cleared as vig with no counterclaim, so can’t be them. So it has to be 2 of the remaining 4. I’ve obviously felt good about Hu this entire game (especially day 1) so I’d feel hit with a ton of bricks if it were Hu. But it has to be narrowed down to Titus, gera, you and Hu because nothing else would fit. If you’re asking me which 2, my past scum reads had been Titus and gera. I thought I was wrong about Titus with the early claim but now with everyone else claimed, it seems very possible that was a lie. It always struck me a bit odd how adamant the vig shot claim was from Titus but I guess I assumed such an early claim had to be legit. Not sure I believe it anymore.
i am so pissed that people have decided my claim is fake and are going to eliminate me for it.In post 2446, Psyche wrote: im boredd. too bored to stick to protocol
geraint's claim has to be fake, right?
yes, your logic of "there is one player who is clearly scum but i am not going to shoot them" has been very helpfulIn post 2472, Psyche wrote: gist is that i like to throw in a little limit-testing into my mafia play, and this time i crossed the limit
gera seemed already inevitable (and boring). i wanted to find the third scum in case the rest of yall couldn't. my guess was wrong, which is good to know for me at least (i'd be more insufferable today otherwise). could go into why i made my guess, but does it matter anymore?
and yes,i knew coming into today that i was going to be the person put under pressure first. i was hoping beyond hope someone would have checked me and cleared me by now but didnt happen.In post 2472, Psyche wrote: gist is that i like to throw in a little limit-testing into my mafia play, and this time i crossed the limit
gera seemed already inevitable (and boring). i wanted to find the third scum in case the rest of yall couldn't. my guess was wrong, which is good to know for me at least (i'd be more insufferable today otherwise). could go into why i made my guess, but does it matter anymore?
im notIn post 2535, Political Clout wrote: i'm fine with gera dying today...
you seem to think time on site = experienceIn post 2540, Aristeia wrote:In post 2538, Psyche wrote: yeah gera sounds great. but who after gera?
probably Kay
i dont think anyone with experience would fake claim doctor
im going to be so mad when i flipIn post 2569, Psyche wrote: uhh i'll stew on it
maybe setup spec. can we accept a world where it's just gera with the fake pr claim?
well no because you have the most time on site but I don't really think you're very experienced in terms of knowing what to fake claim to fit into this setupIn post 2594, geraintm wrote:you seem to think time on site = experienceIn post 2540, Aristeia wrote:In post 2538, Psyche wrote: yeah gera sounds great. but who after gera?
probably Kay
i dont think anyone with experience would fake claim doctor
I don't really understand the sarcasm here - are you upset he didn't shoot you at night?In post 2591, geraintm wrote:yes, your logic of "there is one player who is clearly scum but i am not going to shoot them" has been very helpfulIn post 2472, Psyche wrote: gist is that i like to throw in a little limit-testing into my mafia play, and this time i crossed the limit
gera seemed already inevitable (and boring). i wanted to find the third scum in case the rest of yall couldn't. my guess was wrong, which is good to know for me at least (i'd be more insufferable today otherwise). could go into why i made my guess, but does it matter anymore?
ok who would you rather flip today instead?In post 2595, geraintm wrote:im going to be so mad when i flipIn post 2569, Psyche wrote: uhh i'll stew on it
maybe setup spec. can we accept a world where it's just gera with the fake pr claim?
In post 2542, Psyche wrote:for my sanityIn post 2540, Aristeia wrote:In post 2538, Psyche wrote: yeah gera sounds great. but who after gera?
probably Kay
i dont think anyone with experience would fake claim doctor
let's talk about the hutao scum scenario
you used to scumread hutao -- where'd that go?