In post 1506, Snow2697 wrote:
In post 1481, Gypyx wrote:
VOTE: snow
still want this gone
Naerys is town and for those of you pushing scum you kinda need to recalibrate your scum compass
if snow flips town i swear i'll leave the hood stuff alone for a bit and try to explore more options
Soooo..... I read Gypyx as follows.
"I am town!Gypyx (don't ask me why and take it as given) and I am very confident that Snow is scum. I won't explain why, don't even ask this, but again you should take it as given. And you should also take it as given that Thomith is town. Snow should be executed (because I say that he is scum), but if he somehow flips town, then I will leave the hood and give you another execution option (which you should follow)."
This is nonsense.
When I flip town (I know that I am town, so it's "when", and the way Gypyx puts it suggests that she also knows this), why should people follow her? May be they should do quite the opposite, i.e. review the hood again and put some scrutiny at Gypyx and her self-proclaimed towncore with Thomith? At once.
BTW, one scum is off board, so I am fine to be executed today with a condition that one of Thomith-Gypyx is executed tomorrow.
Thomith/Gypyx - does this sound like a fair deal for you?
Okok i'll indulge in seriousness for a bit
yeah that's what is happening right now, this is not nonesense because i'm correct
i am fine with not being followed tommorow if i turn out to be wrong, you are acting like this confidence is set in stone forever, while mafia is a game of shifting borders and alliances