In post 1597, Gypyx wrote:
correct me if i'm wrong also, but we probably shouldn't go around assuming there could be 4 scum in every 13P normal because of "worst case scenario"
...
13p is not 15p, gypyx.
Why you continue to fight on this is concerning.
VOTE: Gypyx
Look RN like, idc if it sounds personal but if jesters were normal i would be convinced you would be one right now
can someone else come over and talk some sense please?
hearing blatantly wrong takes is the one thing that pisses me off yeah
and as i've said my only concern was you trying to claim there could be 5 scum, i'm just that hellbent on trying to prove there can be as few 3 because of the way you were acting
can we please recognize that argument is T/T + going nowhere + kill snow ? okay thanks byeeeee <33333333
In post 1602, Random Nurse wrote:
If there were 4 Scum it would make sense for them to try and convince the rest of Town there were only 3 Scum.
I'm not feeling manipulation from Gypyx here.
You'd be right, but she has argued against a mass claim today. I don't see the benefit here for a scum!gypyx at this time. It's too early for a consensus here to matter much.
Naerys is town and for those of you pushing scum you kinda need to recalibrate your scum compass
if snow flips town i swear i'll leave the hood stuff alone for a bit and try to explore more options
Soooo..... I read Gypyx as follows.
"I am town!Gypyx (don't ask me why and take it as given) and I am very confident that Snow is scum. I won't explain why, don't even ask this, but again you should take it as given. And you should also take it as given that Thomith is town. Snow should be executed (because I say that he is scum), but if he somehow flips town, then I will leave the hood and give you another execution option (which you should follow)."
This is nonsense.
When I flip town (I know that I am town, so it's "when", and the way Gypyx puts it suggests that she also knows this), why should people follow her? May be they should do quite the opposite, i.e. review the hood again and put some scrutiny at Gypyx and her self-proclaimed towncore with Thomith? At once.
BTW, one scum is off board, so I am fine to be executed today with a condition that one of Thomith-Gypyx is executed tomorrow.
Thomith/Gypyx - does this sound like a fair deal for you?
Okok i'll indulge in seriousness for a bit
yeah that's what is happening right now, this is not nonesense because i'm correct
i am fine with not being followed tommorow if i turn out to be wrong, you are acting like this confidence is set in stone forever, while mafia is a game of shifting borders and alliances
In post 154, Hu Tao wrote:
This is true. Yet you voted me, how come?
To generate information.
What have you learned?
How is it that Titus pushed Dave for being whiteknight, and then did not respond to a direct legit question, but pushed Dave on a different issue? VOTE: Titus
In post 347, Snow2697 wrote:
If you don't respond to legit questions, why do you complain of people voting you?
Still dislike Dave, but Naerys is worse.
VOTE: Naerys
In post 602, Snow2697 wrote:
I don't understand why people are really voting NAS. If the purpose is to get information and then take the game from there, this is not the most helpful lime for me. And largely irrelevant.
My pick is Naerys, but it is largely based on her playstyle. And I see comments that she can be town.
I would rather lim one of Gypyx-Thomith-Titus-geraintm-Little Will o' Wisp-PenguinPower-Dave who were on a speedwagon vs me. I think there are at least 2 scums there. My preference here would be:
VOTE: Davesaz
Notice how snow only gets back on dave when it is too late anyways
dave vote would also indicate town willow (as scum!snow would be able to realistically bury NAS into the ground without much scrutiny) if snow flips scum, which is EXTREMELY good info
