NY 170: Georgetown II (Game Over)
-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
-
-
Garmr Survivor
-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
Starting to think I shall keep my vote on emo girl.In post 14, emogirl123 wrote:you should, considering that you are scum, it is your objective to gain my approval. learn to play pls-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
You got to step out and vote someone. If you think my reasoning weak then vote me you might be able to start a wagon. You'll gain information when you start a wagon.In post 22, emogirl123 wrote:I can vote people for arbitrary reasons as well. For instance: VOTE: Garmr because he felt the need to explicitly state that his vote is no longersuuuperRVS for an arbitrary reason.
That's terribly weak though so no, I will not oblige.
UNVOTE:-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
Better yet since your new do you know what a day-vig is. It's a townie that kills someone during the day phase.
daykill emogirl-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
http://wiki.mafiascum.net/index.php?title=Vigilante
Under varitions day vig and this is what it says.
from the wiki.One of the most coveted variations of this ability is the Dayvig, which is a Vigilante that can kill during the Day. Depending on the game, the Dayvig may be able to submit its kill privately, or it may be forced to declare its kill publicly. Daykills are not normally stoppable by active abilities, so Dayvigs are considerably more potent than ordinary Vigilantes.
Emo I just wacked you out the ballpark your gone out of here dead. The mod will kill you.-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
Because of the way your acting. I felt you needed some more pressure and you started become flaily when you shouldn't it's early game. I don't understand why town would react the way you did with just two votes.In post 34, emogirl123 wrote:
This is because the vote has already been placed.In post 24, emogirl123 wrote:If I were making an honest attempt to data-mine with my vote, my first priority isn't to explicitly state that my vote is no longer RVS.
I wouldn't feel the need to explicitly state that the vote is no longer RVS, that is completely trivial. I place RVS votes only to data mine, but that is my play style. I just can't see why someone would say, "oh my vote is serious now", without contributing any new information. The vote just ended up being another garbage vote.
Extreme dislike.-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
If that's all you wanted then word it better I thought I answered your question clearly.In post 43, emogirl123 wrote:Vanilla Townie
Garmr needs to address why he voted for me yet made no comment on kaboooom's reasons for voting me, and dropped vote for reasons of AtE.
I liked kablamo vote on you and I didn't see him drop his vote on you after he voted so can you please explain what you mean by dropped vote to clear confusion.-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
You probably guessed by now my daykill was faked. I saw the amount of games you did and thought I'd give it a shot to sort you out. I underestimated you because your newer and you didn't fall for it. Reading your games after this post I can see the ate is null sign with you. I really wish you would play against DBG (Drippinggoofball) She plays very emotional so it would be funny to watch you two go at it. (Send me a pm when this happens)In post 49, emogirl123 wrote:You dropped your vote on me because of AtE. Typo.
Here is my meta.
Hint: He was scum.In post 49, Dessew wrote:In the meantime, emogirl is being jumpy and her joking (I guess those are intended to be jokes) seems forced.
UNVOTE: Paschendale
VOTE: emogirl123
I retract my stupidity.
UNVOTE:
I disagree with this we are putting out a lot of information before the game begins and pretty much destroyed the rvs stage early on which I like so I don't see a reason for stopping the discussion.In post 52, Sotty7 wrote:/confirm.
Lets not spam the thread if none of these votes are counting. Plus the three of you are probably town anyway.
Also what makes you think we three are town can you give us a reason?-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
Yeh totally shocked I was even more shocked when I unlynchable godfather in vanilla only game.In post 56, emogirl123 wrote:
Weren't you a little shocked when you realized that non of your scum partners were PRs?In post 55, Garmr wrote:You probably guessed by now my daykill was faked.-
-
Garmr Survivor
-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
Mod didIn post 60, emogirl123 wrote:Who said it was a vanilla only game?
In post 0, Huntress wrote:Spoiler: Role PMs
As this is a vanilla game these are the only roles:
Townie PM wrote:
You are a Vanilla Townie. You have two weapons; your brain and your vote. Keep active and use both to the best of your ability.
You win when all threats to the town have been eliminated.Mafia PM wrote:
You are a Mafia Goon. Your partners are XXX and XXX.
During the pre-game confirmation stage and each night you may confer with your partners in this Quick Topic.
Each night you and your partners may choose one player to kill.
You win when all members of the town have been eliminated or nothing can prevent this from occurring.-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
Off topic but
I am liking this player list already I think emogirl's spunk is going to keep people talking this game.
It's got a mixture of newer players and oldies which I think will be a great learning experience. It's not often a game like this appears something that draws you in and keeps you intrigued.
I only wish fferylt and mollie were in this game to.-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
Fresh meat how sweet I see your link to as a message saying this me this town read up and go easy on me. Also even through slaandar brought up wifom of multiball with out going to the night phase (Bad slandy) you responded with more wifom.In post 78, emeraldemon wrote:Hi team. I am very new, I have exactly one finished game (here if you're curious). I will try to keep up though.
Can this happen in a vanilla game? The signup post just says "no PRs", so I guess it is still possible, as well as maybe serial killer or something similar?In post 70, Slandaar wrote: I have an inkling that it's multiball.
And
VOTE: Acidic_TACO
because you are at the top of the page.
The question you should of asked was what makes you think it's multiball?
btw you played with pirate mollie isn't she just doll . Pirate mollie and fferylt are mentors to me when it comes to mafia but my play style is radically different to theirs.
So my question to you is what do you think of bulba's vote on you?-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
Why mention slaandar's post as scummy if you think it was probally a mistake?In post 85, WBOCampfire1104 wrote:I'd take Slandaar's post as sorta scummy but probs a mistake.
VOTE: Nobody Special
No matter if he's town or scum, his lynch will benefit town. (I kno dis)
SituationIn post 90, Acidic_TACO wrote:
Well considering the fact that the only way in hell you could know who's a scum is if you are a scum then his reason makes alot more sense...In post 89, Aegor wrote:Whoah. Way to make completely unfounded accusations.
VOTE: Brian Skies
VOTE: Aegor
What I saw was sarcasm and a bait where brian voted him for a reaction and Aegor omgused. Even through Aegor vote was suss. The way you reacted and voted Aegor was even more suss.
VOTE: Acidic_TACO
Ok this is a sheep can you tell me in your own words why you voted emerldemon. Is there anything that stands out more about him?In post 83, Tebow wrote:
Yeah, this'll do.In post 80, Bulbazak wrote:Vote Emeraldemon
Saying stuff after game begins that could have easily been said in confirmation stage means it's only for towncred.
Vote: Emeraldemon
So do you think bulba's town or scum for that vote.In post 82, emeraldemon wrote:Re: bulba, gotta start somewhere I guess.
re: slandaar, honestly I was asking more of a rules question. There is a list of things not allowed in normal games, but I don't really know if "vanilla" carries strict rules about what it can and can't have. Looking more carefully at the first post it does say "As this is a vanilla game these are the only roles:", which makes me think it can't be multiball or have a SK.
Ninjaed
Aegor is starting to Look like a bit of VI instead of a an intentional bait.-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
We should wait till day 2 before we jump on the multiball wagon.In post 101, Slandaar wrote:
The sample PM didn't remove type but did remove an XXX to hide how many scum there are? I see!In post 98, Tebow wrote: The sample scum role PM also says 'You are a Mafia Goon' not 'You are a [TYPE] Mafia Goon.' It seems unlikely to me Huntress would deliberately reveal the exact size of the scumteam(s).
Maybe the sample PM wording is exactly the same as the real PM's after-all that is the point of them. Mafia Goon could be coloured to indicate the team.
What do you mean at this point in the game?In post 98, Tebow wrote: In any case - why do you believe speculating on this at this specific point in the game is useful?
It is something to talk about, to generate discussion, that is what the point of RVS is.-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
Didn't sign up for a mountingness game signed up for any random game only and got nabbed for this game when you said all your partners are vanilla.In post 108, emogirl123 wrote:lmao where did all my votes go. Slandaar vote me please.
In post 27, Garmr wrote:Better yet since your new do you know what a day-vig is. It's a townie that kills someone during the day phase.
daykill emogirl
Should have been clear to you by this point that I was not going to fall for a day-vig? Seriously, who would fall for a day-vig these days, especially when most people signed up for this game for the purpose of signing up for a mountainous game.In post 28, emogirl123 wrote:So the premise of your vote on me is that I am new to this game. How would you react if I'm not? Is your vote still for pressure or are you scum reading me for god knows what.
I have pushed players thoughts and have got motives through my way of generating content is different from your come vote for me style.In post 108, emogirl123 wrote:
Of course I didn't fall for it, it should have been clear. You just spout out nonsense trying to look like you are validating new players even when it is clear that they are not new? I don't see what you were trying to accomplish other than act like you pro town without generating new content.In post 55, Garmr wrote:You probably guessed by now my daykill was faked. I saw the amount of games you did and thought I'd give it a shot to sort you out. I underestimated you because your newer and you didn't fall for it.
This a scummy post as a no lynch is a bad idea and you never point out reasoning why I you think I am scummy. This is opportunistic,omgussy and a nonsensical this where people should vote.In post 117, Aegor wrote:What is the point of speculation? If we care that much, NL today and see how many people die. Otherwise, let us just proceed seeking out scummy people.
VOTE: Garmr-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
The main point was he was using that to sneak a opportunistic vote under with out explaining himself. What do you think of his voting so far?In post 125, Maestro wrote:I don't read that as calling for a NL, Garmr
So everyone join the Aegor wagon or if you think I'm scum vote me let get things moving.-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
Wow just wow. I be vocal and I get this much response.
Going to be honest I fused acidic taco and Aegor into one person in my mind for some reason. Probably not a good reason but yep it is.
But peoples reactions over me are great A lot of information came from it.
Basically emogirl defended me and bulb went full out over me. what we can get between the two if one is scum the other is not of the same alignment.
I can sort out this right here I'm town so no need for latter.In post 186, Bulbazak wrote:We can argue about Garmr later, but we have guaranteed scum right here.
Because you ninjaed me.In post 187, Maestro wrote:yo Garmr, where you at bro?
I see you visited the site this afternoon, y u no post
I was on this morning as well but couldn't post because I was in the middle of study.-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
VOTE: emogirl123
Felt she is scummy after a read I'd also prefer to defend myself than have someone else defend me and if you think what I have to say is bollocks why are you town reading me.
Quick list town
Bulb
maestro
emeraldemon-This one needs a little explaining. This is based on his attitude which doesn't come as scummy to me and the interactions people have had with him make me think his bait. He also seems inquisitive bad point is he caught up in that wifomy multiscum thing.
kabooooom
scum
Emo
Aegor
Acidic taco/slandy These two are Not strong scum reads but still reads none the less.
Also to aegor
Maybe the actual reason itself why you agreed with emo.In post 129, Aegor wrote:The main point was he was using that to sneak a opportunistic vote under with out explaining himself. What do you think of his voting so far?
We are on page 6. This is a large game. What detailed explanation were you expecting?
Also noting your relationship with EMO even through she just put words in your mouth you didn't question her straight away.
Why didn't you?
Didn't answer your other two questions because it was my stupidity for not voting you and fusing you as one person with another player and they are linked.-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
You did agree with emo atIn post 194, Aegor wrote:
What the fuck are you talking about? Are my direct responsesIn post 193, Garmr wrote: Maybe the actual reason itself why you agreed with emo.disagreeingwith emo somehow insufficient for you?
She was the only one voting me and your vote came on with no reason. Which means you were sheeping a wagon and agreeing with emoIn post 117, Aegor wrote:What is the point of speculation? If we care that much, NL today and see how many people die. Otherwise, let us just proceed seeking out scummy people.
VOTE: Garmr
You never mentioned this before bulba started scum reading emo why If you really wanted emo gone wouldn't of you voiced it earlier when you were disagreeing..In post 194, Aegor wrote:
See above. I do not see how anyone could interpret my responses as anything close to "relationship with EMO." If this were not mountainous, I would try everything I could to have both you and Emo annihilated utterly.Also noting your relationship with EMO even through she just put words in your mouth you didn't question her straight away.
Why didn't you?
The ones revolving around not voting you in post 129 question 1 and 3 this can be answered by me fusing you and acidic together in my mind.In post 194, Aegor wrote:
What other two questions?Didn't answer your other two questions because it was my stupidity for not voting you and fusing you as one person with another player and they are linked.-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
Not quite true just remembered a rvs vote on me. She was the only one voting me with a case (flawed but still a case.)In post 197, Garmr wrote:In post 117, Aegor wrote:
What is the point of speculation? If we care that much, NL today and see how many people die. Otherwise, let us just proceed seeking out scummy people.
VOTE: Garmr
She was the only one voting me and your vote came on with no reason. Which means you were sheeping a wagon and agreeing with emo-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
Next time go back and look at your own post yourself.In post 203, Aegor wrote:
OMG unbelievable. Voting for the same person is not the same thing as conscious agreement. Did I mention emo's reasoning at all? Was there any indication whatsoever that my vote was in any way connected with hers? I did not even know whom she was voting.In post 197, Garmr wrote: You did agree with emo at...She was the only one voting me and your vote came on with no reason. Which means you were sheeping a wagon and agreeing with emo
By your bogus reasoning, anyone who happens to RVS someone who has previously been voted is "sheeping a wagon."
The tone of my posts speaks for itself. Unless you are suggesting that I engage in liberal FoSes, we are done here.You never mentioned this before bulba started scum reading emo why If you really wanted emo gone wouldn't of you voiced it earlier when you were disagreeing.
In post 194, Aegor wrote:The ones revolving around not voting you in post 129 question 1 and 3 this can be answered by me fusing you and acidic together in my mind.LINKto them. I still have no idea what you are talking about.
quote="In post 129, Aegor"]Are you serious, Garmr? Your posts 27 and 55 bothered me (purely emotional reaction).
I never advocated for a NL. It is bad. And if people agree, then there is no reason to bother speculating about the number of scum groups, which is exactly what I said. My vote was not opportunistic (what opportunity), not OMGUSy (you were not voting me), and not nonsensical (what made it nonsense?).This a scummy post as a no lynch is a bad idea and you never point out reasoning why I you think I am scummy. This is opportunistic,omgussy and a nonsensical this where people should vote.
We are on page 6. This is a large game. What detailed explanation were you expecting?The main point was he was using that to sneak a opportunistic vote under with out explaining himself. What do you think of his voting so far?
[quote]So everyone join the Aegor wagon or if you think I'm scum vote me let get things moving.[/quote]
You are not even ON my wagon. After all that, you are not even voting me?
I am happier than ever with my vote.[/quote]
here see the questions now?-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
I got the ball rolling but not in the way I wanted to get everyone involved everyone contributing but oh well I got some town and scum reads but now people don't value opinion.
I can easily anwser thisIn post 247, emeraldemon wrote:#170 - this is actually the only post from emogirl I don't like. The rest of it is null.
#188 1- garmr: "if one is scum the other is not of the same alignment." I dunno, are you sure?
#193 2- Not sure if I like this vote either... or the waffly townread on me.
#200 - Ok Maestro is obvtown now
#204 3- garmr again, you vote emogirl but you want to go back to arguing with aegor?
So... 170 aside, I don't really see anything scum in emogirl's posts. I don't think she's intentionally confusing, I think she's just confused. Not feeling great about garmr though.
vote: Garmr
@garmr I'd like to hear more about your emogirl vote please. Do you agree with bulba and maestro? Why do you think they are town?
pre-edit: i like you, ohgodmylife. Can we be friends?
1.would a scum buddy bust so hard on another this early on in the way bulb did? I don't think so.
2.a What's not to like about my vote about think from my perspective your town and someone who's done the biggest push against you starts defending you in such a way it corrupts your defense, sets you up in such a way if you get lynched she gets the town cred.
2.b Ok i got my town read from questioning you from post 81 and 94 so the town read didn't come from no where and this shows I been considering where to place you. I know this wasn't the question you asked but you seem to think it's a town read I just slapped onto you for little reason.
3. This one is super easy and shouldn't even be a question your asking because you should know how I am going to answer. I have more than 1 scum read, in this game there are multiple scum I'm going to vote who I think my scum reads are.
I have question for anyone on my wagon.
What's my scum motive?
1.I have talked to everyone, I gave my opinions freely, Generating mass conversation
2.I have made mistakes like confusing peoples votes and posts. Pushing people on them before I realized they were mistakes. I have admitted to them and face palmed at my own stupidity.-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
I would love to be in the position I am in if I were scum but I'm not, I am a competent player I don't need defending I'm not a easy lynch and would rather be viewed as a competent player than a incompetent townie that a easy jump for scum. Even if this means I get lynched in the future at least my opinions and cases would actually be valued more than people seeing me as lynch bait townie.-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
In post 283, emogirl123 wrote:
Hey Sotty, I have no problem with lynching Maenara when the time comes, but cut the shit please. You are misdirecting attention away from Garmr and Bulbazak over a null read, and this isn't making me happy.In post 259, emogirl123 wrote:if her wagon ever builds, I suspect it will be a misdirection.
I would probably like this post more if you mention yourself in that as well as at the moment most of the commotion is between the three of us. The fact yourself out is a bit disturbing.-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
what happens if one of us is town and the other is scum?In post 287, emogirl123 wrote:I suspect if Bulbazak and Garmr are both town, scum would place a vote on one of you.
If Bulbazak and Garmr have scum within, scum would make a counter push towards a easy target with a strong case.
Also I played with manera before she rode a miller claim to end game didn't do much and got mislynched. So I will agree with you on the manera front.
Also you didn't answer what you think of scotty.-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
From now on I will think of sooty always wearing a red shirt.In post 291, Slandaar wrote:
Her name is Sooty get it right Garmr! Don't think star trek think Childrens TV!In post 290, Garmr wrote:scotty.
So Slandy what do you think of me this game?-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
bulb is probably scum because of This vital piece of evidence-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
I nabbed tierce/squirrelgirl with this in a past game as well.In post 376, The Goodfather wrote:
2 things:
1) I thought this was real evidence... fool me once and all that nonsense...
2) I have never seen rick astley before. i would have bet every dollar I have that he was black... and definitely not some pale guy with red hair...
^Is this enough to justify an OMGUS vote... its not like its a vote on him cause he voted for me... he justreallysucks
on second thought, I don't care if its omgus. You have deserved this vote for wasting my time and ruining my image of the dude who sings that song... shame on you garmr... shame...
UNVOTE: Tebow
VOTE: Garmr-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
Troll post like that are null like maestro said and I have done it as town in the past. You need to over explain your unvote way to much.In post 387, Chevre wrote:
I don't care that it's misspelled, I have had the same reaction. I've been staring at the ceiling for like minutes, so confused by emogirl.In post 384, Maestro wrote:I know. I'm just fucking confised
And it's not really that she self-voted, because I never know what to do with that. It's that she has yet again, when someone has tried to start a counterwagon to that of her own, she has gone against it. First with Maenara and now kabooooom. I don't see scum doing that.
Unvote: emogirl123, not that I'm really pleased with emogirl's play, it's not feeling very town and it's wrecked any semblance of usefulness that Day 1 can possibly have. I do still think that lynching her would make for interesting relationship analysis, but there is no longer that same scummy feel due to her denial of two potential counterwagons to her own.
Also my computer sensed that Garmr's link was a virus and even though I know it is not it is a rickroll I still think it's really distracting and not really town either
VOTE: Cheve-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
You haven't earned a town read from me but you earned a read to my heart. <3In post 419, Brian Skies wrote:Page 17? Really? I'll catch up on Sunday.
Haven't read anything, but Albert and Garmr both get townreads for being awesome. Maenara gets one too because I still feel bad.
Emogirl can be scum for as long as I sit on her wagon. Will try to figure out why she's getting wagoned later.-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
I asked it so many times because emo wouldn't answer. But I have you as null-scum.In post 425, Sotty7 wrote:
:-/In post 297, Garmr wrote:So what do you think of sooty emo?
What do you think of me? You asked this question a bunch of times.
-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
Where is it mentioned emo is from there???In post 429, Nobody Special wrote:
Let me stop you right there.....In post 424, Tebow wrote: BTW... I suggest people familiarise themselves with the mafia-playing norms of 2p2.net.
Not just NO, but HELL NO.-
-
Garmr Survivor
-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
I'm sorry Brian but the only read I got was Garmr early town read which you agreed with evidence is it possible to get a quick reads list.
But bussing a buddy on day 1 is stupid as fuck because people will look for it. It's way better to leave it to day 3 or 4 and gradually build up the bus. It requires both players to look town through but when your nail scumbuddy this way you look so much fucking townierIn post 474, Brian Skies wrote:
Why not? They will get a ton of towncred for it, and in a mountainous game, will make it easier for them to slide by.In post 257, Garmr wrote:1.would a scum buddy bust so hard on another this early on in the way bulb did? I don't think so.
Was I right through.In post 473, Brian Skies wrote:
Well, this is an interesting conclusion.In post 94, Garmr wrote:What I saw was sarcasm and a bait where brian voted him for a reaction and Aegor omgused. Even through Aegor vote was suss. The way you reacted and voted Aegor was even more suss.-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
Albert's a slow start this game but that could be outside influences.
After a reread and thinking the game through from a new angle
I want a Brian
I think I only ever seen Brian as town and he was a lot better in those games because he actually stated his own opinion instead of what his doing now. His posting style has changed he usually tears apart a post but now his big walls don't so much
Out of post
472
I am a town read
get the feeling of a emo town read by the way you acted to kaboom not to sure on this one through
no sign of any scum reads.
473
a free town read to acidic because he figured out what you were thinking?
confused about what you thought of my post 94
Your comments to emo aren't giving her a town or scum read in this post they seem to be giving her question?
You like bulbs logic yet you didn't like Aegors post 129 they are basically saying the same thing but bulb also adding I tried to misrep aegor in some form. Also about some thing about emo knowing my alignment and that makes me scum partners with her somehow. There's more than one reason to defend a read as scum or town If she's town she genuinely thinks I'm town and if she scum she knows I'm town and and defended me to get some free town cred but did it prematurely. I thought it was the latter before but now I'm not so sure. I know your not the type to not think about all the options either
Oh you got a town read on bulba.
Post 474 didn't have much in read wise or much important information so this was hardest for me to analyze
Just a null read on manera which I can understand since last game we had together with manera miller... Oh and a town read from omgl this one has a least a bit better reasoning than the acidic taco one.
Rest were discredits and questions which probably won't go anywhere. Only question I liked the one about NS's town block and I'm not even sure if that was asked before.
UNVOTE: chev
VOTE: Brian skies
(I could still do a chev lynch but I am more confident in a Brian one now.)-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
@Aegors response
The fact you describes yourself as low hanging fruit is a bit pathetic in my book. If your town step up your game. If you see yourself as low hanging fruit at least try to hang higher. I think there's only one game I didn't struggle my hardest as town to keep myself from being mislynched (Out of the games I was being scum read) don't use it as a excuse.
@Good father
What sounds wishy washy. Point to me the bits you don't like tell me whats wrong with it, what you don't like ect. Don't be a lazy bear because with out pushing and prodding you won't get in any information out of post you don't like or be able to push your lynches effectively. I could say the same thing about every single post in the game and it won't make a difference. It produces no pressure,Information anything. Give reasoning behind your post please.-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
Tbh I saw your question was going to answer it then I had to do something and forgot about it. The question itself doesn't apply much pressure and the information gained will be minimal if I answer in a certain way. But if you want my answer It's mostly because I was/ still am having doubts about the emo wagon and am unsure about it and saw chevs post 387 and it ticked scum. I answered why it ticked scum in my response to it 393. So doubt on emo and that post 393 was why my vote switched.In post 562, emeraldemon wrote:In post 521, Sotty7 wrote:How has it worked twice? He was a big push behind the start of the emo but he was the 4th vote on a momentum wagon of Cherve. What do you think about him being on both wagons? As for your point on Brain Skies, I could see him as scum. His catch up posts aren't really bringing anything to the table and he might as well just jump in the deep in rather than spend forever on out of date catch posts to make it look like he is doing some work. He seems to be asking a lot of empty questions rather than scum hunting.Offtopic, your pic and ohgodmylife's look too similar, I keep confusing you two.
In my memory Maestro called out Chevre's vote right away, but it was actually Maenara's vote he called out (239), so I was wrong about the second wagon.
Maestro feels kinda town to me, at least I feel like I can understand the intention behind his posts and his votes. This game is really complicated to follow, but I have a slight townread on you and ohgodmylife, and a slight scumread on Chevre, although that's probably 75% sheeping. Garmr ignored my questions to him, so clearly my vote is ineffective where it sits.
Also I get the feeling your scum read on me isn't very strong and your vote isn't very committed so I don't feel pressured in any sense. Maybe change up your tone of your posts. Your questions were good through.-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
@Good father
Also If you don't see the point I'm building up to with all those posts then you need to learn flow and how to read in context better. I'm waiting for brian's response to see why i'm reading him as scum then here's the point. Also the fact his throwing town reads around which can easily take back and some of his posts are straight out discredits which make no sense to do as they will lead no where.
Most of the question will lead to dead ends and won't bring relevant information at all and some easily skipped. If if skipped irrelvant ones like
orIn post 473, Brian Skies wrote:
Is this going to be one of those games where the scum-team is going to be extremely cheeky, or the town wants to set themselves as lynchbait?In post 93, Aegor wrote:
Take it to our QT. No one is going down in flames.In post 92, The Goodfather wrote:@aegor, I just got a pm saying something about townies and my favorite flavor of ice cream... If you're intent on going down in flames, try not to drag the nearest idiot with you(that would happen to be me...)
He would of saved a lot of time the fact he does this is giving the illusion of packing more information in his post.In post 473, Brian Skies wrote:
What if it's my real name, though?In post 95, Chevre wrote:Vote: Brian Skies because what a silly username!
I don't remember brian fluffing around so much.
Also where are the scum reads they are absent from his list he was 12 pages in and all he got where town like posts nothing scummy in the slightest? Nope not buying it.-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
..................................In post 714, Brian Skies wrote:
1
No, I don't like to do those in larges because they are too hard to fill out. I'll be throwing down my reads/thoughts as they come.In post 476, Garmr wrote:I'm sorry Brian but the only read I got was Garmr early town read which you agreed with evidence is it possible to get a quick reads list.
Okay I expected something witty and maybe more substance.
first up the reads list thing. So how about a scum read list then not including town or null even you can do a simple request like that?
Your not invested in this game that's fine but instead of choosing to keep up to date with current event you go back from the begging and right a summary about each page. What made you think that was a good idea? You even put useless page filler there so no.In post 714, Brian Skies wrote:
I am clearly not invested in this game up to this point, so what is it you're trying to accomplish here? If it doesn't look like I'm looking at the thread, then I'm obviously not looking at it (as in when I lurk, I don't read any posts).In post 561, Garmr wrote:I want a Brian
This is also my response to your feeble attempt at beetlejuicing me and trying to apply my meta to this game (which only ever gets me mislynched unless your name is Falcon).
You should also know better after VisCon/Jake's game/I'm on a Boat.
Also 3 hours isn't even a beetle juice please use the term correctly and the meta thing lol no just no.
1.You misapplied meta in viscon not me i read you as town when I applied meta on you and I was right Also I nailed desp with his meta
2.I didn't even meta you in on the boat that was a miller thing and most people lynched you because you were claimed miller and you weren't the most helpful townie and even then you played better in that game than this one. There's differences between uninterested town you and uninterested scum.
3.Why even bring up jake's game for this point that was the first time I meet you and was new to the site? I don't think there was much meta in that game anyway.
So that makes no sense to even mention that meta thing. Also your language looks like a attempt to belittle my argument with out providing facts so no this not on.
In post 714, Brian Skies wrote:
I leave my vote in place unless either: A) I no longer want to risk said person getting lynched or B) I'm caught up and I see something better. I don't move votes in the middle of my catch-ups unless I feel the need to. I was still approximately 8 pages behind on my catch-up when I stopped.In post 574, Garmr wrote:Also If you don't see the point I'm building up to with all those posts then you need to learn flow and how to read in context better. I'm waiting for brian's response to see why i'm reading him as scum then here's the point. Also the fact his throwing town reads around which can easily take back and some of his posts are straight out discredits which make no sense to do as they will lead no where.
Unvoting also isn't much of a thing for me.
Ok that's fair enough-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
Ok sland is your only scum read you don't have your suspicions on anyone else? I mean we have a lot of content.In post 758, Brian Skies wrote:
Sometimes brief and concise is more helpful. Anyways, my reads are littered about. And Slandaar is my only scumread atm.In post 728, Garmr wrote:Okay I expected something witty and maybe more substance.
If its the way you catch up meh and low you still have walls with no content and you haven't really pushed or pressured anyone it's like your posting walls and saying look at me i'm town. Describe to me what benefits do you get from posts like that Brian what are you achieving.In post 758, Brian Skies wrote:In post 728, Garmr wrote:Your not invested in this game that's fine but instead of choosing to keep up to date with current event you go back from the begging and right a summary about each page. What made you think that was a good idea? You even put useless page filler there so no.
This is how I make my catch-up posts. I'm not going to change it just because you don't like it.
I actually used to throw my catch-up comments all in one huge post. So you guys should be grateful that I was considerate enough to break it up into separate posts.
Lol you interrupted it that when I said I want a brian I wasn't referring to you coming here right now when I said I want a brian I meant I want a brian wagonIn post 758, Brian Skies wrote:
3 hours? I didn't see that post for over 2 days. And that WAS intended as a beetlejuice. "I want to see a Brian" is clearly written and read as "I want that guy to get in here and post."In post 728, Garmr wrote:Also 3 hours isn't even a beetle juice please use the term correctly
Why would I care if you were online or not. You seem to misinterpreted my meaning so that's a null.In post 561, Garmr wrote:After a reread and thinking the game through from a new angle
I want a Brian
Why the fuck are you bringing up fferys meta from another game when my point is about other things. These two meta reads are not even using the same points mine focuses on you being more suspicious of others intentions when your town,Posting more fluff than usually, discrediting stuff that isn't even worth the time for townie points which I haven't seen you do as town and the lack of scum reads until someone awesome brought it up and finally handing out town reads to things that are nullish.In post 758, Brian Skies wrote:
What the hell is this shit? I was talking about you trying to draw connections between my alignment and my activity. If you're curious, Ffery's already misread me and mislynched me with that crap logic. Like literally, anything and everything that people have been calling me scum for (or about to call me scum for) in this game can be found in Ffery's case against me in that game.In post 728, Garmr wrote:and the meta thing lol no just no.
1.You misapplied meta in viscon not me i read you as town when I applied meta on you and I was right Also I nailed desp with his meta
2.I didn't even meta you in on the boat that was a miller thing and most people lynched you because you were claimed miller and you weren't the most helpful townie and even then you played better in that game than this one. There's differences between uninterested town you and uninterested scum.
3.Why even bring up jake's game for this point that was the first time I meet you and was new to the site? I don't think there was much meta in that game anyway.
So that makes no sense to even mention that meta thing. Also your language looks like a attempt to belittle my argument with out providing facts so no this not on.
If you'd like, you guys can just copy it over as a meta-case here.
While fferys case about you lacking emotion, being disengaged and not caring,deflecting questions (notice the words deflecting and not fluff filler),and defending your rvs vote hard core,usleess questions.
The only point that similar is the useless questions (fluff post)
Still think your scum-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
and this is reason to take your vote off brian why?In post 783, yessiree wrote:
This is horrible.In post 781, emeraldemon wrote:Well time is short and it looks like it's either gonna be slandaar or brian skies. I could see either as scum honestly but I think I will
VOTE: Brian Skies
I'm pretty sure 101 was sarcasm, and the "important investigations" was probably just BSing, not trying to fake a breadcrum. So... that doesn't leave much.
I'll need some time to digest the back and forth between Brain and Slandaar
UNVOTE:-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
@yessiree
That doesn't explain much so I will ask it again in a more direct way so you can't try and dodge it.In post 808, yessiree wrote:In post 793, Garmr wrote:In post 783, yessiree wrote:
This is horrible.In post 781, emeraldemon wrote:Well time is short and it looks like it's either gonna be slandaar or brian skies. I could see either as scum honestly but I think I will
VOTE: Brian Skies
I'm pretty sure 101 was sarcasm, and the "important investigations" was probably just BSing, not trying to fake a breadcrum. So... that doesn't leave much.
I'll need some time to digest the back and forth between Brain and Slandaar
UNVOTE:
and this is reason to take your vote off brian why?
uhh, hmm... idk really...maybe it's because of line above the unvote?
What in this vote clears Brian of being scum to you?
@him
Saying stuff like forced and manufactured is the type of comments people use on me when they don't have anything critical and work off gut this has been used on me when i'm town and scum. But the reaction can be different between town or scum depending on the circumstanceIn post 819, inHimshallibe wrote:I do like I do for notetaking purposes.
Anyhow, yessiree that post read manufactured, forced, faked, whatever you want to use to describe it. Takes more than just that feeling to make you scum, but it's a starting point.
Do you think yessiree reaction was scum or town him?In post 824, yessiree wrote:
I was genuinely pissed at Brain Skies, yes I admit it was forced, faked, etc. That's because I had to force myself not to use too many "fuck" and "shit"In post 819, inHimshallibe wrote:I do like I do for notetaking purposes.
Anyhow, yessiree that post read manufactured, forced, faked, whatever you want to use to describe it. Takes more than just that feeling to make you scum, but it's a starting point.-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
Don't like this one bit. I looked backed and didn't see a direct response to it unless you mean this.In post 830, Albert B. Rampage wrote:...
I responded to your question but my post got caught in the simulposting. If you didn't spam the thread with one-liners, you might have seen it. Too bad for you.
Unvote Slandaar, vote emeraldemon
I'll be coming after you tomorrow.
Also the shift to emerald is bad and with little reasoning. You haven't even made much of a case on him just taken little sarcastic stabsIn post 822, Albert B. Rampage wrote:I'm right here Slandaar, going to watch you and your scum team burn.-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread