Open 590: Diffusion of Power (Town Win)

Randomnamechange · Post Post #250 (ISO) » Mon Mar 16, 2015 2:21 am

Godammit boonskies.

inte · Post Post #251 (ISO) » Mon Mar 16, 2015 2:39 am

really nerds

really

inte · Post Post #252 (ISO) » Mon Mar 16, 2015 2:40 am

lets start off with a penguin lynch tomorrow boys

House · Post Post #253 (ISO) » Mon Mar 16, 2015 2:47 am

The previous 3 posts don't make sense to me following my quickhammer of ChiVi.

Mentor · Post Post #254 (ISO) » Mon Mar 16, 2015 2:58 am

I tried to note down some of my thoughts as I caught up but it is a lot of pages. I will probably read it again later tonight and try to clarify my thoughts.

The biggest thing was this response from ChriVi:

In post 155, ChriVi wrote:GTFO of our game you piece of trash

...

God we're blacklisting you as soon as this game is over..

It seems way over the top and barely addresses the points brought up in Antihero's post.

This too..

In post 158, ChriVi wrote:Unless you're not the person that I'm thinking of, in which case go fuck yourself.

NM thought the post sounded fake and I had the same reaction.

I'm actually pretty concerned about this attitude. Is this game-related or what... because NM wasn't being an asshole, but these people definitely are.

In post 161, ChriVi wrote:I know you're a giant asshole

VOTE: VOTE: ChriVi

In post 175, killapenwin wrote:I'm a little surprised you haven't been warned by the mod for being overly volatile to other players, 'GTFO piece of trash and I'm blacklisting you after the game' is quite excessive for questioning

Yeah.... actually.

In post 182, Randomnamechange wrote:House is confirmed town.

How did this happen? I only saw one post from him, or maybe two, so far.

In post 189, Green Crayons wrote:@BBT: After taunting people into voting you, and then promising to hunt scum off of your wagon, you've instead voted Killa for five words ("risk being misread as scum").

I was going to ask about this but couldn't figure out the words I wanted to use. I thought the Killa vote came out of left field. It didn't make sense to me based on previous posts.

In post 190, BlueBloodedToffee wrote:I don't really see the point in looking at who voted me before the game had actually started; especially when some of those people have pursued other options since.

Yeah but you were giving me shit for not knowing about the votes and saying that your vote was serious, so the prior votes, whether they counted or not, should still be valid enough for you to scum hunt off your wagon, but now you don't want to because "they didn't count"??? What?

In post 201, House wrote:So, what do you say we stop pussy-footing around with the finger-pointing and mass claim?

I don't know if I like this idea. What is the benefit?

In post 204, Green Crayons wrote:Thus, upon a cop dying, town cannot analyze to see whether that cop had already used its power

Yeah but cops who survive through their investigation should be claiming results right away anyway right? Since they only get the one night so after are then useless.

You said this in your next paragraph.

In post 205, davesaz wrote:ChriVi (4): Antihero, Not_Mafia, killapenwin, Green Crayons
BlueBloodedToffee (3): ChriVi, Newbie, randomidget
randomidget (1): inte
killapenwin (1): BlueBloodedToffee

Not Voting (4): House, Creative, NJAC, Mentor

I like all the people on the ChriVi wagon.

Antihero took the time to address ChriVi's statements, to which they just lashed back with nastiness, instead of saying why they think he was wrong. More nastiness at NM for calling the reaction fake, despite the notion being observed by more than a couple people. I liked killa's response to BBT also, and of the two who argued with me in the beginning, Green Crayon seemed the most interested in what I had to say, whereas BBT was just trying to pin me with anything he could come up with.

In post 208, Antihero wrote:claiming which NIGHT (but not the ROLE) could be useful to let docs know who to protect because scum don't have an rb to counter it

But what if there's a cop with a missing night? Wouldn't it just allow the mafia to zero in on one of two, or only one target for each night? I mean, it effectively increases the odds of losing someone important from 1 in however many to 50% if two same-night claims, and 100% if only one.

I really don't like the BBT seems to be creating "slips" and "tells" out of thin air and hammering them until he realizes it's not going anywhere.

I also don't like the lynch bait statements. I don't understand the purpose of those. I mean, if you are town, why would you point out that someone is lynch bait, especially without prompting and without using it as a reason to explain why you think a particular something about that person? It seems kind of like, if one mafia says that about his partner as a way to deter votes on that person, and using it to accuse people of going after easy pickings. I guess I don't understand how it's really relevant. If you are town, it doesn't matter, especially if you know someone gets lynched easily, you still don't know their alignment.

In post 217, killapenwin wrote:I assume Chriv is scum and by extension that Anti could be also.

I don't agree with this statement at all. If ChriVi is scum, I'm going to say that Antihero and NM are probably not.

In post 219, Newbie wrote:I'm surprised that Chrivi didn't continue to engage further with killa and that it's just these few posts.

Oh, this is actually an interesting observation. I'm not sure what it means, so I'm just putting this here to remind myself later.

In post 228, House wrote:Hey Antihero, I wanna tunnel you.

Scumread me, please.

This post is really, really, really weird. Why would you want to force a suspicion? I don't get it.

In post 235, inte wrote:someone sumarize this shit wagon on ChriVi in 5 words or less

This is actually really interesting to me because I don't see any reason for anyone to be defending ChriVi, especially from someone who hasn't really said much about anything. Is it common for mafia to defend people? It seems like it might be a way to gain trust for a "correct" read, so if ChriVi were to turn up town I think I would actually look at this person to be mafia. And from the wagon, maybe killapenwin, but at the moment, I definitely think ChriVi is mafia. Hmm.. actually if ChriVi ended up mafia I would still think inte was mafia for this post. That seems backwards... but it makes sense to me. Does that mean inte is more likely to be mafia in any case or not?

VOTE: VOTE: inte

In post 237, ChriVi wrote:You're fucking stupid

Go back to newbie games if you can't handle a little swearing

Me hating anti is un-alignment related. Your vote is useless. You are being anti-town.

That doesn't explain the nastiness you've given to everyone else. I think this is really uncalled for.

@mod: I'm starting to get a bit uncomfortable with the way this player is treating people.

In post 240, ChriVi wrote:Nice sheep, fuckass.

Newbie, I haven't even fucking /been/ here to engage more with killa. Now that I am, obviously: VOTE: Killa.

Newbie + killa scumwagon, anybody?

@Mod: is there any option to vote to have a player removed or do I have to wait for them to break rules first?

I really think you should be removed... instead.

I don't know what happened on the last page. I saw a vote that looked like a hammer and I wanted to get this posted.

House · Post Post #255 (ISO) » Mon Mar 16, 2015 3:16 am

^ Scumposting.

Mentor either wanted to make sure ChriVi was hammered in case mine wasn't the hammer vote (which it was, so...), or he wanted to look like he was "with town" on wanting ChriVi out of the game.

The flip will tell which of the two.

inte · Post Post #256 (ISO) » Mon Mar 16, 2015 3:26 am

In post 255, House wrote:^ Scumposting.

Mentor either wanted to make sure ChriVi was hammered in case mine wasn't the hammer vote (which it was, so...), or he wanted to look like he was "with town" on wanting ChriVi out of the game.

The flip will tell which of the two.

i like you regardless

Mentor · Post Post #257 (ISO) » Mon Mar 16, 2015 3:27 am

In post 255, House wrote:^ Scumposting.

Mentor either wanted to make sure ChriVi was hammered in case mine wasn't the hammer vote (which it was, so...), or he wanted to look like he was "with town" on wanting ChriVi out of the game.

The flip will tell which of the two.

I don't really get what you're trying to say here, but this post makes me feel like you didn't really read anything I had to say.

Mentor · Post Post #258 (ISO) » Mon Mar 16, 2015 3:27 am

I mean, aren't you the one that hammered, knowing it was the hammer?

inte · Post Post #259 (ISO) » Mon Mar 16, 2015 3:27 am

mentor are you an alt

Mentor · Post Post #260 (ISO) » Mon Mar 16, 2015 3:29 am

In post 259, inte wrote:mentor are you an alt

I don't know what you're asking me.

Not_Mafia · Post Post #261 (ISO) » Mon Mar 16, 2015 3:31 am

VOTE: ChriVi

Antihero · Post Post #262 (ISO) » Mon Mar 16, 2015 3:35 am

best.
hammer.
ever.

inte · Post Post #263 (ISO) » Mon Mar 16, 2015 3:36 am

everyone on this buttcheeks wagon smells. since when does being mad = scum? i could say fuck 50x times and still don't matter cuz its about the meaning of what i said rather than what actually was said

fuck fuck fuck fuck fuck fuck fuck fuck fuck fuck
fuck fuck fuck fuck fuck fuck fuck fuck fuck fuck
fuck fuck fuck fuck fuck fuck fuck fuck fuck fuck
fuck fuck fuck fuck fuck fuck fuck fuck fuck fuck
fuck fuck fuck fuck fuck fuck fuck fuck fuck fuck

Not_Mafia · Post Post #264 (ISO) » Mon Mar 16, 2015 3:41 am

ChriVi wasn't wasn't lynched for "being mad"

inte · Post Post #265 (ISO) » Mon Mar 16, 2015 3:48 am

maybe not from you or antihero but can you seriously give me a reason why GC, penguin, and newbie are all on this wagon? no...

this is discussion for tomorrow, though.

Green Crayons · Post Post #266 (ISO) » Mon Mar 16, 2015 4:10 am

In post 264, Not_Mafia wrote:ChriVi wasn't wasn't lynched for "being mad"

Green Crayons · Post Post #267 (ISO) » Mon Mar 16, 2015 4:11 am

In post 263, inte wrote:everyone on this buttcheeks wagon smells. since when does being mad = scum? i could say fuck 50x times and still don't matter cuz its about the meaning of what i said rather than what actually was said

fuck fuck fuck fuck fuck fuck fuck fuck fuck fuck
fuck fuck fuck fuck fuck fuck fuck fuck fuck fuck
fuck fuck fuck fuck fuck fuck fuck fuck fuck fuck
fuck fuck fuck fuck fuck fuck fuck fuck fuck fuck
fuck fuck fuck fuck fuck fuck fuck fuck fuck fuck

Like, you're making my point for me.

Context and delivery matters.

Not_Mafia · Post Post #268 (ISO) » Mon Mar 16, 2015 4:12 am

I really want ChriVi to post before lock, not because I want his thought on the game if he's town, but for the profanity laden rant

inte · Post Post #269 (ISO) » Mon Mar 16, 2015 4:14 am

davesaz · Post Post #270 (ISO) » Mon Mar 16, 2015 4:20 am

Official Vote Count

ChriVi

(7 - LYNCH): Antihero, Not_Mafia, killapenwin, Green Crayons, Newbie, randomidget, House

killapenwin

(2): BlueBloodedToffee, ChriVi

randomidget

(1): inte

Not Voting

(2): NJAC, Creative, Mentor

With 13 alive, it takes 7 to lynch.

Mod Notes: NJAC is being replaced.

Antihero · Post Post #271 (ISO) » Mon Mar 16, 2015 4:21 am

/in before lock

Not_Mafia · Post Post #272 (ISO) » Mon Mar 16, 2015 4:21 am

inb4 lock

inte · Post Post #273 (ISO) » Mon Mar 16, 2015 4:24 am

baaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa

davesaz · Post Post #274 (ISO) » Mon Mar 16, 2015 4:29 am

I might try to write some flavor in which case it will go here.

ChriVi,

Mafia Goon

,

was lynched d1.

Night 1 begins now. PM your orders if your night specific role is Night 1.
Night cannot end until a replacement for NJAC is found. Invite your friends (or enemies).

If a replacement were found early enough, deadline would be in 3 days. (expired on 2015-03-19 21:00:00)