In post 1421, West9 wrote:Egh. I was kinda thinking that this was one of those "newb-bji trying to back-up a scumread and in the process seeing every action that someone made in a scummy light" things again, but this is actually super gross. As is his ignoring of most of 1417.
Not sure what you'd have me do. I made my points, he made his counter points. Any response I make is likely to just be me reiterating my points and him reiterating his counter points. We've been through this before, and no one liked it.
OK so people don't see anything in my case against VDA. That's fine; it's not an airtight case, it's suspicion based upon hunches. I'm not voting VDA, but I'm not backing down when he asks me why I found him suspicious. I'm not going to pretend like I don't have any suspicions. I laid my reasons out numerous times already. Take them for what they're worth (which in the opinion of texcat and West, is not much, apparently).
All I hear though is people telling me who is innocent. So texcat and West, if it's not VDA or Pea Brain, who is it? Who should we be voting for?
Also, Victor, if the day 1 and day 2 scum were so obvious, can you say who the obvious day 3 scum is?