In post 119, Boonskiies wrote:You done yet?
Yeah for now.
In post 126, Boonskiies wrote:Khan's like the towniest guy besides me.
In post 91, implosion wrote:
Unvote
VOTE: Necessary Evil
Necessary Evil voted for Mario for doing something "strange", without equating strange with scummy. When questioned on it he once again called it strange. I'd like a better explanation of why strange in this case equates to scummy.
Good candidates for town so far are dragonspawn and Woody, and maybe Shazam. Boonskiies also might be scum.
In post 133, Shazam wrote:I feel as if the recent action in this thread is consistent with a scum derailment of conversations about Mario and Foxxx that were actually going somewhere. It's hard to keep track now of exactly where we are in either of those conversations. Mario, don't think you can get away with not answering post 81 after all this nonsense. I won't be posting tomorrow, jsyk guys.
In post 129, dragonspawn wrote:I'm hurt boon
In post 102, implosion wrote:In post 98, GrayFoxxxx wrote:In post 95, implosion wrote:I wasn't sheeping KK, I just didn't have enough of an inclination to vote for you before I saw that it would make a wagon.
But you said
In post 49, implosion wrote:Unvote
VOTE: GrayFoxxxx
I wanted to do this earlier but there was no one else voting him so it wasn't really worth it. Thank you, KK.
So you did or didn't want to vote me before Kahn did? Youre flip flopping.
I'm not flip flopping, you're misinterpreting me. I had some inclination to vote before KK voted, but not enough to actually vote. I wasn't sheeping because I was voting him for my own reasons.
Why are you so concerned with your vote's 'weight' so early?
Like why are you more focused on your votes placement than on addressing scumreads or producing content?
I would have also expected you to vote him after you said you wanted to. Why havent you?
In post 78, WoodyWoodpecker wrote:You missed my post obviously cause I pointed out he wasn't the only one, I don't even think he was the first to vote without a random reason so why is he scum and not the others?
In post 140, implosion wrote:Also, meant to say this earlier, happy birthday KK!
OrwecouldsurrenderAndletloveinvadeus
In post 142, Kublai Khan wrote:Sorry, I thought I had addressed it. He was the only one using a system to make his choice. The alphabet.
In post 142, Kublai Khan wrote:Who do you think acted similar to GrayFoxxxx that I should be voting?
In post 142, Kublai Khan wrote:Why did you wait to long to vote me for "ignoring" your question?
In post 143, dragonspawn wrote:Both have been resisting/defending the push on implosion.
In post 73, Necessary Evil wrote:I think we're better off focusing on one at a time. It creates more pressure and keeps the town from becoming splintered.
In post 89, implosion wrote:People discussing my vote wrote:RVS literally requires no reason and D1 requires only a weak one.
Yeah I Dont like this. Town doesn't need cover for a vote.
Switching from a singleton vote to another person with no votes on them seems rather pointless when the aim is to get the game moving and start seeing how people react to votes. I wanted to vote for GrayFoxxxx, but there wasn't much point in it and I didn't particularly like any other votes I saw.
My reasoning is similar to Khan's. Overjustified RVS votes are scummy, although this was a minor case.
Another miscellaneous thing: Khan's vote/reasoning is not a towntell. Reasoning is reasoning, it's the kind of thing that will be done as either town or scum.