He self-voted and I had no idea what the fuck that meant. If he had continued with the same behaviour I would have voted him, but he just up and quit. Trying to think about the town motivation behind self-voting, have to make sure he's not VI obviously, but I really can't think of anything. It just perturbs me and I don't feel comfortable voting him with that over me.
Why didn't you vote before he self-voted? In particular at #141. "I wanted him to admit he was lying to me" seems like an odd condition - what kind of scum admits they're lying to you?
uhh yeah, that's the thing, they don't. And whaddya know, pip didn't admit he lied. I N F E R.
TheLhix wrote:Before I go for class: I am halting on voting because that is a big play to make for someone leaving for several hours. I chose pip only because I was following Nos logic and was extra wary of pip. I still am given he could be drawing a lot of attention to himself and detracting. Yokka has continued my wary of minor levels as he has continued playing the same song. Nos is overly aggressive. I'll vote when im back
Overly aggressive is scummy?
TheLhix wrote:Reading from class. Loha is either scum that is baiting or is being needlessly disruptive. I'll cast my vote to this despite being away.
Vote: LoHa
nvm, guess you'll just ignore your previous intent of voting me for the sake of joining the bandwagon.
So I meant to catch up and post last night, but then OuATbrought back my two fav characters in one episode and probably will ship them in the near future so I got glued to the tv for two hours... Sorry lol
No matter how high the stakes, sooner or later you're just gonna have to go with your gut.
And maybe, just maybe, that'll take you right where you were supposed to be.
In post 168, Titus wrote:
...
you resemble the last mini normal.
Is this referring to NY 190? (Technically a large, but not a big one.) Without really good cause I don't want to read ~130 pages of game to get context for pignash replacing in on page ~120, and I have some reservations about the meta value of such a late replace in any event.
Can you explain the similarity between his play there and here?
Honestly I am surprised I didn't get lynched there, w/e. 212 doesn't make any sense, but I am not sure how it is scum indicative.
Nos is making more random semantics arguments, but I would be lying if I said that I am not really biased towards seeing her lynched. I will say however that she seems to be more focused on finding small things she can catch people on more so than assessing people's argument, which allows her to look like she is scumhunting without ever actually finding scum.
Loha votes me for reasons that aren't clear. The only thing I said was I needed a counter to itep to get things going. That indicates not much is alignment indicative.
Loha sheeps that thought process, but votes me. If he thinks my thought process is scummy, why would he follow it? If he doesn't, then why is he voting me?
All around, that's pretty bad. If I am right, itepip is almost certainly town.
In post 234, Titus wrote:Loha votes me for reasons that aren't clear. The only thing I said was I needed a counter to itep to get things going. That indicates not much is alignment indicative.
Loha sheeps that thought process, but votes me. If he thinks my thought process is scummy, why would he follow it? If he doesn't, then why is he voting me?
beeboy - Everyone thought this game was made to troll pie but it was really made to troll pisskop. Almost50 pisskop: Overall, that's a townie slot. Don't ask for specifics because with PK everything can be interpreted either way. It's probably WHEN he says/does things that matter, so it's more of a matter of conception rather than solid reasoning.
In post 234, Titus wrote:Loha votes me for reasons that aren't clear. The only thing I said was I needed a counter to itep to get things going. That indicates not much is alignment indicative.
Loha sheeps that thought process, but votes me. If he thinks my thought process is scummy, why would he follow it? If he doesn't, then why is he voting me?
All around, that's pretty bad.
This is bs. I'm not sheeping anything.
In post 179, LoHa wrote:I've read the thread and can't recall a single alignment indicative argument, so we're still in-between RVS and what comes next.
Pip's interactions don't seem forced or otherwise scummy to me and anyone exaggerating the alignment indication of the selfvote looks fishy.
If theLhix is scum his talkative style will reveal a scumslip sooner or later. Same for gung-ho farside.
VOTE: Titus
Soren, why did you get lynched on day1 3x?
Agreed.
Titus: You want to explain yourself better there?
Just an fyi I'm going to do my best not to be an asshat this game, please for the love of all that is holy don't be a hypocrite.
Sarcasm is just a way of saying how stupid you think someone is but in a more polite way.
can't recall a single alignment indicative argument
, so we're still in-between RVS and what comes next.
Pip's interactions don't seem forced or otherwise scummy to me and anyone exaggerating the alignment indication of the selfvote looks fishy.
If theLhix is scum his talkative style will reveal a scumslip sooner or later. Same for gung-ho farside.
VOTE: Titus
Soren, why did you get lynched on day1 3x?
This is pretty lazy and weird.
First you say you don't recall anything alignment indicative about the arguments.
Then you defend pip (which means you do see something alignment indicative) about him.
Why the vote on Titus?
Nope. I said
nobody vocalized any alignment indicative arguments
, which is not contradictory to Soren saying pip's self-vote was scummy being fishy.
You add the qualifier 'vocalized' here. I don't understand how those sentences (bolded) are different. I'm saying that whole sentence seems unnecessary as it looks like you are simply attempting to say farside is wrong and coming up with a justification that makes no sense. From my perspective you simply added the word vocalized and pretended it changed the meaning of sentence? Would you mind explaining it differently. As I don't see what you're talking about.
can't recall a single alignment indicative argument
, so we're still in-between RVS and what comes next.
Pip's interactions don't seem forced or otherwise scummy to me and anyone exaggerating the alignment indication of the selfvote looks fishy.
If theLhix is scum his talkative style will reveal a scumslip sooner or later. Same for gung-ho farside.
VOTE: Titus
Soren, why did you get lynched on day1 3x?
This is pretty lazy and weird.
First you say you don't recall anything alignment indicative about the arguments.
Then you defend pip (which means you do see something alignment indicative) about him.
Why the vote on Titus?
Nope. I said
nobody vocalized any alignment indicative arguments
, which is not contradictory to Soren saying pip's self-vote was scummy being fishy.
You add the qualifier 'vocalized' here. I don't understand how those sentences (bolded) are different. I'm saying that whole sentence seems unnecessary as it looks like you are simply attempting to say farside is wrong and coming up with a justification that makes no sense. From my perspective you simply added the word vocalized and pretended it changed the meaning of sentence? Would you mind explaining it differently. As I don't see what you're talking about.
It's not different.
What are you talking about? Are you for real?
I just found your comment about the arguments vague.
You really have no right to smurf on other players arguments and then OMGUS when players vote you.
And that is the nicest way I can put it.
In other news I'm voting pip because he took the weakest point to bw vote Loha.
Sarcasm is just a way of saying how stupid you think someone is but in a more polite way.
In post 243, Titus wrote:I say there's not much here until I see a counter wagon.
In the post Loha votes me, he says there's nothing alignment indicative.
My post was pretty fucking clear. It's like people cannot understand English. :@
That isn't sheeping sweetie.
In post 244, Titus wrote:Farside moves down several notches unless I am wrong and itepip is scum.
Nope.
You tell me why pip's vote makes sense to you and not a desperate let me jump on this bw approach newb scum tell.
Sarcasm is just a way of saying how stupid you think someone is but in a more polite way.
