In post 5, The_Jester wrote:Hi. I'm conf town, whoever votes me is scum and we lynch him ASAP.
VOTE: Not_Mafia
You're not fooling me.
1 scum found, 3 more to go.
This is gonna be easy.
Best starting post ever!
-Fire (Town Head)
In post 5, The_Jester wrote:Hi. I'm conf town, whoever votes me is scum and we lynch him ASAP.
VOTE: Not_Mafia
You're not fooling me.
1 scum found, 3 more to go.
This is gonna be easy.
In post 64, Sharky5x wrote:you're being less useful than lurkers
surely there is some stuff you could have made something of
In post 72, lilith2013 wrote:Fire has no way of scumreading me. If the hydra were voting me seriously this early, it would probably come from Vedith because I have played with him before. Also, from what I know, Fire and Vedith have similar playstyles (e.g, unserious/trolling). Therefore, I doubt Fire's vote on me was serious or had any reasonable basis. --> trolling
It had nothing to do with him not sharing reasons.
In post 81, Sharky5x wrote:I overuse wording like "make a case" srry
diego may have possibly just done something stupid rather than scumslipped or anything, would like to move on from it. so many people jumped on him its kinda odd
In post 83, The_Jester wrote:Sharky, do you think there's scum on Diego's wagon?
In post 84, DiamondSentinel wrote:If someone is at L-1 and gives me a decent reason for voting, then I will vote. Otherwise, I will not be voting anytime soon.
In post 89, The_Jester wrote:Haha Vedith sorry to disappoint you but I'm playing exclusively from phone lately and that just sucks major balls. We can get a lil' bit dirty in here if you want to, though.
As to your question: no.
@Sharky why don't you vote him then?
In post 93, The_Jester wrote:Well since I'm town, I think we should lynch Apricity.
@Apricity, are you scum? Just admit it, you'll feel all fresh and relieved after all.
In post 94, lilith2013 wrote:In my view, trolling = not serious. Not necessarily a bad thing. I do think you both are not always serious and use a lot of sarcasm, which is trolling to me. In terms of being able to scumread me, I seriously doubt Fire would be able to say right off the bat, while I was obviously RVSing, whether I was scum. Because we haven't played together before.
Who on Diego's wagon do you think is scum?
In post 72, lilith2013 wrote:Also, from what I know, Fire and Vedith have similar playstyles
In post 94, lilith2013 wrote:I seriously doubt Fire would be able to say right off the bat, while I was obviously RVSing, whether I was scum. Because we haven't played together before.
In post 96, DiamondSentinel wrote:I can't talk about my other games besides my first. Check out Antihero v. Fakegod if you want to see my playstyle. That's my only finished one.
In post 101, itlepip wrote:FTR there is a 25% chance a wagon with 3 people on it will not contain scum, so saying that it probably will contain scum doesn't provide any real insight into the game.
Also it is nice that someone has filled the next policy lynch slot...
In post 102, lilith2013 wrote:I believe I've read through one or two of his games, which gave me a general idea of how he behaves and his posting style. As I only have one finished game onsite, I doubt anyone would know enough about me to know my playstyle.
What kind of play would lead you to form a legitimate reason to vote someone you'd never played with before?
In post 107, DiamondSentinel wrote:Absolutely nothing. It's RVS, and I can't really concentrate at this point.
In post 111, lilith2013 wrote:I was actually asking from a theory standpoint. I usually struggle to form reads D1.
In post 112, DiamondSentinel wrote:Fine, someone do a TL;DR for me. I'm a bit stressed on time.
In post 118, DiamondSentinel wrote:I'm sorry about this, MOHIS, but I /in'd a while back when I was dead in my only game. tbh, I forgot about this game until I got the PM, and I'm having a hard time getting in to it.
In post 120, lilith2013 wrote:You can replace out if you can't contribute the time. I don't think anyone is going to object if we can get an active player in your slot.
Sharky, do you actually have views on anyone that you can share, or are you just trying to discredit anyone you can?
In post 128, The_Jester wrote:Don't you go schooling people around. Just swap out please.
In post 130, Sharky5x wrote:im going to discredit all the crappy reads I want thank u very much
however ill share that my vote on you is well placed as of right now, perhaps you could talk me out of it
In post 134, itlepip wrote:How about you giving your read since you voted on lillith during RVS.
In post 137, A Simple Plan wrote:Almost like he's trying too hard to lead.
In post 138, lilith2013 wrote:My vote on random was also during RVS. Somewhere on page 1. As I said, I struggle to form reads D1 so he's pretty null to me. Do I need to unvote? What's the convention here. (The way I play, we usually leave our votes on people until we find a new person to vote. Not much unvoting that happens.)
In post 141, itlepip wrote:That is not what I meant and you know it vedith. All I meant is that before you say "explain why I shouldn't vote you" you should actually explain that read.
UNVOTE:
VOTE: Sharky
Happy now?
In post 149, Randomnamechange wrote:Just so you know guys according to meta asp will tunnel me then flake day 2.
I am now joining any games with vedith and jester in.
I'm getting gut scum on lilith. Reminds me of New scum in newbies.
My Other Head Is Scum wrote:@Lillith - Talk to me about Random
I haven't seen you take a step over there for a while, and that is where your vote is.
-Vedith
Talk to me about lilith.
In post 246, DiamondSentinel wrote:Thank you, but again, makes me very suspicious. Last time someone stood up for me, they were scum.
In post 261, Wanderer-nl wrote:I'm going to put more thought into this game tonight.
I think Diamond is probably town.
Diamond, the thing about multiball (more than 1 scumfaction) is that it's harder to find scum because scum will be scumhunting each other which makes it a lot easier for them to blend in. If you think you can't solve this without a lot of PR's then I suggest you do replace out. Don't get me wrong; I don't want you to go and if you want to get better at scumhunting the best thing is to stay here and just try it. It's ok to be wrong, we've all been wrong before (just an assumption, sorry if I'm wrong) and we're not psychics.
In post 272, Sharky5x wrote:yes because as scum if i get voted one time i immediately give up and shitpost
itepip is scum
diamond is either really newbie scum "Yeah, might as well", or newbie town trying to actually play and fit in
by the way you gotta spell my name right for it to count i believe
In post 268, A Simple Plan wrote:I hope to have time to catch up later this evening. Shit is getting complicated IRL
In post 224, Sharky5x wrote:I guarantee there is scum (if diamond is scum then scum of the opposing faction) on that wagon.
it hurts me how easy of a target he is
pedit:
cool story jester
In post 230, DiamondSentinel wrote:I will not scumhunt because I'm terrible at it, lilith. I know my strengths and weaknesses, and scumhunting, on D1 especially, is not one of my strengths. I do better with reasoning through people's actions and claims. Stop asking a fish to climb a tree. It won't happen.
In post 236, Apricity wrote:p-edit: @Diamond: I agree with Lilith in that you should at least try instead of giving up. Practice makes perfect
p-edit2: Also agree with itle.
In post 246, DiamondSentinel wrote:Thank you, but again, makes me very suspicious. Last time someone stood up for me, they were scum.
In post 249, Diego1487 wrote:Alright we need reads. Anyone willing to oblige?
In post 265, Sharky5x wrote:i almost wish i hammered diamond while i couldve, this is ridiculous
In post 293, DiamondSentinel wrote:Anyways, I'm a tad confused. Sharky continues to shitpost even after he's been caught. I don't know if that warrants an unlynch, but it's worth noting.
In post 307, DiamondSentinel wrote:hinobi was scum that game, sorry, I thought I had put Shinobi-scum.
In post 310, DiamondSentinel wrote:Also, to clarify on MOHIS, Shinobi was constantly defending me and agreed with virtually everything I've said. It's made me wary about these playstyles.
In post 312, lilith2013 wrote:Well it was Vedith who voted you and Fire who said you were town/unvoted you.
I'm not sure what I think of them. They're a little more serious than I was expecting from them.
In post 334, DiamondSentinel wrote:PEdit: I can look at wagons extremely well. Since there aren't a lot of actions in this game, wagons will have to be the main source of my work here.
In post 335, DiamondSentinel wrote:Also, Vedith, why are you posting each message separately? Are you trying to build up your post count? That's suspicious as fuck.
In post 345, DiamondSentinel wrote:I actually talked about that in one of my next points.
In post 348, DiamondSentinel wrote:Not by a long shot. You asked me what I'd contribute, and I told you.
PEdit: It's still scummy, regardless. Also, see that Q+ button? Use it.
In post 350, Sharky5x wrote:Explain how an easy lynch target that gets 6 votes that quickly has scum on the wagon in a game with 4 scum? It isn't obvious why I think there is scum on the wagon?
In post 351, lilith2013 wrote:Multi-posting on phone is terrible and when you're switching between pages doesn't even work sometimes (very annoying). He also has another head who could up their post count if that was something they were worried about. I don't think it's something that would concern them though.
In post 354, DiamondSentinel wrote:PPEdit: There are 2 scum factions, genius.