In post 1737, Garmr wrote: In post 1735, AlwaysInnocent wrote: In post 1733, Garmr wrote:Oh that scum are just as likely to bus with genuine frustration as he may of viewed radja as taking the team down.
I don't know how you play as scum, but I tend to treat scum as "buddies" (at least behind the scenes). We're in it together. Even if a partner doesn't play so well, I'm not going to throw them under the bus because I feel like they screw up the game.
Dwlee showed frustration as well and didn't act to much on it.
Because Dwlee was defending his partner in crime.
That's your problem. Because you are constantly saying that's not how I play. Guess what not everyone plays like you. If you use the same standards for everyone as what you would do you are just doing two things.
I know that's not how everyone plays, but it is the most rational play.
1.You are making yourself easier to read
Meh. It is just common sense. Besides, this information is initially unavailable since you don't know how people will flip.
2.Scum will know how to manipulate you and play to your standards and you end up being a tool for them.
It's not as easy as you think it is. I can be deceived and manipulated like everyone else, but if you think I'm an easy tool because I give insights into my play, then you're very mistaken.
Hell everyone is different and not to long ago bussing your scum buddies was a must do every game now that's died down.
When I played on other sites, I bussed every game for town creds. But, there is a difference between that and the genuine frustration expressed by Albert B. and Dwlee.
(1) Bussing for the sake of bussing is much gentler than being upset with a townie.
(2) There is the element of consent.
"You've been furthering the win condition of the Mafia even better than the Mafia." - Dierfire