just fyi though, bins and bulge are loafbirds in the real world.In post 969, JohnnyFarrar wrote:Notable here is Bulge defending bins
wooOoOOooo.
just fyi though, bins and bulge are loafbirds in the real world.In post 969, JohnnyFarrar wrote:Notable here is Bulge defending bins
In post 689, Gorkington wrote:grrrrrrrrIn post 678, Davsto wrote:I mean I didn't really defend hiplop, I just slightly disputed your point. I also fail to see how that escalates to "EVERYTHING YOU'RE DOING HAS NO WEIGHT". The fuck does that even mean, any way?
i hate it when people do this.
OKAY.
every single.
vote.
youve made.
has had nothing behind it that i can see.
yes?
every vote has been framed as a bandwagon vote.
yes, youre questioning things.
but we're X-days in now [i think like 5?] and you havent espoused a single read from anything youve questioned/pushed besides the no-shoot reads i forced out of you.
youve essentially voted because "lol bandwagons are cool i guess" and "lol u suck kuroi".
no weight.
tell me why im wrong for thinking this.
or im going to think your reaction was overblown on purpose.
In post 708, Davsto wrote:In post 707, JohnnyFarrar wrote:I wanna join this hip wagon but I don't know a hip town game looks like so I dunno if he be scummier than norm
Your vote would put him at L-1 I think, so I'd recommend not
In post 712, Davsto wrote:Put pressure on hiplop in other ways which don't risk a premature day end?
In post 826, hiplop wrote:good rebuttle
In post 881, hiplop wrote:we get it. You say that like 1/3 of your posts
In post 974, Gorkington wrote:tell me why you think this.In post 964, Nosferatu wrote:A not kill list is quintessentially against town's objective.
and why does your point translate to this when it has nothing to do with being "against town's objective"?Nosferatu wrote:In post 965, Gorkington wrote:have you read the setup nos?
in a setup where there is only D1, I'm fairly sure scum objective is still to survive a lynch and not get scumread. Now they just have to do it once.
i could get thinking that maybe i was faking being protown with that opening. it is earnestly probably something i could see myself doing as scum, albeit maybe using it as more of a crutch than i did.
but that isnt what you originally said. talk at me about why you changed your angle from "this guy is playing against town's wincon" to "hes trying to fake being protown".
might be being semantic here, but i'd still like you to elaborate.
Gorkington wrote:theres nothing in johnny's catch-up that i really disagree with.
just fyi though, bins and bulge are loafbirds in the real world.In post 969, JohnnyFarrar wrote:Notable here is Bulge defending bins
wooOoOOooo.
you have a strange way of thinking about how scum play this game if you are town. what do you think my motivation would have been to do that as scum? try to look proactive without actually doing anything? why wouldnt i have just done the most proactive thing possible for townpoints if asking for a kill list is so much more beneficial to town than not? btw i do have some very good reasons for asking for not-kill-list vs kill-list. so you should probably beef up your case on me or im going to rain all over your parade.In post 985, Nosferatu wrote:Unless there's some reason why a not kill lists is objectively more useful than a not kill list, I will stand by the point I've made.
In post 989, zMuffinMan wrote:could someone outline the main point/s against hiplop and why they think these points make him scum
not even going to play my game.In post 988, Nosferatu wrote:would you like to share those reasons?
In post 969, JohnnyFarrar wrote:In post 428, KuroiXHF wrote:In post 423, Davsto wrote:You are managing to be wrong, idiotic, and stubborn all at once.
What an achievement.
Vague, ad hominem and ad hominem. Congratulations.
Alright before you were objectionable but now you're just being gross.
@Kuroi I'm curious to know what about the ISO of myself, Dav and Kats sets us apart from those of Gork and bins?
In post 990, KuroiXHF wrote:In post 989, zMuffinMan wrote:could someone outline the main point/s against hiplop and why they think these points make him scum
Not that Hiplop is even the top 3 on the list of people I would vote, but my biggest beef with him is that he coasts more than anything. He comments and makes the appearance that he does a lot of stuff. If this game was A New Hope, he'd be one of those X-Wings not trying to bomb the exhaust port. He'd just be circling the Death Star a hundred times for the fuck of it.
In post 959, Davsto wrote:I've just been skimming the last few pages but the issue came up briefly of Snarky's activity
And well
It's pretty null as far as I know. I've modded two games with Snarky
In Werewolves of Miller's Hollow, he was one of two players which required prodding throughout the course of the game, 9th highest number of posts out of 13 players.
SCP Foundation Mafia, required two prods in the first day, was then treestumped and then his activity levels were so low that I ended up prodding him and replacing him despite originally planning not to do that to the treestump. As in, two softprods (PMs telling him without actually counting as prod), the second of which came with a warning that if he didn't post for 3 days he would be prodded and replaced.
Yes, he was town in both of those games.