SAME
VOTE: NADHIA
HOLY SHIT HOW CAN ONE PERSON BE THIS SCUMMY VOTE YOURSELF
no mafia wouldn't know because that would be confirmed knowledge on a player's role. It's giving an informed minority even more knowledge. Also don't discuss things the anti-town factions could do to detriment town.In post 144, heuristically_alone wrote:I don't think mafia would know, or else it would give them too much of an advantage, because they could too easily out this information to the assassin when they are about to get lynched.In post 129, WhiteLight wrote:The answer will essentially be no-comment.In post 120, Nahdia wrote:@Mod Do the members of the mafia faction know Maiza's identity?
I have literally zero idea what you're talking about. You should think really hard and re-read thread maybe?In post 155, Florestan wrote:I think Nos created a state in which the assasin could fall into and reveal themselves which Dwlee did.
If I asked what this post was about would that defeat its purpose?In post 344, Nahdia wrote:I almost think you or Thor is scum for pushing on the assassin to claim. Like, scum wants to know who is Slizard more than anyone else at this point because they really don't want to waste a nightkill hitting them. Also the Flore vote is bad, friendo.
p-edit no no no stop THERE IS A DOWNSIDE.
pretty sure he can't invest during the day and he didn't claim that he used his ability on fate did he?In post 564, Cerberus v666 wrote:Camn saying he's an investigative.
Camn repeatedly saying that fate is confirmed szilard.In post 471, camntsuki wrote:OOPS CATS OUTTA THE BAG NOW
WE ARE ISSAC
TOWN BAD DRIVER
ONCE DURING THE GAME, WE MAY CHOOSE TO CRASH OUR CAR INTO A PLAYER
WE WILL BE NOTIFIED IF IT IS SZILARD
LYNCH AHOYIn post 477, camntsuki wrote:Oh you're now reduced to calling the wagon on you a petty revenge wagon?
Like we have no plans on letting a confirmed 3P live. It is a net positive for us, we get a confirmed bulletproof townie out of it.
Now that you've outted our role we outed our result HOPE YOURE HAPPY WITH THATIn post 489, camntsuki wrote:NEVER TRUST FATE HOLY SHITIn post 486, Aristophanes wrote:Untrue.In post 480, camntsuki wrote:PURGE THIS WITH FIREIn post 479, Fate wrote:I am nota threat to town
ANYONE NOT VOTING THIS IN THEIR NEXT POST MIGHT AS WELL CLAIM SCUM
We said we would keep Sziliard alive under certain circumstances.
Fate, you are Sziliard, yes?
Are you willing to scumhunt with is or need we lynch you?
WE
DO
NOT
NEED
CONFIRMED 3P ALIVE
WHEN WE CAN GET A FREE BULLETPROOF IC FOR THE REMAINDER OF THE GAMEIn post 491, camntsuki wrote:YA BUT WHO CARES ABOUT SCUMTHOR WHEN WE CAN HAVE OUR SCUMFATE LYNCH????????????????In post 488, Fate wrote:I live to scumhunt Aristo.
Katsuki even agrees with me on Thor
Can you talk some sense into IssacIn post 493, camntsuki wrote:WE SHOULD 100% LYNCHED THE CONFIRMED SZILARD SO THAT WE CAN HAVE A BULLETPROOF IC FOR THE REMAINDER OF THE GAMEIn post 490, Nahdia wrote:Anyway in all seriousness, shouldn't we like, not lynch the 3p that doesn't have any nightkills?
Also I completely buy camm's claim as town tho so that's radical.
VOTE: Aristo
Decent vote.
LIKE WHY IS THIS SO HARD???
MAFIA LITERALLY CANDISPOSE OF MAIZA AFTER FATE IS LYNCHEDNOTFate did not flip as szilard. Camn is a dirty liar who fucked up this game for town, if he is town, for no fucking reason, and he doesn't deserve to continue to play.In post 497, camntsuki wrote:SO LET HIM WHILE ITS STILL EARLY ENOUGH INTO THE GAME THAT HE PROBABLY WONT HIT MAIZA LMAOIn post 494, Nahdia wrote:We can't lynch Fate. He'll take a stab at Maiza if we try to. Why not put it off and lynch for mafia now? :T
WE GET TO LYNCH 3P
AND HE HAS A LOW CHANCE OF HITTING MAIZA
Ok? Are you Camt? Are you literally every mafia player that had ever lived? Are you an omniscient deity? Are you implying that your definition of a faked result is the one used by each and every player in the game? Well I'm sorry to inform you that you're incorrect. To me a faked result is a claim that they investigated someone and received a result that they did not actually receive. Camt did not do that. So unless you have some other reason they should be lynched that isn't essentially a policy lynch, I'd suggest you tell the crowd.Cerberus v666 wrote:EBWOP.In post 586, Cerberus v666 wrote:Oh? Do you know what I call a conclusion one arrives at regarding someone's alignment, without being informed of said alignment due to mod communication?
A read.
Any read which is passed off as a guilty, or confirmed information of any sort, is a faked result.
In post 525, camntsuki wrote:tbh itll be a lot funnier if we lynch Fate before he gets a chance to eat so pls vote accordingly guys
Ye ok fate was totally oozing "not szliard" wasn't he. Fate LITERALLY said he was trolling. He had basically no intention of playing seriously and was basically trying to get lynched.In post 527, Fate wrote:I refuse to eat.
I won't allow my Ghoul nature to take over
But I will find a way to live in harmony with it
I don't like to lynch people for non alignment indicative things if I can help it.In post 600, Thor665 wrote:What's wrong with a policy lynch?In post 591, Nosferatu wrote:isn't essentially a policy lynch
In post 446, camntsuki wrote:LOOK AT THIS BACKTRACK LMAOIn post 407, Fate wrote:Staeg there's uh
a few things that would interfere with my ability to read Katsuki.
THis game unfortunately includes one of them
We can lynch White Light or Thor.
Unvote:
Vote: White Light
Thor will probably have less traction and he's a slippery son of a bitch, so here we are
FATE SCUM WOULDNT BACKTRACK LIKE THIS
AND FATE TOWN WOULD NEVER HAVE PUSHED US IN THE FIRST PLACE
G FUCKING G
In post 597, Cerberus v666 wrote: 2) He said something about not giving in to his ghoul nature and eating. That is CLEARLY a joke. There is no argument that can be made that he intended that be interpreted as a claim to be Szilard.
This argument, unlike the defense of camn's terrible play, goes far beyond semantics alone.
This is also pretty obviously a joke.In post 471, camntsuki wrote:OOPS CATS OUTTA THE BAG NOW
WE ARE ISSAC
TOWN BAD DRIVER
ONCE DURING THE GAME, WE MAY CHOOSE TO CRASH OUR CAR INTO A PLAYER
WE WILL BE NOTIFIED IF IT IS SZILARD
LYNCH AHOY
No. There are townies that just act in anti town ways. Policy lynches are just lynches for a reason other than the content of their posts. Something better if avoided.In post 610, Thor665 wrote:I have never seen a policy lynch applied to anything that isn't excessive lurking, lying, or solid anti-town play.In post 602, Nosferatu wrote:I don't like to lynch people for non alignment indicative things if I can help it.In post 600, Thor665 wrote:What's wrong with a policy lynch?In post 591, Nosferatu wrote:isn't essentially a policy lynch
If someone is actively playing in a way that benefits scum (which is why it's called anti-town) isn't that alignment indicative of them being less likely town?
Ascetic is a modifier, not alignment indicative at all. Scum can have a modifier as well as town.In post 614, heuristically_alone wrote:I find that when someone claims immediately right at the beginning and there is no counter claim, they are most likely town. Would you disagree?In post 610, Thor665 wrote:Did you forget that Cerberus claimed page one? Even if Cerb didn't care about the game, we shouldn't just vote out someone that is more likely townI didn't forget it, I still never read it - why do you think it makes him more likely town than not?
not exactly, I'm not saying you shouldn't policy lynch. If kaintepes was in this game, I'd be all for lynching him. My argument is they shouldn't be prioritized over an actual lynch.In post 620, Thor665 wrote:So we can agree that the player plays in a way that hurts town when they are town, and hurts town when they are scum.In post 611, Nosferatu wrote:No. There are townies that just act in anti town ways. Policy lynches are just lynches for a reason other than the content of their posts. Something better if avoided.
I fail to see how the idea of lynching them then doesn't pay attention to the content of their posts.
If a player is hurting my wincon, then they're a good lynch, yeah?
can you find the word camn in any of my responses to thor's questions?In post 623, Cerberus v666 wrote:What is the actual lynch you're suggesting we prioritize over camn?In post 622, Nosferatu wrote:not exactly, I'm not saying you shouldn't policy lynch. If kaintepes was in this game, I'd be all for lynching him. My argument is they shouldn't be prioritized over an actual lynch.In post 620, Thor665 wrote:So we can agree that the player plays in a way that hurts town when they are town, and hurts town when they are scum.In post 611, Nosferatu wrote:No. There are townies that just act in anti town ways. Policy lynches are just lynches for a reason other than the content of their posts. Something better if avoided.
I fail to see how the idea of lynching them then doesn't pay attention to the content of their posts.
If a player is hurting my wincon, then they're a good lynch, yeah?
don't have one atmIn post 628, Thor665 wrote:@Nosferatu - Why not answer his core question instead of playing a dance, who is your current top lynch desire?
I'm going to have to ask you to prove your competence by telling the class why camt is scum and not why he should be lynched. So far you have only demonstrated that he exhibited anti-town play.In post 663, Cerberus v666 wrote:No, you just need a consistent display over an extended period of time. Your inability to understand that when I comment on a demand you make that is not, in and of itself, a statement one way or another about how I feel about the slot in question, is messing with the consistent part of my expectations.In post 662, Thor665 wrote:1. Oh, snap, sorry, didn't realize I need to continually prove that I don't drool on myself.
2. I said unvote him if you weren't - you told me to sod off, if by that you meant 'but I am scuma-reading him!' then I submit you need to work on how you express your beliefs.
I'll spell it out for you: I'm scumreading him, but fuck you if you think I give a damn about whether or not you want me on a wagon.
Is that clear enough now?
semantics are scummy why? I argue over semantics literally every game.In post 652, Staeg wrote:Wait alright alright alright
Nosferatu's iso is actually devoid of any non-semantics content after an early florestan vote
literally empty
anti town and scummy are differentIn post 671, AlpacaAlpaca wrote:Is being anti town not a reason on its own to suspect scum?In post 667, Nosferatu wrote:I'm going to have to ask you to prove your competence by telling the class why camt is scum and not why he should be lynched. So far you have only demonstrated that he exhibited anti-town play.In post 663, Cerberus v666 wrote:No, you just need a consistent display over an extended period of time. Your inability to understand that when I comment on a demand you make that is not, in and of itself, a statement one way or another about how I feel about the slot in question, is messing with the consistent part of my expectations.In post 662, Thor665 wrote:1. Oh, snap, sorry, didn't realize I need to continually prove that I don't drool on myself.
2. I said unvote him if you weren't - you told me to sod off, if by that you meant 'but I am scuma-reading him!' then I submit you need to work on how you express your beliefs.
I'll spell it out for you: I'm scumreading him, but fuck you if you think I give a damn about whether or not you want me on a wagon.
Is that clear enough now?
I've done it to you as scumIn post 672, Dwlee99 wrote:I didnt expect nos to just say they could do that as scumIn post 664, Staeg wrote:Had you not considered this turn of events?In post 658, Dwlee99 wrote:oh.
red neighborhood.In post 692, Dwlee99 wrote:Yo nos, somehow I missed your 27 pagebottom. when did you make a case while you were scum like that?
yeah, someone earlier said it was VCA so I assumed it was. Just read up, I still don't like it. Has this ever worked for you? You never used this in the games we've been in.In post 821, Dwlee99 wrote:That isn't VCA. What the fuck are you doing?
well this isn't even VCA nowIn post 825, Dwlee99 wrote:Warning to nosferatu: Yes this is VCA on Day 2, deal with it.
Fate (7): Dwlee99, camntsuki, WhiteLight, Nahdia, Aristophanes, Thor665, Florestan
Thor665 (2): Nosferatu, Fate
WhiteLight (1): Staeg
camntsuki (1): AlpacaAlpaca
Not Voting (2): heuristically_alone, Cerberus v666
One of ari/flore who are on the wagon scum.
And then Alpaca or HA are off the wagon scum.
Now that I think about it nosferatu and staeg could be scum as well. Still mostly suspicious of the 4 people on the other list but I could see nos or staeg being scum.
It was harder to find than I imagined, since this one didn't come up when I just typed in '+semantics' into the search barIn post 833, Staeg wrote:Setup spec is nowhere near my main gripe, so let me reiterate. I asked about the semantics thing. You said you do it every game. Please link me a game where you've done it before, since I did not succeed at finding one.In post 820, Nosferatu wrote:@staeg: if you look through any game I have you'll probably find a section of my iso heavily focused on setup spec. I guess my first game on site was like that, but that was a weird game for me, I had a pretty big post count uncharacteristic of me. As scum, I don't think I've ever focused on setup spec.
so you basically expected him to flail?In post 858, AlpacaAlpaca wrote:But than why was it than when people were saying you are scum and are going to die that you didn't say this than. If the accusations were baseless than you should have refuted them when they happened not now, or maybe even counterwagon one of your accusers on the grounds of them pushing an innocent town. I just don't like how you responded to the accusations. If you did defend and they kept on pushing than you keep on defending not just say lol.In post 851, Dwlee99 wrote:There was nothing for me to defend. I defended against everything they had said and they just ignored me and continued to scream I was scum lol
Don't worry, I'll obv town, lynch scum, and die immediately afterwards long before then.In post 1042, camntsuki wrote:I don't want him in LYLO, either.
I'm at the point in the game where I envision a 5p lylo with me, thor, and 3 other players ... god forbid they are Florestan/Alpaca/nosferato.
I don't want any of them there.
Flore is probably scum. His attempts to swing attention back on alpaca, the opposing lynch, is really scummy in particular. Also doubt that loved and hated are on the same team. I don't like staeg and very was givin me some weird vibez so I might check them out.In post 1052, camntsuki wrote:Yeah we need 6, right?
Plu we need Nosf and Cerbrus to take a pre-flip stance here, too.
1. Mostly gut, just weird.In post 1073, Thor665 wrote:Why?In post 1066, Nosferatu wrote:Also doubt that loved and hated are on the same team.
So you'd like the Vig to shoot you, is what I'm hearing?In post 1066, Nosferatu wrote:Also as camn was saying, you guys actually need to kill me before LyLo. Me in LyLo is pretty much auto scum win cause hated.
Phone errorIn post 1154, Nosferatu wrote:But flore is scum too?
Thor665 wrote:Vote one of them, you're not voting anyone so, y'know, vote a top scum read?
Uh huh.In post 1067, Nosferatu wrote:On that note
VOTE: Flore
Claim, yadda yadda yadda; this is L-1, you know the drill.
truly.In post 1213, camntsuki wrote:WTF, Dwlee?
Rolecops are scummy af at baseline.
Besides, he actually means "Rachael, Scum JOAT, one of which is a rolecop, the others too scummy to express, please lynch me"