In post 28, ecane wrote:A game without rvs wagon? Nah. VOTE: Titus
Because derp, obviously.
L-2 I believe.
You mentioned later that you wanted to achieve something with that. I agree that putting pressure on someone can teach information but everything in this post is made to tell “hey, this is a joke vote”, strongly lessening its effect IMO. Were you trying to achieve something else here?
I play a lot of games with a guy in real life. Lets call him Kyle (not his real name). He teaches everyone the game, leads the discussion the whole time, and then everyone votes him out of the game because he's also the most experienced (e.g. able to trick us).
I'm also voting for shaddowez because he's our inexperience challenged player. Rawr.
You stated the purpose of that vote was to "start the sorting process." The sorting process would "figure out whether the fear was town or scum motivated."
I'm asking you to show us the sorting process you're referring to.
In post 87, Titus wrote:Asking questions isn't the right tool to use.
The vote increases pressure. The guy fears being lynched. A reasonless vote increases the fear level. It's not about asking questions.
idc if you're annoyed, I'm not getting what I want. I asked about your process. You said the word "process" I used the word "process" at no point did I ever dig at you about "questions". Where is your process. How does it work. Show me what it was supposed to be doing. You "increased the fear level" gr8 but how the hell does that sort anybody. Is this thing on? ¿Estoy hablando Inglés?
Like this shouldn't be so hard. I'm literally trying to get at what your motivation was on that vote cuz what was posted in-game made 0 sense. It's super easy to understand what I'm trying to get at here and thus (AND THUS) should be super easy to just provide what I'm looking for and move on. Why am I having to drag this shit over multiple pages?
In post 104, nn30 wrote:I play a lot of games with a guy in real life. Lets call him Kyle (not his real name). He teaches everyone the game, leads the discussion the whole time, and then everyone votes him out of the game because he's also the most experienced (e.g. able to trick us).
BTW if this is your criteria your vote should be on me.
In post 113, Papa Zito wrote:idc if you're annoyed, I'm not getting what I want. I asked about your process. You said the word "process" I used the word "process" at no point did I ever dig at you about "questions". Where is your process. How does it work. Show me what it was supposed to be doing. You "increased the fear level" gr8 but how the hell does that sort anybody. Is this thing on? ¿Estoy hablando Inglés?
In post 114, Papa Zito wrote:Like this shouldn't be so hard. I'm literally trying to get at what your motivation was on that vote cuz what was posted in-game made 0 sense. It's super easy to understand what I'm trying to get at here and thus (AND THUS) should be super easy to just provide what I'm looking for and move on. Why am I having to drag this shit over multiple pages?
And it shouldn't be that hard for you to understand what I'm saying.
I'm investigating whether he fears a lynch because he's town or scum.
Voting him would help figure that out.
Then I coincidentally get wagoned. He doesn't feel the same fear and the opportunity is gone.
It's because you are not listening that's so frustrating.
So here's where my thoughts are right now. Please chime in if you agree / disagree.
Townie feeling - Dunhallym - entered the game and gave some good analysis on what was going on. This is difficult to do as scum since pretending to do analysis on who is and isn't scum is difficult when you already know the answer.
Townie feeling - Aronagrundy - more of a feeling than anything, but she seems genuine town.
Scummy feeling - Algebra - quick to go along with a lynch vote but isn't offering much in the way of reasoning. Maybe because he knows the people he's putting votes on aren't scum.
Scummy feeling - Titus - five pages in and he won't let go of his scum tell on me. Is it so hard to believe that a newbie would think a no lynch is good?
Scummy feeling - Morning Tweet - post 81 was the tell. Read page three up to post 81. Tweet's analysis comes out of nowhere basically. As I said above it's difficult to do analysis as scum, no?
No reads - everyone else.
Whatever happens, I just want day one to be over. Nothing here is set in stone - I want to see if scum do before I make any concrete conclusions.
@Titus to get out of RVS you need something to happen, so I decided to create that something with my hard push, which you probably suspected when you posed this question
I assume you mean Dunhallym and not Arona? That's who I referred to in my post anyways.
Dunhallym - post 91 - She came in and asked a number of good questions about what had happened so far. Her thoughts were well developed and I agree with most of her sentiments.
Your post (81) was kind of rambly and commented on something which, judging by page three, was a dead topic at the time.
In post 118, nn30 wrote:So here's where my thoughts are right now. Please chime in if you agree / disagree.
Townie feeling - Dunhallym - entered the game and gave some good analysis on what was going on. This is difficult to do as scum since pretending to do analysis on who is and isn't scum is difficult when you already know the answer.
Townie feeling - Aronagrundy - more of a feeling than anything, but she seems genuine town.
Scummy feeling - Algebra - quick to go along with a lynch vote but isn't offering much in the way of reasoning. Maybe because he knows the people he's putting votes on aren't scum.
Scummy feeling - Titus - five pages in and she won't let go of her scum tell on me. Is it so hard to believe that a newbie would think a no lynch is good?
Scummy feeling - Morning Tweet - post 81 was the tell. Read page three up to post 81. Tweet's analysis comes out of nowhere basically. As I said above it's difficult to do analysis as scum, no?
No reads - everyone else.
Whatever happens, I just want day one to be over. Nothing here is set in stone - I want to see if scum do before I make any concrete conclusions.
Interesting. You
do
seem phased by the fact I suspected you and blind to the fact my vote is now on Algebra. You seem to phrase your own actions as a scumtell, when I never did. Guilty conscience much?
You're no less than the third person who has expressed Algebra is scummy, but has voted elsewhere. If you think that my insistance on wanting you sorted is scummy, how can you have no read on Papa Zito, who is pushing that point. You're also voting him over your scumreads, which makes as much sense as subtlety on me.
I don't know where you got the idea that I'm phased. You don't get to Donald Trump this conversation (e.g. declare something to be true and then have it indeed be true).
In post 104, nn30 wrote:I play a lot of games with a guy in real life. Lets call him Kyle (not his real name). He teaches everyone the game, leads the discussion the whole time, and then everyone votes him out of the game because he's also the most experienced (e.g. able to trick us).
BTW if this is your criteria your vote should be on me.
