In post 1092, Almost50 wrote:I also want those who are familiar with the flavour to weigh in regarding that claim. Does it sound legit? Is that character a main character (as in must be included) or does sound more like a safe fake-claim (Kuroi does provide those, btw).
In post 1093, MariaR wrote:Who did Clum claim I didn't see I know quite a bit on DBZ so I can judge
In post 1095, Imperium wrote:I'm not sure why Maria is interesting in assessing flavor here.
Maria, this is why I voted you.In post 1097, MariaR wrote:Flavor means NOTHING but if it will get people off the topic I'll help
When we played together in the last DBZ game, the second flavor was brought up you said that there would be fakeclaims and that flavor meant nothing. When I tried to argue that some flavor was alignment indicative, you argued with me about it for pretty much the entirety of the very short game. Here, you didn't mention that flavor meant nothing until I reminded you that was the stance people were supposed to take, I don't really buy that "I'll participate in flavor discussion to get people off topic (but not mention how useless it is in the process!)" considering your hard stance in the last DBZ game - it looks more to me like you were just trying to be helpful and went against your credo from last game and that wouldn't happen unless your beliefs were fake.
I also didn't like your interactions with me - the "now who can't read!! wait, why are you voting me? oh i meant to say you can't read me" exchange in particular feels underwhelming, unnatural and while I realize this might not necessarily be alignment indicative because I don't know if you're this awkward in exchanges in general, I can very easily see you as scum not knowing how to approach me while as town you've had absolutely no problems in the past because genuine emotion has prodded you before.
And with that, I need to leave for work. I'll be back briefly in the morning.