We must have monkey blood.In post 13, PersephoneSidekick wrote:Because we must have blood.In post 12, Robbnva wrote:why is me not voting scummy?
VOTE: monkey
We must have monkey blood.In post 13, PersephoneSidekick wrote:Because we must have blood.In post 12, Robbnva wrote:why is me not voting scummy?
Honestly I feel like the reason for the wagon building on them right now is pretty stupid.In post 45, Robbnva wrote:I didn't argue anything actually. I asked you a simple question.
You chose to use something game related to vote me, asking you to explain your vote is perfectly acceptable response.
you claim it was rvs, but according to my definition of rvs, it wasn't.
Also I don't really buy the whole "see if his reaction would be useful" because you have to have a familiarity with me to know how I would react as town and scum, and you don't.
my apologies for calling you he, I have issues with pronouns all the time. I will try not to make that mistake again.
There hasn't been enough from you to determine if you are scum or town yet, so I won't put you at L-1 but you are definitely on my radar. Let's see if your play improves.
This is totally understandable to me and as far as wanting to get out of rvs as early as possible goes it still takes some time. You can't force the game to a point where every action has a reason on post 15.In post 15, PersephoneSidekick wrote:Dude, it's RVS; why are you expecting me to make sense?
UNVOTE:In post 34, Robbnva wrote:Well I don't consider it an rvs vote. I just never understand why people vote me for saying "sup", because this isn't the first time it's happened. Getting people to explain what their issue is I feel helps me better understand them. Right now I don't like percy's response and the old me would probably go into a death tunnel, but with limited posts and lack of cares right now I'm not going to dwell on it.In post 31, humaneatingmonkey wrote:Do you think Percy trying to add reason to his RVS a bit odd? Like as if he's trying hard not to make his vote scummy?
that isn't a good reason to give a town read imo. The best way to seem genuine, is to actually be genuine. You can totally be genuine as scumIn post 32, Ginngie wrote:Town.In post 29, humaneatingmonkey wrote:Hi nancy. This vote is to add weight to the Robbinva-PersephoneSidekick conflict. Basically, I want them to squabble while I observe from a distance.
Sounds scummy as if instigating a fight, but townAF for honesty
Just to help build it in general. As in a reaction test. People kept harping on Percy to provide reasoning for a rvs vote. I wasn't gonna continue to be a part of that when I realized that was the basis for the wagon.In post 49, Robbnva wrote:coming from the guy who was just helping the wagon along...In post 47, Tchill13 wrote:Honestly I feel like the reason for the wagon building on them right now is pretty stupid.
why did you join it if you thought the reason for it was stupid?
In post 5, Ginngie wrote:VOTE: monkeyIn post 3, humaneatingmonkey wrote:I'd like to start by saying hello to nancy, who I killed because she intimidated me last game, and to Aristophanes, who I killed because he wasn't easy to lynch.
VOTE: Tchill13
Let's not make this game fast-paced and meme-ful. I'm already currently playing that is hard to follow. Instead, let's take our time to chew everything and make meaning out of everything.
I'm here to eat bananas and scum. And I'm all out of bananas.
Also, does a good read this one does
viewtopic.php?f=4&t=30907
Spoiler:
In post 32, Ginngie wrote:Town.In post 29, humaneatingmonkey wrote:Hi nancy. This vote is to add weight to the Robbinva-PersephoneSidekick conflict. Basically, I want them to squabble while I observe from a distance.
Sounds scummy as if instigating a fight, but townAF for honesty
So an rvs vote, claims someone is town, then I believe that korts comment was directed at me because I implied I scumread korts.In post 115, Ginngie wrote:who is dumb enough to scum read Korts?
Not korts Robbvna... Geez I keep messing up the names.In post 133, Tchill13 wrote:This is what I'm talking about when I say we're looking into the rvs vote too much. Seems like korts is looking too much into nothing. I'm not sure what korts is wanting to accomplish at this point.
I agree with you for the most part on your intentions. My problem is I can see this play coming from newbie town. What would you have me do here Robbnva? Your intentions look honest so you've got a town read from me.In post 144, Robbnva wrote:You aren't reading the game closely. It's not just the vote. It's the reaction to me ask him about it. It's how he tried to play it off as rvs which somehow means he's absolved from answering the question. It's how he tried to take town credit for getting the game out of rvs. Its how he's falsely accusing me of things and somehow thinks my question is remotely close to his question. It's the lack of substance/scum hunting he's done.
Like I've said all this already. It's not just his vote...
I can see this coming from you as town. That's mainly why you're not scum read.In post 32, Ginngie wrote:Town.In post 29, humaneatingmonkey wrote:Hi nancy. This vote is to add weight to the Robbinva-PersephoneSidekick conflict. Basically, I want them to squabble while I observe from a distance.
Sounds scummy as if instigating a fight, but townAF for honesty
Umm... That's an awful response to one vote lol.In post 204, Aristophanes wrote:Like, I'm such an easy ML push right now!
Tchill loses whatever townread I didn't have for him.
Why? You get to see who reads into every slot versus the people that only push the easy scum read day 1 just to get by. I've got a lot of scummy tendencies because I really don't care how I'm viewed if I'm town I care about scum hunting and lynching scum. It's funny because the real problem with my scum game is I DO care how I'm seen, obviously, and that's such a change of pace for me it usually gets me lynched pretty quickly because I'm not playing comfortably.In post 329, Ginngie wrote:Stop being bad
Lol it's not flattery when you're chasing the wrong person up a tree. It'd look much better if it was on Aristophanes or Ginngie.In post 335, Korts wrote:This warms my heart, thank you. But flattery will get you nowhere. I will not be misdirected.In post 328, Tchill13 wrote:Actually korts I like your case. I'm not gonna say you're wasting your time because that's very well thought out and put together. I will say your efforts are better used elsewhere.
This looks like Ginngie is appealing to Robbnva.In post 431, Ginngie wrote:Yo Robb, you scumread Eddie right.
They're partners!AF with TChill.
Flip TChill today, Eddie tomorrow.
*finger guns*
Of the 3 I'm gonna push monkey. Korts laid a very well thought out case on me that seemed to me not to show any bias and correctly pointed out my scummy play. I've not seen anything from monkey that screams town.In post 427, Vecna wrote:In my mind I have this triangle-shape like this;
Tchill - Korts
\ /
Monkey
And where there is probably 1 scum in the 3. Monkey being scum, ruling out the other 2 as being scum, Tchill being scum ruling out the other 2 as scum etc. Based on the way these 3 slots have been interacting. Korts has been rather critical of Monkey, both of them have been quite on Tchill. The way all of their interactions have been feel rather genuine, and either TvS or SvT - but not really like theyre scum teammates putting on a show.
This is the post Ginngie is bragging about as noteworthy and its the one that states I got told off in scum chat? I'm just gonna laugh that reasoning off.In post 393, Ginngie wrote:Spoiler:
Wagon builds on PS/Eddie Cane.
TChill counterwagons onto monkey
No one latches onto the monkey wagon, he hops onto the wagon to bus
Spoiler:Gets told to feck off her wagon in PT and bounces out for sketch reasoning.In post 47, Tchill13 wrote:Honestly I feel like the reason for the wagon building on them right now is pretty stupid.
VOTE: robbnva
town-robb, korts, Ari, nancy, Ginn, Sunlit Diamond, monkey, massive, Darkhorse
scum-Eddie, TChill, Assemblerotws
Grendel scum if I'm wrong