Please omg please. Do the fuck something. Cite something. There's even a case on the slot and you go with gut scum. Make a stand.
This feels wifom town so idk, but if you are town put in some effort. This is a real hard game to get anything out of.
Please omg please. Do the fuck something. Cite something. There's even a case on the slot and you go with gut scum. Make a stand.
please not this again.In post 273, UC Voyager wrote:like. for reals
who rolls scum 60% of the time???????how could anyone take that seriously? PLUS IT WAS RVS
anyone who has used that as a way to scum hunt me has a good chance of being scum trying to take advantage of something like that!
you crumbed it pretty hard manIn post 275, UC Voyager wrote:did i say i was VT?In post 274, Jodaxq wrote:So when you're a town PR (who was outed and therefore roleblocked every night) you come right out and scum hunt openly, but when you're a vanilla civ you don't?In post 270, UC Voyager wrote:well Jodax. why me?
because i havn't posted much or scum hunted?!?!?
crappy. i do that as town sometimes. You can't meta me because the only type of gameplay you have seen from me is my town PR play
no. what i said was you have seen my "town pr game style" and it is way to early to be meta reading!
so trying to use "he publicly scum reads and what not as town" isn't valid
northsidegal wrote:by the way, nice hat!
Thanks! And it's not that I think it's scummy, that's not what I was pointing out. I was laughing that he made nearly the exact same post as 269 that I complained about before. Also the divide between "null" and "lean scum" is... not huge.northsidegal wrote:addendum to the last non-hat related post:it seems here that you even recognize that dunnstral's hop-ons are scummy - why place such a huge divide between the two?In post 715, Keychain wrote:but why must you do this to the wagonDunnstral wrote:VOTE: Espeonage
gut scummyI'mon
A crucial part of my towngame is throwing out my good reads to tunnel on town, don't you know? not sure why you'd think I'm confbiasing on you when I've told you I strongly townread your slot though.northsidegal wrote:responding to the first part of this separate from the second.i'm waiting on schadd. cy had a really awkward rvs and nothing else he did really stood out to me. nothing espe has done has looked particularly townie to me, either - i'd be willing to lynch there.In post 715, Keychain wrote:Why no vote? Also, I don't think you've given your read on the Cy/Espe slot, I'd like to hear that.In post 704, northsidegal wrote:i'd say i'm fully in this game now even if i still haven't gotten around to wall iso-ing everyone yet - feel free to engage. the same goes for keychain, who i believe said something along the same lines.
i'm not really sure why there's such a huge divide between the two to you, and to me dunn's actions seem a lot scummier. i don't think only responding to posts about you is a scumtell, at least when it comes to lurkers. i say this because there have been games i've been in that i've found it hard to get into and i find myself only responding to either comments about me or questions directed towards me. dunnstral, on the other hand, only seems to hop in to vote the consensus wagon. i'm not saying either are the best lynch today - what i'm saying is that the people who want an everyone else lynch should really be looking at dunnstral instead.In post 715, Keychain wrote: Regarding Dunnstral vs EE: For me, Dunnstral is null. Voting there is literally a lurker-lynch. It looks a lot like he's only skimming a couple of recent posts each time he says anything, from his response to me and his vote on Espe. Your 701 is seriously weird. Dunnstral is an awful lynch for today and I'm sure you can do better than that.
EE is also lurking but his actions have been considerably more scummy. Every time someone votes him he appears and splashes around a bit. It doesn't seem like uninvested town, who I don't think would be so bothered by a bit of pressure. 462 and 506 were particularly bad as posts that looked like he was trying to exist in the game but contributed exactly nothing.
why are you assuming that i'm scum here? i'm really not sure what to make of this comment. i would think confbias but you don't seem to show that anywhere else. why do you assume that i have some ulterior motive or gain some benefit out of examining dunnstral, as opposed to it being my actual thoughts and a genuine attempt to get into this game?In post 715, Keychain wrote: What benefit do you get out of trying to equalise the two?
Aww man, I thought you were straight bulletproof. My crumb reads are getting worse.In post 332, wavemode wrote:I hardclaim 2-shot bulletproof
Metaphor, if it were like the engorged member of justice but not quite it would be a similie.In post 367, KidAmn wrote:Vote Count Four, Or "Maybe We Can Get This Cantenna To Pick Up A Satellite Feed If We Wish With All Our Hearts"
Jodaxq (3): Transcend, Dunnstral, Keychain
Firaja (3): Katyusha, cytheflyguy, Zachstralkita
UC Voyager (2): Firaja, Jodaxq
Transcend (2): UC Voyager, Everyone Else
Keychain (1): wavemode
cytheflyguy (1): Schadd
Everyone Else (1): Havo
Day 1 Will End Most Likely With Me Getting Tired Of All This And Doing A "Rocks Fall, Party Dies", Or In (expired on 2017-11-28 21:00:00).
With Thirteen Alive, Seven Votes Are Required To Lynch.
Everyone Else has been prodded. This is their first prod of the day.
Please Use People's Usernames To Vote For Them. This Vote Was Accepted This One Time, But The Price Of That Is Me Using You As A Learning Example For The Rest Of The Class.
While We Are Providing Learning Opportunities, I Would Like To Remind All Players Of Rule 7, And Rule 13
In post 0, KidAmn wrote:7. Lurking:Players who sign up in this game are expected to actively post and participate. Players who do not post for 48 hours without prior warning will be prodded. Failure to respond to a prod within 24 hours will result in replacement. Receiving 3 prods in the same Day will result in forced replacement.Lurking will not be a viable strategy in this game and players who are consistently prodded or post only to avoid being prodded will be replaced at the Mod's discretion.Don't Make Me Metaphorically Slap You Across The Face With The Engorged Member Of Justice.
(Is That A Metaphor Or A Simile? Dammit Jim I'm Not An English Teacher.)[/color][/b]
where did you say that? you said i seemed a lot scummier than firaja in 599 and you said you were waiting to talk about your read on me in 604. the confbias thing wasn't necessarily to imply that you were scumreading me, it's just a comment that i feel would come from someone who was confbiased on someone else - assuming by default that they're scum in their questioning.In post 728, Keychain wrote: A crucial part of my towngame is throwing out my good reads to tunnel on town, don't you know? not sure why you'd think I'm confbiasing on you when I've told you I strongly townread your slot though.
ah, i think i understand a bit more now. people voting everyone else over dunnstral seems like an inconsistency to me, and i try to point those out whenever i see them. besides, there's a lot to be gained from hearing people's reasoning on one over the other, and it could even be an indicator of associatives later in the game after we have some flips. iIn post 728, Keychain wrote: I'll concede that my reasoning for EE isn't strong, but I still don't like how you're trying to talk me into scumreading a slot that has done nothing. I'm happy to leave him until he can get into the game.
I'm referring to your persistence in comparing the two, as shown in these posts.
Spoiler:
If you are town, you must have a reason. I scumread Cy for trying to analyse an absent player and the situation roughly applies here too. Your actions make sense as town if you're suspicious of the EE wagon and you're looking for scum on it. But you say you're suspicious of Dunn, and you're trying to move people compromising on a lurker onto adifferentlurker. Do you see why that might set off alarm bells for me?
Why are you going around crumb reading, openly?In post 729, Espeonage wrote:My crumb reads are getting worse.
Andrius is one of my best friends.In post 734, Srceenplay wrote:Why are you going around crumb reading, openly?In post 729, Espeonage wrote:My crumb reads are getting worse.
SKSKSKSKSKSKSKSKSKSKSKSKSKSKSKSKSKSKSKSKSKSKSKSKSKSKSK?In post 480, Zachstralkita wrote:U guys can't be deadass lol this is not flipping scum
In post 474, UC Voyager wrote:town and scum
we should no lynch every day
then mafia, you no kill every night, then see how many days we can get in before the mod gets mad and tells us to kill people!
JK, lets not do that, i wan't to join a game to do that one day, but i don't think this one, i really like the flavor in the vote counts
I don’t want people trying to find and out roles publicly. That is the definition of anti-Town.In post 738, northsidegal wrote:also not really understanding your reaction, screenplay - what's the problem?
I think it might have been this.In post 55, schadd_ wrote:we have like 5 latent policy lynches. where is bins
i'm excited to Get Endgamed and Lose who's with me
but wavemode already hard claimed bulletproof. there's no new information there, wavemode himself hard claimed bulletproof. espeonage even quoted it in the post you were responding to:In post 741, Srceenplay wrote:I don’t want people trying to find and out roles publicly. That is the definition of anti-Town.In post 738, northsidegal wrote:also not really understanding your reaction, screenplay - what's the problem?
Espeonage wrote:Aww man, I thought you were straight bulletproof. My crumb reads are getting worse.In post 332, wavemode wrote:I hardclaim 2-shot bulletproof
Only the second bit is anti-town.In post 741, Srceenplay wrote:I don’t want people trying to find and out roles publicly. That is the definition of anti-Town.In post 738, northsidegal wrote:also not really understanding your reaction, screenplay - what's the problem?
It’s not the only time.In post 743, northsidegal wrote:but wavemode already hard claimed bulletproof. there's no new information there, wavemode himself hard claimed bulletproof. espeonage even quoted it in the post you were responding to:In post 741, Srceenplay wrote:I don’t want people trying to find and out roles publicly. That is the definition of anti-Town.In post 738, northsidegal wrote:also not really understanding your reaction, screenplay - what's the problem?
Espeonage wrote:Aww man, I thought you were straight bulletproof. My crumb reads are getting worse.In post 332, wavemode wrote:I hardclaim 2-shot bulletproof
He talking about how I said I saw a crumb.In post 743, northsidegal wrote:but wavemode already hard claimed bulletproof. there's no new information there, wavemode himself hard claimed bulletproof. espeonage even quoted it in the post you were responding to:In post 741, Srceenplay wrote:I don’t want people trying to find and out roles publicly. That is the definition of anti-Town.In post 738, northsidegal wrote:also not really understanding your reaction, screenplay - what's the problem?
Espeonage wrote:Aww man, I thought you were straight bulletproof. My crumb reads are getting worse.In post 332, wavemode wrote:I hardclaim 2-shot bulletproof
if you're talking about 727, i don't really consider that crumb hunting. ucv's 270 is hardly a crumb, it's more of an implication. besides, there's still no new information being revealed there.