In post 887, Lil Uzi Vert wrote:Zach, how many people do you think you can get to vote Dunn?
that depends
are you bussing c:
In post 887, Lil Uzi Vert wrote:Zach, how many people do you think you can get to vote Dunn?
I’ll get back to you if I’m alive Day 2
it's not just that he hasn't explained them, it's that they appear to come from nowhere and never once does he show signs of doubt. him not explaining his reads or showing signs of doubt isn't the problem, it's an indicaton of the problem, to me. i've already said why i think it comes from scum - he's playing to avoid confrontation with the most active players. it's not necessarily that's hes fabricating town reads, it's that he's playing in a style that assumes people are town - the townreads are implicit. it's not like he had made a list at that point with those people at the top and that's what i'm suspecting (until i asked him about it), it's that he's playing as if he had.In post 904, Lil Uzi Vert wrote:Clueless town can mean those things but also can mean town who often blindly trust the information that is being presented to them. I thought that is what you were getting at, North.
So because Schadd has not explained his town reads, you think they’re not real. I don’t understand how you can reach that conclusion if he’s not offered an explanation for those reads yet. Also, how does fabricating town reads without offering any explanation for them helps him achieve a scum win-con? All that does is bring an unnecessary amount of attention to himself and doesn’t help him control the game state at all. The opposite of what you believe he is doing, which is buddying to avoid suspicion.
it's certainly possible - like i said, it could always just be a meta thing. it's a little unfortunate that schadd's been missing because the explanations were what i was really looking for, but based on the play so far i'm still willing to lynch there.I think your problem with Schadd is that he’s not showing any paranoia. Meaning, there is no fear or suspicion displayed in regards to the players he feels are town. There’s no doubt and that worries you. If so, that’s a fair reason to scum read someone but I find a lack of paranoia is a personality trait.
LMAO. Yes push me. The slot that’s been on your slot from the start.In post 906, Lil Uzi Vert wrote:Doggo I don’t feel Espeon or Joda scum. Definyeky Havo though.
This needs to be lynched 3days ago.In post 906, Lil Uzi Vert wrote:Doggo I don’t feel Espeon or Joda scum. Definyeky Havo though.
Okay?In post 908, Havo wrote:LMAO. Yes push me. The slot that’s been on your slot from the start.In post 906, Lil Uzi Vert wrote:Doggo I don’t feel Espeon or Joda scum. Definyeky Havo though.
I’ve been TR by half the players and I’m obvious town.In post 912, Espeonage wrote:Yep if everyone else gets their vanity wagon I'm gonna get mine.
Vote: Havo
In post 530, Havo wrote:why do I get the feeling that’s Trans is intentionally being on the other side of Zach?
In post 531, Havo wrote:How about you contribute to the game?In post 511, Everyone Else wrote:how about no
You signed up to play....so play.
This post makes it obvious you are lurking.
You know, tell us who you think is most likely scum and why?
Who’s most likely town and why?
And who do you think would be the best slot to Lynch today?
You know, play the game.
In post 539, Transcend wrote:no me
In post 546, Havo wrote:How can Schadd post so much (49) and say so little?
In post 549, Jodaxq wrote:I might actually believe this if you hadn't been posting quite often in another game at the same time that you've made some of these posts.In post 547, Everyone Else wrote:will try to work on that as soon as possible when im sober and when i have free time.In post 531, Havo wrote:How about you contribute to the game?In post 511, Everyone Else wrote:how about no
You signed up to play....so play.
This post makes it obvious you are lurking.
You know, tell us who you think is most likely scum and why?
Who’s most likely town and why?
And who do you think would be the best slot to Lynch today?
You know, play the game.
In post 550, Jodaxq wrote:In post 530, Havo wrote:why do I get the feeling that’s Trans is intentionally being on the other side of Zach?These are both very good observationsIn post 546, Havo wrote:How can Schadd post so much (49) and say so little?
In post 558, northsidegal wrote:oh, i misinterpreted this the first time i read it - are you asking if i replaced in thinking that my slot was town or scum? i honestly don't follow games that i'm just reading as close as games that i'm playing in, so the slot was null for me. that didn't factor into anything, though - i was on the replacement queue and had no idea who i was replacing.
In post 559, northsidegal wrote:okay, so here are my thoughts having followed along with the thread and done a quick reread.
can someone explain the wagon on the ucv slot to me? i get that he really hasn't done much this game except for a weak push on jodaxq, but i'm not sure that that's especially alignment-indicative enough to warrant a lynch. lynches for "null" behavior like that have always struck me as lazy in the same way as lurker lynches. with that in mind i'm not necessarily saying i'm against it today, just saying that hopefully screenplay can clarify the read there on that slot.
i'm getting a scumlean from jodax, but it's something i'm constantly doubting myself on. the intial motivation for ucv makes total sense to me - ucv wasn't really contributing anything but was clearly in the thread, so that warrants suspicion. at this point, though, i wonder about the motivation behind singling out ucv specifically over other posters who weren't really contributing much or were just lurking it out. the later continuation of the read and the justifications are what leads to the scumread - specifically, i take issue with this:jodax, what makes you read ucv's posts specifically as intentionally fake contributions as opposed to just intentional non-contributions? you're saying that he's attempting to put forward the image of contributing but to me it seems like he never attempted to put forward that pretense.In post 406, Jodaxq wrote:3. It's not about low contributing, it's about fake contributing. In that same newbie game I hard cased sheepsaysmeep (who was scum) very early on in the game for similar reasons as I'm casing you now. He posted a lot of fake contibution (he always wanted pagetops and asked for reads instead of provided) and I feel like you're doing the same with your asking about meme posting or trying to keep people from insulting one another.
another thing that grabs my attention is the explanation of ucv's actions in 489. it just doesn't make sense to me: ucv's actions can hardly be considered a serious push and the explanation doesn't explain anything outside of the one post where ucv says he scumreads jodax.
finally, this post just exudes someone twisting facts to fit their beliefs and constructing narratives. this is a telltale sign of either a confbiased townie or scum who deliberately has to contrive pushes on people given that they already know everyone's alignment. i'm getting the feeling that it's the latter of the two.In post 492, Jodaxq wrote:I love how this post precedes your boldest read of the game. So I'm guessing you made this post so if I turn up vanilla civ you can just say you weren't taking it seriously, right? Making sure you cover all your bases is a typical scum move.In post 490, UC Voyager wrote:i wonder how easy this game would be if i took it seriously. lol
i am 100% positive scum want to lynch bait me.
splitting the rest up to avoid a wall for transcend's sake.
In post 561, northsidegal wrote:the feeling i get from reading schadd's iso is that he seems to take for granted that some people are town. whereas he's commented on his townread on keychain given that the topic of keychain being scum was brought up, it seems to me like without any discussion or at least visible reasoning he's accepted transcend, zach and katayusha as being town. this could just as easily come from familiarity with the players as it could from already knowing everyone's alignment and only commenting on cases that other people bring up (to give the appearance of activity or of deliberation), so i'm not making this as some huge alignment indicative point.
schadd, could say who you townread and explain why?
In post 573, Transcend wrote:define: scum!katy
In post 613, Srceenplay wrote:Scared of my FOS
In post 627, Zachstralkita wrote:Screenplay our reads are sort of similar ish
Schadd probably won't happen today and is not the besr cnadidate
nsg, lol
In post 639, wavemode wrote:K I actually have no idea how to read this fucking game
Which is unfortunate considering I'm currently invincible
Still gut feeling that 2 of shadd/Transcend/Keychain are scum. Dunnstral/EE could be scum as well. tinfoil hat theory that Zach is scum
None of these people are wagons so I will start one! VOTE: Transcend
bettr not be fucking wagoned rnIn post 644, Srceenplay wrote:Katy is a knight. Not town. That’s the only thing giving pause about cy/espe but not big enough pause.
Weren't you voting Uzi just a page before this? What happened?In post 892, Transcend wrote:the uzz nd the keech are townIn post 881, KidAmn wrote:Lil Uzi Vert (4): Havo, Keychain, Espeonage, Jodaxq (L-3)
there's scum within {havo,esp,joda}
Havo has been acting very paranoid in these recent pages and hasn't contributed much since he got town read from many of the players. Uzi has gained some points with me for not breaking down and voting schadd out of self-preservation. Let's see where this wagon goes.In post 912, Espeonage wrote:Yep if everyone else gets their vanity wagon I'm gonna get mine.
Vote: Havo
why are you voting a player whose contributions were in the beginning of the thread as opposed to someone without much contribution at all, like dunnstral?In post 922, Jodaxq wrote:Havo has been acting very paranoid in these recent pages and hasn't contributed much since he got town read from many of the players. Uzi has gained some points with me for not breaking down and voting schadd out of self-preservation. Let's see where this wagon goes.In post 912, Espeonage wrote:Yep if everyone else gets their vanity wagon I'm gonna get mine.
Vote: Havo
UNVOTE:
VOTE: Havo
At this moment I do want Havo to be the lynch. As I noted in 762 I've been growing more suspicious of Havo as this game has gone on, and his recent posting made me more confident he'll flip scum. He was active right up until the point where people called him town, then he became a lurker and only popped in to push one of the easier targets. Then, instead of becoming proactive again once his town vibe had worn off a little, he just referred back to how we used to view him as town.In post 923, northsidegal wrote:why are you voting a player whose contributions were in the beginning of the thread as opposed to someone without much contribution at all, like dunnstral?In post 922, Jodaxq wrote:Havo has been acting very paranoid in these recent pages and hasn't contributed much since he got town read from many of the players. Uzi has gained some points with me for not breaking down and voting schadd out of self-preservation. Let's see where this wagon goes.In post 912, Espeonage wrote:Yep if everyone else gets their vanity wagon I'm gonna get mine.
Vote: Havo
UNVOTE:
VOTE: Havo
i really don't understand the motivations for this vote. we're really at the point in the day where you can't wagon people as a reaction test or "to see where this goes" - you're wagoning people to be the lynch for the day. i don't like havo for today.