noIn post 339, Luca Blight wrote:Basically you're asking me how UCV's behaviour this game could come from a Town perspective?
If so, you should ask that question to whoever is against UCV's lynch.
you do it
noIn post 339, Luca Blight wrote:Basically you're asking me how UCV's behaviour this game could come from a Town perspective?
If so, you should ask that question to whoever is against UCV's lynch.
I didn't replace out, I was night-killed after your lynch.In post 343, UC Voyager wrote:ok. you were replaced out. i forgot about that. plus, would you really count a game where I threw it that baddly. i mean, i pretty much accepted the lynch like a bar of chocolate.In post 340, Luca Blight wrote:In response to UVC's orange-coloured text above:
1. I have been in a game with you when you were VT (Baseball).
2. Fence-sitting, not 'fence-shitting'. It's basically where you're flip-flopping; not taking an actual stance on something.
3. Fake scum-hunting as you're giving the impression you're looking for scum. I've already explained why it reads fake.
What were you getting at, then?In post 347, Impede wrote:Not really what I was getting at.In post 339, Luca Blight wrote:Basically you're asking me how UCV's behaviour this game could come from a Town perspective?
If so, you should ask that question to whoever is against UCV's lynch.
But I think I've seen enough. The fence sitting looks bad enough, but combined with that jankity vote it just comes off wrong.
VOTE: UC Voyager
This is L-2 by my count
As Moz pointed out, in what world should the person pushing someone's lynch then be the one to offer a defence to that player?In post 350, Sesq wrote:noIn post 339, Luca Blight wrote:Basically you're asking me how UCV's behaviour this game could come from a Town perspective?
If so, you should ask that question to whoever is against UCV's lynch.
you do it
Can you look at the questions I have for you in #302?In post 306, Zaraki_Jaegerjaquez wrote:Also, an addendum. I dislike throwing around my vote, so I take it a little seriously when it comes to voting.
Lawyers ask questions with the goal of discrediting the person they are asking or catching them in self-incrimination. Why WOULDN'T you be asking lawyer questions?In post 352, mozamis wrote:anothe rgood reason impede is scu, for asking such an awful "lawyer" like question.
Fair, as long as you are being honest with yourself. If he flips town you're going to come under a lot of scrutiny.In post 365, Luca Blight wrote:Impede - I understand your question now. I still don't want to answer it however for a couple of reasons: a) it will influence how UCV is playing now and b) it will influence him in possible future games which will make it harder for me to read him.
If you had a brain, you'd realize I'm questioning Luca with the GOAL of boosting the credibility of his read (or potentially undermining it if his read is bad). You're impossibleIn post 363, mozamis wrote:@ Impede - you are voting UV. So you think he is scum, right?
and yet you are more concerned with arguing with Lucca than pshing your scum read. you are scum.
hmmmm. scum reads me onIn post 151, Luca Blight wrote:Gut feeling on Impede and UCV being scum buddies....just putting it in here for reference.
wow, you were litterally just accusing me of making reads with no reasoning. talk about hypocrisy
OK. let me walk through thisIn post 215, Luca Blight wrote:UNVOTE:
Impede's catch-up was pretty decent and I no longer want to lynch him today.
My preferred lynch today is UCV. I have experience with him and know his style well - this really feels like his scum game to me. I've been trying my best not to tunnel on him as I'm aware I have a tendancy to, but it really feels as if he's trying to buddy me to get me on his side so I won't go for him.
Spoiler: UCV's buddying
He has also made a lot of 'on the fence' comments, as is his style as scum:
Spoiler: UCV's fence-sitting
VOTE: UCV
Everyone sheep me.
Doubt it. I think you're being genuine. But people tend to be quite shallow.In post 369, Luca Blight wrote:Are you saying if UCV flips Town you would be scumreading me?
because they dont give out reads and they dont catch scum.In post 366, Impede wrote:Why WOULDN'T you be asking lawyer questions?