In post 1868, Gamma Emerald wrote:Pages 1-6
In post 6, Hinduragi wrote:Vote: Kotoko Utsugi
Rules wrote:The following is a list of outlawed shenanigans:
Using invisible text, codes,
cryptography,
etc.
Yeah...
LLD
, looking at you
In post 8, Lady Lambdadelta wrote: In post 6, Hinduragi wrote:Vote: Kotoko Utsugi
Rules wrote:The following is a list of outlawed shenanigans:
Using invisible text, codes,
cryptography,
etc.
Yeah...
LLD
, looking at you
>.>
<.<
My Playfair cypher was TOTALLY legal that game~ <3
What the hell is this about Hindu?
In post 24, Cabd wrote: In post 20, Kagami wrote:AD, your plan makes it impossible for masons to ever out their N1 results without completely revealing the set, and makes it extremely dangerous to even hint at them.
This ALSO actually makes claims at lynch pretty fucking terrible too.
Assuming 3-4 scum here...
Claims of "I'm a mason" are a terrible conundrum. We don't want a second mason to claim to confirm it should it be legit; but otoh as scum, a counterclaim still kills one of our three.
Whilst Cabd is dead now I'm baffled by this post, as he seems to be forgetting the Daughters have the ability to hide, and as such can't be directly killed by scum
In post 38, Kagami wrote:Time for the conversation to stop, I am going to present a solution we can all agree on shortly.
This post prompts me to state it seems a lot of the early game discussion around hiders seems to be done by town, I don't know if I can extrapolate any good information from it though (good means in town's interest)
Ugh Nosferatu's new avatar triggers me every time I see it, thank god I can skip his posts
In post 52, Kagami wrote:This is basically equivalent to having a publicly available lookup table with all combinations of masons and specifying what order they should visit players in. That makes sure the masons know who the other masons visited, and doesn't really allow for reverse engineering until the game is essentially over anyway.
I feel like this idea was alright, was this done or have daughters just been operating on their reads
In post 63, Vaxkiller wrote:I'm a hard _no_ on this code idea. I have no idea what your supposed to do.
Looking at his future thoughts I feel like this is okay but honestly he just rings scummy to me so far
In post 78, Kagami wrote:
This is fluffy fear-mongering.
If there's a rigged coin that lands in my favor 65% of the time, I'll bet the game on it happily even if there's a 35% chance that it costs me everything.
I guess this is a good description of what I'm feeling here: he's shooting down a theory, but he just seems to be doing it to do so, not because he truly believes it's faulty
In post 85, Maki Harukawa wrote:If 1 daughter claims it'll be obv who is and who isn't a daughter due to who they let wagon and who they don't let wagon.
Just play the game out imo maybe say who you're hiding behind if you're a daughter we look back and check or play this game out normally if we keep doing this we'll overthink
Daughters know who they are correct?
Good post, Maki starting out towny
In post 87, Maki Harukawa wrote:If we make a plan I think it should be one where daughters don't have to out
I like playing this set up like coper13 where people basically say
"if I'm a daughter I'm hiding behind _____"
In post 88, Kagami wrote:I think then it becomes very powerful to shoot people who have a lot of people hypo-hiding behind them.
Very good plan, this was discussed in a JK9++ game I replaced into recently (didn't really play it).
In post 98, Kaede Akamatsu wrote:Hmm...
The issue is that scum knowing the dauthers is less of a problem than knowing who they'll hide behind, Kagami's method makes it easy to know if they hid behind scum or not, but also makes it easy for scum to coinflip predict who they'll hide behind so long as they know their identity, say im scum and my kill fails what am i supposed to think?, everything has it's pros and cons.
THIS GUY GETS IT
SINCE THEY'RE HIDERS, WE JUST NEED TO WORRY ABOUT THEM VISITING SCUM OR THE NIGHTKILL
That's what I thought, I was dumb to think that
lol I had the same thinking, were LLD to still be alive I'd definitely be townreading her for this
In post 131, Nosferatu wrote:what are you guys even doing scum wouldn't have 3 people anyway
VOTE: kaede
Hm I can kinda get why peopl have been scumreading my predecessor, so I'm prolly gonna be on the lookout for people who seem to be pocketing my slot
In post 149, Cabd wrote:That's it indeed, you got it in one, it's because I have straw for brains and the raven told me to do it.
Nice Wizard of OZ reference