In post 111, Luca Blight wrote: In post 54, jmo16mla wrote:This post is meh. You're acting like this is a great advantavge for town so we can "hold people to their word" but in reality, you can iso someone and it would literally be more informative.
'
Meh
'? Are you actually trying to read his alignment based on a post praising the mod for putting links in the vote count?
people try to read each other based on RVS posting all the time; luca is in no way newbie enough to not realise this
harping on other people for generating content is outright detrimental
In post 113, Luca Blight wrote:I skimmed the thread and you stood out as someone just making comments that are actually pretty useless like the one I quoted above.
The fact you want to get me to L-1 not only based on nothing but when I wasn't even active at the time makes matters worse. You also drop that wagon at the first opportunity, which brings into question your motivation for doing it in the first place.
literally untrue, jmo was making comments/early reads that were fine, but some of the comments point to luca so
also this is pure AtE
"woe is me, you want this poor player to be at l-1 based on nothing"
what's wrong with the motivation
how is dropping the RVS wagon alignment indicative
notably, luca didn't point out the fact that i and a few others completely dropped their RVS wagons that they said they supported (i'm no longer voting NSG/aneninen)
he's just harping on jmo in particular, heaping on things
In post 114, Luca Blight wrote: In post 57, jmo16mla wrote: In post 55, JaydragonKing wrote:Well at least I'm trying to start up a conversation here about topics that are game related.
And for the question about Mutant, I do the same exact thing as scum that I did once as town. I have no doubt in my mind he would do the same.
Right, you voting him has no basis then.
You look like you're trying to play the same way you did last game as town, so that means you've got to be scum... what?
Since when did votes need a solid basis? Your vote on me had literally none, and yet you wanted to get me to L-1.
What is the basis behind your Creature vote?
bad take
overemphasises the hardness of RVS wagons to paint himself as the victim
jay clearly came up with reasoning for his mutant vote, and jmo was pointing out that the reasoning was flawed
plus this doesn't actually even address jmo's comment (which, admittedly, was bad)
it's just harping on jmo for being hypocritical instead of engaging in the discussion
it's standard "gotcha" scumhunting
In post 127, Luca Blight wrote:@Math
: I find it extraordinary how you could get any sort of ping from this post:
As RVS posts go, that is pretty standard.
Why did you not mention this ping at the time, instead of vaguely agreeing that I '
can be scum
' when jmo voted me? Why bother making such a remark only to change the topic entirely in your very next sentence?
In post 124, jmo16mla wrote:
Jay tried to have reasoning behind his. I didn't think it was legit. I stated this.
His reasoning is no different than that of '
gut
' - there is no real evidence what he thinks is true, he just feels it's the case.
Is there any particular reason you didn't want to get Mutant to L-1?
1. self defence by way of "hey my RVS post was standard!", apparent disbelief in the value of early gutreads
2. instead of actually asking where i got my read from (which is what you would ask if, you know, trying to sort me), he asks leading questions trying to highlight some perceived inconsistency
"WHY ARE YOU A HYPOCRITE"
"Well I mean I'm really no-"
"OKAY WHY ARE YOU NOW BEING INCONSISTENT"
"Well I think your lines of questioning are a little predato-"
"NO YOU'RE BEING PREDATORY, I'M TRYING TO CREATE INFORMATION"
^Luca in a nutshell
In post 134, Luca Blight wrote:Presumably you didn't want to get Mutant to L-1 like you did with me and Creature, or else you would have voted him instead of disagreeing with Jay. I was wondering why you didn't choose to join the wagon of an active player, rather than start a wagon on an absentee.
Why mention you're looking at my scum games? Do you do that every time you take a metadive?
how is this actually going to ever help determine jmo's alignment
like what kinds of responses are you even looking for here
and again with the victimisation, calling himself an absentee as if that matters
In post 142, Luca Blight wrote: In post 139, Mathdino wrote:@Luca: Like dude both of the people you're aggressively interrogating (and that your whole ISO is directed to) are the only 2 people who suspected you
What is your point exactly?
I'm not aggressively interrogating you; I'm just pointing out your dubious scumread based on my RVS post.
i mean i think my point is pretty obvious here
like that post IS the point
and so i don't see the point of asking this question
In post 143, Luca Blight wrote: In post 141, Mathdino wrote:Then how do you expect to get out of RVS
Gimme a break, this is how the game goes
Talk about your reads on others
What are you talking about? RVS was long gone by the time jmo voted me and you agreed that I '
can be scum
'.
Your comment was terrible. Face it.
ah yep and now back to deflecting on me
ignoring the point tho
RVS is used to get early reads on people
jmo had an early read based on your RVS post
so did i
what about that is not okay
and how does you being absent actually make a difference