Mini Normal 2108 : 1st game
-
-
Rabid Schnauzer
-
-
Rabid Schnauzer Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 592
- Joined: October 30, 2019
-
-
Rabid Schnauzer Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 592
- Joined: October 30, 2019
You haven't noticed that this is against the rules?In post 54, Robbnva wrote:that will ultimately drive me to replace out if his behaviour continues.-
-
Rabid Schnauzer Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 592
- Joined: October 30, 2019
-
-
Rabid Schnauzer Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 592
- Joined: October 30, 2019
Except...this entire postIn post 91, Robbnva wrote:Well people have accused people of things that are nai. You being one of them. Me saying what I said and using legit (besides the fact that legit is part of my vocabulary) means that the stuff I find scummy are things I’ve actually seen scum do. Instead of using a long work like actually, I say legit. If y’all want to call it a slip go ahead but it isn’t. Your line of thinking doesn’t even make sense on a logical or even common sense level so I’m not going to worry about it.isyou worrying about it.-
-
Rabid Schnauzer Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 592
- Joined: October 30, 2019
Yes, that's what I thought as well. The "legit" line of discussion seems like a straw man distraction.In post 93, skitter30 wrote:
the key part was this part ^In post 89, skitter30 wrote:and it kinda implies you feel like this situation needs some credibility because rn you're bullshitting so you're comparing it to a ~true~ time you've caught scum this way-
-
Rabid Schnauzer Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 592
- Joined: October 30, 2019
In post 65, Hectic wrote:I accuse people, see how they react, and then sort.
It's why I poked so many people with my first posts in the game.
Reads list incoming.
Why can't you reaction test someone by accusing them and seeing how they react?In post 66, Robbnva wrote:That’s a way I guess. You can’t really reaction test people that way-
-
Rabid Schnauzer Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 592
- Joined: October 30, 2019
You don't get to declare what can or cannot be a reaction test (above), and you don't get to declare that AtE is NAI. It gets mentioned enough that it has an acronym and a wiki page, so apparently a lot of people think it can be AI. This is (at least) the second instance of you trying to control the narrative by declaring what counts as valid scum hunting.In post 73, Robbnva wrote:You’ve basically ignored game relevant discussion for something insignificant. If you think I broke a rule. Report me and move on. And ATE is NAI so you really should focus on more important things if you are town.-
-
Rabid Schnauzer Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 592
- Joined: October 30, 2019
You're scum.In post 74, Robbnva wrote:What are your thoughts about what’s actually happened?
You try to misrep me as only coming in on the replace out issue. Fact is I had already changed my RVS vote to a serious vote on you due to your reaction to Hectic's posts, which clearly seemed to be joking or RT to me.-
-
Rabid Schnauzer Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 592
- Joined: October 30, 2019
Bad post.In post 101, Tchill13 wrote:got my eye on skitter's probing of robb for sure.-
-
Rabid Schnauzer Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 592
- Joined: October 30, 2019
This appears to be exactly what you accused me of doing with the rule break accusation.In post 110, Robbnva wrote:
You should probably learn the definition of straw man before before using it. That isn’t an example of straw manIn post 107, Rabid Schnauzer wrote:Yes, that's what I thought as well. The "legit" line of discussion seems like a straw man distraction.-
-
Rabid Schnauzer Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 592
- Joined: October 30, 2019
In post 45, Robbnva wrote:Also Did you really accuse me of going after something easy to push? Try Harding and calming non ai things scummy are likethings I’ve legit see scum do. I say SUP and don’t try to advance the game on page one ever game I play, as well as more then 75% of the players on the site. So if anyone is attacking easy things it’s you sir
You seem to think that it's valid to read people in part based on things you've seen scum do. Yet, when I do just that, you argue that ti's invalid.In post 115, Robbnva wrote:I can actually. I can do whatever I want. Reaction tests are almost never reliable cause you have to know how somebody reacts as town and scum. Just cause you see a reaction you don’t like doesn’t mean that person is scum or even scummy.
Ate is nai cause town use ate also. You can’t determine alignment by ate and that’s been proven over and over.-
-
Rabid Schnauzer Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 592
- Joined: October 30, 2019
Another bad post. You generally can't have deep, nuanced reasoning by post 11, or 12, or 29. This post is also easy reasoning that makes you look like you're doing something.In post 59, Tchill13 wrote:In post 12, BrightEyedFish wrote:EBWOP
My vote is on wake because this was going to be my excuse if I have trouble getting engaged on D1.these are eazy votes with eazy reasoning. Nobodies gonna argue with this stuff. Looks like you're doing something.
of the 2 i find bright eyes scummier. my vote's already there.
FOS: tchill
This could very well be tchill's scum game.-
-
Rabid Schnauzer Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 592
- Joined: October 30, 2019
-
-
Rabid Schnauzer Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 592
- Joined: October 30, 2019
So, despite all the shade you're casting my way, you don't find me scummier than anyone else. Interesting.
-
-
Rabid Schnauzer Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 592
- Joined: October 30, 2019
Why not? I had already made a RVS vote. I then changed to another person and gave a reason. That's usually considered a real vote.In post 132, Robbnva wrote:I really didn’t consider that a real vote.-
-
Rabid Schnauzer
-
-
Rabid Schnauzer Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 592
- Joined: October 30, 2019
Since tchill knows you both, that's even more reason he should have a position on your 1v1.In post 140, Robbnva wrote:while I agree that tchill probably should start adding content, I don't really see this as fence sitting. tchill knows how I am a player. It seems tchill knows how hectic is as a player. If I was playing how I normally do, this game would already be at page 20 of me and hectic fighting back and forth.-
-
Rabid Schnauzer Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 592
- Joined: October 30, 2019
Scummy AF.In post 142, Robbnva wrote:hectic - what do you make of schnauzer's playstyle shift after getting called out? ignore the points he made because tbh the points he made could be made as either alignment, does the playstyle shift itself concern you?-
-
Rabid Schnauzer Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 592
- Joined: October 30, 2019
I didn't. Maybe you're conflating 74 and 105.In post 141, Robbnva wrote:schnauzer, why did you answer my question that I asked bef?-
-
Rabid Schnauzer Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 592
- Joined: October 30, 2019
Nah, you're not casting shade...In post 149, Robbnva wrote:before three people mentioned-
-
Rabid Schnauzer Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 592
- Joined: October 30, 2019
Of course, you think they're NAI facts, so...why keep repeating it?In post 152, Robbnva wrote:again, telling the truth isn't casting shade. I am sorry if you think so but the facts remain. before me and 2 others call you out your only real contribution is "you broke a rule" after that you decide to contribute.
Those are facts. take it however you want but that is what happened.-
-
Rabid Schnauzer Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 592
- Joined: October 30, 2019
-
-
Rabid Schnauzer Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 592
- Joined: October 30, 2019
-
-
Rabid Schnauzer Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 592
- Joined: October 30, 2019
Fish's style makes him a bad D1 lynch. You'll get no information from it. Anyone can find reason to hop on or off a fish wagon.In post 161, Hectic wrote:Damn, Fish's reads list is terrible. Haven't got time now but will elaborate later.
VOTE: Fish-
-
Rabid Schnauzer Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 592
- Joined: October 30, 2019
Yes, that's it, thanks. I need to review but IIRC skitter correctly read both of us (I survived despite that due to a fake claim). If that's the case, and if I can get comfortable that skitter is town, then I can sheep her fish read.In post 164, BrightEyedFish wrote:
Maybe you're thinking of Pret MafiaIn post 163, Rabid Schnauzer wrote:@fish:do you recall a game in which I was scum, you were town, and a neighborhood played a big role? I think (but not sure) skitter might have been in it too. I'd like to read it but can't find it. If you know what game that is please let me know. Thanks.
viewtopic.php?f=23&t=78424-
-
Rabid Schnauzer Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 592
- Joined: October 30, 2019
I clearly did start pushing you with the FOS in 120. I can only vote one player at a time, and I started pushing robb first.In post 171, Tchill13 wrote:if you want to start pushing me start pushing me. Shade gets you nowhere.-
-
Rabid Schnauzer Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 592
- Joined: October 30, 2019
In the first 30 posts, either alignment will do so, as there's just not much to go on.In post 179, Tchill13 wrote: let me ask you this. Is town or scum better off hoping on trends and making easy vote posts or trying to solve OTHER things early?
Yeah, that's why I suspect you. You repeatedly commented on robb v hectic without taking a stance.I tend to town lean those that go against the wind early since they're taking a blatant stance or are trying to generate more content.
opposed to what basic scum do, go with the flow.-
-
Rabid Schnauzer Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 592
- Joined: October 30, 2019
Yep...except for the fact that IIn post 190, Tchill13 wrote:essentially most players will take a stance on hectic and robb then the game will go from there.
there's no reason for that to happen since every time BOTH players are town they'll prob get in a huge argument like this.
I refuse to let this turn into the robb v hectic game this early.
Seems like thats EXACTLY what rabid wants.changedit from robb v hectic to robb v me.-
-
Rabid Schnauzer Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 592
- Joined: October 30, 2019
So...why did you engage in it? You just felt like providing cover for scum?In post 193, Robbnva wrote:the me vs hectic isn't even anything serious. It's two playstyles clashing. You can't determine alignment from either of us based on what has been posted so far. anyone who claims they can is clearly lying to themselves or lying to us.-
-
Rabid Schnauzer Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 592
- Joined: October 30, 2019
I did some checking and saw you say this in another game where you were town, so I suppose it's NAI. But in a micro, two mislynches puts us in lylo, so you're saying you're not participating in HALF the lynches before potential lylo. You probably shouldn't play micros with that approach.In post 10, Wake1 wrote:Hey all.
My general play-style Day 1 is to lurk in the background. Take a breath. Breathe out.
I'll be observing Day 1, and going hardcore Day 2 and on. That's how I roll. I'll still pick at things during Day 1 if they catch my attention. I'm probably going to make a copy/paste post about this for all games I play, because it gets annoying when some ree in light of this information.
I'll be observing in the background. Please don't assume that I'm not present when you're posting.-
-
Rabid Schnauzer Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 592
- Joined: October 30, 2019
Which do you think it is?In post 201, Robbnva wrote:you are either scum or incredibly conf.biased-
-
Rabid Schnauzer Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 592
- Joined: October 30, 2019
And is rabid's reputation for making unique plays, or for playing as by-the-books as possible?In post 204, Tchill13 wrote:is rabid genuinely concerned about tchill being wary of easy goers then not taking a stance on robb/hectic? Does he genuinely think scum! robb is gonna make that particular reason why he votes hectic and starts all this crap (shitty reasoning imo)
or is rabid making a lot of noise and trying to get rid of robb here because that'd be a unique play for scum here....
thats the question.-
-
Rabid Schnauzer Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 592
- Joined: October 30, 2019
This is a micro. We unfortunately don't have the luxury of taking out lynch bait on D1. BEF is better left to PRs, or as I noted, skitter (if town) can probably read him. Votes on BEF at this point are lazy AF.In post 208, Tchill13 wrote:rabid Defending BEF then FOS'ing me doesnt make sense for the reasons rabid stated imo.
If all you got is meta to defend BEF and you're gonna white knight him this early... what the hell.-
-
Rabid Schnauzer Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 592
- Joined: October 30, 2019
OK.In post 218, Tchill13 wrote:then vote someone not named hectic or robb. Because from where I sit if every player was town here those 2 would be the biggest lynchbait.
VOTE: Tchill13-
-
Rabid Schnauzer Goon
-
-
Rabid Schnauzer Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 592
- Joined: October 30, 2019
Do you really find it mystifying that sometimes Player A can read Player C better than Player B can read Player C? I don't think it's unusual at all. I don't think you really find it unusual either, so this line is strengthening my scum read on you.In post 222, Tchill13 wrote:let the records show BEF is at least worth the use of a night action or skitter's read.
While rabid is man enough to make HIS OWN read on tchill. devoid of claimed PR's or Goddesses of the skitterarian mythology.-
-
Rabid Schnauzer Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 592
- Joined: October 30, 2019
Why not? Seriously, you don't really believe that both you and tchill both have played so squeaky clean as to be above a push, do you?In post 223, Robbnva wrote:rabid is such a bizarre character. None of his pushes or even his play make any sense as town,-
-
Rabid Schnauzer Goon
-
-
Rabid Schnauzer Goon
-
-
Rabid Schnauzer Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 592
- Joined: October 30, 2019
Drama queen much?In post 240, Tchill13 wrote:and as rabid pointed out. its a micro game. nobody should get a pass.
unless skitter is indeed town (no basis for this), then skitter gets to decide the game for us.
One sheeped vote on one player (and only IF I can get comfortable with skitter) does not equate to "skitter gets to decide the game for us."
Again, your reactions are really troubling me.
Do you realize that the game hasn't even been going for 48 hours yet?"if skitter is town" Rabid has done nothing to sort skitter. I dont believe more than 1 question or statement has been pointed at skit from rabid.
I have some things that I'll watch for when skitter addresses the new content.-
-
Rabid Schnauzer Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 592
- Joined: October 30, 2019
LOL - you don't think I've been sorting you?In post 241, Robbnva wrote:this is what I am talking about re rabid. He isn't trying to sort anyone.-
-
Rabid Schnauzer Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 592
- Joined: October 30, 2019
Yes, reason was given.In post 244, Robbnva wrote: no because by your own admission you voted me seriously in post 29 (for no reason mind you)
How do you know how I sort?and all your posts have been attacks/shading and no actual attempt to actually sort me. they are all conf. biased with me being scum. There is no objectivity.
FWIW, I didn't remove my vote from you just because tchill challenged me to do so. I'm considering the possibility that you're emotional and overly defensive town. If you were at L-1 right now I wouldn't hammer.-
-
Rabid Schnauzer Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 592
- Joined: October 30, 2019
For crying out loud, it was page 5.In post 245, Robbnva wrote:There is no evidence of sorting between your vote on me and this post.-
-
Rabid Schnauzer Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 592
- Joined: October 30, 2019
Because I was sorting you, not hectic (who I have a town lean on) nor skitter (who IMO isn't sortable through pressure).In post 246, Robbnva wrote:Rabid. Why was I accused of misrepping you regarding the rule violation but you ignored hectic and skitter (who I honestly feel like if you are scum, you are trying to buddy here)-
-
Rabid Schnauzer Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 592
- Joined: October 30, 2019
You're projecting. Maybe you prefer to sort through gentle questioning, rather than pressure. I in general prefer pressure. And, my read on you has adjusted because of it.In post 251, Robbnva wrote: I can only go off what i see and your entire iso has been skewed towards me being scum. So you are either conf. biased or are scum. if you were sorting me, there would be more questions trying to understand my thought process.-
-
Rabid Schnauzer Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 592
- Joined: October 30, 2019
OK. Sorry to hear your mind is closed this early, but really we need to end this now anyway as I suspect it's TvT and providing cover for scum.In post 255, Robbnva wrote:at this point you need to not worry about convincing me you are town.-
-
Rabid Schnauzer Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 592
- Joined: October 30, 2019
I'm not providing a summary, or focusing on just 40 posts, but here's where I'm at with robb and tchill:In post 261, bob3141 wrote:So can soemone sum up what all these last 40 posts ahve been about. As it just looks like dialogue between 3 players. So can each player sum up whats been talked about in their opinion
robb - somewhere in null. I would say lean town - he could easily just be naturally defensive and over-emotional town - BUT, I saw one scum game where his posting was much different than it is here, and in that game he admitted that he was playing differently than usual. That shows that he's aware of his own playstyle and able to manipulate it. So, I'm concerned he might just be doing that in another way here. I'm also concerned about his appeals against me to other players - particularly hectic, who was supposedly his only scum read at the time. I don't understand the mentality of trying to work with your scum read.
tchill - scummy. Unlike robb, my interaction with him has strengthened my scum read on him. I've played scum and town with him, and this seems like scum to me. His town game is more logical. I don't buy this bullshit outrage he's making at my saying that I might sheep skitter on fish. That's a really minor thing - feels like he's grasping at something to attack because I'm hitting some valid points.-
-
Rabid Schnauzer Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 592
- Joined: October 30, 2019
Here's the scum game, which you won with skitter:In post 268, Robbnva wrote:
link?In post 266, Rabid Schnauzer wrote:I saw one scum game where his posting was much different than it is here, and in that game he admitted that he was playing differently than usual.
viewtopic.php?f=2&t=80934
I was wrong that you said you were playing differently there. Must have been someone else, or I was thinking of what you said earlier in this game: "I can't speak for hectic, but tchill knows I can actually copy my town meta as scum."-
-
Rabid Schnauzer Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 592
- Joined: October 30, 2019
-
-
Rabid Schnauzer Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 592
- Joined: October 30, 2019
What are your open alts?In post 274, Robbnva wrote:tbh, if I was scum I would be too afraid of changing my meta/playstyle. Obviously you have to just take my word for it but under one of my accounts (probably jfsf) I did try and change my play but I rolled scum and it is so much easier to bull in a china shop as scum than it is to experiment with a new playstyle. Everyone is automatically going to wonder why the change. As town i don't care how I am perceived. As scum I absolutely do.-
-
Rabid Schnauzer Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 592
- Joined: October 30, 2019
He felt more like frustrated omgussy town than scum. Plus, when I backed off on the scum read, he kept pushing back at me, even harder in fact. When a scum is pressured in a heavy 1v1 and manages to placate his opponent, he tends to either then mend things to some extent with the opponent, or at least let the matter drop.In post 285, Hectic wrote:How did your read adjust from pressuring Robb?
When I read his ISO in a couple scum games. His tone is very different here. BUT, I do see signs of the scum tone starting to creep in.At what point did you start figuring he was Town?-
-
Rabid Schnauzer Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 592
- Joined: October 30, 2019
If you would, you know...actually participate in the current game, people wouldn't have to go to old games...In post 311, Wake1 wrote:You shouldn't use posts from very old, past games to determine my current gameplay.-
-
Rabid Schnauzer Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 592
- Joined: October 30, 2019
That's not at all true, and I think you're smart enough to know that.In post 338, Tchill13 wrote:you obv think robb is town if im scum ind. of robb.-
-
Rabid Schnauzer Goon
-
-
Rabid Schnauzer Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 592
- Joined: October 30, 2019
The way you did it I'd call it a really weak defense of robb.In post 363, Tchill13 wrote:
what do you call disintegrating a fight between hectic/robb then eventually saying hectic would be scum of the two?In post 361, Rabid Schnauzer wrote: LMAO - you hard defended robb?-
-
Rabid Schnauzer Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 592
- Joined: October 30, 2019
LMAO again. You're admitting that you're picking and choosing what points of skitter's posts you'll even bother toIn post 364, Tchill13 wrote:rabid is picking and choosing points to attack.
skitter is taking a conversation directed towards rabid and manipulating it so i look a certain way.
im sorry im not seeing some of your info skit. I loathe the huge wall posts.read.-
-
Rabid Schnauzer Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 592
- Joined: October 30, 2019
And yet you mention him.In post 366, Tchill13 wrote:if you notice those that do participate usually get FOS'd. Wake will not reach more than 3 votes this day phase. Ever. He very well could be scum but hey who cares...
ppl always say they care then they ignore the inactive slot entirely d1. If someone likes they can portray this posts as an attempt to deflect from my situation atm.
so its pointless to even mention wake.-
-
Rabid Schnauzer Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 592
- Joined: October 30, 2019
Yeah, like when I quoted five of your posts that were all fence sittty on robb/hectic.In post 371, Tchill13 wrote:"the way" as in you have a specific idea of HOW something is.
Would you like me to do it again?-
-
Rabid Schnauzer Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 592
- Joined: October 30, 2019
Bad move. This isn't his town game. In my experience with him as scum, he's bad at it on D1, but gets better with each passing day. So, be really sure you don't scum read him today, because if he's scum, today is the day to catch him.In post 376, skitter30 wrote:Ok i think i get where you're coming from better, i dont think i sr u super strongly anymore
-
-