I dont know why you think it's so apparentIn post 2298, ssbm_Kyouko wrote:it seems apparent that S_S visited Critter and theres no way you're all scum who are not seeing this
Dunn one feels more straightforward to me
I dont know why you think it's so apparentIn post 2298, ssbm_Kyouko wrote:it seems apparent that S_S visited Critter and theres no way you're all scum who are not seeing this
ehIn post 2300, ssbm_Kyouko wrote:This could also potentially point to hiding behind Dunnstral: "I can get behind this", but the problem with this as a crumb is he goes on to say "I'm going to have to favor the one who's probably going to be dead tomorrow", indicating he's favoring LLD, who doesnt make sense as a target. I feel that if this post were meant as a crumb, it would have been worded more carefully so it could not be misinterpreted. There's even potential here that there's some kind of EMMI crumb toward the end if this post. This post is too unclear to be a crumb, so I'm going to assume it was not one, and "getting behind" something is not a crumb on the same level as "hiding behind" something as a Hider crumb.In post 2051, Something_Smart wrote:I can get behind this.
It's quite unfortunate that two people I respect are disagreeing so heavily, but I'm going to have to favor the one who's probably going to be dead tomorrow.
Also, I think I agree with the reads here-- I can follow the town reasoning for SM, but Emmi not so much. But of course it's entirely possible LLD sees something I don't.
Another thing is that this post is in a middle of a real time exchange where replies are literally one minute after another, and I kind of doubt that S_S thought to place a crumb there within that one minuteIn post 1613, Something_Smart wrote:Huh, that's interesting. To me it seems clearly like something that can happen to town or scum. My main point with the post was just that hiding behind the alt was ineffective and it was responsible for some of his problems this game.In post 1610, ssbm_Kyouko wrote:So what do you think this indicates for Critter then? I did assume you were TRing him because of this post, because if that's what I thought was happening, I would TR him for it:
"hiding behind the alt" was referring to this btw, for anyone who lost the thread of repliesIn post 1556, Something_Smart wrote:I personally think it was fine. Critter was attempting to have his cake and eat it too. You can't simultaneously preserve a secret alt and expect people to treat you the way they would treat someone with 30,000 posts.
eh sure targeting me would not be a bad idea, Im just saying the posts youre talking about do not indicate thatIn post 2326, Towelie wrote:And clearing those players to know if you can trust those reads is often a great strategy, no?
So yeah, there is 100% a crumb.In post 4081, Something_Smart wrote:Weak roles should always always crumb, no exceptions.In post 4076, insomnia wrote:Btw why do people expect everyone to have crumbs
another relevant SS quote I foundSomething_Smart wrote:Gonna have to call BS on this. I've been mis-exed because people thought that a hider visited me, the person they had been pushing all day.In post 621, Almost50 wrote:ISO PP. He voted implo in RVS, was focused on him all day, and revoted him to reassert his crumb.
News flash, hiders want to not visit scum. You do not hide behind a person you're scumreading. That's terrible play.
Have you read?In post 2337, Gamma Emerald wrote:Have anything better?In post 2332, Wisdom wrote:that's not a crumb Bork.
Something_Smart wrote:It's not a clear crumb. It doesn't mean it's not a starting point. But it's not like "I could get behind SS" or "I'll be looking into SS overnight" level clear.
whatIn post 2389, ssbm_Kyouko wrote:he's scum whether or not he's a doctor.
no there isn't. He said he could get behind "this", this being the quoted person, Dunn. The rest of the post is not relevant.In post 2397, ssbm_Kyouko wrote:. There is too much in 2051 that could point at a different player for it to have been a Dunnstral crumb.
Even if not a doctor it's guaranteed a protective exists. Macho does not affect other preventions such as blocks on the killer. It only stops protectives from working.In post 2396, ssbm_Kyouko wrote:There's no guarantee a doctor exists in the setup. There are other ways kills can be prevented.In post 2317, Wisdom wrote:But yeah with the doc claim and no cc I feel like Critter's pretty conftown, so thats another point against that crumb being the one
How is a neighborizer powerfulIn [url=https://forum.mafiascum.net/viewtopic.php?p=13116538#p13116538]post 2589[/url], Milk & Mocha wrote:probly the most powerful one still alive