14 I like this post. Finds something odd and comments on it. Discussion is good.
17 This is generally a good response.
19 Of the posts on the first page, this one is my favorite. Nom lays down a naked vote and Drake immediately pounces.
24 I think my predecessor has misconceptions about the RVS stage. Ambiguity might be anti-town. But promoting discussion and trying to move us away from RVS is pro-town.
26 I can see a player of both alignments saying this. A town player might see it as a reason to push something they think is suspicious. A scum-player might use it as a reason to jump on the wagon. I'll leave it as null.
29 Sounds frustrated. TRG wants a solid response from Nom about the vote and Nom keeps skirting around it with his SE interactions.
33 The push here is just okay. I don't see Second's justification to be that big of a deal.
34 This post is good, but it's not alignment indicative. I can see any experienced player making this statement.
35 This is a good post and something that should have been addressed. Probably the only thing that points to town in this little clutter of posts.
37 Still a solid defense.
38 Interesting chip-in by JacobSavage. I don't know how to appraise it because I thought he was just a hardcore lurker. Must be his IC responsibilities.
39 This person has been fairly disappointing so far. A lot of fluff and talk about rust. I hope it gets better.
41 Interesting observation that should have led to him making or discussing reads.
43 I like the discussion in this post as a whole. I feel like Drake is actually trying to piece this out. It feels genuine. My general rule of thumb is RVS ends as soon as people start pushing each other and try to form reads.
You can read more on it here.
46 This is an interesting response from Nom that I don't find alignment indicative, but only because I think it could have been faked.
47 The explanation for the vote is pretty sound here and the discussion that was generated from said vote was pretty good. I like the timing of when he decided to give his reasoning. Any longer and the responses he would have garnered would have been weird and probably not usable.
49 Oddly enough, I actually like this response. I can see how the two posts between Second and JS could be comparable.
50 His vote on Frettory reminds me of me.
I was destined for this slot.
52 On one hand, I'm scum-reading the push against Second because it feels out of place. On the other, she makes a good point that the statement didn't need the sarcasm tag. The interactions with TRG are pretty good though and I like how she's clearing things up. I like the part about her asking TRG why he just immediately assumed Nom's vote was serious. The one thing I don't like is Raven calling out a misrep against her.
53 Second's post actually kind of does compare to the post from JS. Neither one was meant to be taken seriously. I can see the issue Raven has with Second though, as it looks like he's trying to share blame. But it makes sense to me from his perspective.
56 First serious vote from this slot this game. It does worry me that it comes after Raven's push on the slot and it might be to hop on a wagon before it gains steam. I need to see more.
58 Regarding unvotes, it's better to take your vote off of someone you don't find scummy and move it to somebody that you do find scummy. I have a bad habit of leaving my votes on people too long because I don't know where else to put it. Everything else in the post looks town to me.
61 Another weird chip-in from JS. But I can see why he would be uncomfortable with Tigris.
62 Good response.
63 Who was your main suspect and why weren't you voting him? Montosh replaced Frettory and wasn't at L-1. TRG was at L-2 and I don't remember you scum-reading him.
64 I wonder what caused him to unvote and if a re-read had anything to do with it (looking at timestamps here).
65 This is an okay post. Good questions, but shallow.
66 What about it holds merit? I feel like this argument is getting way more credit than it deserves.
68 Some players can be very open as scum. Openness is not a town-tell.
69 This guy is still in full-blown SE mode right now. It feels genuine, but not town.
70 This is an interesting response that I don't find scummy. So this wasn't the reason he was lynched, or at least it shouldn't have been.
74 This is a very iffy post. Insider information isn't scummy as people tend to be more familiar with certain players. I also don't like the FOS at the end. He's not voting anybody, so I don't see a reason to not vote. And the FOS on Nom instead of Raven is a red flag. If anything got him lynched, it was probably this post.
75 Interesting observation from JS. But the post that raises the red flags is 74, not 70.
79 I like this guy. He's the only person oozing towniness for me. Everyone else is sketchy.
83 Really? I don't see how this makes post 70 scum-motivated. He obviously saw something he didn't like and pulled his vote back for that reason. You're attacking the wrong post.
85 Good attack from notscience.
86 Another bad post from Montosh. He's not looking so hot.
87 And notscience revives the slot for me. Been scum-reading Raven up till this point.
89 This sounds genuine.
90 
Not really sold on a town-read at this stage of the game. He hasn't really done anything. If at any point I'm convinced he's scum, I'm coming after him. You've seen this.
92 I'm really interested to hear why it's more likely to be scum-motivated instead of town-motivated. This jump feels wrong.
93 He redeems himself here though.
95 The logic here is pretty impressive coming from a newbie, but it's pretty sound. The only part I have an issue with is the "Montosh seems like a follower. Does that make him scum?" part. It feels like he's still trying to shed responsibility. It's still pretty damn impressive, though. Would have been nice if this wasn't the only person he tried to scum-hunt.
97 What have you been doing this game?
99 This is a pretty good post and it's kind of like the icing on the cake. It genuinely feels like he thinks he may have caught scum.
101 Why do you think JS could have been a buddy with Montosh?
102 I'm extremely interested in the logic here, notscience.
103 I generally like the logic presented in this post. But there are no new lines of thought. Feels like you're going along with the flow this game.
104 This is an okay post. I agree that Raven was kind of suspicious, but not for the reasoning in 74.
105 I'd find it hard to believe that this is scum-notscience at this point. He makes too much sense.
107 This makes me sad because he is. Both town and scum can feel trapped. The trick is distinguishing the difference between the two.
108 I can see notscience thinking this. But I've given town the feeling of being trapped. My walls do that to people.
110 Being wagoned and up for a lynch puts you in a very good spot because you can try to pick out which players are most likely to be scum based on the way they're pushing you. I find notscience to be the least likely right now. I feel like notscience legitimately believes you are scum. The other people (with the exception of Second), not so much.
112 Pretty good argument, but I'd like to see more out of this slot.
114 I wonder what your opinion on said "not neutral" action was.
115 The gingerly argument is iffy for me because you're not applying it to Second as well (or Spaces, or Tigris). The part about voting you instead of Raven is good, but would have been better if notscience hadn't already pointed out.
121
And this is where I stop because TRG has a reads list on the next page and I need sleep.
Town
Drake
notscience
Nom
Second Engineer
Spaces
Jacob
Montosh
Tigris
Scum
Since his last entrance into this game, he hasn't really done much except pressure JS. I wish he would at least explain why Montosh was a scum-read instead of trying to state the obvious.