First! lol
Exactly what scum would say....hmmmm...
Get out of here with your arithmetic and numbers, we don't abide by that kind of witchcraft here.
It's ok, you dont have to be sorry.In post 22, Friend Computer wrote:Sorry, but I'm a ground-type.
First! lol
Exactly what scum would say....hmmmm...
Get out of here with your arithmetic and numbers, we don't abide by that kind of witchcraft here.
It's ok, you dont have to be sorry.In post 22, Friend Computer wrote:Sorry, but I'm a ground-type.
I'm just waiting for everyone to post before I decide who to vote for.In post 24, ssbm_Kyouko wrote:Hey that's a lot of writing and not a lot of voting you're doing there
VOTE: the_end
rb hasn't voted for anyone yet.In post 27, ssbm_Kyouko wrote:He's voting someone already. It's okay to just pick a name at random off the list and vote it. It's expected really that you start by voting for someone, especially if you're one of the first few players to post in the game. Sometimes you don't get online until a few pages have passed and then you'll want to check the vote count before you vote so you don't put yourself onto a big wagon you don't actually support.
What do you mean exactly when you say, "I didn't like the direction Zekro's vote was leading to". Two votes is hardly a wagon and it's still quite early in the day. Unvoting rb seems to suggest you've already made your mind up about him. Is this so?In post 47, Sofiel wrote:#43 moved my vote because I didn't like the direction Zekro's vote was leading to/didn't want to be part of a wagon on someone I wasn't 100% sure is scum. Generally standing by that decision bc I wanted to see if rb would continue with conversational/humour posts in lieu of scumhunting ones and the direction of #46 looks promising
Friend I'm wondering about you, what's your opinion on how things are going so far? I'm wondering because the only posts I've seen from you are ones that aren't giving any tells but a random vote/chipping in by giving neutral info
It's all fun and games until some one dies of dysenteryIn post 44, rb wrote:Wagons are the best. I always wagon
or shotIn post 53, ssbm_Kyouko wrote:or ropeIn post 52, the_end wrote:It's all fun and games until some one dies of dysenteryIn post 44, rb wrote:Wagons are the best. I always wagon
5 scumreads, 1 townread and 2 nullreads. Admittedly scumread "heavy" but that's how I see it.
Hmmm, so first you unvote rb. Now quickly unvoted someone else because of what rb said. Also, from #113, you're pretty confident rb's scrumreads are correct.In post 116, Sofiel wrote:ahh man, I'm trying my best, but that does make a lot of sense. UNVOTE: Zekromaster
I think I should clarify my readlist. When I say "Tending towards scum" I mean "NullScum" rather than "LeanScum". I stand by my scum reads. You've quoted me as saying, "I'm not sure", I don't think I said that anywhere. My reads aren't simple statements where I push a singular narrative of a player's alignment. I tried to reason a player's alignment from their "scum-like" actions and their "town-like" actions.In post 135, Aeronaut wrote:This is where I'm at.
{NT}Sofiel [S: 38*][T: 47, 116]
{NT}rb (SE) [T: 118]
{N}ThinkBig(SE)
{N}ssbm_Kyouko (SE) [T: 43][S: 75]
{N}lucca261 [T: 84, 89][S: 93*, 118*]
{NS}the_end [S: RL*]
{NS}Friend Computer [S: 101*]
{LS}Zekromaster [S: 41*, 103*]
Spoiler: ***
Spoiler: Key
Ditto about Sofiel.In post 140, rb wrote:I kinda want Sofiel to take some stronger stances though
I saw her initial push as town but the unvote so sudden wasn't really town and I don't like that she didn't reaffirm her stance when I encouraged her to. It's like she just sort of gave up and it feels scummy to me, like scum trying to push and being shut down and then returning to lurking.
What does
I thought #102 was meant for Friend not me. I thought TB's reaction was a bit odd. He kept defending himself, which I thought was odd. I'd have expected someone to respond just once to your rather baseless accusation of him reading from his PM (which I believe you did just to get a rise out of him) and then move on instead of defending himself over and over.In post 171, ssbm_Kyouko wrote: Going to address the bolded in order.
- My vote was a reaction test because I decided to withhold my reason for voting him when I voted him. I had already noticed the posts I quoted in 81 when I pushed on TB. I didn't come up with those reasons after seeing a bad reaction to my vote.
- 102 was directed at the_end who had posted something on a partial catch-up up to page 3 I believe. I told them to finish their catch-up and comment on my exchange because they were the player I thought TB was chainsawing for, and I wasn't sure if it was because they were scum together or if it was TB trying to pocket the_end. the_end put gave weak stances on both of us that implied he either didn't fully understand my 81 or hadn't read it. I wanted to hear what he thought of my accusing TB of chainsawing him, so I told him to finish catching up and then comment on it. And of course I was happy voting TB at the time, he was my top SR at the time.
- That was not me clearly stating I'd voted him for the comment about daytalk, that was me explaining in my answer that your question wasn't worded correctly because the answer wasn't as simple as the closed-ended question suggested. I clarified that I
bothhad a reason to vote himandthat my vote was reaction testing him.
Why do you think it's a terrible wagon? Why are you so sure he's town?In post 178, rb wrote:I really think kyouko is a terrible leading wagon. can we not? ty
I'm not entirely sure what "chainsawing" means (I couldnt find it on the wiki glossary). I think he was attacking rb for keeping the bandwagon on me going until I was L2. This was quite early on Day 1, which I think at that point put TB off. Ironically, TB has just put me at L2 with his vote in #201.In post 195, ssbm_Kyouko wrote:@the_endIn post 172, ssbm_Kyouko wrote:My last post reminded me you never did explain full thoughts on my TB exchange after I followed your 97 with 102. Specifically, what do you think of my suspicion that TB was chainsawing for you by attacking rb, which I detailed in 81?In post 165, the_end wrote:I'm catching up. Let me know if I missed anything
I get the feeling you're pushing for a fast lynch to take the heat of yourself. So far your reads have been inconsistent (to the point of being all over the place) and from Lucca's post in #151 its clear that you don't have any reads of your own but are only parroting what other people have said. This isn't necessarily a scummy thing. It could just be lazy playing on your part. I haven't voted for you yet because I don't want to put anyone at L1 because I'm not completely sure who is scum. Perhaps this is not the right thing to do because I don't think anyone is sure who is scum this early in the game but a lynch is likely to happen in any case.In post 198, Zekromaster wrote:the_end is basically accusing everyone except him and two other players, and has a single townread (which I suspect may be the other scum, but I'm not 100% certain of this because it may just be a random player he chose to "townread" to avoid suspicions). I just don't trust him, and rereading my posts and the topic I get the feel I got all my first reads wrong and that he actually is scum (the "right" reads are those in post #148).In post 196, Sofiel wrote:A question to everyone: In simple quick terms say who you support for the D1 lynch and why.
Like I said in my response in #165, I was arguing a players allegiance from both their scum-like and town-like actions. After weighing both sides I decided my stand on players' allegiance. There isn't any player who I'm sure is scum (At the moment, I dont think there's any player who thinks any other player is definitely scum). Admittedly there were no strong stances, but that is simply because it was still quite early in Day 1.In post 216, Aeronaut wrote: My issue with it though is that you had said they were leaning scum to you, and then you gave reasons why they could also not be scum. There's no strong stances in that list, and that looks incredibly shady to me.
I have to disagree. I think FC being "utterly useless" is why I think he should be lynched. As I mentioned in my first readlist, I feel that players who don't post a lot (I mean content, not the number of posts) are scummy because by posting less they're drawing less attention to themselves. See below also my response to lucca.In post 219, Aeronaut wrote: As much as FC is being utterly useless, I also don't really want to lynch him today because A) it's going to give us minimal information and not much to work with tomorrow, B) he's likely to get replaced. Zeke is a better lynch in my opinion because he's posting more, but saying less.
I was thinking along the lines of an FC lynch. I think FC has contributed very little to the discussion overall. FC said he was going to do a readlist and a post-by-post more than a week ago but he hasn't. If you go through FC's posts they're literally just a line each. At least zekro is contributing with expressing opinions and reasons (however shitty I may think they are). Day 1 lynches aren't likely to find scum, and it seems that they're mostly to get a feeling for all the players. I'd rather lynch the suspicious player with the least significant posts and most bandwagoning and coasting, which in this case is FC. This is not to say I dont suspect zekroIn post 231, lucca261 wrote: @end, can I interest you with a Zekro lynch?
False! I was never on Zekro's wagon. I had mentioned my suspicions about him but I never actually voted for Zekro. My vote had been on Sofiel for the most part of D1. In fact, when Lucca asked me about lynching Zekro I said I'd rather vote FC (which is what I did).In post 304, ssbm_Kyouko wrote:OK so the end and zekro were both L-2 when FC voted the end. When I voted FC and he gained some traction (Sofiel had been parked on FC a while). FC wagon was counter to whichever of the_end/zekro is scum, assuming town doesnt have it's head up it's ass wagoning 2 town and letting coast chill between the wagons/on vanity wagons. TB moved off of the L-1 the_end to vote FC. TB isn't the lynch today obviously but I want everyone to know this for later if the_end is scum. I also led the FC wagon (even though Sofiel was already there) so that should be remembered if the_end is scum.
the_end and Lucca both moved off of the Zeke wagon to the FC wagon. This indicates FC was not a counter to Zeke unless one of them was bussing Zeke. Lucca can't be bussing Zeke because he can only be scum with TB, but it's still possible the_end was bussing Zeke. I'm feeling the_end for scum from this. Possibly with Sofiel but I think the_end is more likely
Besides zekro, I very strongly feel ssbm is scum (see #307 for why). I'm willing to lynch either. I'm also willing to wait to hear what Aero thinks. If Aero doesn't hammer zekro in his post, I will.In post 320, lucca261 wrote:end unvoted him.
Yikes! Bad math on my part.In post 328, ThinkBig wrote:Aeronaut unvoted. Zekromaster is at L-2.
From post 407, I think Lucca is not going to claim.In post 414, ssbm_Kyouko wrote:If Lucca claims VT I'll wait for one post from each player to claim PR before I ignore any future claims
You seen upset, rb. Why don't you take a break and walk away from the keyboard for a bit. Its not like you're helping us with your shit playing anyway lol.In post 465, rb wrote:@the_end literally if you're town I will end you (hheehehee). "no reasons ssbm is town"
He's the most obvious fucking town player in this entire game, doing more pro-town things than any other slot has all game. Meanwhile since day1 your reads have literally had every single slot range from null to scumlean.
Yeah good job you're such a good player, you've basically just said all game "maybe someone in this game is a scum!!" which is just the precedent of the game, that some ppl are town and some are scum.
Don't call me a shit player when you're not even playing the game twat
"Oh no! I'm going to get lynched soon because I played like shit. Boo hoo!"In post 463, rb wrote:Basic logic is that I'm town, read closely because the way this game has played out makes it almost impossible:
1. I wouldn't bother bussing my scumpartner all game nor would I bus them here. I'm not scum with the_end or aero
2. I wouldn't hard buddy my scumpartner when it's possible I'm a lynch. I'm not scum with Ssbm
3. Sofiel isn't going to make her only play be a big case on her scumbuddy on Day3 when scum have 2 alive and know the last PR and can just kill the PR - there's no chance of a guilty here and so no need to try get towncred. All the scum need to do is just get a lynch on anyone not scum. I'm not in a scumteam with Sofiel.
4. Lucca is conftown, it's the only person that makes sense as scum with me, but I can't possibly be
Unvote me, this is an awful lynch
I'm honestly quite surprised you disagree with me so strongly about the scumteam being Sofiel and rb. The "Sofiel/rb" section of your rereadlist in 430 seems to agree with me. In that list you think Aero/Sofiel is a stronger team whereas I think rb/Sofiel is a stronger team. This is because I'm convinced rb is scum, and his pairing with Sofiel is more likely to me than his pairing with Aero.In post 459, ssbm_Kyouko wrote:Again bussing doesn't make sense here so I don't think rb can be scum here
VOTE: Aero
Maybe with the end, that post explaining Sofiel/rb team is a huge stretch
The scumteam is Sofiel/rb. If we're not in agreement to lynch rb, then I'm willing to lynch Sofiel.In post 468, lucca261 wrote:I think End is town, RB. It's between {Kyouko, Aero and Sofiel.}
I want to lynch Sofiel today, if Kyouko is not available.
Who would vote Sofiel?
Oh and "Don't call me a shit player when you're not even playing the game twat" is exactly how town players talk, is it?In post 476, rb wrote:^^ this is not how town talk.In post 470, the_end wrote:You seen upset, rb. Why don't you take a break and walk away from the keyboard for a bit. Its not like you're helping us with your shit playing anyway lol.In post 465, rb wrote:@the_end literally if you're town I will end you (hheehehee). "no reasons ssbm is town"
He's the most obvious fucking town player in this entire game, doing more pro-town things than any other slot has all game. Meanwhile since day1 your reads have literally had every single slot range from null to scumlean.
Yeah good job you're such a good player, you've basically just said all game "maybe someone in this game is a scum!!" which is just the precedent of the game, that some ppl are town and some are scum.
Don't call me a shit player when you're not even playing the game twat
You've been pushing for a mislynch since the start. ThinkBig accused you of it as early as 61. You've pushed shit wagons and have been lynch happy (see my 455 for a summary). In posts 360, 424, 437, 466, 474 you've flipped-flopped so much who the scum team is between Aero/Sof/me. You're the one pushing for a mislynch. Looking back at posts 353 and 358 I have no doubt you're pushing for a mislynch.In post 477, rb wrote:the_end's only motive right now: to secure a mislynch. There's absolutely zero motive to figure out the game or talk to people about stuff.
Also the_end clearly knows I'm town here because why would they call me shit and scum at the same time? If they think I'm scum, wouldn't they be saying that I'm being scummy when I apparently don't help to solve the game and do stuff? But no, they keep calling me bad instead - because he knows I'm town.
gtfo and dont come back. You've done nothing but ruin a good game with your shit posts, cursing and shit play. Good riddance.In post 501, rb wrote:bye, prod dodging until this shit game is over either via lynching the scum or losing by lynching me
@Lucca, I'm going to restate what I said in 473. I think the scumteam is rb and Sofiel. I am sure of rb being scum, his recent posts have only convinced me more of this. As I've said in 473, I'm pushing for an rb lynch. If there is no consensus in lynching rb, then I'm willing to lynch Sofiel. At the moment it seems ssbm and you aren't willing to vote rb therefore rb in unlikely to get lynched. If there is a consensus on lynching Sofiel then I shall I change my vote to Sofiel. Till then, I intend to continue pushing pressure on rb with my vote.In post 502, lucca261 wrote:Hey End, if I voted Sofiel right now, would you vote him with me?
---
preparing a big post after my re-read of the game after I get my answer.
You need to stop cursing, calling people names and tone down your abrasiveness.In post 546, rb wrote:I know this is a game of catching liars and things get heated but you need to not say stuff like this.In post 543, the_end wrote:gtfo and dont come back. You've done nothing but ruin a good game with your shit posts, cursing and shit play. Good riddance.In post 501, rb wrote:bye, prod dodging until this shit game is over either via lynching the scum or losing by lynching me
First you accuse me of only having scumreads. Now you're blathering about me not having town or scum reads.In post 549, rb wrote:Ssbm I'm slowly coming around to the idea that the_end could actually be town despite their toxic as fuck attitude and despite the fact that they somehow have zero townreads and zero scumreads all game and just 'lean' on everything.
Play cohesively - exactly how Sofiel and you are playing. Sofiel has ignored you all of today. And the only thing you've said to Sofiel is to change his vote from you to Aero, which is blatant coaching.In post 551, rb wrote:The thing is, scum have ZERO reason to bus right now. They need to play cohesive and ally themselves with one another to secure the mislynch. the_end pretty much just entirely ignored Aero today, and vice-versa. Like the entire game is interacting, except those two. It's so blatant they're the scumteam.
Sofiel is no longer busing rb after the wagon on rb started gaining momentum. sofiel and rb are now both on aero's wagon to secure the mislynch. rb is accusing aero and me of doing the exact same thing Sofiel and he are doing.In post 551, rb wrote:The thing is, scum have ZERO reason to bus right now. They need to play cohesive and ally themselves with one another to secure the mislynch. the_end pretty much just entirely ignored Aero today, and vice-versa. Like the entire game is interacting, except those two. It's so blatant they're the scumteam.
I've been saying it all day today - the scumteam is Sofiel and rb. I've also said it twice today (in 544 and 473) that if we dont have a consensus on an rb lynch then I will push for a Sofiel lynch. It's clearly the case that the rb lynch is not happening so I will now push for a Sofiel lynch. If you're basing a Sofiel and me scum partnership on me not voting her then I urge you reconsider after reading 545, 544 and 473In post 578, lucca261 wrote:The only way that End is not scum is if it is Aero and RB or Sofiel and RB.
This is exactly my argument in post 456. The scumteam is Sofiel and RB, also possible but unlikely is Aero and RB.In post 578, lucca261 wrote:The only way that End is not scum is if it is Aero and RB or Sofiel and RB.
I wasn't "fake angry". It was neither fake nor angry (although I can see why you thought I was angry). I was just replying to rb in the same tone we was using with the rest of us (particularly me).In post 589, Sofiel wrote:If lynch does go through 584 is a scumtell tbh.
In response to [post568[/post]. My scumteam prediction is t_e/Aero. t_e because of his fake anger against rb to make himself look like frustrated town. Aero's backpeddling on the rb vote looks like he's covering his butt to me tbh.
If I get lynched, after I flip I ask you guys to look a lot more closely at the people trying to lead the lynch and also the people I've been pursuing lmao