I don't trust your gambits, and therefore I will have to assume you are scum for doing hits.
VOTE: klick
In post 10, Klick wrote:Tell me, what of my meta have you read?
In post 18, Klick wrote:So what made me scum? I fail to see how you came to that conclusion.
(By the way, there's a difference between a gambit and a coin toss. Micro 32 was the latter, this was neither.)
In post 103, Lord Mhork wrote:@Cheery Dog:
...Right. What do you think of guille and HerrRudi? Why is A_Potato so clearly a town read in your opinion?
In post 142, Disturbed_One wrote:To honestly vote based on that, I think you should look into some of my other games. I have purposefully changed my game up a bit, for example one thing I do is try to be more aggressive lately. Because in the first game, I wasn't exactly in a position to be that aggressive.
In post 145, Lord Mhork wrote:How did he act in your first game? How long ago was it?
In post 134, Disturbed_One wrote:Nekoko:
Scum. Is pointing a bunch of fingers at different players, which is obviously a scum move to divert attention from herself.
In post 172, numberQ wrote:Pinpointed my weird vibe from Cheery.
His posts 102 and 105 were extremely vague, and amounted to "I think this person is this alignment because." Which is a fairly scummy thing to do, saying you're suspicious of people but not giving any real reasons so as to not accidentally contradict yourself later.
In post 183, Klick wrote:I'll vote Nekoko when I catch up on this game.
In post 193, Disturbed_One wrote:Also, getting a town vibe from Klick for discussing fakeclaim procedures.
In post 206, A_Potato wrote:lately I've gotten better at finding scum, enabling me to call out the scumteam in the 48th post in one of my games.
In post 250, Klick wrote:Note: A game just finished in which I self-voted in RVS to start discussion as scum. Just thought that should be clear.
In post 272, Cheery Dog wrote:I just don't like that he's asking for explanations on everything, especially those things that are obvious
In post 276, Disturbed_One wrote:Case on Mhork isn't bad, but I get the feeling he's town. Can't really describe it, I guess it's just a gut feeling.
In post 299, Bitmap wrote:As for Klick, I can't really nail the feeling but I have scum vibes from him. He hasn't contributed much and scum usually tends to ask the question "Why?" a lot which is what he's been doing.
In post 330, Cheery Dog wrote:since you've got reasons for him being scum listed down for somebody else.
In post 354, Lord Mhork wrote:Yeah, but the rest of your case is still real weak. Seriously it just boils down to ask questions. You've dropped the other two points already anyway, that is that I missed you voting me and that I lost Disturbed's vote. Basically you don't like my playstyle and that makes me scum, yeah?
In post 103, Lord Mhork wrote:
In post 97, A_Potato wrote:In post 95, Lord Mhork wrote:There's no real town motivation to buddy in this manner,not when Om has done little to nothing this game.
You blind mate?
Nope. You?
In post 265, Lord Mhork wrote:
In post 264, Disturbed_One wrote:Alright. I guess all I have to add right now is that I'm cool with Nekoko or nQ/Bitmap for lynch today.
Why?
In post 360, Lord Mhork wrote:Well one of those was a sarcastic response to a sarcastic question and I'm not exactly sure how I could have lengthened those whys... In fact I'm not really sure why I should have. Wouldn't needless fluff have been distracting and anti town?
In post 364, Lord Mhork wrote:Ah. That makes more sense. But what do you suggest when all I really want to know is why? No other fluff involved? Like when someone says that a person moved up to a solid town read. No why--nothing. I don't get why fluff would help there. What else would you know about my motives?
In post 366, Nekoko wrote:
First all of I didn't find NumberQ (the player he replaced) scummy.
Only Disturbed_One was suspicious of NumberQ (because well he voted him)
and MoI. After MoI has said NumberQ and by extension Bitmap is suspicious,
people started to suspect him.
In post 378, MagnaofIllusion wrote:Who are your scum reads at this point Cheery?
In post 413, Venmar wrote:Vig should kill MoI because I can't read the fucker, I want to trust him but I can't. Just make it simpler for me.
Sorry i'm kind of falling behind, I'll post more later.
In post 417, Nekoko wrote:Suspicious
Venmar - this guy is definitely tunneling me. I haven't seen him scum hunt and it looks like he's not even trying.
What he has basically done so far:
1. Tunneled me
2. Commented on Klick's self-vote
3. Commented on nQ's flaking
4. MoI is null and his excuse is his posts are long
5. Commented on "Defending the VI"
He's probably comfortable that he's under the radar of most people
In post 436, MagnaofIllusion wrote:In post 435, Messiah wrote:Not voting: guille2015, Cheery Dog
Deadline in 3 days, 6 hours, 4 minutes.
This is wrong and needs to be corrected ASAP.
And I don't mean the Deadline count for you smart-asses out there ...
In post 417, Nekoko wrote:1. Tunneled me
2. Commented on Klick's self-vote
3. Commented on nQ's flaking
4. MoI is null and his excuse is his posts are long
5. Commented on "Defending the VI"
In post 465, greygnarl wrote:What if Klick and MoI are a scumteam?
In post 582, Klick wrote:To get MoI lynched afterward.
In post 588, guille2015 wrote:In post 584, Cheery Dog wrote:In post 582, Klick wrote:To get MoI lynched afterward.
How about we actually lynch scum instead of two people that don't like the face of each other?
Are klick and MoI town?
In post 590, greygnarl wrote:I have never seen a town selfvote. From what I've seen scum do it to try to make people think they are townies who know their death doesn't mean their team will lose.