Mini 1522: AA - MFA (Game Over!)
-
-
pieguyn
-
-
pieguyn Survivor
-
-
pieguyn Survivor
-
-
pieguyn Survivor
-
-
pieguyn Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10493
- Joined: August 23, 2013
cause Marquis is awesome <3In post 40, geists wrote:Why sheep Marquis and not glorious ffery/Nat hydra?
not that you all aren't awesome too, but Marquis helped us get a perfect win in fast and furious even tho he lurked the shit out of the game and I'm damn proud of it :>
@TNE:you're probably scum. discuss plz?-
-
pieguyn Survivor
-
-
pieguyn Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10493
- Joined: August 23, 2013
I blame this new RVS strategy. I'm not too sure on how to do it right so that probably explains why some things seem forced @_@In post 51, geists wrote:indeed.
how do you know TNE isn't also on my scumteam? omg scumslip I winCabd wrote:Why ask me and TNE as opposed to somebody on your scumteam like ffery?-
-
pieguyn Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10493
- Joined: August 23, 2013
I can't see how this statement could come from a town PoV. can you explain why you said this plz?In post 57, Mac wrote:if you expect to get any indication of my alignment from terrible reasoning, you're barking up the wrong tree my friend.-
-
pieguyn Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10493
- Joined: August 23, 2013
this seems really weird. why are you being so defensive about an RVS vote? mb as a not-so-serious post in RVS itself it'd be fine, but you seem to be seriously defending it. scared much?In post 62, Brian Skies wrote:Was continuing a discussion from the sign-up thread.-
-
pieguyn Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10493
- Joined: August 23, 2013
the fact that it was a RV. it's natural people are going to RV with weird reasons, so IMO it's defensive because you seem to be really taking it seriously. 0.0In post 65, Brian Skies wrote:What about that vote is defensive?
not sure what you mean by reasoning, if that doesn't explain it can you elaborate plz?
what's your opinion on Kaze?
wagon hopping. note how I hopped on Mac's wagon and then sheeped Marquis on his KA vote. it's objective is just like any other RVS strategy, to make shit happen to advance the game and make information pop up. I chose this strategy cause I wanna try out smth new for onceIn post 64, Kazekirimaru wrote:What strategy, and what was it's objective exactly?
the fact that you're interested in this means you agree my posts seem forced, right?
what's your thoughts on TNE so far?-
-
pieguyn Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10493
- Joined: August 23, 2013
exactly why I think you're being defensive. his vote was a RV just like any other, so why do you feel the need to say it's not true? it's not a serious accusation. 0.0In post 68, Brian Skies wrote:I didn't really care that he voted me. I was just giving him my reasoning for my RVS because what he said wasn't true.
are you initially leaning town or scum on Kaze?
ok, I get you >w<Kazekirimaru wrote:It didn't seem forced, exactly. You're a new face to me so I'm just trying to get some insight into how you think.
TNE? Not many thoughts. I liked the wagon sheep. You?
TNE looks like scum. don't wanna explain the reason yet :>-
-
pieguyn Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10493
- Joined: August 23, 2013
I thought you didn't like his reaction. how come you wanna work with him all of a sudden?In post 74, Kazekirimaru wrote:Me too! Let's be bitchin this game together, eh?
Start off by telling me who you're looking at for scum thus far-
-
pieguyn Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10493
- Joined: August 23, 2013
no, I'm saying it's not natural to have such a motivation to respond to it like that. it wasn't a serious vote, which makes me think since you defended against it you seem scared.In post 75, Brian Skies wrote:So you're saying I can't respond to it?
do you attribute this mostly to him being his usual self here?In post 75, Brian Skies wrote:Right now, probably town.
also, what's your opinion on KA?-
-
pieguyn Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10493
- Joined: August 23, 2013
so you disagree that it seems defensive?In post 81, Kazekirimaru wrote:Nah, his reaction is fine. I was just poking at him. I got nothin'.
also, who do you think is scum?-
-
pieguyn Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10493
- Joined: August 23, 2013
townIn post 98, geists wrote:What is YOUR opinion on Kaze?
nothing's really fkin happened yet. wait till something big happens and then I'll show up :>In post 96, geists wrote:
This lacks the verve you usually bring to the game.In post 48, pieguyn wrote:@Cabd, TNE: what are your thoughts on Sakura so far?-
-
pieguyn Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10493
- Joined: August 23, 2013
it comes from a scum PoV because the wording in that post indicates you're trying to shield your alignment. he was trying to pressure you to learn more about your alignment and what you said explicitly implied you're not going toIn post 121, Mac wrote:how does it come from a scum PoV then?letthat happen. there is nothing but scum motivation in that post. I wanna know why you said it just in case I'm somehow wrong here. nice dodge though
1. this isn't a scumtell. I haven't found anything major to jump on yet, so for now I'm asking these questions to try to get quick reads on people and/or solidify my own reads. why do you think this is alignment indicative?In post 121, Mac wrote:can you explain this, because I thought pieguy was megatown in touhou imperishable night and so far i haven't seen anything similar from him so far. quite the opposite in fact: if i recall correctly, he was more than happy to dish out his own opinion in imperishable night - here, he seems content to ask others and not deliver his own.
2. wait and see :>-
-
pieguyn Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10493
- Joined: August 23, 2013
wait hold up
if Mac/ffery are any indication, I'm not being myself in this game. do you disagree with them? if so, what makes this similar to my usual playstyle?In post 106, Sakura Hana wrote:Also so far all I see from pieguy is pieguy being pieguy nothing alignment indicative, on the other hand i got a slight town lean on ffery/Nat, Cabd will prob take 3-5 more pages to figure out. Also got a slight scum lean on KA and Kaze.
it was fake. read the thread. why are you trying to push blame on him for smth like this?In post 106, Sakura Hana wrote:
This felt fake for example.In post 64, Kazekirimaru wrote:Though your reaction to it was very real! You seem a bit bothered, eh? :3
read it and see how I almost pegged one of the most insane scumteams ever :>In post 123, Sakura Hana wrote:I didn't see Imperishable Night but from most games I've had with him I remember him asking opinions on me, seems like he still has paranoia from his first newbie game where i was scum. If you think about it, it makes sense for him to ask opinions on someone he doesn't know how to read.-
-
pieguyn Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10493
- Joined: August 23, 2013
kaze town. probably the only substantial read I've got from questions so far, and I haven't formally sorted him yet, so it might be wrong.In post 130, Mac wrote:it's alignment indicative because it makes you look like you're doing something when you're not. i like the answer you've given here though. do you have any solid reads through asking for these opinions?
not yet sry :>In post 130, Mac wrote:are you willing to explain you're tne read? im afraid im not even going to try and read him at the moment. confidence shattered.
@Sakura:what's your opinion on Brian?
@Brian:what's your opinion on Sakura? also, plz give me your opinion on KA.-
-
pieguyn Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10493
- Joined: August 23, 2013
I don't think it's similar, but I haven't seen much from him yet so that could change. atm he's leaning scum for the reason I pointed out previously.In post 133, Sakura Hana wrote:
Null leaning Town, his play reminds me of Stacking the Deck, does it remind you of it? What is YOUR opinion of him?In post 132, pieguyn wrote:@Sakura: what's your opinion on Brian?
and plz answer my other questions:In post 131, pieguyn wrote:if Mac/ffery are any indication, I'm not being myself in this game. do you disagree with them? if so, what makes this similar to my usual playstyle?In post 131, pieguyn wrote:it was fake. read the thread. why are you trying to push blame on him for smth like this?-
-
pieguyn Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10493
- Joined: August 23, 2013
this seems like flow-going by trying to copy fferynati 0.0In post 133, Sakura Hana wrote:What is YOUR opinion of him?-
-
pieguyn Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10493
- Joined: August 23, 2013
In post 81, Kazekirimaru wrote:
Nah, his reaction is fine. I was just poking at him. I got nothin'.In post 79, pieguyn wrote:
I thought you didn't like his reaction. how come you wanna work with him all of a sudden?In post 74, Kazekirimaru wrote:Me too! Let's be bitchin this game together, eh?
Start off by telling me who you're looking at for scum thus faralso, why do you think Brian's play here is similar to Stack the Deck?
-
-
pieguyn Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10493
- Joined: August 23, 2013
curious, if it's hidden why would you explain it 0.0 especially since on your wiki page it says you only out tells that are no longer effective, I don't get itIn post 140, Cabd wrote:Meta townread on pie, won't explain it until I'm sure of it though; he's dropping one of the hidden pietells.
also, any progress on ffery?-
-
pieguyn Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10493
- Joined: August 23, 2013
I thought you said me being myself wasn't alignment indicative. why the flip flop plz?In post 144, Sakura Hana wrote:I agree with this, i dont think it's that hidden tho.
also, Nacho isn't even in this game and there's no votes on Kalimar. can you elaborate plz-
-
pieguyn Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10493
- Joined: August 23, 2013
TNE what the hell
why didn't you call me out for keeping my vote on KA while scumreading you?
I could see you forgetting about it, but you used the exact same reasonin that exact postv
I said I was scumreading you and I never gave any actual read on KA. (for the record, KA was reading town for me the whole time) so using your own logic, I should be suspicious, since I'd rather be on KA who I never gave an actual read on, instead of you who I was actively scumreading. but you don't call me out for it?In post 158, thenewearth wrote:So you're pretty much saying.
That you'd rather be on a random-wagon than a scum-wagon? What?
also, why does Sakura's jump on KA make her scum, when you practically did the same thing? and if KA is suspicious, are Sakura and KA both scum?
this doesn't make any senseeven for youT_T this whole thing seems like you're scum trying to look busy and not legitimately scumhunting
vote: TNE-
-
pieguyn Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10493
- Joined: August 23, 2013
no read the thread :>In post 160, thenewearth wrote:1) Answer the thing with your playstyle.
that's a good point, tho I know town Sakura did this before. see: stack the deck where I got lynched D1 and she was one of the people on my wagon, and she had given extra reasons on top of the ones InflatablePie had given. I was scumreading her all the way till endgame and that was one of my reasons, so I dunno if this is alignment indicative for her @_@In post 160, thenewearth wrote:3) But not sakura's Post #46 which looks like a "I'm voting X because of my own reasons. So you can't call me out on sheeping". Almost all the people I've seen do this flip scum, or just newb town. IDK why. I dunno why nobody has noticed. But they do. And she's not newb town no, is she?
who is this referring to? 0.0In post 160, thenewearth wrote:2) I'm ok with the sheeping on Marquis.-
-
pieguyn Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10493
- Joined: August 23, 2013
and plz answer my questionsIn post 159, pieguyn wrote:I said I was scumreading you and I never gave any actual read on KA. (for the record, KA was reading town for me the whole time) so using your own logic, I should be suspicious, since I'd rather be on KA who I never gave an actual read on, instead of you who I was actively scumreading. but you don't call me out for it?
also, why does Sakura's jump on KA make her scum, when you practically did the same thing? and if KA is suspicious, are Sakura and KA both scum?-
-
pieguyn Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10493
- Joined: August 23, 2013
1.
3.In post 67, pieguyn wrote:
wagon hopping. note how I hopped on Mac's wagon and then sheeped Marquis on his KA vote. it's objective is just like any other RVS strategy, to make shit happen to advance the game and make information pop up. I chose this strategy cause I wanna try out smth new for onceIn post 64, Kazekirimaru wrote:What strategy, and what was it's objective exactly?
still doesn't answer my question. if anything it supports my point 0.0 my vote on KA was just sheeping Marquis, so by your logic, why would I leave it there when I supposedly had an actual scumread on you? I think you're scum and I'm voting someone "random".In post 166, thenewearth wrote:3) You. Since you were reffering to the "I voted KA but you never called me out".-
-
pieguyn Survivor
-
-
pieguyn Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10493
- Joined: August 23, 2013
no shit, it was an RVS strategy so it won't apply anymore after RVSIn post 174, thenewearth wrote:1) It doesn't fit the things you did AFTER that
so why the fuck didn't you point it out before then?In post 174, thenewearth wrote:3) You just added stuff to why I scumread you but can't really say because of new playstyle.
Good thing you pointed out the "I'm scumreading person but voting others".
shit like this makes me think you're scum who's just making up reasons to suspect people as you go > <-
-
pieguyn Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10493
- Joined: August 23, 2013
if KA makes you feel sad why do you dislike the KA wagon? 0.0In post 170, Marquis wrote:KA just makes me feel sad-
-
pieguyn Survivor
-
-
pieguyn Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10493
- Joined: August 23, 2013
@Kaze:In post 108, Kazekirimaru wrote:The sudden lack of wagonpush on KA makes me believe that either all the scum are on it already or scum aren't touching it. Not sure how I feel about either situation. Meh.
explain this plz. you're talking about the KA wagon like it's a town wagon by saying scum are either all on it or avoiding it, but you think KA is scum? what's going on here 0.0In post 108, Kazekirimaru wrote:Maybe slightly, but it's nothing alignment-indicative from Brian in my opinion.
The person my vote's on! ^^-
-
pieguyn Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10493
- Joined: August 23, 2013
first you say I still have paranoia from my first newbie game and now you say this? how do you expect people to read you at all then?Sakura wrote:Many times this, I keep telling people to not obvtown me so easily or one day i'll end up surprising them.
also, you agree with this implies you think I'm townreading you. where did you get the idea that I'm townreading you?
but you thought KA was scum. what made you start waffling on him all of a sudden?In post 187, Kazekirimaru wrote:If you reread the sentence a couple times you can probably glean my meaning from it.
Rather, I'll save you the troubles: I was waffling between it being a townwagon or not.-
-
pieguyn Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10493
- Joined: August 23, 2013
ohi I'm townreading you too. wanna beast this game together? <3In post 183, Marquis wrote:pie is probably town for ~probably~ sure-
-
pieguyn Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10493
- Joined: August 23, 2013
if you think my reason is incorrect why didn't you refute it? you just answered my question on KA but didn't respond to why I was scumreading you. 0.0In post 184, Brian Skies wrote:In post 134, pieguyn wrote:atm he's leaning scum for the reason I pointed out previously.-
-
pieguyn Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10493
- Joined: August 23, 2013
oh that's fucking great. it's in the exact post you quoted and you just happened to remove it from the quote. nice job there =.=
TNE gave his reason for scumreading you, I said said reason wasn't legitimate. TNE said meta gets in the way of readsIn post 194, pieguyn wrote:also, you agree with this implies you think I'm townreading you.where did you get the idea that I'm townreading you?
you agreed with himIn post 166, thenewearth wrote:2) Scummy things are still scummy things, IMO. Meta just gets in the way of accurate reads
IMO the fact that you bring up telling people not to obvtown you at the time when you agreed with this implies you thought I was townreading you.Sakura Hana wrote:
Many times this, I keep telling people to not obvtown me so easily or one day i'll end up surprising them.In post 166, thenewearth wrote:Meta just gets in the way of accurate reads
nice misrep. I never said you said you were townreading me. I implicitly assumed based off the above you were, but I never said you said you were townreading me.Sakura Hana wrote:
I never said you were townreading me, why do you think i said that?In post 194, pieguyn wrote:where did you get the idea that I'm townreading you?
why did you say I said this, when I didn't?-
-
pieguyn Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10493
- Joined: August 23, 2013
I just said I wasn't townreading you 0.0Sakura Hana wrote:
I agreed with the thing about Meta, this is because due to meta many people obvtown me easily. It's unrelated to you townreading me at all.In post 199, pieguyn wrote:you agreed with him
also, plz answer my questionIn post 194, pieguyn wrote:first you say I still have paranoia from my first newbie game and now you say this? how do you expect people to read you at all then?-
-
pieguyn Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10493
- Joined: August 23, 2013
this seems like fence-sitting. do you think it's alignment indicative?In post 201, Kazekirimaru wrote:Pie is getting more and more vitriolic as the game progresses. Anyone know if that's alignment indicative for them?-
-
pieguyn Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10493
- Joined: August 23, 2013
I don't understand, can you explain plzIn post 204, Kazekirimaru wrote:Uhhh non sequitur much?
ok why do you say this when I'm more than sure you've used meta to read me before? why the flip flop on meta plz?Sakura wrote:Having paranoia means you're using Meta, if you want to read me, then read me based on my actions this game, not based on my actions on other games.-
-
pieguyn Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10493
- Joined: August 23, 2013
you pointed out my aggression without giving a stance on it. IMO there's a very real possibility you could be scum trying to look busy, without actually giving out their opinion on anything. and then that way you can also avoid possibly getting heat by giving out incorrect information.In post 208, Kazekirimaru wrote:How inquiring about your increasing aggression is related to being fence-sitty.
but you were referring to paranoia in that other statement, not what TNE said. how am I supposed to read you if when I point out possible scumtells on you you say I'm being paranoid and when I say that other things aren't scumtells you claim that's an invalid use of meta?Sakura wrote:Because what TNE said makes sense, people townread me too easily that it isn't fair and is one of the reasons why i stopped using AtE and being too emotional.-
-
pieguyn Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10493
- Joined: August 23, 2013
says I need to look at reasonsIn post 211, Sakura Hana wrote:- No, those aren't scumtells, but if you think they are you're free to pursue that. Heck here's something i've read... Town is more waffly than scum, so if anything that's a towntell not a scumtell, what you need to look at is whether the change of reads or stances have a reason that's genuine or fake.
points this out when I attempt to find out said reasons
ok here's a new one. look at that last part. do you notice any similarity to past games in that last sentence?In post 211, Sakura Hana wrote:Ergo, if you think i'm being scummy don't hold it because of meta, I do like that you're questioning me tho, it helps me figure out whether you're really figuring out my alignment or force me to create a "slip" to push into a mislynch.
remember how in stack the deck I pointed out a contradiction you made and tried to get you lynched cause of it? and I was town there? this seems like a really unnatural thought to have considering I've done the same thing as town before. I'd think you would remember this.
the fact that you "forgot" about this, combined with above, makes me really dislike this line of questioning 0.0
how is that waffly? I'm pointing out I'm not confident in said read since I haven't formally sorted him yet. a lot of the time my initial reads end up being wrong so I don't wanna put too much faith in them until I do a more formal sort. however, it's the best I've got atm so I'm going with itIn post 219, Mac wrote:waffly.
as for the fence-sitting, see my above posts, but I like his answer-
-
pieguyn Survivor
-
-
pieguyn Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10493
- Joined: August 23, 2013
the all contradictions = scum method works for me, except on you as I've learned from that gameIn post 226, Sakura Hana wrote:Except that's not a townie train of thought as you should've seen why the contradiction was made, not assume all contradictions = scum and go from there,
also I'm pretty sure that wasn't even your reason for voting me in that game
In post 226, Sakura Hana wrote:Aditionally didnt I say that I wouldn't be using your meta? why bring an old game of yours into this?
this doesn't seem like not using meta 0.0In post 144, Sakura Hana wrote:
I have the same feeling coming off from him, tho the only other game im comparing him to is Mismatched, but still... in mismatched and stacking the deck he played differently but the vibes i get this game is more of stacking the deck.In post 139, pieguyn wrote:also, why do you think Brian's play here is similar to Stack the Deck?
I agree with this, i dont think it's that hidden tho.In post 140, Cabd wrote:he's dropping one of the hidden pietells.
even if you don't draw alignment from my meta, you're using meta on Brian. and it came fromthe exact same game I was referring to. can you explain why you're fine with using meta on him, but don't want to use it on me?-
-
pieguyn Survivor
-
-
pieguyn Survivor
-
-
pieguyn Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10493
- Joined: August 23, 2013
you explicitly said it wasn't alignment indicative. so I don't count that an application of meta, since you're not drawing any conclusions from it. quit reaching ~In post 231, Sakura Hana wrote:
Except as it can be seen, I agreed with Cabd re: Your hidden tell, so i was aplying meta to you too.In post 229, pieguyn wrote:selectively applying meta on Brian but not me
Not liking this misrep tho.
you not liking being obvtowned easily made you stop using meta on others tho? can you clarify why plz cause I don't get it o.oSakura Hana wrote:
Somewhat, but it's mostly due to the fact that I don't like being obvtowned without even trying.In post 229, pieguyn wrote:was it really just TNE that changed your opinion on meta?-
-
pieguyn Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10493
- Joined: August 23, 2013
hell I even said thisIn post 227, pieguyn wrote:this doesn't seem like not using meta 0.0
even if you don't draw alignment from my meta, you're using meta on Brian. and it came from the exact same game I was referring to. can you explain why you're fine with using meta on him, but don't want to use it on me?-
-
pieguyn Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10493
- Joined: August 23, 2013
explicitly saying your "meta" on me isn't alignment indicative. this was also before TNE's post about meta 0.0In post 153, Sakura Hana wrote:1. You being yourself isn't alignment indicative, i have other methods of figuring out alignments.
here's where you used meta on BrianIn post 133, Sakura Hana wrote:
Null leaning Town, his play reminds me of Stacking the Deck, does it remind you of it? What is YOUR opinion of him?In post 132, pieguyn wrote:@Sakura: what's your opinion on Brian?-
-
pieguyn Survivor
-
-
pieguyn Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10493
- Joined: August 23, 2013
so doing things I do based off alignment is different from me being myself? that doesn't make any sense 0.0 IMO it's not considering said tells are associated with myself.In post 240, Sakura Hana wrote:By Hidden pietell it means it's a towntell that pertains only to you. You being yourself is null, but there are things you and only yourself do based on alignment and those are those tells that we were talking about.
but I'm already voting for another scumKaze wrote:Hey pie, stop arguing with scum and start voting for it!
and if I move my vote off him he's probably gonna lurk his way out of pressure ;_;-
-
pieguyn Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10493
- Joined: August 23, 2013
@Kaze:what do you think of the interactions between me and Sakura?
what do you think about the whole "misunderstanding"? I'm having trouble figuring out if that was really her thought process or if she was BS'ing and had to cover for it 0.0-
-
pieguyn Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10493
- Joined: August 23, 2013
I promise I won't dayvig you this time o/
are you fkin serious. I guess I'll never know what the hell was up with TNE. for the record, I think it's scummy as fuck how he had the most blatant opportunity to call me out for having my vote at a weird place and then he didn't call me on it. IMO it seems like he was just making his reads up to look like he had to do smth. then when I pushed him on it his reaction ws weird. I'd think if he was legitimately scumhunting, he'd admit to missing it, but he didn't say anything like that. it doesn't seem town > <
was that ffery or Nati
what do you think about TNE?In post 246, Kazekirimaru wrote:My eyes honestly started glazing over around post 199 of the argument. But from what I understand, you're the one who's confused. Either way, you both need to chill. You're putting out a lot of noise and it's washing out the signal.
That said, I'm starting to wonder if your spat isn't a TvT situation. Sakura's indigence seems genuine, but it doesn't excuse her epic handwave of TNE earlier.
how do you like the chance of Sakura + TNE team?-
-
pieguyn Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10493
- Joined: August 23, 2013
ohi
answer this plzIn post 223, pieguyn wrote:@ffery:
you haven't been as much of a presence in this game as I'm used to. what's going on? 0.0-
-
pieguyn Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10493
- Joined: August 23, 2013
disagree. we can still use the info we got from TNE to get a better idea of SSK's alignment, since it's the same slot. specifically, I want your opinion on how TNE seems to be cherrypicking his scumhunting
I kept it on TNE to keep pressure on him, since I didn't want him lurking away from my questionsIn post 269, Kazekirimaru wrote:By the way, pie, where is your vote? Still on TNE right? As it has been the whole time you've been arguing with Sakura? It makes me unsettled that the whole time you were pressing her you kept your vote on a slot that barely spoke.
why is that unsettling? I wanted to keep pressure on multiple slots. I find my vote often doesn't match the person who I'm interacting with atm. if I could, I would have voted both of them, but I only have 1 vote.
ok now I really want your opinion on TNE since you pointed out exactly what I wanted him to point out and he didn't 0.0-
-
pieguyn Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10493
- Joined: August 23, 2013
hey what a coincidence. at that time I was still pressuring TNE, just it's impossible to fkin notice since he was being a giant lurkfuck. I had accused him of making up his reads and was waiting for a response. this shows how false your argument really is and I dislike the fact that you're pushing such an easy angle, especially when it falls apart if you really think about it.In post 272, Kazekirimaru wrote:It's unsettling because in my opinion you should be voting the scum you're pressuring. Your vote is a tool. When you leave your vote decaying on a fringe lurker scumread, it does no work.
also, if you don't like people leaving their votes on lurkers, what do you think about Sakura's Kalimar vote? she's left it there for a bit now. I'm really surprised you haven't pointed it out by now especially when I specifically asked you your opinion on her. it seems really weird for me 0.0
okay you know what Sakura's Kalimar vote had been there for longer than my TNE vote and Kalimar has even less content than TNE. this seems like the same shit I think TNE did-
-
pieguyn Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10493
- Joined: August 23, 2013
is that really all you have to say? wow I am disappoint
vote: Kaze
answer my questions plz. why is my TNE vote scummier than Sakura's Kalimar vote, when she's done more of the same shit that you said I was doing? IMO the fact that you just dodged all my questions implies that I'm onto something and you don't have any good answers. not only that but I was mostly looking for an explanation, so this seems like a really knee-jerk reaction. @_@
also, a you x TNE team would explain why you ignored all my points on TNE, since it appears you're doing the same thing
explain yourself plz-
-
pieguyn Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10493
- Joined: August 23, 2013
here it comes
wow nice fucking misrep. I never said Sakura's Kalimar vote was scummy. I'm asking why you seem to be cherrypicking your scumhunting. I specifically asked you about Sakura a while back, and if what you pointed out on me really pinged you, then it should have done the same re: Sakura and I assume you would have pointed it out there.In post 277, Kazekirimaru wrote:To answer your questions in 274, You are getting hardcore defensive. And the way you changed the subject to Sakura again really pings considering the timing. Screams of "I know what I did but LOOK AT THEM AREN'T THEY SCUMMY OMFG"
also, you didn't actually answer any of my questions ~ nice attempt to cover up your cognitive dissonance.
and why is OMGUS a scumtell again? being afraid to vote someone who voted you is 9000x more scummy than doing so.In post 277, Kazekirimaru wrote:The way you reacted to my naked vote though. My goodness, you couldn't have solidified my scum read any better. Well done with the OMGUS. You're a peach.
also, you dodged all my questions. are you saying it's more pro-town NOT to push for answers and let people blatantly dodge questions?
tl;dr: you are bullshitting reads and now that I called you on it, you're putting out even more bullshit to cover it up-
-
pieguyn Survivor
-
-
pieguyn Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10493
- Joined: August 23, 2013
since you seem to have declared this 1v1 over, here's my case:
1. BS's reads
2. when I call him on it, starts flailing and grasping at straws
3. makes it seem like he's answering my questions when he's not. "to answer your question" ... "nothing that answers any of your questions"
4. misreps the fuck out of me
5. accuses me of being scum via OMGUS without trying to determine whether it actually came from scum motivation
6. handwaves all my points. keep in mind he accused Sakura of doing the exact same thing. this also makes me think he's not trying to figure anything out - he seems entirely convinced I'm scum and isn't interested in confirming or denying said read
7. took 13 minutes just to make that last post? it seems likely I had him caught, he had no idea what to do, and had to ponder what to do for a while. and then he decided he's just digging his own grave by arguing with me further ~~
can we lynch this today plz-
-
pieguyn Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10493
- Joined: August 23, 2013
caught scum is flaily scum ~In post 282, Kazekirimaru wrote:More like I'm not giving you a soapbox to spout more rubbish from. You're scum. So, naturally, everything you say is going to be subverting and conniving. You know? The town doesn't need more noise to sort through before they get to the signal. The more scum is allowed to defend themselves, the more the town can indulge in the misinformation and make bad plays.
But, alas, here I am talking to you again. Damn it. This time for realsies, kay? Just sit tight. ^^
you're so convinced I'm scum, why do you need to say smth like this? apparently I'm obvscum and you previously had faith that everyone would be able to see it. oh right it's because you're scum and my points are valid www
also, what you said can directly be used against you too. by cutting off the 1v1 like you did, you prevent yourself from saying anything incriminating. there is no town motivation at all in the way you attempted to end our discussion. if you're so convinced I'm scum, then by pushing me more it should become even more obvious why I'm scum. this shows that your first intent is not to figure out my alignment, but to score a mislynch.
-