Now I must sleep but first
VOTE: Salamence pre-emptively, knowing that he will use Gambler's Fallacy at some point in this game.
In post 195, Firebringer wrote:In post 194, Davsto wrote:That is absolutely terrible maths, and I feel you should be lynched just for that.
lol Policy Lynch based on math.
In post 205, Vedith wrote:Seriously, what the hell is with the FB focus and votes?
Although FB would have challenged regardless of role, he would not have done it so quick as scum, he would have got a feel for who was a weaker link to go for and go from there. Putting 2 people who have not posted is not going for the weak link and it's obvious that this would be argued.
BBmolla gets scum vibes from his partner then votes FB? Of did the opinion change after it was stated as a joke?
In post 276, Titus wrote:@Dave, Differing approaches. To me, pushing reveals alignment.
In post 278, Titus wrote:@Dave, OK, but what is yours? There's a difference between not dominating and not speaking up.
In post 78, Vedith wrote:I follow FB! Partners that stick together win together.
In post 379, Shiro wrote:It kind of annoys me that they have opted to ignore the game when they are part of the lynchpool yea
Then he comes with this nothingness post
In post 456, Firebringer wrote:I am going to be extremely mad if the total lynch pool is Town. >.>
In post 441, VysePresident wrote:Like, just your thoughts in general, even if they don't go anywhere yet? I don't blame you for not having solid thoughts on me, but there's enough there for you to go "Well, this post makes me think this." "I agree/disagree with this point here", etc. Can you do some of that? Like I said, I'm trying to get a feel for you, so help would be cool.
In post 491, Firebringer wrote:Elbirn, you is a funny dude.
I will give you a callback to something you said earlier:
"Maybe one game we will be on the same team together [Name Retraced]"
In post 497, Firebringer wrote:@Davsto I never learned to proofread my posts. Will you teach me?
But Fire isn't stupid. He wouldn't basically risk a good chance (50% or over) on the first day for scum to be lynched in the offchance that they lynch him and possibly assume the rest is town based upon it, not in a game without nightkills where all the kills have to be lynches.In post 529, Titus wrote:And if FB gets lynched, all the other three would be presumed town. It clears BB then. If he challenges an all town pool, there's a decent chance he's lynched. If that happens, the game is practically gg for town at that point.
In post 532, Titus wrote:That's the reason scum FB cannot go with an all town pool. It's not a low chance to lynch 1/4 when the rest of the town cannot be floated as mislynches.
Still presuming you think FB scum, let's lynch him and get the flip. We can talk more about who FB is scum with after confirmation.
In post 538, Kaito Kirishima wrote:In post 537, Davsto wrote:In post 532, Titus wrote:That's the reason scum FB cannot go with an all town pool. It's not a low chance to lynch 1/4 when the rest of the town cannot be floated as mislynches.
Still presuming you think FB scum, let's lynch him and get the flip. We can talk more about who FB is scum with after confirmation.
But I'm not sold on FB being scum. Only thing I've seen against him is this whole thing, and I can see Fire!town thinking that it's a good idea for the sake of starting discussion. I've played with Firebringer, he's the reckless type.
The way I see it is, just cause he was the one who had the balls to pull off such a reckless move doesn't make him town. Any one of us could have done that same exact move, for the exact same reasons as him. I would still think said person is scummy.
In post 509, Titus wrote:In post 507, Metal Sonic wrote:Titus is scum for discrediting my reads
Metal's read. Titus is scum. No reason.
Titus disagrees with my scumread on her, must be scum.
In post 626, Shiro wrote:Dav has PB done anything in your PT?
In post 706, Shiro wrote:I am not sure if I did here or in PT
I don't get the scumread. Sala V Titus seemed TvT to me so nullish town
In post 857, Firebringer wrote:He said:
Dave feels off because he is not scum hunting and going with flow.
Titus is scum because hisn't as abrupt as normal for her.
Elbirn would make sense as scum and he doesn't care who goes. I think he just doesn't want to be on any of the wagons for lynching a townie
PB is a easy push target for scum and I don't agree for voting someone for lurking alone----[THIS IS HIGHLY SUSPICIOUS]
MS is quiet.
Suzune I get a weird feeling from.
Vyse and you (Firebringer) are both town.
I don't remember who said it but the thought of Molla and you (Firebringer) being scum is ridiculous.
I didn't like Molla self vote comment. You play with Molla? Does he normally make threats like this?
Thats a lose paraphrase of what he said.
Noooo! Not readlists!In post 944, Kaito Kirishima wrote:In post 941, Davsto wrote:By the way, tomorrow I'd like to be the one to give/receive the challenge. We need Prolapsed lynched because he is doing literally nothing. Having him alive at lylo would screw us over so bad.
Since I read you as one of the towniest people so far who do you think are the last 3 scum and why?
In post 953, Kaito Kirishima wrote:In post 949, Davsto wrote:Noooo! Not readlists!In post 944, Kaito Kirishima wrote:In post 941, Davsto wrote:By the way, tomorrow I'd like to be the one to give/receive the challenge. We need Prolapsed lynched because he is doing literally nothing. Having him alive at lylo would screw us over so bad.
Since I read you as one of the towniest people so far who do you think are the last 3 scum and why?
Kaito, Titus, Prolapsed Brain.
Titus is the weakest of those.
Not sure who the last would be if any of them flipped town; potentially one of Shiro or Metal (?). I'm gonna have to start paying more attention. I've been a bit off recently (tiredness and IRL shit), but I've recovered and am less asiudhsdufh so my play should be back to good standards. I'll probably have a good idea on the last one once we've lynched Kaito+PB.
Other than the fact that PB is lurking why do you suspect him? Cause too me he's floating between Null/scum mainly null tho. That's also if I geet lynched since won't really give you the information your looking for.
In post 956, Firebringer wrote:In post 954, Davsto wrote:Reason I'm leaning Titus!scum is because she said of the possibility of Firebringer "not being town just because there's scum in the pool". At the time, Vedith was a popular lynch target - there's a chance enough that she knew that Vedith would be lynched and flip town, and was preparing to set up Firebringer for a lynch if Vedith flipped scum. It's silly, I know, but I remember it being a bit odd at the time. Now I can see a potential scum motivation for it.
Davsto this doesn't make sense.....
If Titus was scum she would know Vedith was going to flip scum...wait. Your just not making sense, in next sentence you say she knew he was flipping Scum.
Are you saying because I wouldn't push Vedith the first time he got to L-1 she would pressure me on that?
In post 964, Shiro wrote:In post 962, Elbirn wrote:In post 961, Shiro wrote:Elbrin if you were scum with PB as he is now. Would you defend him ?
Yeah, I'd defend the fuck out of him, and I'd use my meta of defending lynchbait to wave off any accusations of me defending a team mate after his inevitable flip.
like I am laughing right now because this is litteraly what is happening XD
In post 959, Elbirn wrote:Oh wait nvm vedith defended pb, lol fuck him
In post 972, Titus wrote:I am not liking Elbrin's recent posting. On one hand, he's complaining about PB being unable to be read because he can't talk to PB, but on the their hand he's questioning people who want to lynch him for not being here. The two goals he's stating are contradictory. I'd rather watch PB like a hawk and get a replacement if he misses deadlines to allow reads to form on his slot.
In post 959, Elbirn wrote:Oh wait nvm vedith defended pb, lol fuck him
In post 1007, BBmolla wrote:this is definitely going to be one of those times where the mod is mia for like 12 hours isnt it