Fire sympolized evil
Marvel Avengers Alliance - Game over
-
-
ZZZX Survivor
-
-
ZZZX Survivor
-
-
ZZZX Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10778
- Joined: July 7, 2013
In post 15, Aronis wrote:Where did I imply that I was a Doctor?
Are you a pumpkin that shoots lazors out of its ass?
I am pretty sure thats aweasom. Marvel prob bought it-
-
ZZZX
-
-
ZZZX
-
-
ZZZX Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10778
- Joined: July 7, 2013
In post 50, Yates wrote:
Oh. I guess the "JK! LOL!!!" is in invisible text, then. Probably why it just went zooming over my head. I mean, I would have no reason to think you were being serious, right? And I would have no reason to think you are trying to fabricate sticking to your meta, right? My bad.In post 41, Nero Cain wrote:Yates thinking I was being serious is rather sad but it Yates so...
Bro Chill. Too much over reaction for a seemingly RVS vote?-
-
ZZZX Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10778
- Joined: July 7, 2013
I think I got that he called him town based on that you two were having a TownVTown fightIn post 57, Nero Cain wrote:
thisIn post 51, ZZZX wrote:In post 50, Yates wrote:
Oh. I guess the "JK! LOL!!!" is in invisible text, then. Probably why it just went zooming over my head. I mean, I would have no reason to think you were being serious, right? And I would have no reason to think you are trying to fabricate sticking to your meta, right? My bad.In post 41, Nero Cain wrote:Yates thinking I was being serious is rather sad but it Yates so...
Bro Chill. Too much over reaction for a seemingly RVS vote?
I actually kinda agree with Vezok here. Umbrage calling Yates town is
Why is Yates town Umbrage?-
-
ZZZX Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10778
- Joined: July 7, 2013
-
-
ZZZX Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10778
- Joined: July 7, 2013
Not really, I think pushing a wagon on the over reacting dude will give us more info no?In post 61, Chandra Nalaar wrote:That's an antitown decision-
-
ZZZX Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10778
- Joined: July 7, 2013
Ops forgotIn post 64, Nero Cain wrote:
So where is your vote on the over reacting dude?In post 62, ZZZX wrote:
Not really, I think pushing a wagon on the over reacting dude will give us more info no?In post 61, Chandra Nalaar wrote:That's an antitown decision
Vote Yates
-
-
ZZZX Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10778
- Joined: July 7, 2013
Trying to get more info /= Getting a scum readIn post 98, pappums rat wrote:Hi Yates, Nero, PV, and Thad, its good to be playing with you guys again. And you too pidgey.
I dont like this series of posts:
Forgetting to vote? Ehhh... Someone who was serious about this scumread would not be "forgetting" to vote, it sounds to me like he is making this up.In post 65, ZZZX wrote:
Ops forgotIn post 64, Nero Cain wrote:
So where is your vote on the over reacting dude?In post 62, ZZZX wrote:
Not really, I think pushing a wagon on the over reacting dude will give us more info no?In post 61, Chandra Nalaar wrote:That's an antitown decision
Vote Yates
Vote: ZZZX
In another way I am triyng to get us out of RVS, eh?
In my ~3RD game is really acted like this guy when i was town. And it is interesting
also just saw Kid A post, I dont think you actually posted a reason for your vote? Are you just simply sheeping? The last time I checked that IS a scum tell.-
-
ZZZX Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10778
- Joined: July 7, 2013
I could say my playstyle is like that, I never changed it (Prob never will. I find it useful for some reasons).In post 100, Nero Cain wrote:
Its my computer. My posts are so good that the computer double posts. (SRS answer; it IS the computer. Its been doing this since I got it and I'm not tech saavy enought to know what is wrong. I ran virus scan but it didn't pick up anything so meh.)In post 94, beastcharizard wrote:Nero, how do you always manage to double post? Are you click happy? Who do you think is scum? You normally get it right D1 IIRC so I am fine with sheeping you right now. You are probably the person I trust the most because of that FE game.
ZZZX's 58 was pretty silly.
Pidgey's entrance to the game was p lame.
I still don't care for Yate's reaction.
Squirell is being uncharacteristically quiet.
Umbrage's stance that Yates overreacting in the early game and therefore town is mind boggingly dumb.
So prob some scum there.
Town sheep all the time, bro. Yeah he could be scum sheeping but he could be being genuine here 'cause this is a super mature stance to take.In post 95, Josh_B wrote:Sheeping is convenient. -for scum. How about I promise to vote exactly opposite on every one that you vote for except for the times that I come to the conclusion on my own that I should vote on the same person that you are voting for. And even then, it will be voting in opposition.
Could be, I know I have him on my watch list but I've seen town do this before but then again I've seen some of the strangest "town" play these past few years.In post 98, pappums rat wrote: I dont like this series of posts:
Forgetting to vote? Ehhh... Someone who was serious about this scumread would not be "forgetting" to vote, it sounds to me like he is making this up.In post 65, ZZZX wrote:
Ops forgotIn post 64, Nero Cain wrote:
So where is your vote on the over reacting dude?In post 62, ZZZX wrote:
Not really, I think pushing a wagon on the over reacting dude will give us more info no?In post 61, Chandra Nalaar wrote:That's an antitown decision
Vote Yates
Vote: ZZZX
The core of it is that I play in a way that has no logical meaning while still hunting in the background for scum, Then leading the town for the win (If I ended up survivng night kill!, As it seems I die pretty early 70% of the time due to a kill... or a lynch (Check my completed games so far for more info).-
-
ZZZX
-
-
ZZZX Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10778
- Joined: July 7, 2013
-
-
ZZZX
-
-
ZZZX Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10778
- Joined: July 7, 2013
Let me explain a few things.
First off I am not a newb. I did about 10 mafia games total with a nice win rate
Anyway a question pops up. Why am I doing those silly mistakes?
Its clearly a reaction test. I find that my wagon got fast and without a reason mainly. I also find A's defense really lazy. The I just sheeped answer is a risky and useless answer to use. So some town points for you. But I still find that vote weird.
Out of all who voted Mr I found less than half writing reasons that are just being overlooked. I guess scum always goes for middle seats in a wagon.
Anyway @people calling me scared for vla my high-school's results were being published so I had some personal issues
Currently on phone. I will make a general reads as soon as I go to my PC.-
-
ZZZX Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10778
- Joined: July 7, 2013
-
-
ZZZX Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10778
- Joined: July 7, 2013
In post 182, Squirrel Girl wrote:
Again, let's clarify that only one item on your list of three is possible for me to be treating in this way - and I find it odd you're not defending your stance or agreeing with mine on that point. Secondly, people think wagoning is scummy - I still wagon. People think asking too many questions is scummy - I still ask a lot of questions. People think posting pictures is scummy - I still post pictures. Just because I'm aware that people have issues with something doesn't meant hat I agree with them nor that I will immediately adjust my play for them, because my play does seem to work (except for getting people to listen to me - apparently ).In post 174, Umbrage wrote:I know you don't think it's anti-town or scummy. But you know that other people do think that. So why would you want to draw attention to it? I can't think of any town motivation.
I didn't have town or scum motivation in the comment I did. The comment was a joke - if anything it was a motivation to suggest that his playstyle is silly. That could come from me regardless of my alignment because I do find it silly as a tell. It's about the same line as saying someone who doesn't use capital letters is scummy.
I feel you ignored the bulk of the rest of that post, wherein I did not express much agreement with Yates or what he was doing. If you go back and read that I tink the progression will make a lot more sense to you. Let me know if it doesn't and I'll point out things for you to help you understand why I think he's scum.In post 174, Umbrage wrote:also I love the progression from this:
to this:
I can understand that's your stance. I disagree with you.In post 169, Yates wrote:Except if you actually read the posts, you'll see that my beef it isn't a defense - it's noticing meta. I would have said pretty much the same thing if he did this to about three other people off the top of my head. So, again, you're just wrong.
from "you're wrong but I see why you would think that" to "you're scum" in two posts.Squirrel Girl wrote:Vote: Yates
And I'm here now too.
I totally agree with squirrel since I feel in the same boat... Other than that I use my play style to my advantage.-
-
ZZZX Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10778
- Joined: July 7, 2013
-
-
ZZZX Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10778
- Joined: July 7, 2013
I posted that his over reaction reminds me of my self as town but he might be hiding something.In post 245, beastcharizard wrote:Nero, are you talking about your umm what question in post like 131 or something? I fail to see a question somewhere.
@ZZZX:
You forgetting to vote your scum read is a scummy thing to do in some people's opinions. You can't say you didn't scum read them because you voted them outside of RVS. It just looks like a scum realizing they forgot to vote to look town and putting down their vote hoping no one noticed. I have tried going through your games on PO but to be quite honest I only found 1 that is completed and I hated the game so I had no motivation to actually read it. I will read a game or two of yours hear though so you have that to look forward too.
He wasn't that much of a scum read but when people insisted I put the vote which was semi rvs in page 2.-
-
ZZZX Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10778
- Joined: July 7, 2013
-
-
ZZZX Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10778
- Joined: July 7, 2013
I dont know. I still find that his reads might be weird but i am not sureIn post 375, displaced wrote:
Literally Pidgey is making up the reasons for his vote. This is scummy. Who are you voting for and why?Chandra Nalaar wrote:Really? I didn't think it was any good at all.
It's also quite a stretch to call it a case. It was at best a demonstration of one contradiction. I've learned from the past that a contradiction does not necessarily indicate scum, and I happen to think it's not nearly as dramatic a change as it's being made out to be.
Apparently I lied about getting to iso-land tonight.
If there was ever a player to antisheep, it's this guy.vezokpiraka wrote: As for what is happening now. Pidgey is town. Towniest town ever.
VOTE: Pidgey
Also I will post reads this weekend as promised-
-
ZZZX Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10778
- Joined: July 7, 2013
SO I will read a few people right now just before the weekend because I cant do all atm
KidA:This guy has been called experienced, Yet he basically is playing it really dumb, Random voting and refusing to give reasons, And he defended himself with a claim of the "Charcter" which could have beeen given to him from the mod.Slightly Scum But I am not sure about why would the Wolf' would be not used.
Aronis:The only guy that isn't really trying, he has 5 posts of which 1 is an omgus and 2 are rvs'esSlightly Scummy or Vanilla Townie who isn't caring about the game
mozamis:Have been scumhunting and playing with a nice vibe around him.Town Read
Umbrage:Smells town. his push is too risky for scum to do and I find him quite interesting.(Not to self, Read the -Gender before you post, Thank god I did !)Slightly Town
Chandra Nalaar:Unusual reads mostly and quite active. I am not sure but I will be sayingSlightly town?
Josh_B:Let me quote this
Spoiler:
He contracted him self in 2 posts. Also tried to defend KidA way to many times.Scummy
pidgey:He is active lurking for sure but I don't feel scum vibes from him...Netural?
BulbaFenix:Seems to be focusing on setup more than the scum hunting which is a scum tell they say, Well I don't trust what they said (I am looking at you mafia scum wiki!) But he has way too low posts and way lower content for a normal player or a hydraLeaning Scum?-
-
ZZZX Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10778
- Joined: July 7, 2013
Isn't that everyone that isn't oZZZXo??In post 517, PeregrineV wrote:In post 480, jasonT1981 wrote:Day 1 Vote Count 6
Pidgey 5 -,Umbrage,The Rufflig,jklash12,displaced,Kid A,
The Rufflig 4 - Aronis,vezokpiraka,pidgey,Chandra Nalaar,
beastcharizard 3 - Mutleyddmc,ThAdmiral,mozamis,
Yates 3 - Nero Cain,ZZZX,Squirrel Girl,
Umbrage 2 - beastcharizard,UniversalSlutBus,
ZZZX 2 - pappums rat,Aunt Jemina,
Squirrel Girl 2 - UnfriendlyNeighbors,Yates,
Mutleyddmc 1 - PeregrineV,
mozamis 1 - Josh_B,
Not Voting
BulbaFenix,
SnakePlissken,
Also, bad wagons:
Pidgey
Rufflig
Beast
Yates
Umbrage
Squirrel-
-
ZZZX Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10778
- Joined: July 7, 2013
Read what active lurking means.In post 520, pidgey wrote:How am I active lurking if i have the highest post count in the thread?-
-
ZZZX Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10778
- Joined: July 7, 2013
-
-
ZZZX Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10778
- Joined: July 7, 2013
In post 523, pidgey wrote:I would but zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
ok this is exactly what im not doing. What have i posted that is irrelevant besides my first 3 RVS posts and the mention that maybe scum have fake claims, which amount to a grand total of like 5 posts?Active Lurking is the act of posting (thus differentiating it from ordinary Lurking), but the material posted is irrelevant or otherwise useless for scumhunting.
Examples of active lurking include posts made only of taunts, excuses for not posting, incoherent gibberish that will lead people to suspect that you do not have the Internet savvy to play Mafia, general bland agreement with whatever is going on, and so forth. For the less couth readers, this is frequently called "bullshitting" in MeatWorld.
This tactic is employed by scum who wish to appear more active than they actually are; either for the scum who has no comment on the current matter but does not want to seem like they are lurking, or for the lurker who wants to paint themselves as slightly better than some other lurker.
The effectiveness of this tactic is quite impressive if players are not specifically looking for it. It is a common Town mistake to wish for the lynch of people they violently disagree with over the people who post whatever they can to stay on the periphery.
BRB quoting every post I notice you active lurking., Fine?-
-
ZZZX Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10778
- Joined: July 7, 2013
In post 411, pidgey wrote:
And if you mean his, then this.In post 121, displaced wrote:
Don't really think this is a good way to try to discern alignment.In post 113, mozamis wrote:His early posts, particularly this one:
all felt quite relaxed and "bantery". Doesn't seem at all nervous or forced.In post 17, The Rufflig wrote:It was a reference to the show called "The Awesomes" (catch it on Hulu - it's quite good), Aronis. The main character of which is Professor Doctor Jeremy "Prock"Awesome.
I must bow to Squirrel Girl's superior knowledge of comic book minutiae.In post 404, pidgey wrote:Lol.
I could apperantly say "Im going to make a sandwich guys" and youd respond "SANDWICH? SCUM!"In post 410, pidgey wrote:I mean its in my iso right there but here.
In post 125, pidgey wrote:I dunno i have no reads yet nero seems town for now.
Displaced looks scummy with his last post since that seems like a little "throw some dirt and see if it sticks"
vote: DisplacedIn post 400, pidgey wrote:Im speachlessIn post 397, pidgey wrote:What if I had said "Ice cream at the wall" that would have so many connotations.In post 384, pidgey wrote:(Those 2= ruff and displaced. The red bird is just a lazy sheep that read saw words and thought "oo a case")
I did the first few posts I saw, Is it me or is most of those notihng useful?In post 378, pidgey wrote:At least if im lynched you would all had a goldmine to work with since apperantly im all the talk today and everyone is either commenting about my RVS posts or inventing some fucking crap about me.-
-
ZZZX Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10778
- Joined: July 7, 2013
What do you mean by pretty weak?In post 531, Chandra Nalaar wrote:ZZ could be scum, that was pretty weak.-
-
ZZZX Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10778
- Joined: July 7, 2013
Can you explain how it does?In post 535, Chandra Nalaar wrote:
This post. It sucks.In post 526, ZZZX wrote:In post 411, pidgey wrote:
And if you mean his, then this.In post 121, displaced wrote:
Don't really think this is a good way to try to discern alignment.In post 113, mozamis wrote:His early posts, particularly this one:
all felt quite relaxed and "bantery". Doesn't seem at all nervous or forced.In post 17, The Rufflig wrote:It was a reference to the show called "The Awesomes" (catch it on Hulu - it's quite good), Aronis. The main character of which is Professor Doctor Jeremy "Prock"Awesome.
I must bow to Squirrel Girl's superior knowledge of comic book minutiae.In post 404, pidgey wrote:Lol.
I could apperantly say "Im going to make a sandwich guys" and youd respond "SANDWICH? SCUM!"In post 410, pidgey wrote:I mean its in my iso right there but here.
In post 125, pidgey wrote:I dunno i have no reads yet nero seems town for now.
Displaced looks scummy with his last post since that seems like a little "throw some dirt and see if it sticks"
vote: DisplacedIn post 400, pidgey wrote:Im speachlessIn post 397, pidgey wrote:What if I had said "Ice cream at the wall" that would have so many connotations.In post 384, pidgey wrote:(Those 2= ruff and displaced. The red bird is just a lazy sheep that read saw words and thought "oo a case")
I did the first few posts I saw, Is it me or is most of those notihng useful?In post 378, pidgey wrote:At least if im lynched you would all had a goldmine to work with since apperantly im all the talk today and everyone is either commenting about my RVS posts or inventing some fucking crap about me.
I showed my pov. Was that wrong?-
-
ZZZX Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10778
- Joined: July 7, 2013
-
-
ZZZX Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10778
- Joined: July 7, 2013
-
-
ZZZX Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10778
- Joined: July 7, 2013
After I read this I think either you guys are drunk or I am....
Sad part: I called josh b for the reason you just called me for.. When did I say that's the reason?In post 600, ThAdmiral wrote:
This:In post 554, Josh_B wrote:@theadmiral. Can you clarify? You quoted my post twice and the besides you thinking that the post is shit, I don't follow. Are the comments to the second quote related to my post or to another post?
I think we resolved my whole reliance on character claims as proof of alliance.
Was supposed to be in response to this:In post 553, ThAdmiral wrote:He means shit. He means your case is shit.
It looks particularly bad because it is an attempt to pile pressure on the current lynch leader.
I think there was a ctrl-c fuckup somewhere along the line.In post 534, ZZZX wrote:
What do you mean by pretty weak?In post 531, Chandra Nalaar wrote:ZZ could be scum, that was pretty weak.
to clarify, however, I thoughtyourpost was terrible because you were attempting to drum up support for a kida lynch using his inexperience, tendency to jump from wagon to wagon, and fear that he could negatively impact the game later (when there are less people) as reasons. None of these relate to him actually being scum, just a hinderence. In fact you imply he is town with the line "what's he going to be like when the town pool is getting smaller and smaller and the scum are becoming more and more manipulative in their play style?", i.e. if you think he is liable to be manipulated by the scum clearly you don't think he is one.
coolIn post 561, Squirrel Girl wrote:
And I've been debating this, but I suppose my answer is - yes, yes it does make me think you might be scum. Mostly because it doesn't feel like a logical mental shift, which makes me feel like the presented stances from you are false because they don't flow logically. I also feel like you're being evasive in this discussion.In post 553, ThAdmiral wrote:
K. I mean does it make you think I'm scum or not. If not I don't really see the point in bringing it up.In post 454, Squirrel Girl wrote:Yeah, but that's the point though. i think all I did was basically re-state what was already contained in that post, and you didn't even seem to buy half of it, but suddenly your demeanor went from 'can lynch SG' to 'pals with SG' it didn't feel like a legit mental shift considering the interaction. That's why I called it out.
I have to admit I haven't really been paying attention to rufflig. Sell me on the idea of lynching him.In post 556, Chandra Nalaar wrote:
Cheeky fucking scumbutt. You're right, it's quite plain no one is going to bother lynch you over what is essentially a scumclaim because they aren't paying attention. Good deduction. Keep refusing to link to a post that doesn't exist.In post 555, The Rufflig wrote:Nope. How many other players do you hear in this discussion? No one else cares.
Why isn't this dead yet? Can I have a double vote?
Pro tip : I didn't stop saying I said things I didnt say.
When the hell did I role fish?In post 602, Josh_B wrote:Well, DP1 has been fun so far. I'm ready to move on if everyone else is. But now it's time Follow the Scarlet Witch as chaos tends to do, with a little erratic game theory and touch of wagon mongering. I'll try to add as many links as I can, but FTW this game is bungled by flame wars. I hope I can make this post as clear as possible.
Spoiler: considerate wall reduction
Anyways, I don't want to requote the whole damn DP, I'm getting to a point. I noticed this post by Yates
Spoiler: Yate post
It makes me feel like the Yate's/SG war was Faction on Faction considering the misreps that were coming from both sides.they've already been pointed out so read the DP if you want to see them for yourself.
So, That being said, For the scummiest continued game play besides these incidents. I'm voting ZZZX,since I only get to pick one.
VOTE: ZZZX
I know we still have some time left in the DP, but with 24 pages worth of play, I feel like I have a reasonable amount of info to place a solid vote.
Fun fact; I was from the few who didn't go in that doctor argument and now I am called for it
SERIOUSLY YOU GUYS ARE SAYING I SAID THINGS I DIDN'T
EITHER QUOTE ME OR DONT TALK ABOUT IT.
God I feel better after expressing my anger-
-
ZZZX Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10778
- Joined: July 7, 2013
Did you think ZZZX's post [16] somehow influenced Aronis's "rolefish" post [15]?
????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????
So I posted after him and influenced his post before me
This logic is flawless...
Why the hell do I feel you guys are trying to push fake reasons to vote me? @Everyone
HALF the BWs that are going on right now are shit and are lead by scum-
-
ZZZX Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10778
- Joined: July 7, 2013
-
-
ZZZX Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10778
- Joined: July 7, 2013
No not all daykillers town sided but I would expect this one isIn post 612, beastcharizard wrote:
Are all Daykillers town sided? I have never been in a game with one and at first I thought it was a modkill.In post 607, vezokpiraka wrote:Why the fuck did someone shoot aronis now.
There were so many better targets.
If it was mafia Idk why would they do it.-
-
ZZZX Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10778
- Joined: July 7, 2013
This reply is not really aimed at youIn post 615, Yates wrote:
Thank you for restating my point. Josh claimed I was your scum buddy because I didn't include your "rolefish" in my summary of why Aronis's post wasn't a rolefish. I'm saying that your post obviouslyIn post 610, ZZZX wrote:So I posted after him and influenced his post before me
This logic is flawless...influence the post before it. Is that really unclear?did not
I was just too lazy to go to his first post and quote it so I just said this-
-
ZZZX Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10778
- Joined: July 7, 2013
I basically said the part that was related to me to answer someone else's questionIn post 623, beastcharizard wrote:I have never been in a game with a Day killing role but I know that a daykilling town role exists on the Wiki so my first conclusion was assuming it was a town sided thing. I didn't understand why you would jump to conclusions that it was scum sided until now. At least I know you aren't slipping some sort of information now that you have provided a game to back up that suspicion.
@ZZZX:
I found it funny you told Yates the reply wasn't towards him yet you answered a question clearly directed towards someone who wasn't you. If you don't like people replying to something not aimed at them then why do you do the same thing? If you could kindly let people answer their own questions that would be fantastic.
Also at least I didn't lie about what others said like our friends here ("Looks angrily")-
-
ZZZX Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10778
- Joined: July 7, 2013
In post 632, Josh_B wrote:I think my vote was reset. I'm putting it back where it was just to make sure.
VOTE: ZZZXIn post 631, Josh_B wrote:
For further evidence, I will also call into question the post of role fishing that displaced was referring to, and your reasoning for referring to the post that you referred to. Because, I don't see the justification from displaced on the Aronis vote until much, much later.In post 615, Yates wrote:
Thank you for restating my point. Josh claimed I was your scum buddy because I didn't include your "rolefish" in my summary of why Aronis's post wasn't a rolefish. I'm saying that your post obviouslyIn post 610, ZZZX wrote:So I posted after him and influenced his post before me
This logic is flawless...influence the post before it. Is that really unclear?did not
Perhaps we should wait on displaced to identify the post he was referring to.
Dear Diary, I found another guy who ignored my reply to him and uses same BS argument which has been proven so false. While he is saying I did things I didnt do such as Role Fishing.
Also the dear town has been ignoring my posts with only Yates replying to them. I am actually liking him for that.
Now I got voted for reasons that do not exsist while scum pushes me for fake reasons and noone notices.
This seems like a normal day indeed.
#ZZZX
Vote Josh_BScum and trying to ignore all my points. Perfectly clear scum play.-
-
ZZZX Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10778
- Joined: July 7, 2013
-
-
ZZZX Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10778
- Joined: July 7, 2013
-
-
ZZZX Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10778
- Joined: July 7, 2013
First of all thats a nice formating indeed but let me explain a few things.In post 657, BulbaFenix wrote:
1.) How is it a contradiction?In post 598, The Rufflig wrote:
1) Straight up contradiction.In post 475, Chandra Nalaar wrote:In post 466, The Rufflig wrote:
If you had been paying attention, I wouldn't have to keep correcting all your errors that you keep posting. As expected, the wall only brought contradictions from you without any arguments or proof.In post 452, Chandra Nalaar wrote:I'd like to take this moment to note your decision to start out by discrediting me as "not paying attention" and then to do exactly nothing in the rest of the post to demonstrate that I was not paying attention. You're just trying to sound pretty.1)You did not correct any errors in the post in question.2)You probably suspect no one will read closely enough to realize that this point is flagrantly made up.3)Contradictions: lol, show me them.4)Arguments: I'm pretty sure my post was comprised entirely of arguments.5)Proof: Is what scum demand when they are suspected on grounds they don't think are the correct ones, and is not a real thing that exists in mafia outside of power roles.
2) Accusation of making things up.
3) I'd rather not have to quote the whole previous wall.
4) Straight up contradiction.
5) Mud slinging. Proof also consists of quoting posts to prove that you aren't making things up or to prove that someone is making stuff up. Looks like I'm going to have to quote a lot of it of the previous post.
2.) Okay. And?
3.) That's okay. You didn't show them in the previous wall either.
4.) Again, how?
5.) I wouldn't say it's mudslinging, given that it's a direct response to your post. The Burden of Proof has always rested on you to show that what you're saying is true. That is what Chandra keeps asking, yet you keep refusing to provide evidence to. She's right that you saying that her wall does not provide proof is a scummy action designed to change the focus of attention.
Except you never quoted the post where she said all this regarding her vote on our wagon. She keeps asking you to back up your statements, which you refuse to do so. Even now you refuse to show actual evidence of her doing what you say she's doing, even though that evidence would be most beneficial to your case right now.In post 598, The Rufflig wrote:
I asked why she wanted a bulbafenix wagon. Her response was that her wagon was bigger. She is correct in the sense that she didn't use the word 'voting', but this is hair-splitting. The reason someone wants a wagon and the reason they are voting someone are the same. Straight up contradiction and mud slinging (i.e. that I was making stuff up. I did use the word voting when referring to these posts at some point though.I never stated that I voted for Bulbafenix because his wagon was larger. You're extrapolating from what I did say to something that isn't true.
The second half of my post asked if I could interest her in a Aronis wagon then gave a weak reason for an Aronis wagon. I think the context is clear that I was asking Chandra to explain her push behind BulbaFenix.
I don't see the contradictions here.In post 598, The Rufflig wrote: Time to move on to her non-contradiction and "argument" answersCompletely different. I didn't do any misleading.I don't believe there is anything.(Hint: It's not solid)
Oh, hey. ^ The second part actually contains an argument.First of all, it's only neutral by your say-so.
Second of all, YOU don't seem to have been paying attention, because we literally just cleared up the confusion about "throwing dirt" last page.
Her belief in pidgey's argument is separate from her questioning of you. She's inquiring into your beliefs surrounding Pidgey's argument. Her beliefs are not on trial.In post 598, The Rufflig wrote:
Should I point out that Chandra herself has since stated that she doesn't believe in pidgey's argument, either? This was a point that Chandra actually agrees with. She went out of her way to try and use this against me.You assume that the response to your question is "no, you couldn't look me in the eye and state that displaced's post held scummy intent".
You seem awfully sure that displaced has no scummy intent. Is it because you know he's town?
Asking you to prove your point by providing evidence of your assertions is not scummy. Btw, you still haven't done this.In post 598, The Rufflig wrote:
I think I've covered this sufficiently in this post already. Eh, she could have just responded to the topic instead of just saying "No, it isn't". Next!Go ahead, quote it, and I'll tell you how that's not what I said. I'm waiting.
Again, quotes please.In post 598, The Rufflig wrote:
"No, it isn't". *sigh* My wagon is bigger. This was the reason she gave for wanting the BulbaFenix wagon and/or not wanting the Aronis wagon depending on how you read my initial post. It amounts to the same thing. This is more hair-splitting so she can justify denying everything.No, it was not. You asked me if I was interested in voting Aronis, and I told you the Bulba wagon was larger. I did not tell you that was why I was voting on it.
I don't see how she's claiming your posting style is scummy. She's very clearly stating you misrepped somebody. Are you trying to say that misrepping people is part of your playstyle?In post 598, The Rufflig wrote:
She is claiming my posting style is scummy. To the charge of putting words in someone's mouth I simply state 'rhetorical questions'. These questions formed an argument. Rather than tackle the argument, she tackles me.Actually, I have no interest in disproving that statement or of telling you I think that scummy intent exists. What I think about it is entirely irrelevant to the fact that you were putting those words in someone's mouth.
What makes you think Aronis was shot for breadcrumbing Doc? That's a very specific assertion.In post 609, Yates wrote:
Is the target as important as the result or what a day death implies? Honestly, the rest of it is wifom. Maybe it was someone who thought he bread crumbed doc. Maybe it was someone trying to make it look like he was killed by someone who thought he bread crumbed doc. Both are equally likely and uninteresting given how little we know.In post 607, vezokpiraka wrote:Why the fuck did someone shoot aronis now.
Given that nobody was voting at that point, I doubt it. However, this is a rather strange statement for you to make.In post 610, ZZZX wrote: HALF the BWs that are going on right now are shit and are lead by scum
I actually agree with this.In post 626, Umbrage wrote:That was almost definitely a town kill. Scum don't shoot lurkers, and no scum would use a daykill on D1.
Style over substance. When he gets called out, especially to provide evidence for his arguments, he'll slink off and makes some excuse like "I'm getting tired of the wall wars." and then act like he's the better man. As you can see in my response, he doesn't actually back up his assertions, instead choosing to discredit and misrep the players he's talking about.In post 626, Umbrage wrote: Can someone summarize the Rufflig case for me?
Because Bc's not obv. scum.In post 626, Umbrage wrote: Why vote him over obvscum beastcharizard?
In post 639, ZZZX wrote:Dear Diary, I found another guy who ignored my reply to him and uses same BS argument which has been proven so false. While he is saying I did things I didnt do such as Role Fishing.
Also the dear town has been ignoring my posts with only Yates replying to them. I am actually liking him for that.
Now I got voted for reasons that do not exsist while scum pushes me for fake reasons and noone notices.
This seems like a normal day indeed.
#ZZZX
Vote Rufflig
-Bulba
I had posted at least 5 posts that were just ignored ... Also at that time there were at least 6 small wagons which were agianst towny players imo-
-
ZZZX Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10778
- Joined: July 7, 2013
Can you calm down and see we are catching some interesting facts? No need to end the day until we get all info of this dayIn post 746, pidgey wrote:Can we fucking lynch Rufflig i bet my ass he is scum.-
-
ZZZX Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10778
- Joined: July 7, 2013
I would love if you would save me just the bit of time and use Post BBcodeIn post 841, The Rufflig wrote:@Aunt Jemina & ZZZX: Both of you are voting for Josh_B. I would like your opinions on something. Josh_B posts #474, #479, #483, #485, #489, #502, #506, #509, & #511. Specifically, his not understanding about fake claims on this site. If you feel that Josh_B's posts ring true, would you not think that Josh_B didnotreceive such a role pm?
@Chandra: Thank you for your comments. You'll understand if I don't respond to them and just run runaway.
so I will use them here then tell you my opinion after I read them
474
479
483
485
489
502
509
511-
-
ZZZX Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10778
- Joined: July 7, 2013
-
-
ZZZX Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10778
- Joined: July 7, 2013
I couldn't get the wall back but here is the summery
474: I find it weird for him to defend him for his claim, We the reasons to push KidA were not the claim mainly (As demonstrated that this is a Jason game that has fake claims like butter)
479: Makes no sense and contradicts its self, Let me read it again
(This game has fake claims so claiming anything doesnt make you town) (3 words later) (If you claimed a big role you are nearly 100% town)
Well Jason games showed that you can have a major role un-filled with pro town players, And could be a fake claim.
483: Trys to contradicts himself again... After believing in fake claims 4 posts later he denys them(??) and again defends KidA (Which is unnatural, But actually makes KidA town unless Josh_B was still new. (A tactic for a later on I saw being done in a few completed games I read in my free time)
485: A weak explaination to 483?
489: Changes his opinion after someone supported his first theory of no fake claims (What the hell?) and again defends KidA without a good reasoning. Again thats mostly the tactic I descriped in 483 (Where he will try to keep KidA alive if possible to be a weapon in Lylo if he survived that long.
502 No comments
509 Believes that scum's fake claims should be a liability. Idk nothing to say about this one
511 Nothing to say
I had a full Wall 0 text full of theorys and explainations but it was lost-
-
ZZZX Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10778
- Joined: July 7, 2013
In post 911, Josh_B wrote:Let's say you were scum goon, and one of your team mates with a power role was being threatened to be lynched. How would you play it?
ZZZX's post is too erratic to come from a common scum without purpose, and too manipulative and misleading to come from town.
The most recent upturn on a wagon was that of UnFriendlyNieghbors.
Now that we know ZZZX is obvscum. We should evaluate the reasons for such a post-i.e. Sacrifice for protection.In post 912, vezokpiraka wrote:Josh is right.
Also that doesn't feel like town cabd even though I have limited experience with her.
vote unfriendly neighbours
Just for your info you two seem like a scum team there
since what you said doesnt make sense again
I posted these reads cus ruffing requested me to read those posts, how does that relate the UFN?
Also really?
let me read that again
What?In post 911, Josh_B wrote:Let's say you were scum goon, and one of your team mates with a power role was being threatened to be lynched. How would you play it?
ZZZX's post is too erratic to come from a common scum without purpose, and too manipulative and misleading to come from town.
The most recent upturn on a wagon was that of UnFriendlyNieghbors.
Now that we know ZZZX is obvscum. We should evaluate the reasons for such a post-.i.e. Sacrifice for protection
How is reading you as scum have to do with sacrifice with protection? how is it too manipulative and misleading? Is it because I scum read you?
When am I obvscum?
So you say josh is right in something that doesnt mean anything and you then call out someone for being scummy then...In post 912, vezokpiraka wrote:Josh is right.
Also that doesn't feel like town cabd even though I have limited experience with her.
vote unfriendly neighbours
you dont vote him and vote UFN instead?
I dont know about UFN and I dont really care about him. I never defended him and I am yet to gain a solid read on him, I am yet to find where I defended him-
-
ZZZX Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10778
- Joined: July 7, 2013
-
-
ZZZX Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10778
- Joined: July 7, 2013
-
-
ZZZX Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10778
- Joined: July 7, 2013
-
-
ZZZX Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10778
- Joined: July 7, 2013
Because I have so good memeory I remeber what was said 10 pages ago just by seeing the post NUMBER!In post 923, Josh_B wrote:In post 902, ZZZX wrote:Spoiler: ignorant post that doesn't need to be shown again, but included for reference
First off, my interest was not in KidA, it was a press on BulbaFenix. I noticed that they had been tunneling on this for a while and it was giving me mixed signals about their slot. Secondly, it should be obvious that I don't have experience with predetermined Fake Claims being provided by the Mod. But most importantly This:
518
Why claim that you haven't read the posts (848) when you were part of the conversation in the beginning?
You are definitely scum.
#SCARSAM-
-
ZZZX Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10778
- Joined: July 7, 2013
In post 937, Josh_B wrote:Whatever, ZZZX is scum, but why does he make it so obvious.
Let's lynch him and find out logical my theory is.
VOTE: ZZZX
So you say UFN is the PR mafia and you... vote me?In post 932, Josh_B wrote:Sorry for the Tiny Text. I didn't do it on purpose. I tried to get that post out 3 different times and I finally just pared it down to the very basic concept.
ZZZX claimed that he hadn't read the posts despite him having commented on the posts when they occurred. Both times when he called me scum, his comments were misrepresenting the facts and forcing scuminess into my posts that wasn't there.
Now. ZZZX is scum and he's made it obvious which is an unnatural scum thing to do. So, I'm trying to consider his motivation for doing it. I think it's because of the recent snowballing on the UFN wagon. There is no way a scum would be so blatent about his misreps unless it was to save a partner with a PR.
I suspect that ZZZX is a Goon and UFN is the PR that he is trying to protect.
P-edit. ZZZX, Not knowing what was said is one thing. Not remembering what you said is an obvious red flag.
How contridacting yourself
Its called wifom Son-
-
ZZZX Survivor
-
-
ZZZX
-
-
ZZZX Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10778
- Joined: July 7, 2013
-
-
ZZZX Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10778
- Joined: July 7, 2013
In post 970, Josh_B wrote:
zzzx- Die you dirty post skipper, and hater against progressive thought.In post 964, ZZZX wrote:In post 937, Josh_B wrote:Whatever, ZZZX is scum, but why does he make it so obvious.
Let's lynch him and find out logical my theory is.
VOTE: ZZZX
So you say UFN is the PR mafia and you... vote me?In post 932, Josh_B wrote:Sorry for the Tiny Text. I didn't do it on purpose. I tried to get that post out 3 different times and I finally just pared it down to the very basic concept.
ZZZX claimed that he hadn't read the posts despite him having commented on the posts when they occurred. Both times when he called me scum, his comments were misrepresenting the facts and forcing scuminess into my posts that wasn't there.
Now. ZZZX is scum and he's made it obvious which is an unnatural scum thing to do. So, I'm trying to consider his motivation for doing it. I think it's because of the recent snowballing on the UFN wagon. There is no way a scum would be so blatent about his misreps unless it was to save a partner with a PR.
I suspect that ZZZX is a Goon and UFN is the PR that he is trying to protect.
P-edit. ZZZX, Not knowing what was said is one thing. Not remembering what you said is an obvious red flag.
How contridacting yourself
Its called wifom Son
@rufflig - I'm pretty sure you have it backwards. the case on ZZZX is independant from UnfriendlyNeighbors. But the obviousness of ZZZX shot through the roof after the wagon on UFN went up. UFN doesn't really have to be first, we can take out the goon, and be just as close to our wincon as we were before + I still have my eye on you Rufflig.
Nero- Join the crowd, stop tunneling on Yates and trying to start a counter wagon.
When did I post skip?
Also how am I against progressive thought when I reply to ALL your posts with real reads and real scum-tells while your only case on me is that im obv scum ?
I still cant find your case, I find your play too much depending on AtE, It was once used by a great player I admire as town but it wasn't filled with this bs.-
-
ZZZX Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10778
- Joined: July 7, 2013
Lol I got ninja'd too, I sent it in a PM thou
-
-
ZZZX Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10778
- Joined: July 7, 2013
So I am confirmed town?In post 979, Nero Cain wrote:Jason made two wagons 'cuse the first one is all scum and the second one is not.-
-
ZZZX Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10778
- Joined: July 7, 2013
In post 982, Viomi wrote:In post 980, ZZZX wrote:
So I am confirmed town?In post 979, Nero Cain wrote:Jason made two wagons 'cuse the first one is all scum and the second one is not.
It is clearly a joke but here is a treat (Since you still dont get the joke :<)
-
-
ZZZX Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10778
- Joined: July 7, 2013
Feel free to meta me to check out my jokes, They are usually more cruel (Check the Mini game I did long ago, its in my wiki I think?)In post 992, Viomi wrote:No, I got the joke. Made me giggle, but still seemed out of place, even for a joke.
-
-
-
-
-