What manner of role PM did you get that caused pirate mollie to replace out?
Also, RedCoyote, let's be masons together!
In post 20, Elbirn wrote:I'm not a hundred percent up to speed on your fancy lingo. I get wotc = wisdom of the crowds = can pm mod to request someone not play. Didn't the signup thread said mod would use "Wisdom of the one", and if yes, what's the difference?
Either way Mollie replacement is a better case than grapes. I mean, I love grapes. They're probably my second favorite fruit. And have you tried eating glass? It's not a fun time, I assure you. You'll be picking tiny shards out of your gums for weeks.
UNVOTE: Grapes
VOTE: Glass
In post 24, lufan131 wrote:The first one was using a randomizer, now, you've piqued my intrest.
In post 38, SXTLHGaiden wrote:cause no lynch is clearly superior
In post 41, SXTLHGaiden wrote:We no lynch until the Angel's kill doesn't go through.
Then the Angel claims and we are reduced to mountainous w/ a bulletproof IC who still has all the input of all the dead town.
We get no sin until then so the sin counter only goes up from that point.
In post 45, SXTLHGaiden wrote:Cause i like my plan and am committed to it.
In post 46, SXTLHGaiden wrote:But the Angel knows.
Once the Angel get's RB'd, he just claims.
Counter claim is death to conf scum.
In post 57, Sakura Hana wrote:Which reminds me
@Equinox: You were questioning lufan on his vote switch to Glass, while you are now voting Glass does this change your read on Glass from mollie's replace out? Do you think lufan's town/null/scum?
In post 70, lalaladucks wrote:And mollie replacing out was very strange, yes - I'd initially thought maybe because she got town and thought it was boring so left..? But the others seem to think more likely she was scum? Idk, I haven't completed any games with her so I'm not sure what she prefers.
In post 71, SXTLHGaiden wrote:Scenario 1: Angel claims angel, scum must counterclaim. we lynch one, then the other if needed.
Scenario 2: Demon Claims angel, angel does not counterclaim since it is a for sure demon kill.
am i really missing something here?
In post 77, ArcAngel9 wrote:the grapes i get here in my country are not sweet. So I am not big fan of grapes. A lame reason but still true...
In post 113, Elbirn wrote:As pointed out by everyone else, this isn't really the best idea. But I feel like this was put out there with good intentions, and on a surface level it makes sense; we lose if we get sin, so let's ensure that we can't get sin. Leaning town on Gaiden.
In post 118, lalaladucks wrote:Okay, I've digressed a bit but that's my opinion of the wagon. It gained momentum very quickly, before Glass even posted at all. Some very interesting and noteable participation...
In post 245, lalaladucks wrote:Well, Equinox asked me what I thought of the Glass wagon; I believe I conveyed what I was thinking with that post. I wasn't actually asked for analysis. Tere did say it was "a decent attempt at wagon analysis" - which actually implies it wasn't analysis, merely an attempt.
In post 246, Sakura Hana wrote:Also could someone please explain to me what's the deal with Elbirn? i don't see why he's being wagonedm he asked what was the problem was with mollie's replace out and got his question answered so he decided to follow suit, am i missing something super obvious or what.
In post 272, Tere wrote:I have actually been worrying more about Mollie's replace out over the weekend. She wanted me to play together in this game and encouraged me to sign up (although I didn't need much persuasion as the set up looked cool. I doubt she even read that Wisdom of the One applied, I know from hydraing with her Mollie can miss that kind of stuff - she thought we were a cop in Lost Rooms when we were effectively VT because she hadn't read the sample role PM. I am not getting warm fuzzies from Glass either.
In post 281, Katsuki wrote:Hey RC if you still don't see what I mean by MOI impersonators then I don't think you ever will.
In post 289, Albert B. Rampage wrote:Someone convince me of something, I feel neglected. It's standard to talk to other people about who you suspect; you're never going to convince scum that they are scum so talking directly to them is useless.
In post 298, Albert B. Rampage wrote:The mod wouldn't give arcangel a demon role, now would he?
In post 330, ArcAngel9 wrote:I have already responded to this issue. I was mistaken about lalalala vote. I read her unvote as vote.. it was huge miscommunication from my side.
In post 328, ArcAngel9 wrote:its not like grape is dying. I still haven't have strong scummy read to move my vote yet.
In post 367, SXTLHGaiden wrote:I understand it. Which is why i've opted toward a more friendly "No lynch D1" plan.
In post 369, SXTLHGaiden wrote:Well, given the fact that my plan was initially rejected and thus content was produced, Angel should shoot biggest scum read.
I don't trust my reads (lol gaiden having reads) so i can't advise on any particular player.
At worst, angel hits a townie and now has the ability to communicate with that townie and the other dead townie that scum kills.
Otherwise, the angel will have to make tradeoffs of "killing a townie raises the Defcon level"
In post 375, ArcAngel9 wrote:My RVS Bandwagon vote is humor nothing personal in it.
As for my reads, I am quite unsure as of them at this moment, It always a big deal to have strong reads on day 1 at least for me and considering mislynch costs sing points in this game, I am just being careful with who I want to vote.
And you must know that I am pretty occupied in defending myself from logic less accusations and hatred from Katsuki
In post 378, ArcAngel9 wrote:btw... What are your scum reads?
In post 392, ArcAngel9 wrote:I wont argue with you on my town reads. I town read zmuffin or Gaiden is becuz I don't think scum would show interest on setup on d1. I am open to believe that I might be wrong but at least I feel they are far better town then anyone I see at this moment.
I read Albert town becuz his posts are not odd. And his attitude seems very easy going which is something scum wouldn't do with me. this read is from my perspective. if you're my shoes you would understand it..
In post 402, ArcAngel9 wrote:Equinox, what do you think about Sakura?
In post 426, Tere wrote:I want lufan to come back to the thread and start doing something if he's town. :/
In post 442, ArcAngel9 wrote:And mason buddy? are you claiming as mason? Sorry I miss to read that one before!! :eek:
In post 447, ArcAngel9 wrote:How are you town reading RedCoyote? Is it meta or gut? or other reasons?
In post 500, massive wrote:Also, the Katsuki-AA stuff is so egregious that I'm surprised no one's reported it.
In post 504, RedCoyote wrote:This begs the question whether or not you think Gaiden had good intentions or not.
In the same post, RedCoyote wrote:+1 for 386, but she needs to connect the dots for me on Elbrin.
In the same post, RedCoyote wrote:There is definitely something going on between AA9 and ABR. I don't think both of them are town.
In post 557, lufan131 wrote:I don't know how to get votes to leave me... So that's what I end up doing.
In post 569, lufan131 wrote:Why? I thought I was at L-2 before I went to school. Two votes happened in that time. I want her lynched since she's not being cohesive, and prone to misinterpret things. Also her posts feel scummy, so also a gut read. I think that the wagon growing on me is misplaced, since I know I'm town. I'm sad it's dwindled, since I thought I had a chance to live day one. I don't care for the town reads, but they don't bother me too badly.
In post 570, ArcAngel9 wrote:I personally beg everyone to drop their vote from lufan wagon if they are voting him because its a leading wagon. We can work out something else..
I also been begging to look at massive. I don't see anything he did is town motivated.
In post 582, Albert B. Rampage wrote:Equinox what kind of sexual partner do you like?
In post 583, ArcAngel9 wrote:True. I said this before. Why don't you vote massive with me? do you read him town or scum?
In post 584, Katsuki wrote:You pointed out a bunch of things regarding AA's play that are more indicative of scum than town. What has you not thinking he's scum anymore?
In post 589, lufan131 wrote:This one is one that got to me, then later, that same tone that you weren't taking much seriously reappeared. Then, others arguments helped me also understand why. It boils down to gut though. I'm not 100% that you're confused, although your posts have confused me.
In post 594, lufan131 wrote:I'll go on a limb, and say any lurker, and albert.
In post 602, RedCoyote wrote:lufan, you have nothing to lose at this point. Might as well be straight with us as to why you're scumreading ABR. You mentioned his randomness, a.k.a. fluff, which is a logically sound reason. What's the purpose behind it? Keep going and connect more dots.
In post 604, Katsuki wrote:On a scale of 1-10, where would Albert rate in terms of what you look for in a sexual partner?
[...]
Really, I get quite the opposite feeling. Those "scumposting" posts were examples of stuff I found not genuine, and I get the opposite feeling you're getting in terms of appeasing - I think he's appeasing quite a bit when it comes to lines of questioning. There was an example from a few pages back, which might have been incited by you actually, where AA started talking about other stuff when you pointed out that he was using me as an excuse to avoid commenting on the game/other stuff.
In post 611, lufan131 wrote:I also get the active lurking out of him, where he seemed to do stuff for the reason of saying he can. Him going off on seemingly wild tangents, and I'm looking through his posts to see something that's not "fluffy", and I'm legit struggling here...
In post 615, ArcAngel9 wrote:I don't want nolynch. Not at this stage.... Lynching someone gives more understanding about game than no-lynch. But lufan wagon is unfair especially when some players clearly said why they are voting him... Ask sakura and Equnox for this. They voted him becuz we are running out of time not because he is scum. How is this even fair?
In post 687, zMuffinMan wrote:i've read up to page 12 and pages since my post last night (so like, the last 2). i'm slowly making my way through the rest of the game
In post 691, zMuffinMan wrote:but i also don't really like the lufan wagon
In post 695, lalaladucks wrote:Voting massive isn't achieving anything...
In post 710, zMuffinMan wrote:Equinox, who should I be voting for?
In post 711, lufan131 wrote:Because then they'd be like... WAGON, burn it! I'm better leaving my vote there, then
In post 725, The Bulge wrote:@Equinox, answer honestly. Is your blatant coaching of lufan game-specific or just a result of being an experienced player and playing with a newbie?
In post 918, ArcAngel9 wrote:Or you can promote massive wagon.. you said you have potential to build a speed wagon. I am looking forward to see that...
In post 930, Tere wrote:Yeah, I don't like him either but we can lynch him tomorrow?
In post 972, Katsuki wrote:What did you hope to achieve with this question?
In post 976, Katsuki wrote:And what are your conclusions?
What is your read based purely on an analysis of town/scum motivation and not on an attempt to deduce whether your 2yr old meta still applies?
In post 980, Sakura Hana wrote:@Equinox: Why do you think AA9's reasons for voting massive was? some people say OMGUS, but AA9 presented some reasons last time. She also scumread me when i first scumread her, then she switched to townread me when i townread her. Which is something that has been bothering me.
In post 1004, Katsuki wrote:How else would the Equinox drinking game work?
In post 1103, Sakura Hana wrote:Has your read on lufan changed from yesterday? Or are you sheeping zmuffin's thoughts.