Okay, I started to blow this off as AP being... Ap-ish but as you read more down perhaps you'll start to see it too. Commentary as well this time.
In post 55, ProHawk wrote:Rob, you have a few good points against BloodCovenant, except for one part. Wouldn't scum try to avoid each other more than make connections with each other? Do you really think that scum would make two connections back and forth to sacrifice the other scum-partner should one flip scum?
While this does not exonerate BC or Zabriel, I think it does make it not so fairly obvious as you say it is.
So this gets said. Mafia, according to post 1 from PH, don't try to connect to each other so this is going to make things more difficult.
In post 57, ProHawk wrote:I think I can see it now.
VOTE: zabriel
In post 49, zabriel wrote:I was mostly commenting on how he was claiming miller in first post, and that's like one of two schools of thought on how to play Miller. But it was so to the letter it was just kind of funny.
I also wasn't sure if it was a legit claim or not.
These two posts do not equate.
Early town cred of a sort.
Amusing.
In post 473, ProHawk wrote:UNVOTE:
VOTE: zabriel
No reason to call his bluff Day 1. Back to the other scum.
And then.
In post 479, ProHawk wrote:Completely agree, don't counterclaim until later in the game. That way in the off chance he is telling the truth about being cop, we don't mis-lynch him and scum would be forced to kill him.
Well this seems obvious doesn't it? (Should be noted that at the time I was somewhat drinking this coolaid as well).
In post 616, ProHawk wrote:zabriel - Mafia Doctor! - Anyone else as confused as I am about this? I mean, I knew zab was a bad guy, but killed during the night?
Holy shit Batman! (this forum doesn't seem to have a sarcasm font =/)
It should be noted that there were no posts between the two above.
In post 625, ProHawk wrote: In post 623, malpascp wrote:Third party? Is zabriel DC's partner? We have a vig AND mafia kill was blocked/protected? We have to reach some agreement on how this NK happened so we can analyze Day 1.
P-Edit: If a vig shot Zab, then our doc/RB got it right on N1? Is any of these roles "claimable" right now?
No. Not Claimable.
VOTE: malpascp
Has now said mafia won't be working together or linking at all on thread but his votes... seem to generally indicate otherwise or he is an awesome scum hunter who is floundering in late game.
In post 199, ProHawk wrote: In post 188, drmyshotgun wrote:
I see a Miller claims. Detestable. Never seen Miller claim turning out to actually be a Miller. See Spartacus Mafia and Disney Villains Mafia to see where I'm coming from.
If possible, I'd like to lynch both Millers. Believe it or not I saw a two men scumteam plotting to claim millers at the same time, get one lynched and have one live until the lylo in cruising time.
Do you suggest that we policy lynch the Miller claims without trying to see if they are scum or not? I don't really agree with the logic that we should lynch them because one scum-team plotted to both claim miller, especially when the team decided not to try it. As Rob put it, there are motivations for both scum and town to claim miller early on. There are other ways to catch scum without the cop.
Does not agree with lynching millers because they are millers. THIS IS VERY NOTABLE IMO. AP, why am I doing this case for you?
In post 870, ProHawk wrote:@ Rob13 - I am VT which also confirms CKD's claim of me not targeting anyone.
Here is his claim.
In post 1328, ProHawk wrote: In post 1292, Rob14 wrote:Silly attempt to get a DC that was going to inevitably be lynched to admit being scum in thread. If it had worked, he would be rolling in town cred. When Taz ruined it in subsequent posts, he gets really, really angry as indicated in ISO #39-#41 (look them up). Due to the crazy emotion and attempt to get town cred when DC was going to be lynched anyway, most likely, I consider this exchange a tad scummy.
^This convinced me.
Never understood why so many people discredited the claim so quickly without blinking.
UNVOTE:
VOTE: CKD
I am so sad this thread moves so fast. So many one liners I wanted to reply to, but alas they are pages away and the joke is long gone.
And a CKD vote as well.
In post 1396, ProHawk wrote: In post 979, Josh Lyman wrote:Oh, there's been a hammer. Well, that gives me a couple more days to catch up. Will post when day opens up.
UNVOTE:
VOTE: Josh Lyman
Time to lynch the lurker.
Aside from that, rofl looks town to me. Still have more digging to do on Darthe.
Doesn't agree with lynching millers. Perfectly ok with lynching Lurkers.
In post 1440, ProHawk wrote:@Rob - Your logic on Lyman scum is spot on so long as there are only 4 scum.
UNVOTE:
VOTE: malp
I also concur with your malp reasoning. I don't feel like Darthe is scum.
You're very agreeable aren't you? (Read the ISO, I am not quoting every damn time he is agreeable or submissive.. let's leave it at the fact that it is a lot)
In post 1465, ProHawk wrote:Malp, You are a supposed miller, no way for us to tell what your real alignment is. I don't see anyone else more scummy around.
Rob has an outstanding track record of fishing out and lynching scum. Of course I am going to believe him when he says you are a good lynch.
You actually read Darthe's quotes?
So you don't think he is really a miller then?
In post 1578, ProHawk wrote:2 Millers and 1
Gunsmith does not compute.
So with the setup we have to lynch one miller and gunsmith the other? Something smells fishy.
Today, we lynch Malp or Cheery.
Pretty much a turnaround here, I can see this building.
And there it is! Contrary to everything before you now want to lynch a miller, and have planted the suggestion that perhaps lynching a PR wouldn't be bad either, because of what they are.
In post 1692, ProHawk wrote: In post 1689, Rob14 wrote:
I can do a wall if you want, but it won't be for a day or three. I have a midterm, quiz, and a shit ton of homework coming up this week that I need to get under control.
So yeah, will get wall on Darthe going as soon as I can.
If I am reading the deadline correctly, we have 2 Days, 13 hours to come up with a consensus. If you are really busy this week, you should consider lynching Cheery with us and we can go after Darthe tomorrow if it comes down to that.
But make sure you guys hammer quickly, let's not dally. This is some pretty inconsistent play, and worth a bit of a look.