NY 165: A Large Normal (Game Over!)
-
-
StubbsKVM Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1387
- Joined: June 6, 2013
-
-
StubbsKVM Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1387
- Joined: June 6, 2013
No game for me without RVS! I hadn't actually read the entire topic when I posted. I'll have to say Post #10 wins the prize for stupidness.In post 73, BROseidon wrote:
I don't think fucking with ProHawk's plan would take any planning for scum to WIFOM the fuck out of.In post 53, Calcifer wrote:I really really really don't think scum would care about the plan all that much.
But hey, at least this pegs you as likely town.
Also I'm going to assume that vote is serious, and I have no idea why you would vote there. Why Ank over any of the other people who've posted relatively little?
Not sure if troll...In post 63, TheIrishPope wrote:I'm thinking whoever hasn't posted is scum yay we win
Why can't Varsoon be in this game his shitty reaction tests are hilarious. Then again, we already have a village idiot.In post 66, KingCrabd wrote:It was a reaction test pulled from the "Varsoon's shitty reaction tests" closet or something.
Guys can we not vote TiP he's just our village idiot.
I also don't like the way Stubs just came in and RVS'd despite the fact that there is actually stuff going on. Not sure if Dramonic's vote is serious or not, but if RVS then same applies to him as well.-
-
StubbsKVM Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1387
- Joined: June 6, 2013
This is the best post in this topic.In post 130, Doc Holliday wrote:Second, lol at anyone and everyone talking about 'lurkers,' people 'avoiding the thread,' and suspicion leveled against those who haven't posted yet. TIP is massively guilty of this. The game is SEVEN HOURS OLD. Some of us have jobs, and have been at work literally the entire span of the game so far. Chill.
VOTE: Nero
For telling me I suck for not voting within the first 4 hours of this game.-
-
StubbsKVM Mafia Scum
-
-
StubbsKVM Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1387
- Joined: June 6, 2013
Could you please quote your original opinion of me?In post 164, Nero wrote:you haven't changed my opinion of you for the better with that
I only saw my name in 1 post, quoted above...-
-
StubbsKVM Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1387
- Joined: June 6, 2013
-
-
StubbsKVM Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1387
- Joined: June 6, 2013
Would you like to share?In post 169, dramonic wrote: Also Im starting to get strong townreads, yay~-
-
StubbsKVM Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1387
- Joined: June 6, 2013
In post 245, Calcifer wrote:Mac, MS, Nero all new townreads. Do you agree?
Could you explain why Nero is town? I'm not seeing it.-
-
StubbsKVM Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1387
- Joined: June 6, 2013
-
-
StubbsKVM Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1387
- Joined: June 6, 2013
In post 464, Baby Spice wrote:To mr. Crab.
Re: Stubbs.
Private scum tell. Stubs did something specific that I have only seen done twice, both times by scum. Call this time yhe testing of a theory
His iso also struck me as scummy.
So what you're saying is: "I have a scumtell but don't want to share?" Why bother telling then?
it's easy to say someone is scummy. Making a (decent) case about it is a different matter.-
-
StubbsKVM Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1387
- Joined: June 6, 2013
it's alive!In post 454, Brian Hollywood wrote:Ah, I see Nero's personality hasn't changed a bit. Glad to see Nero still being the best douche in mafia
*Waits for clever Nero insult response patiently*
and lets just do this..
Unvote:Vote:BROseidon-
-
StubbsKVM Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1387
- Joined: June 6, 2013
In post 501, Ankamius wrote:
The scumclaim in general gave me a town vibe.In post 477, Zdenek wrote:How do you know Hollywood is town?
-
-
StubbsKVM Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1387
- Joined: June 6, 2013
I can't wait.In post 571, Baby Spice wrote:
Oh there's more. But I was asked why I had you on my list.In post 468, StubbsKVM wrote:In post 464, Baby Spice wrote:To mr. Crab.
Re: Stubbs.
Private scum tell. Stubs did something specific that I have only seen done twice, both times by scum. Call this time yhe testing of a theory
His iso also struck me as scummy.
So what you're saying is: "I have a scumtell but don't want to share?" Why bother telling then?
it's easy to say someone is scummy. Making a (decent) case about it is a different matter.
An actual case could wait until I, to pull an example out of thin air, actually vote you. Well that and computer access.-
-
StubbsKVM Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1387
- Joined: June 6, 2013
been a week since you've posted this. Your ISO tells me you've basically had nothing to say besides this.In post 169, dramonic wrote:DOMO, never sign up for one of my games
Also Im starting to get strong townreads, yay~
I'd like to hear those townreads(or at least some input)-
-
StubbsKVM Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1387
- Joined: June 6, 2013
In post 162, StubbsKVM wrote:
This is the best post in this topic.In post 130, Doc Holliday wrote:Second, lol at anyone and everyone talking about 'lurkers,' people 'avoiding the thread,' and suspicion leveled against those who haven't posted yet. TIP is massively guilty of this. The game is SEVEN HOURS OLD. Some of us have jobs, and have been at work literally the entire span of the game so far. Chill.
VOTE: Nero
For telling me I suck for not voting within the first 4 hours of this game.
He continued to ask for a quicklynch on Stevie and posted random BS.
So no reason for me to remove my vote.
Why?-
-
StubbsKVM Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1387
- Joined: June 6, 2013
which other 4 are you refering to??In post 515, PeregrineV wrote:Vote Count 1-3
(as of Post 514)
StevieT92 (5)- BROseidon, Nero, Zdenek, Baby Spice, The Goat
BROseidon (4)- Ankamius, ProHawk, Brian Hollywood, DOMO
Nero (3)- StubbsKVM, Doc Holliday, StevieT92
Doc Holliday (3)- Calcifer, TheIrishPope, Rift Adrift
TheIrishPope (1)- orcinus_theoriginal
TMTOLBTWNTOF (1)- Mac
Mac (1)- dramonic
dramonic (1)- KingCrabd
Metal Sonic (1)- T S O
Not Voting (4)- Metal Sonic, TMTOLBTWNTOF, truly14, Shadi1337
With 24 alive, it takes 13 to lynch
Deadline:Wednesday, July 3, 2013 at 3pm Central Time.
Replacing:
truly14
Prods:
orcinus_theoriginal
V/LAs:
None
I'm counting 3-
-
StubbsKVM Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1387
- Joined: June 6, 2013
-
-
StubbsKVM Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1387
- Joined: June 6, 2013
In post 596, orcinus_theoriginal wrote:
Personally, I think this is masterful, just because of howIn post 362, Nero wrote:In post 346, TheIrishPope wrote:Can we just policy lynch Nero?In post 347, Nero wrote:stop participatingIn post 348, truly14 wrote:Are you talking to me?In post 349, Nero wrote:im talking to the 16 year old bachelor still living with his dad. no further comments.
Unless you're also a 16 year old bachelor living with your dad I fail to recognise how you could possibly imagine I was talking to you.In post 351, truly14 wrote:Ok scum nero. Your wish is my command. Mod/s please replace me and sorry.stupidly obviousthis was coming to Truly.
DOMO: BRO is the more likely scum between he and doc, we're going with him today.
I'm going to also call Stubbs scum.
Pedit: That is not a good reason to be town-reading fery. I also don't really think sharing fery-meta at this point in time is conducive to my efforts to ascertain her alignment.
Another one to call me scum without stating a reason.
I have you as town, so I am interested in your reasoning.-
-
StubbsKVM Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1387
- Joined: June 6, 2013
The fact that I have townreads on doc and Stevie has nothing to do with me voting on Nero.In post 609, DOMO wrote:Looking at stubss' ISO, I can see him being scum with BRO and/or doc based on #383. Plus he's townreading doc and stevie to justify being on the nero wagon.
In fact fuck this, BRO, doc, stevie and stubbs are all scum. You heard it here first. God I hope scum are actually playing that transparent lol.
You're trying to point out things that are not there. I'll be watching you closely from now on-
-
StubbsKVM Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1387
- Joined: June 6, 2013
-
-
StubbsKVM Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1387
- Joined: June 6, 2013
At least now you're telling me why you read me as scum.In post 632, DOMO wrote:Why am I focussed on the nero wagon? Because I don't like it, I don't like those on it. I realise information is limited, and so there's a good chance I'm wrong, but analysing wagons is pro-town, why don't you want me to focus on the nero wagon? If you think doc and stevie are town, aren't you a teeny weeny bit suspicious of those voting for them?
I don't think you're scum because you have a different opinion to me. I'm concerned about you because you're on the nero wagon and townreading two people I'm reading as scummy. Those two people both have wagons on them, so I'm looking at the nero wagon thinking it might be a scum driven counterwagon. It's not merely "this guy isn't thinking like me", I'm seeing potential scum motivation for you being on this wagon. You're also reluctant to join the BRO wagon, someone else I'm reading as scum. Are you really surprised I'm reading you as scum too?
It's still day 1, so not that much to go on, so I'm not surprised, no.
What does bother me is that Nero is getting town credit for posting nothing but BS. That's also my problem with dramonic or what's his name. He pops in, post something unrelated to anything and leaves for a couple of days.
The difference between him and Nero is that Nero is pushing for a quicklynch on Stevie. If that's what you have to do to be considered "town", I'll pass.
I've not played a "large" game before, but if we need 13 to actually lynch someone on D1, I'd rather pressure the ones with little or no content than someone with an actual opinion about stuff.
I'd rather be lynched now, than to be stuck with those people in a few days.
I've not been playing long, but I consider scumhunting to be a discussion between "town-players", trying to filter out the "scum-players". When half of the "town-players" have nothing to say, better to get rid of them early, instead of carrying their dead weight.
So: unless Nero actually does anything meaningful, I'm not moving my vote, no matter what anyone has to say about it.(Unless people start mass-voting dramonic, he's useless too)-
-
StubbsKVM Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1387
- Joined: June 6, 2013
Just want you to have something to say. Content on me is better than no contentIn post 657, Baby Spice wrote:
You seem overly worried. Is there a reason for that?In post 574, StubbsKVM wrote:
I can't wait.In post 571, Baby Spice wrote:
Oh there's more. But I was asked why I had you on my list.In post 468, StubbsKVM wrote:In post 464, Baby Spice wrote:To mr. Crab.
Re: Stubbs.
Private scum tell. Stubs did something specific that I have only seen done twice, both times by scum. Call this time yhe testing of a theory
His iso also struck me as scummy.
So what you're saying is: "I have a scumtell but don't want to share?" Why bother telling then?
it's easy to say someone is scummy. Making a (decent) case about it is a different matter.
An actual case could wait until I, to pull an example out of thin air, actually vote you. Well that and computer access.-
-
StubbsKVM Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1387
- Joined: June 6, 2013
In post 659, orcinus_theoriginal wrote:I dunno if TIP is scum or not
I want to policy lynch dramonic, not TIP. Talk to me about that fery.
Why doyouthink I am scumreading you, Stubbs?
Nero is definitely town. I meta'd him to death for BSG. He's town. Don't touch him.
I'm not you, therefore I don't know. Why not just answer?-
-
StubbsKVM Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1387
- Joined: June 6, 2013
-
-
StubbsKVM Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1387
- Joined: June 6, 2013
I'd rather look into other people than try to look into my own posts to see how you could find me scum. That's a waste of time.In post 687, orcinus_theoriginal wrote:
Can't you guessIn post 681, StubbsKVM wrote:In post 659, orcinus_theoriginal wrote:I dunno if TIP is scum or not
I want to policy lynch dramonic, not TIP. Talk to me about that fery.
Why doyouthink I am scumreading you, Stubbs?
Nero is definitely town. I meta'd him to death for BSG. He's town. Don't touch him.
I'm not you, therefore I don't know. Why not just answer?
It gives you towncred
If you've got a point to make, make it. If you don't, then I'm dropping this.-
-
StubbsKVM Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1387
- Joined: June 6, 2013
We have to ask before you'll share your reads??In post 692, Shadi1337 wrote:
Finally someone jumped onto the fact that I wasn't giving reads myself, shame it had to be one I personally read scum.In post 686, orcinus_theoriginal wrote:
Can you stop being so freaking obvscumIn post 674, Shadi1337 wrote:Can you guys tell the reasons for your 3-4 strongest reads?
Like you are pressuring people about their reads in this shitty general manner that does nothing but try (unsuccessfully) to look like you are doing something, while having basically /no reads of your own/.
Unsuccessfully? It worked fine up until now; and I want to work my own reads out of other people's reads instead of spamming reads more than Google is used.
If you want reads so badly then ask for them, give names preferably I cannot be bothered with a full reads list.
So you have no intention to contribute anything before we ask?
okay I'll ask:
How can we consider you to be town if you don't share any of your thoughts/reads?-
-
StubbsKVM Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1387
- Joined: June 6, 2013
In post 179, Shadi1337 wrote:
Sorry dude, but what are you searching for? A medal? I mean kudos for (perhaps) trying to scum hunt and set some pressure on a few players but other than kicking off the game a bit your reasoning was weak; just rvs for that.In post 176, ProHawk wrote:For the record, I hate all of you that have nothing to say but criticism. It's honestly not all that dumb, but I do suppose change is hard for the simple minded. Regardless it has served its purpose regardless of whether or not you agreed with the idea or not.
VOTE: Shadi
From him I get the shielded scum-vibe.
The simple minded would let it go and think it meant nothing, smart people question the purpose of a lot and criticise stuff rather than going along blind-folded.
What do you mean with shielding scum-vibe, and once you have explained it tell me which posts you see this in or which part of them.
I think (not sure) what was meant is that Orc posted unlike many others, but not a lot. Just a shoot in the dark though. It does indeed seem a bit off, but so far I'm having a town read on Krab more or less; unlike the one I had in newbie newbie by Maestro with him. Then again he's a split personality this time.In post 177, Mac wrote: Krab person (cabd?) - why did you feel the need to seperate orc for not having enough posts from everyone else who don't have enough posts? I found this kinda bizarre behaviour.In post 306, Shadi1337 wrote:
As for the part, fair point. I'm not going to argue against it. I just thought I could share my thoughts about it while /maybe/ answering his question. inb4 this post is also very scummyIn post 305, Baby Spice wrote:The last.
You answered a question directed at someone else. It could even be said that you defended someone whom you could not possible have a town read on from a question directed at someone else.
I can even see you leaving the vote in there as an attempt to direct the attention of others away from you question to me.
"Look I'm just asking a question, she's voting someone else"
As for the second part, welp wasn't the intention but whatever; I genuinely just... left it.
so you're not giving reads, while giving reads in the quoted posts. Your posts are contradicting.In post 692, Shadi1337 wrote:
Finally someone jumped onto the fact that I wasn't giving reads myself, shame it had to be one I personally read scum.In post 686, orcinus_theoriginal wrote:
Can you stop being so freaking obvscumIn post 674, Shadi1337 wrote:Can you guys tell the reasons for your 3-4 strongest reads?
Like you are pressuring people about their reads in this shitty general manner that does nothing but try (unsuccessfully) to look like you are doing something, while having basically /no reads of your own/.
Unsuccessfully? It worked fine up until now; and I want to work my own reads out of other people's reads instead of spamming reads more than Google is used.
If you want reads so badly then ask for them, give names preferably I cannot be bothered with a full reads list.
Also, your ISO strikes me as very defensive.
UNVOTE:
VOTE: Shadi-
-
StubbsKVM Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1387
- Joined: June 6, 2013
-
-
StubbsKVM Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1387
- Joined: June 6, 2013
In post 709, Shadi1337 wrote:
Nah wasn't really unsuccessful, your read isn't necessarily right.In post 695, orcinus_theoriginal wrote:And of course you note that I scumread you within like 30 minutes of starting to read up in the game
so
Unsuccessfully, yes.
You've let your scumbuds down
It means that I see other people's reads and work my own reads out of it.In post 696, T S O wrote:"I want to work my own reads out of others." What the hell does this even mean?
Vote: Shadi1337
e.g a group of people could jump on someone who I see town, so I could see that group of people or some in it as scum.
I genuinely didn't know the term towncred, it was a genuine question it had nothing to do with reactions. And I STILL don't fucking know what you found scummy and you STILL haven't really explained it.In post 697, orcinus_theoriginal wrote:
If you were really reaction testing, this was your chance to own up to you. You would've noticed that I was scumreading you. In response, however, you saidIn post 556, orcinus_theoriginal wrote:Why do you think I'm voting you?
Yeah bullshit. If you were reaction testing then you would've known what it was that you were doing that I found scummy.I don't know
Granted, I kinda forgot I gave a read on Krab and therefore stated I didn't give any reads so I'm guilty as charged there and contradicted myself. Reason for the read in case anybody cares; He stood out extremely town to me in this game because if you look at the Maestro newbie newbie game he was being quite aggressive while he's more careful and gives more time to his posts and reads.In post 698, StubbsKVM wrote:In post 179, Shadi1337 wrote:
Sorry dude, but what are you searching for? A medal? I mean kudos for (perhaps) trying to scum hunt and set some pressure on a few players but other than kicking off the game a bit your reasoning was weak; just rvs for that.In post 176, ProHawk wrote:For the record, I hate all of you that have nothing to say but criticism. It's honestly not all that dumb, but I do suppose change is hard for the simple minded. Regardless it has served its purpose regardless of whether or not you agreed with the idea or not.
VOTE: Shadi
From him I get the shielded scum-vibe.
The simple minded would let it go and think it meant nothing, smart people question the purpose of a lot and criticise stuff rather than going along blind-folded.
What do you mean with shielding scum-vibe, and once you have explained it tell me which posts you see this in or which part of them.
I think (not sure) what was meant is that Orc posted unlike many others, but not a lot. Just a shoot in the dark though. It does indeed seem a bit off, but so far I'm having a town read on Krab more or less; unlike the one I had in newbie newbie by Maestro with him. Then again he's a split personality this time.In post 177, Mac wrote: Krab person (cabd?) - why did you feel the need to seperate orc for not having enough posts from everyone else who don't have enough posts? I found this kinda bizarre behaviour.In post 306, Shadi1337 wrote:
As for the part, fair point. I'm not going to argue against it. I just thought I could share my thoughts about it while /maybe/ answering his question. inb4 this post is also very scummyIn post 305, Baby Spice wrote:The last.
You answered a question directed at someone else. It could even be said that you defended someone whom you could not possible have a town read on from a question directed at someone else.
I can even see you leaving the vote in there as an attempt to direct the attention of others away from you question to me.
"Look I'm just asking a question, she's voting someone else"
As for the second part, welp wasn't the intention but whatever; I genuinely just... left it.
so you're not giving reads, while giving reads in the quoted posts. Your posts are contradicting.In post 692, Shadi1337 wrote:
Finally someone jumped onto the fact that I wasn't giving reads myself, shame it had to be one I personally read scum.In post 686, orcinus_theoriginal wrote:
Can you stop being so freaking obvscumIn post 674, Shadi1337 wrote:Can you guys tell the reasons for your 3-4 strongest reads?
Like you are pressuring people about their reads in this shitty general manner that does nothing but try (unsuccessfully) to look like you are doing something, while having basically /no reads of your own/.
Unsuccessfully? It worked fine up until now; and I want to work my own reads out of other people's reads instead of spamming reads more than Google is used.
If you want reads so badly then ask for them, give names preferably I cannot be bothered with a full reads list.
Also, your ISO strikes me as very defensive.
UNVOTE:
VOTE: Shadi
Defence is a decent weapon, but I seem to have used it wrong.
Fair do's.
Ask for a name.In post 700, orcinus_theoriginal wrote:
what 'reads' are you seeingIn post 698, StubbsKVM wrote:so you're not giving reads, while giving reads in the quoted posts. Your posts are contradicting.
True, as I said earlier I forgot I gave a read on him. Guilty as charged if you really wanna keep jumping on that fact be my guest.In post 701, StubbsKVM wrote:
and thenbut so far I'm having a town read on Krab more or less
contradicts with:I just thought I could share my thoughts
andI wasn't giving reads myself
I want to work my own reads out of other people's reads instead of spamming reads more than Google is used.
Another contradiction: you have a "more or less" townread on kingcrabd. And now that I point it out, he was extremely townish...-
-
StubbsKVM Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1387
- Joined: June 6, 2013
You give a "more or less" townreadGranted, I kinda forgot I gave a read on Krab and therefore stated I didn't give any reads so I'm guilty as charged there and contradicted myself. Reason for the read in case anybody cares; He stood out extremely town to me in this game because if you look at the Maestro newbie newbie game he was being quite aggressive while he's more careful and gives more time to his posts and reads.
You say you don't give reads.
You say you only posted the read because he was extremely towny
That's just not right...
Built up?? That's bs...-
-
StubbsKVM Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1387
- Joined: June 6, 2013
you're not getting it.In post 740, Shadi1337 wrote:Oh, now I might understand wtf you meant.
I gave the reason for my read, not the reason as of why I posted it. Nobody questioned WHY I really saw him as town and why it kept building up.
You say you don't give reads-I prove you wrong by quoting your "more or less " town read on kingcrabd
Then you say the reason why you did post that read is because kingcrabd was "extremely towny" at that time.
That does not make sense because you posted "more or less". If you thought he was "extremely towny", you wouldn't have posted "more or less" towny. You telling him it was built up does not make sense either, because I'm talking about 1 post. Sure, it's possible your town read on him improved later, but you never mentioned that again.
I'm not saying people can't be wrong. But you're trying to defend yourself using a false argument.
You're piling up the contradictions and you keep defending them too.-
-
StubbsKVM Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1387
- Joined: June 6, 2013
-
-
StubbsKVM Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1387
- Joined: June 6, 2013
Whether or not your read became different later on is irrelevant, because we're talking about the time of the post.In post 747, Shadi1337 wrote:
Read my post again pls, not gonna repeat.In post 743, StubbsKVM wrote:
you're not getting it.In post 740, Shadi1337 wrote:Oh, now I might understand wtf you meant.
I gave the reason for my read, not the reason as of why I posted it. Nobody questioned WHY I really saw him as town and why it kept building up.
You say you don't give reads-I prove you wrong by quoting your "more or less " town read on kingcrabd
Then you say the reason why you did post that read is because kingcrabd was "extremely towny" at that time.
That does not make sense because you posted "more or less". If you thought he was "extremely towny", you wouldn't have posted "more or less" towny. You telling him it was built up does not make sense either, because I'm talking about 1 post. Sure, it's possible your town read on him improved later, but you never mentioned that again.
I'm not saying people can't be wrong. But you're trying to defend yourself using a false argument.
You're piling up the contradictions and you keep defending them too.
You say it's not possible that I got a stronger town read of him later, yet you say it is??
I'm not defending myself on a wrong argument, I told you I'm guilty as charged for forgetting that one read.
What I'm defending is that my read became different later, if you're gonna keep on your vote for that. Be an idiot, and be my guest being an idiot.
Call me an idiot all you want, you're just not getting my point.
I'm tired of trying to explain and no-one is backing me up. No point in continuing a lost cause, I suppose-
-
StubbsKVM Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1387
- Joined: June 6, 2013
-
-
StubbsKVM Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1387
- Joined: June 6, 2013
You're not getting my point either. I'll try and explain one more time:
Shadi:
I have a more or less town read on this guy.
x amount of posts later:
Shadi:
I don't share my reads
Stubbs:
you did --> points at first post
Shadi:
yeah but I only shared because he was extremely towny at that time.
Can you not see the contradiction in this?-
-
StubbsKVM Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1387
- Joined: June 6, 2013
-
-
StubbsKVM Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1387
- Joined: June 6, 2013
Your reason for the "more or less towny" read is he stood out extremely town.Granted, I kinda forgot I gave a read on Krab and therefore stated I didn't give any reads so I'm guilty as charged there and contradicted myself. Reason for the read in case anybody cares; He stood out extremely town to me in this game
That's exactly what it says.-
-
StubbsKVM Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1387
- Joined: June 6, 2013
Missing some posts: from what I can remember I'll summarize.
I said Shadi's large reads post felt forced and that it felt like he had to make up for not posting any reads earlier.
Shadi admitted that he did want to make up for not sharing earlier but that he wasn't going to do such large posts again because they are too time-consuming.
That's all I remember. Correct me if I'm wrong, Shadi.
I remember asking Shadi why he doesn't just post his reads when they come up instead of putting so much work into that one post. I cannot remember what the answer was, if there was an answer at all.-
-
StubbsKVM Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1387
- Joined: June 6, 2013
-
-
StubbsKVM Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1387
- Joined: June 6, 2013
So you're dead weight on day 1, at leastIn post 852, dramonic wrote:
I'm not dead-weight, I just don't put any faith in Day 1.In post 846, StubbsKVM wrote:Rift Adrift and Crab make some good points on Shadi's gameplay. I'm not convinced he's town yet, but I think there are better options for now.
UNVOTE:
VOTE: Dramonic
Back to the dead weight.-
-
StubbsKVM Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1387
- Joined: June 6, 2013
okay Nero, you're officially on my town list. I'm sorry I ever voted for you.In post 921, Nero wrote:we're witnessing a mental breakdown of one of the most retarded hydras to grace this site.-
-
StubbsKVM Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1387
- Joined: June 6, 2013
-
-
StubbsKVM Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1387
- Joined: June 6, 2013
There's a whole world out there you know...In post 938, Serene wrote:In post 936, StubbsKVM wrote:Serene...
So actually reading the game is too much to ask.
But filling an entire page with profanity is what you consider scumhunting?
Nice.
look man i stick with what works for me-
-
StubbsKVM Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1387
- Joined: June 6, 2013
what exactly are you referring too?In post 974, Baby Spice wrote:Kinda liking Shadi's last few posts actually, and not exactly liking who else is on that wagon. Not saying he's town yet though.
Unvote, Vote Stubbs
I hate it when you discover that a post got ninja'd and you didn't see it happen, then find it the next day still waiting-
-
StubbsKVM Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1387
- Joined: June 6, 2013
I'm actually voting Dramonic, not Serene.In post 1085, Zdenek wrote:
I liked you when you were pressing Shadi.In post 936, StubbsKVM wrote:Serene...
So actually reading the game is too much to ask.
But filling an entire page with profanity is what you consider scumhunting?
Nice.
Now it looks like you are just jumpy.
Do you think Serene is scum?
No BulbaFenixIn post 969, Serene wrote:I'm sorry. I drowned some ceremonial kittens in the Ganges and I'm feeling better.
VOTE: Stevie
Vote: Stevie
What the fuck?In post 974, Baby Spice wrote:Kinda liking Shadi's last few posts actually, and not exactly liking who else is on that wagon. Not saying he's town yet though.
Unvote, Vote Stubbs
I hate it when you discover that a post got ninja'd and you didn't see it happen, then find it the next day still waiting
You were voting Shadi with Stubb's, Stubb leaves that wagon and votes Serene, so you leave it to vote Stubbs?
Why do you think that Stubb's is scum?
I think this is a great idea:In post 1030, Rift Adrift wrote:Rift would really like to get a town bloc formed
EVERYONE VOTE STEVIE, HE WILL FLIP SCUM AND IT WILL BE GLORIOUS!
Now do I think Serene is scum? A 2-headed hydra is difficult enough for me to read. Now there's 3-headed hydras?
Well based on one of the sane head's posts, I'm leaning town. But the insane head's so annoying I just want to vote to be done with it.-
-
StubbsKVM Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1387
- Joined: June 6, 2013
poorly reasoned?In post 1098, Zdenek wrote:Well, I ISO'ed Stubbs. He could be scum, I find his pushes somewhat opportunistic and voting choices poorly reasoned, but it's tricky because he could just be new-town trying hard, which could produce the same effect.
Which pushes are you talking about exactly?-
-
StubbsKVM Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1387
- Joined: June 6, 2013
So you would consider posting at least something.In post 1109, dramonic wrote:More importantly, why the fuck has everyone jumped on me? <_<-
-
StubbsKVM Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1387
- Joined: June 6, 2013
-
-
StubbsKVM Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1387
- Joined: June 6, 2013
good point. Not considering unvoting yet though. Maybe you should post some more of that crap.In post 1115, dramonic wrote:
Grats, I just posted twice!In post 1110, StubbsKVM wrote:
So you would consider posting at least something.In post 1109, dramonic wrote:More importantly, why the fuck has everyone jumped on me? <_<-
-
StubbsKVM Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1387
- Joined: June 6, 2013
In post 1139, Zdenek wrote:
Yes.In post 1100, StubbsKVM wrote:
poorly reasoned?In post 1098, Zdenek wrote:Well, I ISO'ed Stubbs. He could be scum, I find his pushes somewhat opportunistic and voting choices poorly reasoned, but it's tricky because he could just be new-town trying hard, which could produce the same effect.
Which pushes are you talking about exactly?
Nero, dramonic.In post 635, StubbsKVM wrote:
At least now you're telling me why you read me as scum.In post 632, DOMO wrote:Why am I focussed on the nero wagon? Because I don't like it, I don't like those on it. I realise information is limited, and so there's a good chance I'm wrong, but analysing wagons is pro-town, why don't you want me to focus on the nero wagon? If you think doc and stevie are town, aren't you a teeny weeny bit suspicious of those voting for them?
I don't think you're scum because you have a different opinion to me. I'm concerned about you because you're on the nero wagon and townreading two people I'm reading as scummy. Those two people both have wagons on them, so I'm looking at the nero wagon thinking it might be a scum driven counterwagon. It's not merely "this guy isn't thinking like me", I'm seeing potential scum motivation for you being on this wagon. You're also reluctant to join the BRO wagon, someone else I'm reading as scum. Are you really surprised I'm reading you as scum too?
It's still day 1, so not that much to go on, so I'm not surprised, no.
What does bother me is that Nero is getting town credit for posting nothing but BS. That's also my problem with dramonic or what's his name. He pops in, post something unrelated to anything and leaves for a couple of days.
The difference between him and Nero is that Nero is pushing for a quicklynch on Stevie. If that's what you have to do to be considered "town", I'll pass.
I've not played a "large" game before, but if we need 13 to actually lynch someone on D1, I'd rather pressure the ones with little or no content than someone with an actual opinion about stuff.
I'd rather be lynched now, than to be stuck with those people in a few days.
I've not been playing long, but I consider scumhunting to be a discussion between "town-players", trying to filter out the "scum-players". When half of the "town-players" have nothing to say, better to get rid of them early, instead of carrying their dead weight.
So: unless Nero actually does anything meaningful, I'm not moving my vote, no matter what anyone has to say about it.(Unless people start mass-voting dramonic, he's useless too)-
-
StubbsKVM
-
-
StubbsKVM Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1387
- Joined: June 6, 2013
why should I vote a mason?In post 1120, Serene wrote:dramonic is my mason.-
-
StubbsKVM Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1387
- Joined: June 6, 2013
Okay, because I didn't really get why there's so many players voting or suspecting Stevie, I ISOed him to see if I missed anything.
In post 84, StevieT92 wrote:
Because in the beginning of the game a good town is supposed to be suspicious of everyone. It should take more than 2 pages of fluff/RVS for you to determine that someone is a townie.In post 47, Mac wrote:
can you tell me how this is scummy and how this doesn't work in reverse?In post 44, StevieT92 wrote: Scum suspect #2 is BROseidan for making a town read on page 2.
Scumhunting, on the other hand, is always encouraged.In post 203, StevieT92 wrote:skimmed stuff because im lazy and talking to a friend in the library
i never said don't townread, i said you shouldn't have a townread by page two. do you get the difference and why i think that might be.
unvote, vote:nerofor the 2 back to back votes with no analysis or reason for the switch.
I think I get what he's trying to say, he just put it out there in a bad way. I suppose he means it's impossible to be certain about someone being town on page 2?
I've seen one post where he said he still had to ISO BRO, but he never actually did it. I'm not sure I get that last line. "I will definitely hammer him." How can you hammer someone if you're already voting for him? Don't get it.In post 355, StevieT92 wrote:In post 198, Nero wrote:good work comrades, pile the votes on stevie. if required, i will hardclaim my role to get him lynched.
Just re-posting this quote to remind you all of what a scum Nero is. I think BROseidon is probably the best, most agreed-upon lynch target today. Will ISO him for my next post. I'm not going to move my vote off of him, but I will definitely hammer him.
This is his last post. Still nothing on BRO.In post 1104, StevieT92 wrote:So my expected internet problems have finally manifested themselves. I am too busy to read 17 pages right now but I will try to get to Starbucks later tonight. Expect a post tomorrow at the latest.
Regards,
Stevie
So my question. Are you all still voting on that townread on page 2 comment? Or is there something else I'm not seeing?-
-
StubbsKVM Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1387
- Joined: June 6, 2013
-
-
StubbsKVM Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1387
- Joined: June 6, 2013
Why isn't anyone answering?In post 1176, StubbsKVM wrote:Okay, because I didn't really get why there's so many players voting or suspecting Stevie, I ISOed him to see if I missed anything.
In post 84, StevieT92 wrote:
Because in the beginning of the game a good town is supposed to be suspicious of everyone. It should take more than 2 pages of fluff/RVS for you to determine that someone is a townie.In post 47, Mac wrote:
can you tell me how this is scummy and how this doesn't work in reverse?In post 44, StevieT92 wrote: Scum suspect #2 is BROseidan for making a town read on page 2.
Scumhunting, on the other hand, is always encouraged.In post 203, StevieT92 wrote:skimmed stuff because im lazy and talking to a friend in the library
i never said don't townread, i said you shouldn't have a townread by page two. do you get the difference and why i think that might be.
unvote, vote:nerofor the 2 back to back votes with no analysis or reason for the switch.
I think I get what he's trying to say, he just put it out there in a bad way. I suppose he means it's impossible to be certain about someone being town on page 2?
I've seen one post where he said he still had to ISO BRO, but he never actually did it. I'm not sure I get that last line. "I will definitely hammer him." How can you hammer someone if you're already voting for him? Don't get it.In post 355, StevieT92 wrote:In post 198, Nero wrote:good work comrades, pile the votes on stevie. if required, i will hardclaim my role to get him lynched.
Just re-posting this quote to remind you all of what a scum Nero is. I think BROseidon is probably the best, most agreed-upon lynch target today. Will ISO him for my next post. I'm not going to move my vote off of him, but I will definitely hammer him.
This is his last post. Still nothing on BRO.In post 1104, StevieT92 wrote:So my expected internet problems have finally manifested themselves. I am too busy to read 17 pages right now but I will try to get to Starbucks later tonight. Expect a post tomorrow at the latest.
Regards,
Stevie
So my question. Are you all still voting on that townread on page 2 comment? Or is there something else I'm not seeing?-
-
StubbsKVM Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1387
- Joined: June 6, 2013
-
-
StubbsKVM Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1387
- Joined: June 6, 2013
-
-
StubbsKVM Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1387
- Joined: June 6, 2013
In post 1104, StevieT92 wrote:So my expected internet problems have finally manifested themselves. I am too busy to read 17 pages right now but I will try to get to Starbucks later tonight. Expect a post tomorrow at the latest.
Regards,
Stevie
I'm still waiting for this too.-
-
StubbsKVM Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1387
- Joined: June 6, 2013
-
-
StubbsKVM Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1387
- Joined: June 6, 2013
where's your case on BROseidon?In post 1301, StevieT92 wrote:
i've been posting content??In post 1300, StubbsKVM wrote:I hope you're actually going to post content this time.-
-
StubbsKVM Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1387
- Joined: June 6, 2013
-
-
StubbsKVM Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1387
- Joined: June 6, 2013
-