Micro 274 OVER!

[Peabody]

Hi,

I'm Lucky2u's replacement.

Good morning:

Hmmmmmm which wagon to join?

Vote: Loranthaceae

Out of curiosity, why did you choose the wagon you chose?

[Peabody]

@Mod

/confirm, if you needed me to say the actual word.

[Peabody]

VOTE: Peabody

Judging by the info currently on the table I'd say Peabody is a werewolf

*Howls at the full moon*

Who me?

[Peabody]

Your bandwagon choice was really the only thing I wanted to question.

[Peabody]

vote Wake88

I get accused of being werewolf, and I'm nonchalant about it (howl).

Wake gets accused and he makes a similar joke (Annihilator beam). It looks like he is trying to blend in.

[Peabody]

At least the slot has been upgraded.

D'aww <3

[Peabody]

I'm pretty sure he's not trying to blend in.

Please explain.

[Peabody]

Peabody

———✹

I don't think you know me.

———✹

Explain your vote, please.

———✹

What of me outside this game do you actually know?

I don't know you, but I don't see how that nullifies the reasons for my vote on you which are that I interpret your annihilator beam joke as trying to be similar with how I responded to an accusation. I no longer think this is the case.

unvote

As far as the 'crumb' that was mentioned, I don't see a benefit of revealing whether I'm the innocent child or not now. The only distraction that the supposed crumb is causing is that Yates didn't explain what he meant right away.

----------------

Lor:

It says there's a chance that werewolves are in it and my first instinct was Peabody is one of them.

What made you so sure that -I- was a werewolf? That's oddly specific. Normally, I'd see someone just call someone scum...

I first thought you were reaction testing, but were you serious?

[Peabody]

I did the research DBK suggested which is why I relinquished my vote in the first place. I do not think you get a town card, but you're pinging as town for me now.

I also found it strange that DBK did come to Wake88's side throughout that whole thing.

I also did find it odd that Lor agreed with my reasoning for Wake. No one ever agrees with me on things.

vote goodmorning

Wake's declarative post helped me to see the oddity involved in goodmorning's quick pushback on my question to him. Goodmorning's 'which wagon should I choose' comment pinged strangely as well. At this point, I'd love to see more from Goodmorning considering how strangely this player responded to my question. I really don't see a 'Why didn't you question anyone else' as a scumhunting technique.

I'm not getting good vibes on the mastina hydra due to the refusal to cooperate on principle of 'that's my playstyle'. It is a defense-only approach to the game.

[Peabody]

I think I've explained that throughout my ISO, that Peabody is neutral to me (I can't figure him out right now)

I get this a lot.

[Peabody]

Seriously, Mastina? This game is in page 5. Of course, I don't have the best case... GM posted like... twice.

[Peabody]

fyi I never refused to cooperate I was defending the argument that for some, it is a playstyle but sweet misrep

Hence why I said your posting is defensive based. You're arguing an irrelevant point for a majority of the game instead of scumhunting.

I'm not even sure if you are truly voting me because you think I'm scum.

[Peabody]

With Lor, I'm questioning WHY he decided to call me a werewolf instead of scum?

I thought his posting was a reaction test, but it seems like he was serious the whole time.

Additionally, I saw his agreeing with my point on Wake as odd because I never get followers on my votes. So naturally, I was suspicious of that.

Null/leaning scum.

[Peabody]

Actually, no... More leaning null than scum. I don't know.

[Peabody]

His conviction on his reads are what are throwing me off.

[Peabody]

Sorry for the extra posts:

Lor, why are you still voting Wake88??

[Peabody]

I don't see a benefit of revealing whether I'm the innocent child or not now.

Really? You don't see the benefit of having a mod confirmed Townie?

No, I see the benefit of that, but I have other reasons I'd rather not claim yes or no.

You've gotta trust me on this. If I'm IC, I'll reveal it when I feel it has the best impact on the game.

[Peabody]

I see. So Rach's vote switch, mastin's FoS (on your slot, even), Yates' 10, Wake not doing RVS, none of these things were significant enough for you to mention? And my pithy comment was?
This is what I was trying to ask you. Not "what why pick on meeeee"?

Wake's lack of RVS didn't bother me. Mastin's FoS was focused on Lucky posting in other games. It has nothing to do with me. I didn't notice Rach's vote switch. I had no opinion about the messup of games.

But I did have questions about why you chose the bandwagon you did. Which is why I questioned you.

^ to me it looks like you have more cause to think loran is scum just based on interaction than you do gm so i am trying to figure out why would you not vote loran. read your reasons for your reads on both players <----- your points on loran are more solid than your points on gm so why are you going after gm

Good point.

vote Lor

His conviction on his reads are what are throwing me off.

why would that throw you off

I suppose I didn't see why scum would take such an aggressive stance and risk the spotlight so early.


-------

Yates, do you still think Wake is crumbing vig or not? Your 'until the above post' is muddying up what your actual stance is for me.

[Peabody]

By the way, this whole 'did he crumb vig or not' thing is distracting.

[Peabody]

unvote Lor

I had no idea it was L-1.

[Peabody]

Lor, you criticized me for not keeping you at L-1 and you still decide to not claim?

[Peabody]

No... What are you?

[Peabody]

Your scum read on me is bizarre considering you agreed with me the entire game until I... unvoted you? And now you're lynched?

I don't think you should have been hammered this fast. I agree.

[Peabody]

Why would I keep you at L-1 when obviously lynching you was a risk?

[Peabody]

Are you scum or are you trolling?

[Peabody]

Really.. 48 hours into the game?

Yes. And it did happen.

[Peabody]

If he reaches lylo just lynch him ok?

@ Peabody There was no way you could've predicted that, nostradamus. You're function at that point in time was to make me slip and for some reason you unvoted .. not even voted someone else just simply unvoted. You are scum and you will die for this, hopefully.

No, I couldn't have predicted that for sure, but I was right.

And die for what? Unvoting you so this wouldn't happen?

I don't have anything against you as a person, just so you know. It seems like you're really heated against me, who if you are town, are on my side.

[Peabody]

Huh?

I unvoted so you didn't get lynched. But two votes came in super fast.

[Peabody]

I predicted it was possible for one person to lynch you. Not two within a span of a couple hours.

[Peabody]

... Someone is trying to frame me.

[Peabody]

Peabody, what do you make of Yates, DBK, and RachMarie?

I think Yates is either gambiting to see if DBK would slip up as scum or he really is the tracker. Either way, he's town.

If Yates is tracker, DBK is scum.

I really don't have opinions on RachMarie at the moment. It's a lurking slot, and I have no opinions on that squabble about who was scum in what game.

... Someone is trying to frame me.

Why do you think that??

The 2 mastinas were pretty set on me being scum from day 1, so I figure the scum probably find me an easy, next logical lynch. In order to start the dominoes, they killed Mastinas. That's my opinion on why Mastina died.

[Peabody]

Sorry, but, well, that's not really good enough. Are you or are you not a Tracker? If you're not lying, then cat's out of the bag, so say what you are right now, because you've got nothing to keep from Town. If you won't answer me, I

will

vote for you. Of that you can be sure.

I'd let Yates complete his gambit. Which I'm starting to believe he's doing more and more by the moment. But I certainly wouldn't vote him.

[Peabody]

I'm not comfortable on voting Yates at the moment as he is a town read.

At the moment I'm undecided who to vote for. The lurking slots are tempting, but I'd love to see more. I need to do some more ISOing.

[Peabody]

Yeah, I suppose I didn't help the case by pointing it out.

[Peabody]

I sort of don't trust Yates and DBK, so I'm going to question them, then move on to others when I'm ready.

Are you thinking they could both be scum? Or just one?

[Peabody]

I don't think a Yates/DBK team is likely.

RE: My opening post:

It was my feeling at the time that I was the next target of accusation, so I posted that.

[Peabody]

Wake, why did you quickhammer Loran after specifically asking for no quickhammers?

Peabody: Why don't you think Yates is scum before even confirming or denying a gambit?

If Yates IS gambiting: It's too much of a ballsy move for scum at this point. It is my assumption that scum want to make it to a lylo situation before pulling off something like this without backing down. Either way, if Yates continues this gambit until your lynch and you are VT, he will be lynched. I don't know why a scum would trade scum for town at this point and ruin a possible 5 man lylo (There are normally 2 anti-town players in this setup right??? It's my first micro).

If Yates ISN'T gambiting: You are scum and Yates is town.

[Peabody]

IF Yates is gambiting and he's town, he will back off soon enough.

[Peabody]

Huh.

VOTE: Does Bo Know

Lol I guess you were done pressuring Peabody?

Whew, Wake. I was sweating bullets.

[Peabody]

I hate not knowing things. I do feel rather ravenous for answers, though.

Is this an answer to my 'why did you quickhammer' question?

[Peabody]

I hate not knowing things. I do feel rather ravenous for answers, though.

Is this an answer to my 'why did you quickhammer' question?

No. Although, I do find it interesting that both you and DBK are, at the same time, rather chatty. Do you think you'd vote for DBK?

Yes. If Yates doesn't back down.

[Peabody]

Can you answer it now? I know you posted that you voted him because he didn't claim, but it was still a quickhammer.

[Peabody]

I'd like to hear more from Goodmorning.

I'm willing to throw down a vote on her if I don't end up voting DBK.

[Peabody]

I just decided that if Yates is gambiting and is not really tracker or whatever powerrole, I think DBK is town.

[Peabody]

Wake:

It's mostly based on DBK's response to my first post of the day. He reacted how I figure town probably would.

Additionally, I think DBK acted appropriately in response to Yates' accusation if he is actually a vanilla townie. I know this may seem like too much speculation, but I would guess a mafia who had a night action and was called out on it would claim something different than vanilla townie.

[Peabody]

Huh.

Peabody and DBK?

Everyone else needs to talk.

Are you suggesting a scumteam comprised of DBK and I?

[Peabody]

DBK is obviously scum.

Yates is town. I was able to see his gambit because he played like it was a gambit. He didn't claim, yet he hinted results. The reason I felt it was safe to mention the possibility that it was a gambit is because DBK already reacted by claiming VT. I thought that was adequate.

Aegor is probably DBK's partner because:
1)

What the fuck are you talking about? By claiming that I or Peabody am/is his partner, you are also claiming that Yates is a psycho townie who is lying for...what reason, exactly? Because he simply had a hunch that DBK was scum? Because he is a cop trying to conceal himself?

Aegor believes Wake, but for some reason feels the need to argue with him? I see this as an OMGUS for finding his scum partner.

and

2)

Thanks for erecting a giant-ass straw man, though. Given that you are lynch-1 and both a fake Tracker and a real one saw you conducting a night action, maybe you should reconsider your VT claim.

This looks like partner coaching partner.

[Peabody]

I'm waiting for Rach to post within 2 hours.

If DBK is not lynched by then, I will hammer.

[Peabody]

But Wake I don't understand the image.

Also I'm changing my mind

UNVOTE:
VOTE: RachMarie

Because reasons.

There's nothing left to be secret 'reasons'. You claimed. The only information you may have that we don't is possibly from an ongoing game or something?

[Peabody]

You may as well vote already, Peabody. I'm not lying.

I don't think you are.

I'm confident DBK will flip scum when I hammer, but I know hardly anything about Rach atm. I'd rather her get a post in, but I'm not willing to wait longer than the 2 hours I said. There'd be too much time for someone to bail the wagon.

[Peabody]

Oh wait. Nevermind. I didn't see post 386.

VOTE: DBK

[Peabody]

Suspect list currently:

Aegor
Goodmorning (possibly? Maybe?)

In that order.

[Peabody]

<3 Love the GIFs

[Peabody]

Goodmorning, why is your figurative vote on Rach?

[Peabody]

As I said before, Yates is town.

Rach's speculation about the setup makes me uneasy which makes me ask:
How many games have you played?

As far as Aegor goes, the frustration against Wake was apparent, but it didn't look like a townie being frustrated the tracker claimed.

GM, Can you please explain why you think RM is scum, especially because you said you have no scum reads?

Aegor:

We have WIFOM distancing from DBK in posts 374 and 375 toward Peabody and RM respectively.

I have nothing to say to that. I was wondering if he was WIFOMing me for tomorrow by trying to 'distance'.

Really not liking Peabody's post 104 for incredibly weak reasoning and defensiveness, his post 246 for apparent ignorance of buddying,

Lor was being incredibly inconsistant. I know what buddying is. I felt that Lor was buddying me because he was agreeing with me on things. I didn't use that as a main argument against him. I was more worried about him thinking I was scum while also agreeing with me...

his post 246 for apparent ignorance of buddying, and post 264 for preemptive defense against claims of framing which was completely unnecessary.

I already explained this.

GM summed up the reasons I mentioned earlier about Aegor's inconsistant frustration with Wake pretty well.

[Peabody]

Obviously my theory was proven false, but up until wake's NK I still internally admitted the possibility he was mafia.

I like this from Aegor. It does address my concern.

[Peabody]

Aegor and GM are the two who have my most attention based on gut.

I promise I will be following up with that with some research. I don't know if it will be today.

[Peabody]

That's... a good case, actually.

Yeah, I know. I look forward to GM's defense.

This is an awkward post.

[Peabody]

I was crazy busy today, but I PROMISE content will come within the next 24 hours.

[Peabody]

I can't get over the inconsistancy of this post with your prior post regarding Wake.

You said you were entertaining the possibility that Wake was scum while keeping your vote on DBK. But this does not explain why you maintained what you said to Wake:

You have

so

got to die.

It doesn't make sense why you would use the wording you did when you did. Is this not an attempt to focus attention away from someone you said was certain to be mafia in 444?

To DBK, Aegor says:

Given that you are lynch-1 and both a fake Tracker and a real one saw you conducting a night action, maybe you should reconsider your VT claim.

How is this NOT a coach?? Why would you want to help out a mafia in this situation, especially because you said it was basically certain DBK was mafia??

I know I raised these concerns earlier, but they still linger in my mind.

-------------

I'm glad that Rach is posting more content though her first few posts regarding setup speculation looked as if Rach posted just to post.

[Peabody]

I doubt its lylo. I'd rather not mass claim.

[Peabody]

Aegor, I'm not sure what you don't think I responded to in 444. I referenced that post in my post.

VOTE: Aegor

Yates is my only townread at the moment. After Aegor, Goodmorning and Rach are on a level read for me unfortunately. I keep wifoming my own reads.

[Peabody]

I vote no for a massclaim. I am guessing we only have one mafia left, so I'd rather not give them the advantage by claiming now. Tomorrow is fine.

[Peabody]

I know you answered the issues, but what you said is scummy enough for a vote from me. Just as you said, it's the fact that you said those things, whether or not you explained them.

Yes, Yates, I think it would help scum more than us at the moment. Tomorrow is the day before lylo, right?

[Peabody]

Not if they were adequately explained. So something in my explanation was inadequate, or your vote is based on a feeling. Which is it?

I don't think you can adequately explain all of my concerns. At first I thought you did, until I reread. My vote is on you for now.

You seem to have a better memory than I do. Where did I say that?

Your explanation is not what bothered me. The fact that you made the statement at all is.

That is the quote I was referring to.

------

As far as tomorrow being Lylo, I didn't realize that. I'll vote for a massclaim then.

[Peabody]

Like Aegor, I'm least concerned by Yates.

[Peabody]

A universal backup, a rolecop AND a tracker?

I'm really suspicious of Rach's claim.

Vote Count 3.4

goodmorning (1) - RachMarie
RachMarie (1) - Aegor
Aegor (1) - Peabody

Not Voting: goodmorning, Yates

With 5 players alive, it takes 3 to lynch

[Peabody]

unvote

This town is either too overpowered or there are 2 more scum left.

[Peabody]

VOTE: RachMarie

[Peabody]

UNVOTE: RachMarie

No.. I'll wait for the rest of the claims.
Sorry.

[Peabody]

I am VT.

I think we're in lylo. These power roles make no sense. One of them is certainly mafia. And I'm leaning toward RM or GM.

[Peabody]

RM as scum seems most likely.

Also, a roleblocker doesn't act as a jailer. It just stops whatever my role is from performing the role. Not from others investigating me or whatever.

[Peabody]

However, Rolecop CLEARING two people in the town looks anti-scum...

I'm rethinking this...

GM may be lying.

[Peabody]

Hm. GM's crumb of townreading me does help his case.

[Peabody]

Roleblocker, tracker, and universal makes way more sense than tracker, rolecop and universal backup.

I'm kind of afraid of a quickhammer if I vote though if we are in lylo.

[Peabody]

Yates, think about the BALANCE here.

A tracker with 2 lives (via universal backup) and a roleblocker is believable.

But think about a tracker with two lives and a rolecop???

That makes no sense. It makes the town overpowered. I am not a serial killer either.

If anyone is lying, it is RachMarie.

I'm just afraid to vote at the moment.

[Peabody]

Screw it. This is the only thing that makes sense to me.

Here's to hoping I'm right.
VOTE: RachMarie

[Peabody]

The setup speculation from RachMarie (which strikes me as a 'need' stemming from pressure to post content) and her case on GM based mainly on VCA and DBK's WIFOM readings, this is feeling better to me.

[Peabody]

That wasn't the hammer.

[Peabody]

UNVOTE: RachMarie

I'm going to reapply my vote, but I want you to answer this:

Let's hope I'm right.

Why wouldn't you be right? What is the other scenario?

[Peabody]

Oh, you're right, that was the hammer.

The fact that you took the time to explain tells me you either aren't scum or this isn't lylo. ^_^

[Peabody]

I wouldn't be surprised if there is one more.

[Peabody]

2 trackers and a roleblocker is a bit much for just 2 scum. Unless we have 2 false claims.

[Peabody]

VOTE: Aegor

I'm seriously confused by this setup.

[Peabody]

VOTE: Aegor

I'm seriously confused by this setup.

I'm seriously confused by your thought process.

I do not think I will ever play with you again.

I've never seen a universal backup for scum before, so if you really want to know what was going through my mind, I did not think a universal backup made sense for mafia since DBK was a goon. I was not aware universal backups can span alignments (mafia taking a town role).

I apologize for the quick hammer, but I simply didn't think it was possible. Now I know.

[Peabody]

Good job, Yates and DBK.

[Peabody]

I hope you can forgive me for my play, Aegor and town.

[Peabody]

Aw, thanks, Yates. It was fun to play with you too.

I was convinced you were town basically the entire game. Well played.