In post 707, reinoe wrote:The whole "not paying attention" argument is dead on arrival and is the most hypocritical argument made this game to date.
I honestly don't think anyone has ever stipulated that not paying attention is = scummy. It just means that your opinion is invalid.
In post 722, I Am Innocent wrote:[quote="In
My thoughts on farside being considered for a doc claim help scum out none-what-so-ever.
What is this I don't understand. Someone help me.
In post 729, farside22 wrote:
One day not to long ago there was a crazy person that claimed scum from the start and was scum.
There was also a crazy person who claimed a cop role and there was a cop in that game. The person who faked claim was town.
So when I see crazy and stupid stuff it's null tiki I see what else the player does.
Yeah, this is a dumb argument. Just because stupid people do stupid things doesn't mean we should assume everyone is stupid. You fake claim as town you die. Period. There is no null or any shit like that. You die because that is scummy. PERIOD. Any counter example is irrelevant because
most of the time people aren't stupid fucks. I mean, mafia is predicated on the fact that there are rational actors.
If that isn't true then the game is random and we should lynch at random.
In post 730, Cyberbob wrote: In post 729, farside22 wrote:One day not to long ago there was a crazy person that claimed scum from the start and was scum.
There was also a crazy person who claimed a cop role and there was a cop in that game. The person who faked claim was town.
So when I see crazy and stupid stuff it's null tiki I see what else the player does.
lmao this town is going to lose and lose hard.
Yes, it is. Don't mean to be doom and gloom. But this game is not going well.
In post 749, Beck wrote:Wtf red. That hurt my thumb scrolling through that.
yeah, seemed solid though. Drew is completely wrong in what he says. And so is farside as of late.
In post 753, reinoe wrote:If someone has a scumread they shouldn't have to sheep a
for the scumread. They should have their own independent reason for scumreading someone.
WHY? If the reason is solid I'll sheep that shit all day long.
no. they do. you are wrong. There is a scummy associations that work without a flip. Prime example: Buddying the fuck out of a town leader. Example: Defending someone irrationally. Example: Calling out town players with little reason.
In post 766, farside22 wrote:I missed the great case cooldog presented. Did anyone else see it?
Just curious since he called my cases bad, what a good case supposedly looks like.
My brain has checked out. My son is watching the fairly odd parents live action movie.
Painful.
Your cases are shit and you know it. Let's nip the tu quoque bullshit in the bud, shall we.
In post 772, Beck wrote: In post 688, CooLDoG wrote:In post 664, Beck wrote:
can you explain why your SK read did change? It is kind of suspect to be pushing someone and then do a 180 and vote with him and unless I missed it, I don't see what caused your read to change.
It changed when he actually started to scum hunt and stopped talking about rvs. When he started to generate content it changed
Can you point me to the posts that started changing your read on him? I want to see these posts you consider scumhunting please.
read the game. I'm not fishing through this garbage to give you a link. If you cared you would look it up.
yes. I feel the exact same way right now. I caught up and it was pointless.
Why is this in a spoiler? Why the hell would you claim this now? I don't understand anymore.
In post 797, reinoe wrote:There was nothing to discuss. The good stuff is that I'm a 1-shot tracker. Both roles crumbed.
what the fuck?
@renio, Going on the drew wagon. For sure just blowing with the wind. Here, take more ammo for your case. I don't care anymore.
vote:drew
If he flips scum we lynch dessew. Drew/dessew scum team where drew decided to defend reinoe for town points. Seems legit.
In post 816, RedCoyote wrote:
I'm happy to lynch Drew, but if reinoe is strongly against it, I'll give him some leadership capital here
Why? What because he was wagoned? That isn't a valid reason.
Also, farside as a darkhorse scum person for asking a bunch of red-herring questions.
after a wank.