Mini 1625: Redemption (Game Over)
-
-
droog Jack of All Trades
-
-
droog Jack of All Trades
-
-
droog Jack of All Trades
-
-
droog Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 5242
- Joined: September 20, 2014
-
-
droog Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 5242
- Joined: September 20, 2014
-
-
droog Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 5242
- Joined: September 20, 2014
-
-
droog Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 5242
- Joined: September 20, 2014
-
-
droog Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 5242
- Joined: September 20, 2014
-
-
droog Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 5242
- Joined: September 20, 2014
In post 26, Naomi-Tan wrote:Scum?
scum.
easier. less pressure.
managing 2-3 allies toward a coherent goal is easier
than shepharding a large towwn
my scumhunting has also atrophied since whenever i last played regularly-
-
droog Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 5242
- Joined: September 20, 2014
-
-
droog Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 5242
- Joined: September 20, 2014
THIS IS THE 4TH VOTE ON RIDDLETON
THIS IS L-1
DO NOT QUICKHAMMER
ESPECIALLY SINCE RIDDLETON HASNT EVEN POSTED-
-
droog Jack of All Trades
-
-
droog Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 5242
- Joined: September 20, 2014
-
-
droog Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 5242
- Joined: September 20, 2014
-
-
droog Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 5242
- Joined: September 20, 2014
-
-
droog Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 5242
- Joined: September 20, 2014
-
-
droog Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 5242
- Joined: September 20, 2014
In post 53, istott wrote:I count 5 votes out of 13.
fuck me
there are 4 playres who havent posted
sorry guys please ignore me now-
-
droog Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 5242
- Joined: September 20, 2014
In post 51, Munkir wrote:In post 46, droog wrote:why would you do that
you have to get lynched tomorrow
if you're scum you just claimed
if you're town you just created two mislynches
Wait what is this in response to?
Also reason i voted for the guy is because Is because Naomi did and i have no clue what im doing
Is there a way to change your vote?
I will say that this whole situation is pretty funny though
in response to willow
posting what i thought was hammer on riddleton
to change your vote cast another one
theres also an unvote tag-
-
droog Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 5242
- Joined: September 20, 2014
In post 60, crazypianist1116 wrote:VOTE: droog
I think you super over-reacted with what you thought was a l-1. If you were so worried, why didn't you unvote?
because i wasnt worried anyone would vote
once id marked it as l-1
who does that
Tag fixed
~ModLast edited by GuyInFreezer on Fri Nov 14, 2014 1:43 pm, edited 3 times in total.-
-
droog Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 5242
- Joined: September 20, 2014
-
-
droog Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 5242
- Joined: September 20, 2014
In post 82, Originalchris wrote:@Droog:What made you decide there were only 9 players, let alone freak out about Riddleton being L-1 (he never was), yet not unvoting? Let's not pretend an RVS wagon adds pressure to anyone, so it wasn't like him being L-1 or L-2 (assuming there were 9 players instead of 13) would've made any difference.Wondering what your mindset was here.
i saw 9 posters playing and 4/9 votes on
no one will believe me but im doped up on pain pillls rn
kinda said this already
im neighbors with riddleton
i specifically voted him to suss a reaction out of him
see if he'd mention we were neighbors to the public or not
shot that plan to hell-
-
droog Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 5242
- Joined: September 20, 2014
i have no clue
what this means-
-
droog Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 5242
- Joined: September 20, 2014
-
-
droog Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 5242
- Joined: September 20, 2014
-
-
droog Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 5242
- Joined: September 20, 2014
-
-
droog Jack of All Trades
-
-
droog Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 5242
- Joined: September 20, 2014
-
-
droog Jack of All Trades
-
-
droog Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 5242
- Joined: September 20, 2014
In post 136, Whomping Willow wrote:I'm a little ambivalent about droog's reaction to the quickhammer, going off the people who posted and not looking at a VC or realising what forum he was in seems a bit odd, but his reaction seemed genuine, and I like that he tried to get immediate in-game pressure on his neighbour.
why'd you place that vote?
im assuming you knew it wasnt l-1
was it a test?-
-
droog Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 5242
- Joined: September 20, 2014
In post 141, Whomping Willow wrote:In post 139, droog wrote:In post 136, Whomping Willow wrote:I'm a little ambivalent about droog's reaction to the quickhammer, going off the people who posted and not looking at a VC or realising what forum he was in seems a bit odd, but his reaction seemed genuine, and I like that he tried to get immediate in-game pressure on his neighbour.
why'd you place that vote?
im assuming you knew it wasnt l-1
was it a test?
I knew it wasn't L-1. I mostly did it for my own amusement, but also as a test.
you were ambivalent about how i scored on your test
which is the only reason i have trouble believing this-
-
droog Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 5242
- Joined: September 20, 2014
In post 145, Whomping Willow wrote:Why are the two linked? I read your post and thought it would be funny to vote Riddleton, but I also knew your reaction might help me get a read on you.
right
but your analysis of my response
was mixed
so viewed as a reaction test
it kind of failed-
-
droog Jack of All Trades
-
-
droog Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 5242
- Joined: September 20, 2014
-
-
droog Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 5242
- Joined: September 20, 2014
In post 209, Whomping Willow wrote:But Riddleton capitulated on that read far too easily for my liking and Flames is being too hardline with it, Riddleton doing that and declaring istott town seems pointless as scum though, and he atleast did something to try and develop a read, which Flames349 has yet to do.
i agree re: riddleton
sorry riddle
something about you feels off-
-
droog Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 5242
- Joined: September 20, 2014
In post 214, Originalchris wrote:Are you serious right now? Are you trying to tell me what I can and cannot comment on? Also, does Naomi = Whomping Willow?????
Why are you and Naomi answering questions for each other? Naomi answered questions directed toward Droog and you. You answer questions or deflect questions asked about/to Naomi. SCUMMMMYYY.
VOTE: originalchris-
-
droog Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 5242
- Joined: September 20, 2014
-
-
droog Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 5242
- Joined: September 20, 2014
In post 165, Naomi-Tan wrote:Finally, at the end of post; post 136 you went and voted for chris, but you only mentioned him once as a mid sorta comment, rather than at the end like a bold statement, could you perhaps expand on that point as I personally feel that he isn't really doing anything and looking like he is contributing without saying much, but your RVS statement doesn't speak to me much. so I'd like more.
however
something about this seems more like
scum explaining their town thought processes
than town having town thought processes-
-
droog Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 5242
- Joined: September 20, 2014
In post 219, Originalchris wrote:Scummiest player by far.Anti-town in beginning til coached by Droog, became "super serious" with a bunch of fluff commenting on how people force the word "anyways" over saying the word "anyways" casually (SCUM TELL OF THE YEAR!), somehow disliked my first post of the game as being not-relevant (trying way too hard here to look like a serious scum hunter), and overall deflecting for Naomi now, who I'm still wondering if she made a scum slip or what exactly happened with that post of hers. It makes zero sense whatsoever in regards to this thread, although it was directed toward Whomp, who tried to deflect away from it after I pointed it out.DO scum have day chat? This would explain quite a bit.
>if scum have daychat, willow is scummy
>if scum dont have daychat, willow is scummy-
-
droog Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 5242
- Joined: September 20, 2014
-
-
droog Jack of All Trades
-
-
droog Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 5242
- Joined: September 20, 2014
In post 225, Originalchris wrote:Has he contributed well enough for you? You unvoted him.
i said id unvote if he talked
he did
why are you casting aspersions on this-
-
droog Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 5242
- Joined: September 20, 2014
-
-
droog Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 5242
- Joined: September 20, 2014
In post 225, Originalchris wrote:and then go on to defend that player consistently for no apparent reason whatsoever
pointing out your bad logic
is not defending
consistently
for no apparent reason-
-
droog Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 5242
- Joined: September 20, 2014
In post 225, Originalchris wrote:I also dislike how Droog/Naomi/Whomp all answer questions not directed at them but one of the other two in that list. It's happened consistently. That is not pro-town at the best, and scummy at the worst. I'm wondering which is which.
no one respond to this
otherwise
youre answering things not directed at you
therefore scum
!!!!!-
-
droog Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 5242
- Joined: September 20, 2014
-
-
droog Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 5242
- Joined: September 20, 2014
In post 225, Originalchris wrote:I also dislike how Droog/Naomi/Whomp all answer questions not directed at them but one of the other two in that list. It's happened consistently. That is not pro-town at the best, and scummy at the worst. I'm wondering which is which.
this is posturing
compare to actual town ochris
In post 333, Originalchris wrote:In post 331, BlueBloodedToffee wrote:
Are you expecting my explanation of a past event to change? You questioned why Ihadvoted Wgeurts, I said my vote had clearly been explained.
I'm not sure what you're struggling to understand.
I expect everything to change as the context of the game moves forward. Yes, I do. If you tunnel on a specific incident while not looking at fresh evidence, I find that bad play in every regard, if not scummy as well.
I'm not sure what you're struggling to understand myself.
In post 339, Originalchris wrote:2. I'm basically saying that if you can't take the time/effort to simply post a reason for a vote, especially one on a wagon, then don't claim you had different reasons later on in the game if this becomes an issue that looks scummy. Basically, you better hope the reasoning you used previously holds up, because I don't want you to come up with new reasons to defend yourself later on if you couldn't make the effort to begin with right now. I can't read minds, only posts. Whatever scum reads I have now on page 12 might not be the same as I had on page 8, but it's my own fault if I fail to express that. Apparently though, BBT never changes his mind on anything.
In post 1469, Originalchris wrote:Considering wgeurts was trying to get ME lynched, I definitely did notice it. Are you serious right now? You seem to ignore all the good empirical evidence on players and go for the WIFOM stuff instead. I seriously don't understand your mindset Copper. It's as if you assume the most elaborate, outlandish things are the ones that will be true.
i could quote in this vein for some time-
-
droog Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 5242
- Joined: September 20, 2014
-
-
droog Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 5242
- Joined: September 20, 2014
-
-
droog Jack of All Trades
-
-
droog Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 5242
- Joined: September 20, 2014
In post 229, droog wrote:In post 225, Originalchris wrote:and then go on to defend that player consistently for no apparent reason whatsoever
pointing out your bad logic
is not defending
consistently
for no apparent reason-
-
droog Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 5242
- Joined: September 20, 2014
-
-
droog Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 5242
- Joined: September 20, 2014
In post 147, droog wrote:In post 145, Whomping Willow wrote:Why are the two linked? I read your post and thought it would be funny to vote Riddleton, but I also knew your reaction might help me get a read on you.
right
but your analysis of my response
was mixed
so viewed as a reaction test
it kind of failed
which one is this
coaching
defending
or deflecting-
-
droog Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 5242
- Joined: September 20, 2014
anyways ill concede that
me stating willow was a town read
was not very clean-
-
droog Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 5242
- Joined: September 20, 2014
-
-
droog Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 5242
- Joined: September 20, 2014
In post 191, Riddleton wrote:Game over, pal. You scum?
In post 193, Riddleton wrote:Hm ok. Istott is town.
Im not sure why you didn't string it ong more-
-
droog Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 5242
- Joined: September 20, 2014
In post 265, crazypianist1116 wrote:In post 263, Flubbernugget wrote:Dayvig reaction tests are gay
Please don't violate sitewide rules again.
is this really a sitewide thing
im gay and it pisses me off if
calling things gay
is against the rules-
-
droog Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 5242
- Joined: September 20, 2014
In post 283, Flubbernugget wrote:Oh and thanks to your backseat modding my infraction has been copied twice over in the thread so gg.
its actually a thing
fuck that shit
im a faggot
someone report me-
-
droog Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 5242
- Joined: September 20, 2014
-
-
droog Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 5242
- Joined: September 20, 2014
-
-
droog Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 5242
- Joined: September 20, 2014
-
-
droog Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 5242
- Joined: September 20, 2014
-
-
droog Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 5242
- Joined: September 20, 2014