[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/ext/alfredoramos/seometadata/event/listener.php on line 114: Undefined array key 7452482 [phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/ext/alfredoramos/seometadata/event/listener.php on line 114: Trying to access array offset on value of type null Blitz 12: Double Trouble! (Game Over) - Mafiascum.net
Post
Post #103 (isolation #5) » Wed Dec 09, 2015 6:20 am
Postby Squirrelly »
In post 23, Errantparabola wrote:Nice playing with you again, Ranger, Yakko, Titus, Fire, wanderer, Dwlee.
VOTE: AlwaysInnocent
Saying he's a non-conformist seems like an attempt to look town.
What do you think your greeting looks like to other people? Most every game has people who have played with each other before, but there's not a lot of greetings like yours.
Post
Post #105 (isolation #6) » Wed Dec 09, 2015 6:26 am
Postby Squirrelly »
In post 74, Ranger wrote:So!
{Dwlee}
{Yakko, Dominator}
{Errant, Firebringer, AlwaysInnocent, Flubbernugget}
{Squirrelly, gimick, ZZZX}
{Wanderer}
{Phantom Cobalt, Titus, texcat, Bebop}.
(Forgot Flubbernugget in my notes before.)
There we go!
Post
Post #110 (isolation #9) » Wed Dec 09, 2015 6:32 am
Postby Squirrelly »
In post 89, AlwaysInnocent wrote:I know that people sometimes have weak reasons to have some ill-informed opinion about someone during this stage, but it seems like he is just throwing around reads for the sake of appearing town. He has not even explained
any
of these reads, as far as I can see.
I am compelled to leave my non-conformist identity behind and join the Ranger wagon.
She does that. I don't like it and will continue to point it out. Reads don't do much for the rest of us without explanation. But, I have seen her do this as town.
I am impresssed, who else besides maybe titus would have this many votes on them this early?
I amaze myself, I haven't even done anything
Maybe, just maybe, you should do something then??[/quote]
I'd lynch this too but it's meta/feeling like a bitch moment.
In post 71, Ranger wrote:At least one of {PhantomCobalt, Titus} is scum.
Dwlee is town; texcat and BeBop also are pinging for scum.
It's too early to tell for sure on Errant/Firebringer/AlwaysInnocent, but early indicators are town.
Squirrelly, not so sure about; still too early to say.
In post 71, Ranger wrote:At least one of {PhantomCobalt, Titus} is scum.
Dwlee is town; texcat and BeBop also are pinging for scum.
It's too early to tell for sure on Errant/Firebringer/AlwaysInnocent, but early indicators are town.
Squirrelly, not so sure about; still too early to say.
Here, we have strong positions taken here. I liked PC as scum, so Ranger stating one must be scum isn't a problem.
Dwelee is indeed obvtown.
Hell no. And with that comment you lost many town points I had on you.
In post 125, Squirrelly wrote:Titus: is this the dumb association part of you again?
I have to ask because I'm not sure if I should start raging yet or not
I don't recall ever playing with you.
Second, "dumb association"? Talk to me about your Dwelee read.
Farside here.
You want to discuss another speed game with your association reads?
Post
Post #133 (isolation #15) » Wed Dec 09, 2015 6:51 am
Postby Squirrelly »
In post 126, Errantparabola wrote:Considering i have explicitly stated i dont scumread fire, i dont see how you are comfortable with saying that i am weak-scumreading fire.
You also said you don't see town fire in what I quoted
In post 125, Squirrelly wrote:Titus: is this the dumb association part of you again?
I have to ask because I'm not sure if I should start raging yet or not
I don't recall ever playing with you.
Second, "dumb association"? Talk to me about your Dwelee read.
Farside here.
You want to discuss another speed game with your association reads?
Blitz 1. Sure. Let's discuss it.
You're town. Dwelee town. Ranger town (we should agree on this one). Let's go.
Not the first blitz.
I'll play along for a moment. You trust me, I'll trust you and just smile and nod when I say innocent is a town read of mine.
Post
Post #186 (isolation #18) » Wed Dec 09, 2015 9:14 am
Postby Squirrelly »
In post 166, PhantomCobalt wrote:
tells ranger to include reasons with condensed reads --> does the same thing
what are you doing
Here you go:
Townie
Errant - played scum with her once and she feels more involved with this game
Titus, AI - farside says so
texcat - played town with her once and this is similar so far
Scummy
Phantom - feels like scum trying to act townie
DWlee - active lurking
Don't know
Ranger - checked her scum game and it started very much like her town game
Firebringer - tough for me to read
Domiator - tough to read someone who's a douchebag in every game
You throw in a green and a couple reds, but who do you follow up with? Titus, who is scum reading you. You're not after scum, you're trying to protect your own hide.
You throw in a green and a couple reds, but who do you follow up with? Titus, who is scum reading you. You're not after scum, you're trying to protect your own hide.
I'm scum reading you, Dom, and Ranger. How is that not scumhunting?
I already told you. Instead of going on to pressure your scum reads, you were more concerned with Titus's scum read on you, even though you don't scum read her.
Post
Post #268 (isolation #23) » Wed Dec 09, 2015 2:02 pm
Postby Squirrelly »
In post 218, Titus wrote:Wait, you're a hydra? Wow I need to re read the first page.
I'll try to be better about signing - this is my first hydra.
I was most active at first as farside was busy. When you first noted a post of ours as town, that was mine. Then farside came in for a bit, and now we're mixing it up.
Post
Post #269 (isolation #24) » Wed Dec 09, 2015 2:05 pm
Postby Squirrelly »
In post 223, AlwaysInnocent wrote:What do people think about TheDominator (ISO)? While I have my doubts about Phantom, I sort of get why he would vote TheDominator. TheDominator's posting behavior is just... odd. Even weirder than Dwlee's posting behavior.
Dominator's an easy target. Even When he's town he doesn't help town, and can actively hinder it. I believe he just came off a lengthy ban so that should tell you something - he's a troll, not a serious player.
I found phantom's vote on him to be a blatant attempt to shift attention off himself.
Post
Post #318 (isolation #25) » Thu Dec 10, 2015 4:27 am
Postby Squirrelly »
trying to catch up and had to stop at page 11.
I'm about to run out so let me fill in those spots I marked first.
In post 137, Errantparabola wrote:Why are you not similarly attacking my push on you, innocent?
Squirrelly, just because i say im not confident in fire being town doesnt mean i have a scumread. Again, even if i had a weak scumread, i would vote.
I'd say you are for sure scum and I'm a little miffed at persivul for switching votes currently.
vote: Errant
Will explain more why, later
In post 139, Errantparabola wrote:Also, just because someone is joking in a blitz doesnt mean that slot is scum. And i find it odd that you're trying to push that because thats the kind of logic that sets us up for mislynches.
Yeah because doing shit all is a great reason to town read someone?
No seriously.
How do you know it is a mislynch by the way?
In post 153, Titus wrote:Ok, I will meet you half way. I take Dwelee as innocent. You take AI as innocent.
Your move.
Fine, but not ranger.
In post 163, hi im Yakko wrote:Was reading through can't seem to focus. I did just wake up. I don't think people dissappearing is cause for alarm yet might just have different posting times.
The errant v always is bad imo if one of them is schm I can't tell yet because of post inflation and arguing their individual points. It would be great if you guys could focus on other people so I could tell if one of yous is full of shit.
The ranger reads idk I saw them raised brows. It was weird to me. It felt like filler.
@firebringer what do you think of the game so far? UNVOTE:
You throw in a green and a couple reds, but who do you follow up with? Titus, who is scum reading you. You're not after scum, you're trying to protect your own hide.
I'm scum reading you, Dom, and Ranger. How is that not scumhunting?
You throw in a green and a couple reds, but who do you follow up with? Titus, who is scum reading you. You're not after scum, you're trying to protect your own hide.
I'm scum reading you, Dom, and Ranger. How is that not scumhunting?
Scumhunting is more about the process than having a list of scum.
Post
Post #324 (isolation #26) » Thu Dec 10, 2015 8:19 am
Postby Squirrelly »
In post 319, Titus wrote:Farside I am here. Let's talk. I want to get a town block going, the fact you two aren't giving me ranger who should be a shoe in is problematic. Talk to me.
Why did you move your vote?
Just few questions
1) do you even realize there is more then 1 scum team in this game?
2) why should I give you ranger as a town read?
3) do you even read my post or skim?
Post
Post #326 (isolation #28) » Thu Dec 10, 2015 8:25 am
Postby Squirrelly »
I'd say only one good post by errant while the rest is just meh.
Firebringer is a scum read at this point. I'm used to him being more active and fluffy as town
Post
Post #331 (isolation #29) » Thu Dec 10, 2015 8:30 am
Postby Squirrelly »
In post 327, Titus wrote:1) Yes. Bebop is likely bussing. We can sort it out later. Find scum lynch scum. Then be certain on buddies.
2) Blitz One + Sudoken
3) which one would you like me to reread?
1) not sure about this. It depends on set up game wise.
2) meh.
3) 318 when I said I'd be back later to explain and had to run.
Post
Post #429 (isolation #42) » Sat Dec 12, 2015 4:27 pm
Postby Squirrelly »
In post 426, Titus wrote:No I really don't read crumbs. I leave em but I don't see em.
Second, you buy me jking you. So if that's the case someone else saw them.
No I'm asking you questions about it.
I'm not going to point to my crumb any further since all your saying is I'm voting squirrelly because she didn't die and I would kill her but she must be scum that submitted the kill.
That's like taking a cake and chocking on it.
In post 428, BeBopAReBop RhubarbPie wrote:Titus, can you explain how that makes squirrelly scum? If you jailed them, then you yourself said you could have either protected or role blocked them. That makes this a 50/50, what is pushing you to say that squirrelly is scum?
Her response. I told her the truth. I believed she was the reason for the one kill. That is true of roleblock or heal. Squirrel jumps to attack me and imply I am lying.
Scum tend the twniest looking scum and I didn't like how close you two were.
If I am wrong, having documentation she was the other team's kill is good.
No you voted me.
There was nothing clear about protecting me at all
Post
Post #442 (isolation #49) » Sat Dec 12, 2015 4:45 pm
Postby Squirrelly »
Here is why I don't believe Titus and her claim.
She attacks do to one death but acts like it should be clear with her vote it could be protective.
Her scum read is based on lynching pc, we weren't on the wagon so that is crap and not a single post seems to go on the assumption of protecting, which is what a town protective role would think too.
In post 428, BeBopAReBop RhubarbPie wrote:Titus, can you explain how that makes squirrelly scum? If you jailed them, then you yourself said you could have either protected or role blocked them. That makes this a 50/50, what is pushing you to say that squirrelly is scum?
Her response. I told her the truth. I believed she was the reason for the one kill. That is true of roleblock or heal. Squirrel jumps to attack me and imply I am lying.
Scum tend the twniest looking scum and I didn't like how close you two were.
If I am wrong, having documentation she was the other team's kill is good.
Post
Post #450 (isolation #51) » Sat Dec 12, 2015 5:04 pm
Postby Squirrelly »
In post 445, Titus wrote:Point blank: I healed or stopped you. I wanted pressure to determine which.
You said you crumbed a role. Said role must not get feedback, thus you would know I blocked you.
You made a post where you assumed my block to be true.
You're assuming I came out here and blatantly lied about jailing you for shits and jiggle. Nope.
Let's use facts here.
My soft claim is only understandable to me and persivul.
I'm about 95% you caught the claim and trying to push this lynch to help your scum buddies get rid of town role that is confirmable.
No where did I say I believed the claim.
I wondered at first if you were trying to gambit or reaction for others.
All of which I stated.
So in short your lying scum hoping to get me lynched.
Post
Post #451 (isolation #52) » Sat Dec 12, 2015 5:06 pm
Postby Squirrelly »
And since Titus is trying to push this mislynch I did my subtle claim in this game directed to Titus and she has made no effort to try and find it.
That is why I'm 95% certain she caught my claim is lying
In post 455, Squirrelly wrote:Your the scum player faking a role that you don't have to lynch town.
I'll wait for others to look at it and question things here
So I randomly fakeclaim jailkeepers to start a day in violation of every scumrule I have?
Let's see, outs any cc for scum.
Helps scum team there.
Trying to lynch a role you know is confirmable, also helps your scum team.
Tell me how your action even should read town?
Post
Post #463 (isolation #58) » Sat Dec 12, 2015 5:16 pm
Postby Squirrelly »
In post 460, BeBopAReBop RhubarbPie wrote:Well I'm not voting you or Squirrelly today based on present info, though your reasoning makes me a lot less comfortable taking queues from squirrelly.
Wanderer is another scum read. Titus isn't talking about anyone on the actual wagon that lynched town sure made me wonder who she was protecting as her scum buddy