In post 233, Belisarius wrote:and my brain's still being an asshole about letting me remember what it was that made me so sure Kim's scum.
any clarity Bel?
In post 233, Belisarius wrote:and my brain's still being an asshole about letting me remember what it was that made me so sure Kim's scum.
In post 32, Witch_Hunter wrote:@ Kim: Thank you for the post - seriously - but we have some miscommunication here. I meant, "would you post one of your logical analyses on this game?"
Then again, ignore it for now. I'll ask again later, when the game really gets going. Just from reading other games, I hadn't realized that takes a while to happen.
In post 322, Smudger wrote:Interesting. Azorious you really have nothing as I read it Bel has negated your argument. So one question if Bel was not a lynch today who would it be in your opinion?
In post 319, AzoriusSenate wrote:
You guys take as long as you need to butI'm just going to say right now I'm never removing my vote on this guy. He's scum and needs to bite the dirt so we can find the next one.We can read for interactions right now but I think he's probably going to play today as if he's being lynched and will probably throw out a bunch of random stuff to throw us off of the second mafia.
In post 322, Smudger wrote:Witch I think that Scum is somewhere here Azorious/Kim/Bluebird, in no particular order I might add
In post 323, MrCurlyNoodles wrote:In post 318, Witch_Hunter wrote:Smudger, MrCurlyNoodles, what should we do while they have their fight? Just watch and hope for good information? Take a side? There's still a while before the deadline, but that doesn't mean we shouldn't be doing something.
I'm not sure. It feels like if we don't add on to the argument it's just going to fizzle out super quick (like it seems to already have). That being said I'm not really sure what to add past what we already have. I do agree that it's improbable for them to be a scum team but as scummy as Azorius' tunnelling is comments like this:Are what make me suspicious of Belisarius as well (though still more suspicious of Azorius). He also seems to be hard on the Kim train for not a very well explained reason since early in day 1.In post 317, Belisarius wrote:Join me against Kim. It is your destiny. Together we shall rule this galaxy as father and son!
In terms of talking about other things while they argue it out, Kim and especially Bluebird's current inactivity is unhelpful but in their absence I'm not entirely sure what there is to discuss since they're not bringing anything new. In terms of what they've done so far did you have anything specific to talk about or bring up? Which one do you find scummier?
In post 326, Smudger wrote:In post 233, Belisarius wrote:and my brain's still being an asshole about letting me remember what it was that made me so sure Kim's scum.
any clarity Bel?
In post 324, Smudger wrote:Kim who are your top three lynch candidates and why?
In post 331, Witch_Hunter wrote:at least Kim isn't neglecting his defense, since he isn't actually being accused of anything.
In post 328, Smudger wrote:In post 32, Witch_Hunter wrote:@ Kim: Thank you for the post - seriously - but we have some miscommunication here. I meant, "would you post one of your logical analyses on this game?"
Then again, ignore it for now. I'll ask again later, when the game really gets going. Just from reading other games, I hadn't realized that takes a while to happen.
did this happen?
In post 333, Kim wrote:In post 324, Smudger wrote:Kim who are your top three lynch candidates and why?
Top four candidates are easy, via process of elimination: you, Belisarius, AzoriusSenate, and Bluebird. Since last I posted, MrCurlyNoodles has shown both understanding of what's been happening in the game and an ability to adjust his thoughts when presented with new information (or new to him, at least).
Out of those four, as of now I think I'd put you as fourth-scummiest (or third-towniest, whichever you prefer). I probably have too much of a bias towards open-minded players, but you seem to be reading, rereading, and thinking about the game. Yay you!
These last three aren't in any particular order:
I've seen both town and scum tunnel on players before, but I haven't figured out how to tell the different alignments apart. AS's tunnel on Bel seems farfetched -- I particularly disliked 303. However, is 305 frustrated town? It feels like it to me, but I know I don't have the experience/skill/whatever to say so for sure.
Bluebird's lurking has moved her to null for me. I'm not sure it's scum-motivated lurking, but I can't rule it out. More answers/thoughts from her will hopefully help.
Belisarius' "trust me" argument for lynching me wasn't very townie, but he's dropped that now. I assume that he hasn't seen anything that changed his mind; at least he's consistent. My responses to his rationale for voting against me are in 53 and 154.
In post 331, Witch_Hunter wrote:at least Kim isn't neglecting his defense, since he isn't actually being accused of anything.
A small nugget of defense on my part: hiplop had me as his second-highest townread when he was NKed. All other things being equal, scum!Kim would have kept him alive.
Besides that, her ISO is strange. Too passive, answers questions but doesn't ask them nor does much that feels like she is actually involved in the game.
In post 336, AzoriusSenate wrote:Let me make something very clear guys. The lynch IS going to be Bel today. Whether you guys accept that now is on you. If you accept it now it's going to be a lot easier on you later.
In post 337, AzoriusSenate wrote:As far as other lynch candidates if Bel was dead, I'm looking at Witch and I'm looking at Smudger.
In post 338, Witch_Hunter wrote:Can I have your opinion about something I posted a while ago?
Post 279, concerning Bluebird:Besides that, her ISO is strange. Too passive, answers questions but doesn't ask them nor does much that feels like she is actually involved in the game.
In post 322, Smudger wrote:Interesting. Azorious you really have nothing as I read it Bel has negated your argument. So one question if Bel was not a lynch today who would it be in your opinion?
In post 329, Smudger wrote:Just reading back, I think 55 got Hiplop killed along with 58 .
Azorious did you read 58 . In particular the trust part?
In post 299, Smudger wrote:In post 298, Kim wrote:In post 295, Smudger wrote:Kim what would you think of two players who appear to use the same terms of phrase or mention a particular observation? Almost as if one is parroting the other?
I found this quote on the wiki when searching to see if parroting might have a more technical Mafia definition than the normal English usage: "Parroting is not a scumtell; it's more of a 'I-just-read-the-thread-tell.'" It was on the user page of dopog, so it's not official or consensus thought or anything like that, but I think it's true. If you want something in my own words that'd be longer and harder to understand (coincidentally, that's a good reason to use other people's phrasing), I could probably oblige.
oh Ok. you never asked me why I asked that question? anyway I did because of this ....
In post 244, Bluebird wrote:
As I have stated earlier, I scumread you because your stats indicate that you subbed out of every game that you were town, one entry notwithstanding. Also,yourconversation with SRMP was what convinced us to lynch.
In post 178, Kim wrote:Short version: I'm not convinced SRMP is scum.
In post 337, AzoriusSenate wrote:As far as other lynch candidates if Bel was dead, I'm looking at Witch and I'm looking at Smudger.