There's another big problem for me too.In post 699, Randomnamechange wrote:Basically everyone outside of you me and Wake accepted it
Why has no one talked about the possibility that Tracer started out as a Mafia Traitor?
There's another big problem for me too.In post 699, Randomnamechange wrote:Basically everyone outside of you me and Wake accepted it
I'd also be fine with this.
So a lynch out of fear.In post 701, Xkfyu wrote:Honestly, I actually think it's a lot more likely that she started out as a Mafia Traitor, instead of some town role that gets converted to a Mafia Traitor if killed by Mafia.
VOTE: Tracer
This is where I want to lynch today.
Nah you don't scare me.In post 707, Tracer wrote:So a lynch out of fear.In post 701, Xkfyu wrote:Honestly, I actually think it's a lot more likely that she started out as a Mafia Traitor, instead of some town role that gets converted to a Mafia Traitor if killed by Mafia.
VOTE: Tracer
This is where I want to lynch today.
Ok.
I don't mean that kind of fear.In post 690, Xkfyu wrote:Nope, but it's fine anyways. I LOVE WIFOM.In post 687, Tracer wrote:Is the deathproof thing the only thing you are going to use to read me? Because if so, you're in for a lot of WIFOM.
Well that's a stray quote.In post 690, Xkfyu wrote:Nope, but it's fine anyways. I LOVE WIFOM.In post 687, Tracer wrote:Is the deathproof thing the only thing you are going to use to read me? Because if so, you're in for a lot of WIFOM.
It's not that I "fear" you aren't what you claimed so much as I just don't believe you.In post 709, Tracer wrote:I don't mean that kind of fear.In post 690, Xkfyu wrote:Nope, but it's fine anyways. I LOVE WIFOM.In post 687, Tracer wrote:Is the deathproof thing the only thing you are going to use to read me? Because if so, you're in for a lot of WIFOM.
I mean the fear that I may not be what I claimed.
In post 436, Randomnamechange wrote:UNVOTE:
VOTE: Doctor Pepper
If this flips scum then there was scum on the Tracer counterwagon
Because these are very bad.In post 238, Randomnamechange wrote:fabricating reasons to scumread people.
The first one was pretty much nonsense, I agree.In post 715, podoboq wrote:In post 436, Randomnamechange wrote:UNVOTE:
VOTE: Doctor Pepper
If this flips scum then there was scum on the Tracer counterwagonBecause these are very bad.In post 238, Randomnamechange wrote:fabricating reasons to scumread people.
"Fabricating reasons to scumread people" could be said about basically everyone in that chain.In post 716, Xkfyu wrote:The second one seemed legit to me.
In post 718, Randomnamechange wrote:He gave a reason for a vote, i pressured him, he changed the reason. That is scummy.
In post 213, DoctorPepper wrote:I'm gonna go off this. Why would this be a legitimate reason to vote for anyone.In post 106, Shadow_step wrote:This post is so bad, it's paranoid scum trying to look busy.In post 93, springlullaby wrote:Ok, I have a question for you Tracer, did you create your account before or after receiving your role PM?In post 53, Tracer wrote:That's my line!
VOTE: Spring
VOTE: Shadow
No, random. He didn't. This is the same thing said in two different ways.In post 217, DoctorPepper wrote:Yes but what shadow did is exactly that, fake scum hunting.
As far as I'm concerned, this is a flagrant misrep.In post 718, Randomnamechange wrote:He gave a reason for a vote, i pressured him, he changed the reason. That is scummy.
So...you're saying that random is fabricating a reason to scum read doctor?In post 720, podoboq wrote:As far as I'm concerned, this is a flagrant misrep.In post 718, Randomnamechange wrote:He gave a reason for a vote, i pressured him, he changed the reason. That is scummy.
Yeah, I guess I'm part of the chain too, except I don't think my accusation is complete nonsenseIn post 721, Xkfyu wrote:So...you're saying that random is fabricating a reason to scum read doctor?
I agree with you about post 436 though. I think that certainly needs to be addressed.In post 722, podoboq wrote:Yeah, I guess I'm part of the chain too, except I don't think my accusation is complete nonsenseIn post 721, Xkfyu wrote:So...you're saying that random is fabricating a reason to scum read doctor?![]()
random's post 436 is individually scummy, but his other stated reason for voting DoctorPepper is just completely off the wall bullshit. He's misrepping DoctorPepper. That's different than just fake scumhunting.