There's another big problem for me too.In post 699, Randomnamechange wrote:Basically everyone outside of you me and Wake accepted it
Why has no one talked about the possibility that Tracer started out as a Mafia Traitor?
There's another big problem for me too.In post 699, Randomnamechange wrote:Basically everyone outside of you me and Wake accepted it
I'd also be fine with this.
So a lynch out of fear.In post 701, Xkfyu wrote:Honestly, I actually think it's a lot more likely that she started out as a Mafia Traitor, instead of some town role that gets converted to a Mafia Traitor if killed by Mafia.
VOTE: Tracer
This is where I want to lynch today.
Nah you don't scare me.In post 707, Tracer wrote:So a lynch out of fear.In post 701, Xkfyu wrote:Honestly, I actually think it's a lot more likely that she started out as a Mafia Traitor, instead of some town role that gets converted to a Mafia Traitor if killed by Mafia.
VOTE: Tracer
This is where I want to lynch today.
Ok.
I don't mean that kind of fear.In post 690, Xkfyu wrote:Nope, but it's fine anyways. I LOVE WIFOM.In post 687, Tracer wrote:Is the deathproof thing the only thing you are going to use to read me? Because if so, you're in for a lot of WIFOM.
Well that's a stray quote.In post 690, Xkfyu wrote:Nope, but it's fine anyways. I LOVE WIFOM.In post 687, Tracer wrote:Is the deathproof thing the only thing you are going to use to read me? Because if so, you're in for a lot of WIFOM.
It's not that I "fear" you aren't what you claimed so much as I just don't believe you.In post 709, Tracer wrote:I don't mean that kind of fear.In post 690, Xkfyu wrote:Nope, but it's fine anyways. I LOVE WIFOM.In post 687, Tracer wrote:Is the deathproof thing the only thing you are going to use to read me? Because if so, you're in for a lot of WIFOM.
I mean the fear that I may not be what I claimed.
In post 436, Randomnamechange wrote:UNVOTE:
VOTE: Doctor Pepper
If this flips scum then there was scum on the Tracer counterwagon
Because these are very bad.In post 238, Randomnamechange wrote:fabricating reasons to scumread people.
The first one was pretty much nonsense, I agree.In post 715, podoboq wrote:In post 436, Randomnamechange wrote:UNVOTE:
VOTE: Doctor Pepper
If this flips scum then there was scum on the Tracer counterwagonBecause these are very bad.In post 238, Randomnamechange wrote:fabricating reasons to scumread people.
"Fabricating reasons to scumread people" could be said about basically everyone in that chain.In post 716, Xkfyu wrote:The second one seemed legit to me.
In post 718, Randomnamechange wrote:He gave a reason for a vote, i pressured him, he changed the reason. That is scummy.
In post 213, DoctorPepper wrote:I'm gonna go off this. Why would this be a legitimate reason to vote for anyone.In post 106, Shadow_step wrote:This post is so bad, it's paranoid scum trying to look busy.In post 93, springlullaby wrote:Ok, I have a question for you Tracer, did you create your account before or after receiving your role PM?In post 53, Tracer wrote:That's my line!
VOTE: Spring
VOTE: Shadow
No, random. He didn't. This is the same thing said in two different ways.In post 217, DoctorPepper wrote:Yes but what shadow did is exactly that, fake scum hunting.
As far as I'm concerned, this is a flagrant misrep.In post 718, Randomnamechange wrote:He gave a reason for a vote, i pressured him, he changed the reason. That is scummy.
So...you're saying that random is fabricating a reason to scum read doctor?In post 720, podoboq wrote:As far as I'm concerned, this is a flagrant misrep.In post 718, Randomnamechange wrote:He gave a reason for a vote, i pressured him, he changed the reason. That is scummy.
Yeah, I guess I'm part of the chain too, except I don't think my accusation is complete nonsenseIn post 721, Xkfyu wrote:So...you're saying that random is fabricating a reason to scum read doctor?
I agree with you about post 436 though. I think that certainly needs to be addressed.In post 722, podoboq wrote:Yeah, I guess I'm part of the chain too, except I don't think my accusation is complete nonsenseIn post 721, Xkfyu wrote:So...you're saying that random is fabricating a reason to scum read doctor?
random's post 436 is individually scummy, but his other stated reason for voting DoctorPepper is just completely off the wall bullshit. He's misrepping DoctorPepper. That's different than just fake scumhunting.