Mini 1813 - Overwatch Mafia! TOWN WINS

[Xkfyu]

Basically everyone outside of you me and Wake accepted it

There's another big problem for me too.

Why has no one talked about the possibility that Tracer started out as a Mafia Traitor?

[Xkfyu]

Honestly, I actually think it's a lot more likely that she started out as a Mafia Traitor, instead of some town role that gets converted to a Mafia Traitor if killed by Mafia.

VOTE: Tracer

This is where I want to lynch today.

[Shadow_step]

It's all wifom and pointless fluff.
What good is going to come out of talking about it anyway?
Do you really want to lynch Tracer again to make sure she isn't a traitor ?

Pedit just as I was typing that lol

[Shadow_step]

VOTE: Fox

I'd like this

[Foxbird]

We spent SO much time discussing Tracer instead of scumhunting. Some (including me) have said we can't let her live to LyLo, but I think we just needed to move away from her for a while to allow for some different conversations. I'd rather find the actual scum team.

pedit: Also ninja'd because actual Overwatch :c

[Xkfyu]

VOTE: Fox

I'd like this

I'd also be fine with this.

Either way, I don't like the DoctorPepper lynch. I think he's town.

[Xkfyu]

Where'd everybody go?

I thought we were having fun.

[Tracer]

Honestly, I actually think it's a lot more likely that she started out as a Mafia Traitor, instead of some town role that gets converted to a Mafia Traitor if killed by Mafia.

VOTE: Tracer

This is where I want to lynch today.

So a lynch out of fear.
Ok.

[Xkfyu]

Honestly, I actually think it's a lot more likely that she started out as a Mafia Traitor, instead of some town role that gets converted to a Mafia Traitor if killed by Mafia.

VOTE: Tracer

This is where I want to lynch today.

So a lynch out of fear.
Ok.

Nah you don't scare me.

[Tracer]

Is the deathproof thing the only thing you are going to use to read me? Because if so, you're in for a lot of WIFOM.

Nope, but it's fine anyways. I LOVE WIFOM.

I don't mean that kind of fear.
I mean the fear that I may not be what I claimed.

[Tracer]

Is the deathproof thing the only thing you are going to use to read me? Because if so, you're in for a lot of WIFOM.

Nope, but it's fine anyways. I LOVE WIFOM.

Well that's a stray quote.

[Xkfyu]

Is the deathproof thing the only thing you are going to use to read me? Because if so, you're in for a lot of WIFOM.

Nope, but it's fine anyways. I LOVE WIFOM.

I don't mean that kind of fear.
I mean the fear that I may not be what I claimed.

It's not that I "fear" you aren't what you claimed so much as I just don't believe you.

[podoboq]

@vonflare: V/LA

GenCon is happening, so I'm gonna have to go V/LA for a few days. I'll take the time to generate a reads list before I go to sleep tonight (if I go to sleep tonight.)

Not happy with any of these wagons today. Can we please get something going on randommidget?

[Randomnamechange]

Y tho

[Randomnamechange]

UNVOTE:
VOTE: tracer

[podoboq]

UNVOTE:
VOTE: Doctor Pepper
If this flips scum then there was scum on the Tracer counterwagon

That isn't what you said
VOTE: Doctor Pepper
L-2

Fill me in on why this was a good reason to put me at L-2

fabricating reasons to scumread people.

Because these are very bad.

[Xkfyu]

UNVOTE:
VOTE: Doctor Pepper
If this flips scum then there was scum on the Tracer counterwagon

That isn't what you said
VOTE: Doctor Pepper
L-2

Fill me in on why this was a good reason to put me at L-2

fabricating reasons to scumread people.

Because these are very bad.

The first one was pretty much nonsense, I agree.

The second one seemed legit to me.

[podoboq]

The second one seemed legit to me.

"Fabricating reasons to scumread people" could be said about basically everyone in that chain.

Shadow says Springlullaby is trying to look busy.
DoctorPepper says Shadowstep is fabricating a reason to scumread Springlullaby over trying to look busy.
randommidget thinks DoctorPepper is fabricating a reason to scumread Shadowstep over fabricating a reason to scumread Springlullaby over trying to look busy.

Are you seeing the problem with this chain? It's complete nonsense.

[Randomnamechange]

He gave a reason for a vote, i pressured him, he changed the reason. That is scummy.

[podoboq]

He gave a reason for a vote, i pressured him, he changed the reason. That is scummy.

That's my line!

Ok, I have a question for you Tracer, did you create your account before or after receiving your role PM?

This post is so bad, it's paranoid scum trying to look busy.

VOTE: Spring

I'm gonna go off this. Why would this be a legitimate reason to vote for anyone.

VOTE: Shadow

Yes but what shadow did is exactly that, fake scum hunting.

No, random. He didn't. This is the same thing said in two different ways.
213: "That is not a legitimate reason to vote for anyone."
217: "Shadow is fake scum hunting, by coming up with illegitimate reasons to vote for someone."

It's the same damn thing.

[podoboq]

He gave a reason for a vote, i pressured him, he changed the reason. That is scummy.

As far as I'm concerned, this is a flagrant misrep.

[Xkfyu]

He gave a reason for a vote, i pressured him, he changed the reason. That is scummy.

As far as I'm concerned, this is a flagrant misrep.

So...you're saying that random is fabricating a reason to scum read doctor?

[podoboq]

So...you're saying that random is fabricating a reason to scum read doctor?

Yeah, I guess I'm part of the chain too, except I don't think my accusation is complete nonsense

random's post 436 is individually scummy, but his other stated reason for voting DoctorPepper is just completely off the wall bullshit. He's misrepping DoctorPepper. That's different than just fake scumhunting.

[Xkfyu]

So...you're saying that random is fabricating a reason to scum read doctor?

Yeah, I guess I'm part of the chain too, except I don't think my accusation is complete nonsense

random's post 436 is individually scummy, but his other stated reason for voting DoctorPepper is just completely off the wall bullshit. He's misrepping DoctorPepper. That's different than just fake scumhunting.

I agree with you about post 436 though. I think that certainly needs to be addressed.

[Xkfyu]

@random

Can you outline your logic in post 436 please?