In post 310, Doughboy wrote:I don’t have reads on all the active players rn. For now tracker claim is legit until otherwise countered. I’m scum reading you. The rest idk how I feel about them yet.
Work on this, otherwise it seems scummy to not look at a whole game and instead look at one person without actual reason. You claimed my policy lynch was scummy but its standard to push people who quick hammer to L-1 and force a claim since scum only benefit from this.
Idk why. It’s kind of pointless.
1. I have no way of verifying if it was a joke by him, if his friend did it to Fuck with him, or if his friend posted his actual role. I don’t think the mod would intervene so I have to ignore it especially since what happened day 1.
2. The fact 2 people are saying scum could possibly not be on the wagon is a statement nobody can prove or deny other than scum themselves. Since I’m obviously one of these people, I don’t think it’s a red flag. If you do, cool beans. I’m not going to worry about something stupid like that.[/quote]
In post 207, Doughboy wrote: In post 205, Thespio wrote: In post 204, Doughboy wrote:I have seen both quick hammer so it's not really something you can hang your hat on
I disagree, gametheory would state its a scum move, it doesnt benifit town, and they have yet to even post since, and havent been prodded. you dont want to even dwell on the fact that a duo beginner team might decided to misslynch, have the quick hammer player lay low, meanwhile other scum pushes a second misslynch?
we aren't talking about game theory. We are talking reality. The sad fact is lots of townies quick hammer, some have a policy to always quick hammer on day 1, and others just think it's funny. quick hammers aren't AI imo, but you are free to have a different opinion.
Hell I quick hammered once as town in a newbie game I think.
I dont Understand why us looking at the last lynch puts you off so bad, it seems scummy to disuade us from looking at a quick lynch, if the hammer yesterday was scum they would have guidance in their day chat. they have that advantage.
In post 308, Doughboy wrote: In post 306, Thespio wrote:I think ive thoroughly explained it was a misunderstanding, also your vote is from before, you said the reason was because of my policy lynch push. which i had to drop when the player subbed out
1. I’d have to take your word for it. I don’t believe you.
2. Just because you moved on due to the player replacing out doesn’t excuse your previous scummy push
3. And you didn’t really move that far from it, you voted numbers for not being concerned with the hammer. That’s you basically scum reading the hammer (which you shouldn’t) and instead of going after the person who did it, you are going after the people who realize it wasn’t anything to scum read.
You still come off looking bad. You should have at least stuck with your push despite the replacement.
1. Thats fine, you have no real reason not too except you are tunneling me. Which i find odd because you basicly pushed everyone away from yesterdays lynch, then pushed me who was hardcore pushing policy.
2. Its not scummy to stick to policy, then reason that they could be new and theres no way to question them because they left.
3. WHY SHOULDNT WE SCUM READ THE HAMMER. it was a quickhammer, in a game where numbers corrected the person who was doing it. so if we reason the hammer was a newbie and trolled, why was numbers lurking about and rather then being like 'wtf' be like 'why would you do that?'. the fact this puts you off gives me serious concern.
I didnt OMGUS vote anyone.
In post 282, Doughboy wrote:
Don’t like your push regarding the quick hammer. Especially after I explained it’s nai, you didn’t back off it’s scummy and I tbink scum motivated. Taking advantage of lhf
again, please explain why trying to pressure a quickhammer is bad, it baffles me you still are hung up on this, but explain it to me.
In post 228, Doughboy wrote:
Sorry you can’t take a joke. Get a sense of humor.
Just genreally antagonistic, and theres no reason to post this as town, scum, who like chaos, would benefit.
In post 232, Doughboy wrote:I don’t like the votes for numbers. You don’t even have a reason and the reason the other person gave is bad.
you really dislike us looking at the hammer. Why?
At this point im not OMGUS voting you, im legit voting you because i think you are scum.
Im not sure if numbers is your buddy and thats why you are pushing us away, but you arent a townie.
VOTE: Doughboy