[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/ext/alfredoramos/seometadata/event/listener.php on line 114: Undefined array key 11890255 [phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/ext/alfredoramos/seometadata/event/listener.php on line 114: Trying to access array offset on value of type null Newbie 2011 - Game Over - Mafiascum.net
Post
Post #49 (isolation #6) » Thu Jun 11, 2020 9:04 am
Postby midwaybear »
In post 46, Battle Mage wrote:Why the "yes" or "no" answers to the first question? I assume votato was just trying to be funny. Were you mimicking him?
votato's answer made me think that you were asking "are you mafia"?
it was hoctac who asked the 1-10 question not you nvm
Post
Post #70 (isolation #8) » Thu Jun 11, 2020 4:13 pm
Postby midwaybear »
you should read 2003 :evilgrin:
i voted BM because of his naked vote, but yours is a lot more serious. I'm not sure how activity is LAMIST, and I disagree that's he's paranoid.
I guess we have officially exited RVS
pedit: YUH
Post
Post #80 (isolation #10) » Fri Jun 12, 2020 4:17 am
Postby midwaybear »
In post 57, Battle Mage wrote:you thought I asked "are you mafia?" because votato said yes? That is very odd. If he said yes, surely you'd assume the question was "are you town?"
votato is a troll, so that's why I thought the question was are you maf
Post
Post #98 (isolation #12) » Sat Jun 13, 2020 10:48 am
Postby midwaybear »
In post 87, AGar wrote:Y'all, running a wagon up on Battle Mage seems like a great idea right now. 4 pages in and he's already given me serious doubts about how likely he is to be town, and that likelihood keeps approaching 0 rapidly.
Is there meta to back this up, or do you just think that he's been super scummy this game?
slight townleans on GWu and sleeper soul right now just because they are engaging and moving the game forward
Post
Post #117 (isolation #13) » Sun Jun 14, 2020 7:45 am
Postby midwaybear »
GWu wasn't chainsawing AGar. He was merely defending Battle Mage...
votato seems to be playing a little lazily, and there is still a week before deadline.
Post
Post #119 (isolation #14) » Sun Jun 14, 2020 8:12 am
Postby midwaybear »
Yeah, but a chainsaw defense is when an someone defends another player by attacking their accuser. This is not what GWu did. GWu just defended Battle Mage by replying to AGar's points. He never attacked AGar.
Post
Post #121 (isolation #15) » Sun Jun 14, 2020 8:30 am
Postby midwaybear »
I don't think he's playing badly per say because a few of the points were valid (like the early votes). The other points might have been conf bias and wanting to get an early gut read right
Post
Post #151 (isolation #16) » Mon Jun 15, 2020 5:06 am
Postby midwaybear »
In post 124, Battle Mage wrote:I appreciate that, but it's not helpful for the newbies if you just nominate me as Player Leader - let's keep it democratic eh?
In post 130, Apogee wrote:I hope to have some time to do closer to real time interactions with people this week
I like to do that too. Townpoints for Apogee!
In post 139, SleeperSoul wrote:I have a (silly?) fear that by revealing my reads, mafia will know which of them is under the most danger.
This seems like an honest answer, and I did something like this in 2003.
In post 143, Freddiethelady wrote:apogee talks about how he likes that Agar puts himself out there by casing and pushing people in post 130. is that sheeping? or is that a newbit trying to learn and imitate something that makes sense to him?
I don't think this is sheeping, but it's more of Apogee pointing out how he likes Agar's aggressive behavior. I prefer to be aggressive compared to passive, but I am still learning how
I have a gut TL on gobble for post 141. Seems like a top of the head comment that town are more likely to do. I also appreciate votato's prod towards GG, but that is ultimately NAI.
Post
Post #183 (isolation #18) » Tue Jun 16, 2020 1:29 pm
Postby midwaybear »
In post 179, AGar wrote:Some scumreads/leans please? Posts that pinged you?
honestly no scumreads so far. Everyone except for you and BM have played relatively safe games so far.
might have to reread sometime to find posts that ping me. I think I'll try to defend sleeper.
Post
Post #186 (isolation #19) » Tue Jun 16, 2020 4:12 pm
Postby midwaybear »
In post 182, Apogee wrote:Midway I'm surprised at the lack of content he's posted compared to my previous game with him d1. Whether this is a change in his playstyle or him being hesitant to post as scum I couldn't really tell you but he posted up a storm d1 in Newbie 2003.
also, 2003 was an iconic game. My favorite game of mafia thus far. This game has been nice too though!
Also, I did have a comparably slow start in 2003 too, and this game has been moving slower too. My defense of Sleeper has been pushed to tommorow
Post
Post #242 (isolation #24) » Wed Jun 17, 2020 9:34 am
Postby midwaybear »
Spoiler: sleeper quotes
In post 68, SleeperSoul wrote:You know, originally my BM vote wasn't that serious, it was just a pure gut-read with a silly justification added on top. But now that I've reread everything, I'm starting to actually suspect BM a little bit.
The amount of activity this early comes off as LAMIST to me, and the overall tone seems a little too paranoid. Too bad he's away for 3 days. Maybe the flurry of activity early on was in anticipation of being away for a few days.
But it's the activity in combination with overall tone. He seems slightly more tense than in the one game of his I've read (newbie game 2004).
So rather than my vote being pretty much random/pure gut-read, it's actually slightly substantiated now. Either that or I'm confbiasing because I want my gut-read to be right.
It's early, so this read is not very strong, but it's the only one I have and I figured I'd share what I'm thinking.
His reasons for scumreading are an extreme reach, and it almost sounds like he is scumreading someone just for the sake of a scumread. However, he does back it up with meta, and high effort is generally townie(not always though). Additionally, it is redeemed by what he said in the bolded part. He sorta acknowledges the read is weak, but that he wanted to share his thoughts. This is definitely town motivated.
In post 37, Battle Mage wrote:3. How upset will you be if you're lynched on Day 1? (out of 10)
How does asking and/or answering this question help town? It almost seems like scum rolehunting.
This is actually an interesting quote because it relates to sleeper talking about scum rolehunting like he suspected freddie of doing. I know in Avalon, it's really important for scum to figure out who certain town PRs are, so perhaps this is why he has brought it up.
In post 97, SleeperSoul wrote:I pretty much agree with everything GeneralWu just said in post 94.
It seems like AGar is too eager to lynch BM. To me it would have seemed townier if AGar toned down his scumread on BM, but instead he doubled down with even weaker arguments. I wanted to see some stronger arguments, or a retraction, not a piling-on of weaker arguments. Like, I want my initial gut-read to be right too, but I'm willing to be wrong on that.
Now he flips onto Agar attacking Battle Mage. The argument for scumreading Agar here is good, and this also shows that he reconsiders reads which is also good.
In post 118, SleeperSoul wrote:The wiki says Chainsaw Defense is only a reliable scum tell when we already know mechanically that the defendee is scum, and I have to agree. Pretty sure that as an SE, AGar would know/agree with the wiki, though I'm not sure if him bringing it up is AI.
meh some light shade. I don't think this is necessarily scummy even if shading is generally considered so.
In post 120, SleeperSoul wrote:Yes, I see your point. It seems like AGar might be playing 'bad' on purpose... the question is, why?
ok this quote is pretty weird lol
In post 122, SleeperSoul wrote:Actually his overall game seems fine to me so far (in terms of optimal play, regardless of alignment), I was just referring specifically to his mentioning of the chainsaw defense.
now, Sleeper backtracks and says that he meant Agar's use of chainsaw defense was bad, and not overall play. I'm not sure I buy this, and it is sorta of sus.
In post 135, SleeperSoul wrote:There has to be scum between AGar and BM. I'm leaning towards BM being scum.
With that out of the way, we should be focusing on players that haven't been pushing the game forwards so much or making themselves readable.
this progression is weird because he doesn't really explain why he reads BM as scum, and he was just focused on Agar.
In post 137, Apogee wrote:Can I hear from you what you think of my vote on you?
Sure. I don't mind your vote on me. I think you're picking up on my over-eagerness to move the game forward.
I am having a general feeling throughout this game that everything is moving too slowly. But this is my first forum mafia game. So I think I just need to get used to the pace of forum mafia.
Also... I haven't addressed the following because I wasn't sure how useful it would be to bring... But I have been somewhat holding back my reads this entire game. Up until now I ~feel~ like the general consensus has been that I'm obviously town. I have a (silly?) fear that by revealing my reads, mafia will know which of them is under the most danger. I do have a tendency towards tinfoil hattery...
I can see how your vote on me is probably coming from a town perspective. I was about to ping you for reads like I did freddie and GG, but your vote on me gave me a slight town read on you. So I pinged the remaining players who I have no real reads on.
This reads as really LAMIST now. Yikes. I don't see scum ever saying that they are a consensus townread in this situation, so this is one of those little moments that make a townread.
In post 161, SleeperSoul wrote:I was waiting for AGar to comment on you two being TvT before touching my vote, but sure, I'll change it to you now.
VOTE: Battle Mage
I feel you've consistently been the scummiest player this whole game.
In post 188, GeneralWu wrote:Also why were you "intentionally serving as bait for scum to jump on"?
It's a strategy I adopted from IRL play. My friends all know I don't like playing as scum, and I'm too easy to read as scum. So I play scummy in the beginning to try to get scum on my side and then turn on them. I was always confident in my ability to be read as innocent. This was in an Avalon setup where scum didn't know who one of their members was.
I was trying to do some 5D plays, but I realize I'm probably not good/readable enough to do it here.
lol another weirdly town post from Sleeper.
And then we have the PR Stuff.
Spoiler: stuff
Idk I sorta read sleeper like Apogee from game 2003, but Apogee was a little less awkwardly honest if you know what I mean. It's just that his explanations are sometimes weird, but he is a newbie and this is probably a result of him being used to a different meta.
There are also some quotes I didn't include which have sleeper prodding people for their thoughts which isn't necessarily townie, but still welcome. Yeah, I'm pretty confident that he's town, and I would like for an elaboration on the BM scumread.
Post
Post #264 (isolation #27) » Wed Jun 17, 2020 10:41 am
Postby midwaybear »
In post 253, votato wrote:also its kinda hilarious that midway is saying that townies wouldnt say they're consensus townreads
I said the exact opposite.
In post 257, SleeperSoul wrote:I don't mean to be rude, but at what point do we seriously consider GG as a policy lynch for inactivity?
I am against policy lynches especially in small games like this. Let's push votato.
In post 260, SleeperSoul wrote:right now I'm more focused on figuring out who I should be sheeping.
me
I voted votato mainly because I felt like him pointing out freddie's potential scumbuddies was unnecessary. He's also been mostly commenting on the state of the thread like GeneralWu.
Post
Post #297 (isolation #28) » Wed Jun 17, 2020 1:56 pm
Postby midwaybear »
generalwu isn't really contributing, but I think the same as him so he is probably town.
as of right now, scum is votato and apogee for me(maybe freddie).
Post
Post #301 (isolation #30) » Wed Jun 17, 2020 2:01 pm
Postby midwaybear »
am i supposed to convince you that you are scum
yeah, you might be town though. Having doubts on sleeper even though I defended him, so I might go votato-sleeper for my solve. But we probably shouldn't be speculating teams yet
GG and GWu I am decently confident in being town. I never scumread lurkers so yeah.
pedit: oops maybe
Post
Post #303 (isolation #31) » Wed Jun 17, 2020 2:03 pm
Postby midwaybear »
lol
the sheeping thing is so weird. A tinfoil hat theory is that he is more motivated to post like this since I already said I townread posts like that.
Post
Post #306 (isolation #32) » Wed Jun 17, 2020 2:08 pm
Postby midwaybear »
i don't really know why I SR you apogee. I noticed that you are playing different from 2003, but then I realized you were playing mostly the same? I'm not really sure. I think you are probably town herem yet not as strong as GWU.
Post
Post #314 (isolation #36) » Wed Jun 17, 2020 2:17 pm
Postby midwaybear »
that's sorta what I was thinking because votato's speculation of who freddie is scum with was completely unnecessary as he admitted he didn't scumread freddie in the first place and that it was just "useful info". I'm not sure if it's throwing shade, but it's not really helpful IMO.
Yes, the PT was a joke.
pedit:
Post
Post #316 (isolation #37) » Wed Jun 17, 2020 2:23 pm
Postby midwaybear »
yeah, but votato's early game was mostly fine(a couple of questionable overreactions)
like this post seems town-motivated
In post 85, votato wrote:mmm, i think we should refrain from speculating too much about people's exact roles, as it only serves scum interests. all we need to do is speculate about who is scum. and putting someone at L-1 is generally not a good idea that early on, but at the same time, it draws a lot of attention to you if you are scum. either way, its a bad play imo, so i dont really know how to sort it without more info.
Post
Post #326 (isolation #39) » Wed Jun 17, 2020 4:03 pm
Postby midwaybear »
UNVOTE: votato some of his early posts were a bit defensive, but I like this better VOTE: freddie
she doesn't seem to have any scumreads at all which is
Post
Post #330 (isolation #40) » Wed Jun 17, 2020 4:45 pm
Postby midwaybear »
In post 328, Freddiethelady wrote:
this isn't a whole lot of context. again, midway, you're looking super sus to me because of posts like this: no context, no explanation, and nothing that pushes the game forward. im beginning to feel like a broken record.
Post
Post #355 (isolation #44) » Thu Jun 18, 2020 8:57 am
Postby midwaybear »
In post 228, Freddiethelady wrote:also, gobbles has barely appeared (and been prodded at least once if not twice). which is relevant to my pondering of the question how can you be sure that he would be my likely scumpartner? you haven't seen his style unless you know him from somewhere else and maybe he's a bad player. if he's a bad player and he's coaching me in the scum thread then that would disprove your assumption that he could coach me, immediately. so it tells me you're taking a shot in the dark at assuming gobbles is a good enough player to coach me which is a big assumption to make. i expect more from you votato.
like wth is this logic? Freddie pulls the fact that gobbles is a bad player out of nowhere and uses it to attack votato.
what?
Post
Post #370 (isolation #48) » Thu Jun 18, 2020 9:16 am
Postby midwaybear »
as confident as i can without seeing green cop check
maybe 8-9
i do see that he is posting on other threads, but that isn't AI tbh. Just shows a lack of interest. Wouldn't he be more invested as an SE to help set a good example of scumplay?
Post
Post #381 (isolation #50) » Thu Jun 18, 2020 11:05 am
Postby midwaybear »
it's different here because gibus and poyzin both had content to evaluate. Gobble doesn't.
How about you let him talk before trying to power a wagon on him.
Post
Post #387 (isolation #51) » Thu Jun 18, 2020 12:37 pm
Postby midwaybear »
In post 386, Freddiethelady wrote:bm makes a compelling argument about getting rid of GG, but i don't agree that we should policy lynch someone based on zero participation only.
Post
Post #398 (isolation #54) » Thu Jun 18, 2020 1:44 pm
Postby midwaybear »
Yes, I would like an explanation from him too. But it is not really reasonable to run up a wagon on him like BM did which is why BM lost some town points to me.
Post
Post #429 (isolation #60) » Thu Jun 18, 2020 4:37 pm
Postby midwaybear »
he said he was sick, so we would expect him not to be posting that much. However, he has been posting game advancing posts outside of this game while all of his posts here were mostly to respond to prods or prod dodge. I suspect it is due to a lack of interest, but it is definitely a little sus now because we would expect him not be posting that much anywhere.
You moved up on my readlist for that(pushing for clarification).