[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/ext/alfredoramos/seometadata/event/listener.php on line 114: Undefined array key 13736192 [phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/ext/alfredoramos/seometadata/event/listener.php on line 114: Trying to access array offset on value of type null Amnesiac Mafia: The Movie! That's a Wrap! - Mafiascum.net
In post 48, DragonEater70 wrote:
Wait is this going to be the first game where I am being consensus townread on page 2?
Rather than consensus scumread on that page, that is.
Hold up, who is townreading you on page 2? I went back and checked and didn't see it.
Thanks! Not used to being townread before page 10.
I see now that Klick is townreadin you, but why are you acting like everybody is?
Basically I saw 46 as Titus saying she townread me. Maybe I misinterpreted her post.
Anyhow, I didn't mean to imply that EVERYONE was townreading me, but I was sincerely surprised to see 2 townreads (or so I thought) by page 2.
In post 81, Thestatusquo wrote:
Specifically if you could get into the part where you assume the alignment of the player who you are saying is pocketed that would be great.
Post
Post #241 (isolation #11) » Sat Apr 15, 2023 9:34 pm
Postby DragonEater70 »
In post 97, Feysal wrote:
Now, what else have we here? Firebringer taking the movie theme maybe a little too seriously, whatever. But I'm not all that fond of just brazenly declaring you're unhappy for not being scum. Dunnstral is asking questions and means business, like that. Dragon entered sounding kind of aggressive? Not sure what to make of that yet.
Oh, I did have a thought which might be beneficial, and games where doing this would make sense are few and far between.
In this setup, there are no true power roles. Everyone is equal. Even if you die with a power role, someone else may randomly get it the next day. How does everyone feel about a day one massclaim?
Feysal, instead of just narrating, would you like to provide analysis? I really want to hear your opinion on Firebringer, as well as Titus's confusing posts.
(you probably gave it later but I am playing catchup).
In post 81, Thestatusquo wrote:
Specifically if you could get into the part where you assume the alignment of the player who you are saying is pocketed that would be great.
I am so town.
Wait you're saying that you're there one pocketed? That's not how i read that post at all lol.
Yup.
Oh no. The horror!
I am confirmed townread by 2 people on page 2!
Impossible!
For realz though, from this whole interaction I kinda townread Shea as well I think? Titus is null-town, I guess?
Like there hasn't been enough content from anyone for me to feel confident committing to a townread, but this is what I have so far.
In post 118, Feysal wrote:
It did not feel like that to me, no. It looked more like they did not care about RVS and moved straight into the game proper.
I would argue Dragon didn't seem to care about RVS much either. I feel like both of their entrances could be considered "aggressive with a disregard for RVS" so I just wanted to see why Dunnstral got the pass
Just to clarify, is either of you saying that disregarding RVS is somehow scummy?
In post 190, Dunnstral wrote:
As soon as I started posting you said it wasn't worth listening to me? Did you not?
Your quoting RP again and taking it as though its my gospel.
Well the thing is, it's quite insincere to say something in character without every implying ooc that you don't believe in it, and exoect people not to be offended.
In post 202, Titus wrote:
Why? What is being pushed aside from semantics?
I'm not sure how to answer this. I don't agree with you, though; I'd need you to show me how they are only pushing semantics in order for me to explain how it's not, or if it matters at all. I generally like what they are doing, and can point to those posts.
I too can select posts from someone's ISO and claim they are "questioning/pushing things". If I am going to go to bat for you with my biggest townread, I need more.
You asked me for 3 reads, the black read is a little strained in order to fit the quota of 3. I didn't want to include Firebringer and I didn't want to Include Feysal because while I don't agree with the reason to scumread on them the only reason I have to think they are town is that they are slightly going to bat for me, which isn't strong reasoning, so they are more neutral for me right now still.
Would it clear things up if I said I was leaning town on Black but wasn't sure based on what we have seen so far, instead of saying "town". I'm also not voting for snake right now as I'm not sure they're not just looking awkward right now.
Why would you strain a read rather than say you have nothing?
Post
Post #275 (isolation #22) » Sun Apr 16, 2023 4:40 am
Postby DragonEater70 »
Guys I re-read FB vs Dunn and honestly I've been scumreading both, but now I want to individually TR each one of them for making a good push on a scummy slot.
I'm honestly confused.
In post 275, DragonEater70 wrote:
Guys I re-read FB vs Dunn and honestly I've been scumreading both, but now I want to individually TR each one of them for making a good push on a scummy slot.
I'm honestly confused.
Talk to me about Dunn's read on Black. Do you agree with it?
That's a very good question. I think I definitely have a slight townlean on Black, but for a different reason than Dunn. So I don't think Dunn's read is far-fetched or anything.
In post 275, DragonEater70 wrote:
Guys I re-read FB vs Dunn and honestly I've been scumreading both, but now I want to individually TR each one of them for making a good push on a scummy slot.
I'm honestly confused.
Okay, so my primary thoughts are that Dunnstral is not acting in this game in a sorting capacity, I think this is best seen in the early questions he came in with. The way he handled interactions with me was also weird and I try to wrap my brain around it because they don't make sense to me much completely in a town or scum dunnstral world but the focus to me wasn't figuring out my alignment and I think overall distraction.
Wish I could blame it on chatgpt but i wrote it all myself.
I am going to intermittently continue the scene because i didn't get the role pm i wanted and i am going to have to fun somehow
What does this mean? Did you read the setup?
Okay so I don't see the purpose in this question at all. The idea here i guess from Dunnstral is he thinks I didn't read the setup, I don't know what this tells a town or scum dunnstral if I did or didn't. I have not read setups beforea s both alignments. Dunn might or might not be aware of me favoring scum (i would think he should know with all our games together) but lets say he doesn't.
So what does this serve? To me this looks like seeing if he can see what i know of the setup to push me for it depending on the response. It doesn't look like sorting because what knowledge of my setup would help him sort as town, we are amnesiacs, we don't know the setup. So its either role fishing or psuedo trap to see if he can push me possibly under pretense of a 'scum slip', that last part might uncharitable here. But to me this question serves nothing of hunting. I don't think this is dunn trying to sort me unless magically he thinks scum me knows the full setup or something and i outed something about not getting the PRs (which i think are probably mostly hidden from scum too..again what does this serve)
In post 48, DragonEater70 wrote:
Wait is this going to be the first game where I am being consensus townread on page 2?
Rather than consensus scumread on that page, that is.
Hold up, who is townreading you on page 2? I went back and checked and didn't see it.
I think the concern on who is townreading who is more of a scum concern. More mental notes taken of who is reading each other what for purpose of knowing where people stand. I also think this shows a lack of attention to the details here which I think is more easily to happen with scum. This one felt a bit less scummy because not paying attention can happen to anyone but the focus of who is reading u like that seems more of a scum concern.
Their first post, 28, gives me that feeling. After that they banter for a bit and then in post 44 seem to say "what's the point of theme games" in response to someone else not liking roleplay. I feel this is a weird stance to have as usually this kind of thing is not present in theme games. I'm not sure where BlueSnakelet is coming from here.
This was after my vote but was pretty damning and most content dunn has made. I have yet to bring it up. I thought snek was the easiest person to push in this game and feel like scum Dunn took the bait here going for him. But even the way its argued doesn't show me hunting beyond someone is being awkward. The weird stance that someone is making about themes? How is this a scum mindset Dunnstral? He also ends it with saying not sure where snek is coming from but yet doesn't pursue it to ask Snek questions of what he is thinking or where thoughts are. Theres no curiosity there. Its not hunting. Its X is awkward and here is a weird take.
Okay thats it for me now. Now i go play more mad games tycoon 2
Post
Post #346 (isolation #26) » Sun Apr 16, 2023 8:08 am
Postby DragonEater70 »
Also on rethinking of the Dunn v FB, I think that Dunn's vote was justified. On the other hand, FB's scumcase is based on something that IS scummy on Dunn's part, but could easily be pushed by scum and therefore doesn't warrant a TR on FB.
Therefore I am no longer TRing FB for pushing Dunn, and am gonna probably vote FB (after I finish the catchup).
For noe though I'll UNVOTE:
In post 239, kuribo wrote:
Kinda iffy on dragoneater, the whole "lol why is everyone townreading me" was kinda weird on page two when that wasn't a thing
why is it you can respond to everyone but me?
don't be scared I don't bite
I mean, I absolutely do bite
I honestly somehow missed your post completely? I am gonna read it in a few minutes, but I have to say I don't really understand what kind of response you looking for? You haven't really asked me a question.
Post
Post #370 (isolation #28) » Sun Apr 16, 2023 8:48 am
Postby DragonEater70 »
Well as I said I missed your post.
Anyway I am not feeling like defending myself today since I am apparently THAT townie (I think I've had 4 people calling me town so far) so I will have to decline the offer to go into defense mode.
Seriously though, if you read my completed games, I basically almost always get a wagon formed on me during RVS (I'm what they call limbait), but this game I got people townreading me instead. So I was quite shocked.
In post 297, Dunnstral wrote:
LLD did miss that actually but it's an empty quote vote and you are being soft on Titus and letting her get away while FB and I were dueling.
Attempting to make it look like LLD is not reading the game is not a townie response to pressure
and
it's a discredit that no one can veritably prove
. In the text you quoted above LLD has made points about specific interactions to
it is pretty clear she is reading
.
Just curious, are these your thoughts or LLD's?
Having our teammates play the game too is going to get hella confusing. Now I have to read 40+ people? XD
IDK, for my team at least I am just posting whatever I want to, and then my teammates give me feedback etc.
Post
Post #379 (isolation #30) » Sun Apr 16, 2023 9:12 am
Postby DragonEater70 »
In post 300, Feysal wrote:
1. Why ask me? I have played with Titus before, but that experience is now years old. There are others here who have played with her more often and more recently.
2. I have also had a look at your past games trying to get a feel for your play, because I have some mixed feelings about it. This would not happen to be a game where you don't feel safe expressing your sincere thoughts, would it?
1. Well I was just trying to engage you. So you saying Titus is hard to read. Not really helpful, I guess. What do you think of the case against her? I personally feel like she's asking too many questions but not providing much of her own opinions, which is scummy.
2. It's unclear if this is aimed at me or Dunn. I assume me? In that case I am definitely expressing my sincere thoughts much mor freely than usual.
In post 275, DragonEater70 wrote:
Guys I re-read FB vs Dunn and honestly I've been scumreading both, but now I want to individually TR each one of them for making a good push on a scummy slot.
I'm honestly confused.
Can you elaborate on the Dunn SR?
It wasn't a very strong SR tbh, I already forgot most of it but I think it was mainly the fact that they asked questions which I felt weren't leading anywhere.
In post 29, DragonEater70 wrote:
VOTE: Firebringer
I really don't enjoy their entrance and I dare say it's possibly scummy.
why?
Their roleplay was triggering my PTSD from scum-spam in your Demon Hunter game. It felt like unnecessarily drawn out fluff that didn't help us get out of RVS and that was actually hindering us from having a readable thread.
Post
Post #389 (isolation #37) » Sun Apr 16, 2023 9:39 am
Postby DragonEater70 »
In post 385, Thestatusquo wrote:
I think dragon gets run up as town a lot and is annoyed by that generally, at least thats my perception from being pretty involved in the newbies queues over the last few months.
Post
Post #394 (isolation #39) » Sun Apr 16, 2023 9:45 am
Postby DragonEater70 »
In post 361, Frozen Angel wrote:
oh and I think there is a good chance FB dun was tvt and feysel freaked when FB called out its possibility and went after feysel instead somewhere in those pages.
I actually agree with you on it possibly being tvt
In post 370, DragonEater70 wrote:
Well as I said I missed your post.
Anyway I am not feeling like defending myself today since I am apparently THAT townie (I think I've had 4 people calling me town so far) so I will have to decline the offer to go into defense mode.
Seriously though, if you read my completed games, I basically almost always get a wagon formed on me during RVS (I'm what they call limbait), but this game I got people townreading me instead. So I was quite shocked.
the next step is to think critically about WHY that is.
If you don't feel like you're doing anything that townie and people are calling you townie, one would think you'd be interested into delving into those town reads to try to read the players professing a town read on you, but I don't really see that step in the thought process happening here.
In post 378, Thestatusquo wrote:
If you're town scum know you're town, after all, right? So wouldn't a too easy town read be a place you would want to start looking?
You know, I actually didn't think about this at all.
Let me have a look at the people who were townreading me this game and see if there's anyone scummy there (though tbh I'm already voting Titus who said I've pocketed her when I randomly townread GiF).
Post
Post #480 (isolation #43) » Sun Apr 16, 2023 6:37 pm
Postby DragonEater70 »
Okay I just read through Klick's ISO, and initially it felt a bit weird:
It is kinda weird that Klick gave like 4 townreads with minimal explanation and no scumreads. It feels very easy to fake, I guess. And none of their posts really stood out for me at the start.
But then I continued reading and I saw those posts, which have a genuine town mindset IMO:
In post 29, DragonEater70 wrote:
VOTE: Firebringer
I really don't enjoy their entrance and I dare say it's possibly scummy.
You're probably town!
super why?
This doesn't feel at all like the desired opening play for scum
In post 437, Klick wrote:
I've played like 3ish games in a row with Titus where she has been scum and in this game I'm getting a zeal from her that I haven't felt in other games. I think she's engaged her town solving brain in a way that she wasn't quite there for in the last few games I've been in with her.
It could be Team Mafia making her tryhard even if she's scum but I'm enjoying her content so far regardless and am fine to boost what she's currently doing for the thread.
In post 432, Klick wrote:
From where I'm at right now FA feels very similar to Cosmos where she was scum though
Go on please.
It's not a very strongly formed thought
But the basic idea is that in Cosmos I felt like FA's approach was largely to question other people's takes as a means to develop her own view of the game and make it look genuine
It's different from a town approach in terms of motive for posting; the whole point of what FA was doing in Cosmos felt like it was to look town through having considered and nuanced takes that were developed by sort of hijacking other players' genuine thoughts and critiquing them
And here it feels very similar, I feel like almost everything FA has done has been a critique of another original perspective with only a couple of reads originating from something she has brought up herself
It all fits under this umbrella idea of 'I think FA wants to look town right now rather than actually doing town things'
In post 331, Klick wrote:
Because people like you aren't going to like it!
why do you think I disliked it? I just noted its existence. it doesn't give me any kind of info either way. that's why asked about what was behind the post in his thought process
I actually have more read on your tr on it than I have on the original read itself. (leaning toward the dislike category)
pedit: his going after blue for the titus thingy was what I called try harding on page 2 IMO I don't care about his rp
It's high-detail, specifically contradicts assumptions I made about her perspective, and develops what appears to be a nuanced take on both myself and DragonEater without doing the heavy lifting. I remember her doing something that made me feel very similar to this in Cosmos. Let me go find it
I'd like to quote that post but I can't quite make it happen, idk whether I just am not able to quote from locked threads at all or if it's a mobile-specific issue
It's not an exact match to what I'm describing here, but basically I made an assumption based on VCA, and FA used it as a means of discrediting what I was saying while developing her own read on me as well as the situation without adding much genuine original thought outside of detailed analysis of my own thought.
The same sort of thing happened in her early-game argument with STD, in their conversation about 'shading'. This is probably a better example of it, it happened in like the first 10ish pages of that game.
341 feels similar. Lots of critical thought in a very focused way towards specific details of Feysal's 97. She gives the appearance of a nuanced perspective but it's limited to what she could derive from 97 itself, and I think the projection of nuance could be intentional.
I actually fairly like FA's last two posts as counterexamples of this - they contain clear general conclusions based on the things she's been talking about. The add-on in 361 a minute and a half later feels kind of like legitimate thought. But I want more of that from her.
So I am actually going to say Klick is a townlean of mine (and I was also convinced by their case that FA is scummy here).
Post
Post #483 (isolation #46) » Sun Apr 16, 2023 6:46 pm
Postby DragonEater70 »
In post 381, kuribo wrote:
Ugh god I really don't like dragon's response there
vote: Dragon
Not to reiterate the things that Shea just said, but I do agree with him on this. You never once questioned four people calling you town seemingly with no good reason. And then calling yourself limbait, ehhhhhhh
Just feels like a way to preliminary poo-poo a wagon on you
Read my completed games - I've been called limbait several times on D1, different games.
In post 300, Feysal wrote:
I have also had a look at your past games trying to get a feel for your play, because I have some mixed feelings about it. This would not happen to be a game where you don't feel safe expressing your sincere thoughts, would it?
It's unclear if this is aimed at me or Dunn. I assume me? In that case I am definitely expressing my sincere thoughts much more freely than usual.
Yes, it was aimed at you, and now that I have your answer, it only worries me more. I have seen your past town games, and in them you have mostly seemed more relaxed than here. There was one exception though where you appeared more reserved, and according to your own notes PT, it was because you suspected the towncore in that game had scum in it, making you feel unsafe. But if that is not the case here, then yes, you are worrying me.
Wow, you've been doing some serious research I see. Well done!
I really don't know why you perceive me as being nervous/unrelaxed here, because in fact I am much more relaxed about my position than in any of my completed games (except the one where I suspected a scum in the towncore, where I was widely townread).
I do however agree that my playstyle is very different here, and if I'm allowed to say my opinion, it's probably just less tryharding on my side, mainly because I am very busy IRL with some exciting things so I don't really have the time or motivation to commit myself to the game fully.
It might change though around Thursday.
In post 346, DragonEater70 wrote:
On the other hand, FB's scumcase is based on something that IS scummy on Dunn's part, but could easily be pushed by scum and therefore doesn't warrant a TR on FB.
I have posted my take on that case here, and frankly, it sounds not only bad but actively malicious. So what do you like about that case?
Post
Post #1507 (isolation #52) » Thu Apr 20, 2023 6:54 am
Postby DragonEater70 »
Actually there's 40 new pages and it's a bit much, so I am going to just read the last 3 pages for now, then look at anything interesting that picks my interest.
In post 1437, Dunnstral wrote:
I think you and I are seeing PB in that interaction differently here. You are seeing PB being aggressive about Dragon and trying to shut things down. I am seeing them as a lot more laid back, saying what is on their mind, and trying to clear things up without trying to push strong opinions.
It's less about his attitude/tone there and more about what I think his motivations are for trying to invalidate my Dragon read. Scum!PB could have seen my "Dragon's siteflake is NAI" comment and got worried that it could potentially stop the conversation around Dragon. He even admitted he thought that's what my comment might do. If the wagon comes to a halt then scum have to find somewhere else to go today
I've got a pretty good feeling that there's scum on the Dragon wagon and PB calling me out for my Dragon read feels like an attempt to shoo me away from breaking the wagon down. He's not necessarily being aggressive about it but he's definitely not ok with me pointing it out or else he wouldn't have tried to invalidate it. Does that make sense?
Agreed completely, pushing me for flaking the site is scummy AF.
I also saw an early post by PB that pinged me as scummy, but didn't think much of it at the time. It was thispost, in which they were implying they were scumreading me (and also implying that since they correctly townread me previous, then this scumread is definitely correct, which I find disingenious). Thing is, they didn't give any reason for it. I kinda missed it back then because I wasn't giving this game my full attention and possibly tunnel visioning on a few players. But now in retrospect, seeing that they called me "obvscum" without any explanation of the read (and also their early push on me with no explanation), I'd say they feel very scummy. VOTE: Pink
Post
Post #1521 (isolation #55) » Thu Apr 20, 2023 7:20 am
Postby DragonEater70 »
In post 1456, Thestatusquo wrote:
I'm having a hard time putting it into words exactly but the impression I got from that exchange was dragon legitimately read what I said and thought "wow, that's a neat idea! I never would have thought of that!" and just went about immediately doing it
Yeah pretty much on the nail.
Also, is this interaction actually why I'm being pushed? Because if it is, holy shit this is funny.
Post
Post #1523 (isolation #56) » Thu Apr 20, 2023 7:28 am
Postby DragonEater70 »
Guys is my brain cooked or is page 59 really that hard to read and that wallposty?
Ughhhh
I think I sort of have a picture of what's going on but not quite?
Post
Post #1530 (isolation #57) » Thu Apr 20, 2023 7:38 am
Postby DragonEater70 »
In post 1524, Pink Ball wrote:
There's no point of keep waiting for DragonEater 'cause it's pretty much obvious that he will be replaced, so this is what I was doing behind the scenes. The idea was to see how DragonEater reacted to someone blindly scumreading him since it was a nice contrast to the early townreads he got.
Post
Post #1534 (isolation #59) » Thu Apr 20, 2023 7:43 am
Postby DragonEater70 »
In post 1524, Pink Ball wrote:
He knew what he was doing, so he knew he would be townread for doing it, but had to act surprised to avoid being called out for being LAMIST.
I didn't know I would get townread for voting FB, at all. I was trying to end RVS with a semi-serious vote and a somewhat firm stance on FB (which matured into a scumread, then a confused townread, then again a scumread). I guess people liked that? Fine with me but I actually had no way to know.