so while we're at it
keep calm and
![Image](https://img.memecdn.com/praise-the-sun_o_2404559.jpg)
townalakakakaIn post 168, Invisibility wrote:are you town
In post 171, Pink Ball wrote:Finally someone funny, sheesh
partly i really didn't like the naked vote that (didn't seem to be RvS) had no reasoning and was right after you made a post about thinking invisi is town, then coming back with saying invisi is OTT.In post 177, kitcat wrote:I don't think SA is really tunneling you right now. Your reaction to SA's push feels a bit like an overaction to meIn post 164, Pink Ball wrote:Could you explain why do you think me feeling tunneled is scummy? And look at rethoric here: I said I feel tunneled, not THINK I'm being tunneled. You know that's different.
Is this because of his vote on me on page1?In post 175, Eragon wrote:Scumlean(light)- Slaxx
Also your entrance feels kinda townie to me
And I approve of the cute cat pictures!
1. I could be wrong about one or both of your alignmentsIn post 189, Slaxx wrote:Oh Jesus am I gonna have to defend myself pbp?
136: How is it pocketing if we are both your strongest scumreads?
Point is, you haven’t tried to sort him.In post 190, Slaxx wrote:126: He hadn’t posted much and I said I have a good handle on reading him. So. How’s that scummy? Seems pretty consistent to me.
In post 192, Slaxx wrote:121: I pointed out an inconsistency in play. Also, “shading” by guessing a motive behind a post- isn’t that what we are all doing here? Doesn’t seem like shading.
UnderstandableIn post 194, Slaxx wrote:135: My vote was to preside OfhrZ for a read because I felt like I could read him.
Why park my vote on a replacement when it can be used elsewhere? Come the hell on. In no way did I insinuate ofhrZ wasn’t scum by replacing our. Talk about assigning motivation to people christ
So you had him as a scumlean but needed more to read him???In post 195, Slaxx wrote:Lol. Look at his ISO. I needed more. Dude.In post 193, Eragon wrote:Point is, you haven’t tried to sort him.In post 190, Slaxx wrote:126: He hadn’t posted much and I said I have a good handle on reading him. So. How’s that scummy? Seems pretty consistent to me.
And you had voted him and had him as a scumread before this post, so you can’t say “consistent”
If you have a “good handle on reading him” then why didn’t you try reading the posts he made and commenting on them?
It means that I scumread the post regardless of whether it’s SvS, TvS, or he’s pocketing youIn post 197, Slaxx wrote:“3. It’s still a disgusting post” means like nothing.In post 191, Eragon wrote:1. I could be wrong about one or both of your alignmentsIn post 189, Slaxx wrote:Oh Jesus am I gonna have to defend myself pbp?
136: How is it pocketing if we are both your strongest scumreads?
2. NGL I have seen scum “pocket” scum before
3. It’s still a disgusting post
1, yes you could. And 2, I don’t think that’s the right terminology but that’s not a fruitful discussion.
It’s not the idea that’s bad, it’s the tone.In post 201, Slaxx wrote:#43: Because lynching the most useless player is a low effort vote. It’s an excuse to not discern alignment. Am I wrong here?
Ok maybe that’s a bit much yes, but I still think you wait until it’s obvious he doesn’t respond, then ask.In post 204, Slaxx wrote:#49 Are you serious? I didn’t get an answer to my question and SA had posted since then. If anything I should be a townread for the follow up, in means I’m genuinely interested in the answer and not just trying to look busy
The point is why did you have him as a scumlean, not why you voted him.In post 206, Slaxx wrote:Lean. Lean isn’t enough to lynch. I want a solid scumread. I mean if I’m 60/40 on him but think a pressure vote can make me 70/30 do I not go for it? Those numbers are arbitrary but help illustrate the point I’m making.In post 203, Eragon wrote:So you had him as a scumlean but needed more to read him???In post 195, Slaxx wrote:Lol. Look at his ISO. I needed more. Dude.In post 193, Eragon wrote:Point is, you haven’t tried to sort him.In post 190, Slaxx wrote:126: He hadn’t posted much and I said I have a good handle on reading him. So. How’s that scummy? Seems pretty consistent to me.
And you had voted him and had him as a scumread before this post, so you can’t say “consistent”
If you have a “good handle on reading him” then why didn’t you try reading the posts he made and commenting on them?
How does that make sense?
43 I’m having trouble putting this one into words but I don’t like this post. It feels just… off to me? It almost feels a little like shade, saying that “your vote it stupid and really took no effort and this is why it was trashIn post 210, Slaxx wrote:Please do explain how the tone was scummy. It was a bad fucking vote.In post 208, Eragon wrote:It’s not the idea that’s bad, it’s the tone.In post 201, Slaxx wrote:#43: Because lynching the most useless player is a low effort vote. It’s an excuse to not discern alignment. Am I wrong here?
As I expressed in the post about it.
You can have a correct idea and a scummy tone
In post 212, Slaxx wrote:If I ask a question and the poster is addressing issues in a similar area and mine doesn’t get addressed I’m going to follow up before I forget. It was important to me to get the answer.In post 209, Eragon wrote:Ok maybe that’s a bit much yes, but I still think you wait until it’s obvious he doesn’t respond, then ask.In post 204, Slaxx wrote:#49 Are you serious? I didn’t get an answer to my question and SA had posted since then. If anything I should be a townread for the follow up, in means I’m genuinely interested in the answer and not just trying to look busy
Cause there’s a good possiblity he just didn’t reach that point in thread and was still catching up.
But I see it’s not really scummy so point dropped
Why do you feel it’s out of place to question a naked vote and to call invisible town?In post 215, Slaxx wrote:#58 and #59 seemed a bit rushed and out of place. It was a very weak read. I think later in the game I say I’m more confident on town than scum reads.In post 211, Eragon wrote:The point is why did you have him as a scumlean, not why you voted him.In post 206, Slaxx wrote:Lean. Lean isn’t enough to lynch. I want a solid scumread. I mean if I’m 60/40 on him but think a pressure vote can make me 70/30 do I not go for it? Those numbers are arbitrary but help illustrate the point I’m making.In post 203, Eragon wrote:So you had him as a scumlean but needed more to read him???In post 195, Slaxx wrote:Lol. Look at his ISO. I needed more. Dude.In post 193, Eragon wrote:Point is, you haven’t tried to sort him.In post 190, Slaxx wrote:126: He hadn’t posted much and I said I have a good handle on reading him. So. How’s that scummy? Seems pretty consistent to me.
And you had voted him and had him as a scumread before this post, so you can’t say “consistent”
If you have a “good handle on reading him” then why didn’t you try reading the posts he made and commenting on them?
How does that make sense?
And I dropped the ones that I agree to be stupid when pointed out.In post 217, Slaxx wrote:So I actually am okay with some of the ofhrZ stuff. I’m playing closer to the cuff than I usually do and that’s on me. If I eat the rope, I’ve learned that playstyle isn’t my look.
But a lot of this peripheral stuff just feels like you wanted to add stuff to the case on me which I actually get if you’re trying to push a lynch but so much of it seems just... superfluous. Like even benign posts were assigned this inflated meaning.
In post 222, Slaxx wrote:Also in game activity was super low at that point. I figured a move like that might get people stirred up.
I suppose it did. Just with a delay.
SameIn post 224, Slaxx wrote:Anyway I really like real time talks, I think they’re kind of special in terms of getting reads.
But I have to sleep, so, just drop any other questions you have for me.
In post 233, Pink Ball wrote:Ok, I'm pretty pissed off right no. I was fucking memeing all time when there was literally ONE PERSON POSTING, and I'm called out for not doing shit? I was doing shit, I was trying to get reactions, and I got one from Invisibility that helped me sort him out. If you don't know what the hell I'm doing, ask me, for fucks sake. I already said I didn't want to explicitly say what my reads were at the time 'cause I was waiting for something to happen, why the fuck is that scummy? I really can't believe this shit.
you were waiting for something on every single thing? you were literally just popping in doing nothing pretty much the entire time, until you are called out on it. thats wolfy because your just coasting and then when people call you out you start doing things. its proof you can, you just didn't feel like it.
Also, I already explained two fucking times why I felt tunneled, and you keep addressing that shit as I am wrong? FEELINGS, FEELINGS, FEEEEEEEELIIIIIIIINGS FOR CRYING OUT LOUD, I CAN'T BE WRONG ABOUT HOW I FEEL, THAT DOESN'T MEAN I *THINK* IT'S A TUNNEL. And the feeling, as I already explained, was justified on some specific posts that made me feel I was going to be scumread by Sleepless no matter what I said/did.
yes, and like i said i think its wolfy you think you are feeling like you are being tunneled. i never said you are not feeling tunneled. Its wolfy because it shows you are hyper-sensitive to being pushed, which in my opinion is a scum trait because town is a lot less worried and scum is aware of every push.
I'm going to be boring from now on and be pretty much straightforward with my thoughts 'cause it's clearly impossible to do something else without people thinking "what the hell is this guy doing, omg scum!!one!11!".
you don;t have to state every thought as long as you state some thoughts. leaving us with posts that means nothing is worse than doing nothing at all. if your gonna wait just fucking wait. you weren;t doing shit until you got called out for it, as you did when invisi called you out and now me.
I started to scumread rooroo 'cause of this post:
It felt like it was not a genuine feeling, too defensive when I think there was no much pressure on her, and including the fact that this is her meme alt was sketchy too, like "don't expect too much coming from me". BUT I changed my mind, everyone scumreading me because of not contributing made me feel the same way, so now this post is NAI and I have nothing on rooroo.In post 79, rooroo wrote:I will policy lynch the next person to suggest that I somehow need to put more effort into towning on day 1 than everyone else just because I'm me this has happened 3 games in a row now and 2 of them including this one are on meme alts.
low effort isn't even scum-indicative for me.
ok at least you can give reasoning, but why didn't you bring this up earlier. withholding reads is bad, and given the fact that it doesn;t seem like you were "Waiting" for for anything on this post then why couldn't you state it? and now its "NAI" just feels a copout to not scumread
Invisibility reaction to my shitposting, on the other hand, felt genuine, like without thinking. "Fuck this guy, I'm trying to play this game and this guy is doing nothing" and voting me without thinking consequences comes from town IMO.
Eragon's catchup is bad in my books. The last post, specially, saying that either me or sleepless is scum and the other town, seems like preparing lynches beforehand. I think there's nothing to come to the conclusion that one of us is town and the other one is scum exclusively. We could both be scum, for example. If Sleepless flipped scum, would I become town because of how Sleepless is scumreading me or because of how I reacted to his scumread on me? No, there's nothing of that. Eragon, on that matter, seems to have the ulterior motive to note this in order to lynch one of us first and the other one when the first one flips town. This gives me even more reasons to believe Sleepless is town; I already pointed out why I feel Sleepless' posts about me feel townie.
so, my catchup is bad because you disagree with one post. coolio. good deflection. But, i thought i was pretty clear. I scumread you both individually, but i also don't think you are ever in a team. This happens because I don't think, first of all, scum is bussing in this playlist and game speed. there is no point because before i got to this game coasting was the word and literally nothing was happening. So the fact that sleepless was voting you, and you "FELT" like you were being tunneled is never SvS because even if scum were bussing, the "FEEL" like you were being tunneled wouldn't have happened unless you were faking it. I think the feeling is genuine, and you genuinely felt you were being tunneled. its just that feeling is wolfy. There is some of that. I seem to note this because ITS WHAT I FUCKING THINK. how is it lining up lynches for me thinking its TvS? i have plenty of reasons to believe its TvS, and i feel confident enough in my skill and my reads to push this. how is having a read fucking ultierior motive? if we lynch one of you and they flip scum, im confident in the other being town. nice. If we lynch one of you and they flip town, im confident in the other being scum. nice. as i said. i . have clear scumreads of both of you individually, and i think you are never scumbuddies. I gave clear progression and saying i have no other motive except lining up lynches is wolfy as shit.
Slaxx I think has been the most reasonable player of the whole playerlist, and his last interactions with Eragon are maybe the most AI think you could get from a player in this game. I get that someone could not like his tone, but that's pretty much NAI compared with the content he has provided. I townread people who is reasonable in general, and this is a perfect case where scum would be doing another thing that Slaxx is not doing.
you actually townread someone for "being reasonable" thats absolute bullshit and a terrible reason to scumread someone. Scum can easily be reasonable too, and content can come from either alignment. if you get that someone couldn't like his tone, how is that NAI? content is NAI and any player that has played more than a couple games should easily know that. I agree hes recent interactions have been extremely AI, and thats why my read on him has sunk slightly.
From the rest, kitcat, EyesWithoutAFace and CultofAthena, I got nothing, mainly because I was focusing on the other slots first; I'm going to reread those ISOs but there's nothing that caught my attention while reading the thread... I mean I have some gutreads on Cult being townie and kitcat being scummy, but I'm not giving too much credit to that for now. Maybe real-time interactions could make those slots easier to sort out.
So my reads would be:
{SleeplessAssasin, Slaxx, Invisibility} townreads
{CultofAthena} nulltown
{rooroo, EyesWithoutAFace} null
{kitcat} nullscum
{Eragon} scumreads
Nulltown, Null and Nullscum are really close to each other, but far away from townreads and scumreads.
"Scum because he OBVIOUSLY HAS AN ULTERIOR MOTIVE of lining up lynches and OBVIOUSLY DIDNT EXPLAIN ANYTHING AT ALL" yes this makes sense 1000%
VOTE: Eragon
i dont scumread everyone.In post 234, Pink Ball wrote:Add to Eragon scumreading everyone to my "Eragon is scum" arguments
i suppose.In post 236, rooroo wrote:In post 231, Eragon wrote:185urgh I dont know about this vote. Yes, its consistent with their post, but their reasoning, “i dont want to put pinkball to L-1 incase he is town” but you were on the ofhrz wagon when he was L-1. plus, if scum decides to quick hammer im fine with a 1-1 trade if pinkball is town. “I didnt want to make assassin a competent wagon” but whats wrong with having multiple wagons? “i dont want it to look like im voting kit cat because she’s voting me” feels very very self-aware and worried about being scumread? I dont know why town would be worried about that.town definitely have these thoughts too and I kind of think scum are less likely to post them specifically because they're too self-awareI want a little more on eye for the moment, but I didn’t really like his self-awareness.
In post 240, Pink Ball wrote:Why are you treating me like an idiot? I said I was pissed off because of being scumread when I think there's no reason for scumreading someone fluffing around with purpose behind. I never insulted you, and when I delivered my reads I toned down the "pissed off mood" in order to not belittle no one. Saying things like ""Scum because he OBVIOUSLY HAS AN ULTERIOR MOTIVE of lining up lynches and OBVIOUSLY DIDNT EXPLAIN ANYTHING AT ALL" yes this makes sense 1000%" is ?. I didn't say you didn't explain anything at all, I said it felt like you were lining up lynches because I didn't like the reasoning behind your reads on me and Sleepless. I know my alignment, of course I think you're wrong about what you're doing.
About scumreading everyone: yeah sorry, I thought you had EWAF as townie and then degraded him to a slight scumread because of being self aware, so I thought you had 5 instead of 4, my bad.
i probably did go a bit overboard, and for that i apologize. im just kinda pissed off at the entire game state right now and the fact that basically this game was just like 3-4 people posting content and not even 7 pages when i replaced in. Im used to games that can get to 7 pages in the first couple hours, let alone numerous days.In post 241, Pink Ball wrote:I think your reply to my post was townie tho. I don't like your tone, but your tone is the thing that makes me feel you're being angry town with who you think is scum. If you were scum and your faked scumread started scumreading you, I think your reaction would've been more "I have to look better than this guy" and the way you reacted doesn't seem to be like that. I mean, you depicted me like an idiot, but the way you did it was different from what I would've expected from scum.
UNVOTE: Eragon
So that makes me pretty confident that the scumteam is in my nullreads. We'll need those sweet interactions now.
In post 246, kitcat wrote:I meant bombastic more in the sense of: 'attention-seeking', or 'loud'In post 179, Eragon wrote:53 NGL I had to look up what bombastic meant to understand this post. Ok seeing what bombastic means, why do you think its towny for someone to post a lot of posts that have no meaning? Or inflated posts or whatever it means. So. Many. Big. Words. ARGH. “Fallacious” this is a towny post as well because I feel scum would just try to ride the new player but not outright say they are a new player, and if anyone asks, just say “ I was trying not to out I was an alt” its simple to get more easily townread but not have many repercussions in the end. Town wants to be read correctly, with full information, so they out they are an alt.
And not particularly in the sense of: 'post a lot of posts that have no meaning
I don't inherently find posts that are loud/ott/attention-seeking to be townie in a general sense, but I think it is for vizzy.
And yeah I feel like it's a little bit misleading to let people think of me as a new player when I'm not since that will probably affect how they try to sort me.
And sorry for the big words - I'm trying a bit of a different posting style
i feel you, this ^ is the bane of my FM existence.In post 251, kitcat wrote:Slaxx, you feel really weird tonally. I'm bad at describing tonal reads (they tend to basically end up somewhere around 'gut') but I guess I should probably mention it and I'll try to figure out why it's bothering me
can you elaborate the bolded a little plz?In post 261, Pink Ball wrote:I changed my mind about Eragon already, and tIn post 256, kitcat wrote:Uh this feels kinda ATE and OTT to me and I'm not sure why you're reacting this way?In post 233, Pink Ball wrote:Ok, I'm pretty pissed off right no. I was fucking memeing all time when there was literally ONE PERSON POSTING, and I'm called out for not doing shit? I was doing shit, I was trying to get reactions, and I got one from Invisibility that helped me sort him out. If you don't know what the hell I'm doing, ask me, for fucks sake. I already said I didn't want to explicitly say what my reads were at the time 'cause I was waiting for something to happen, why the fuck is that scummy? I really can't believe this shit.
Also, I already explained two fucking times why I felt tunneled, and you keep addressing that shit as I am wrong? FEELINGS, FEELINGS, FEEEEEEEELIIIIIIIINGS FOR CRYING OUT LOUD, I CAN'T BE WRONG ABOUT HOW I FEEL, THAT DOESN'T MEAN I *THINK* IT'S A TUNNEL. And the feeling, as I already explained, was justified on some specific posts that made me feel I was going to be scumread by Sleepless no matter what I said/did.
Also this readslist is like upside down in comparision to mineIn post 233, Pink Ball wrote:So my reads would be:
{SleeplessAssasin, Slaxx, Invisibility} townreads
{CultofAthena} nulltown
{rooroo, EyesWithoutAFace} null
{kitcat} nullscum
{Eragon} scumreadshe way you're posting right now reminds me of other player who I usually scumread because of playstyle instead of content, so keep it going.
Also about ATE yeah it was pretty emotional but when I explained my reads I toned it down. I was pretty much pissed off by being scumread by almost everyone just because I was trying to be funny in a game that no one was playing.
going out of the game for a moment but isn't that literally the point of pocketing?In post 264, Pink Ball wrote:Yeah I knew were you where coming from since Eragon already talked about that alternative, but... Again, I don't like talking about what I would and wouldn't do as town or scum since it's pretty much useless, but I wouldn't try to pocket a player I don't know that much or that I think that they could outplay me. You're both of these cases.In post 262, Slaxx wrote: Okay I like that a lot more. Thanks for explaining. Eragon has mentioned pocketing and I’m super susceptible to that, especially as I built a rapport with the player, so I just wanted to see that I wasn’t being fleeced.
In post 267, Invisibility wrote:i like eragon
there was a lot of text that
i'll have to read and not just skim later when i have more time
i also dont really like pink ball's freakout
what reaction test huh?In post 268, Invisibility wrote:actually nah this reaction test is stupid im not sure what to think of the post though
i like eragons breakdown though so maybe i should dislike the post
okay i dislike the post
In post 271, Eyes without a face wrote:But your response makes me feel better, because you are not arguing your alignment, but arguing the evidence. It's like you're saying "It's not what you know. It's what you can prove." which works in a court of law, but not in an online game.
lolIn post 273, Slaxx wrote:This is probably the first time I’ve been told arguing the evidence is scummy
this is kinda rude but i feel someone with good experience should know by now that D1 reads are what are important in this game and not just try to slank and really do nothing until "the night passes" yes i understand that you did PoE and you said some things, but PoE'ing the list doesn't really help us solve alignments, it just is basically rhe lynchpoolIn post 276, Eyes without a face wrote:No preference.In post 229, Eragon wrote:Eyes w/out a Face do you have an abbreviation that you prefer such as EwoF, or Eyes, or Face or anything or does it not matter to you?
also, whats your experience in FM (about how long/how many games)
I have good experience in FM, but I would rather not say where or give any more details.
In post 285, Eyes without a face wrote:I didn't say that and I would appreciate if you didn't put words in my mouth. However you respond is up to you, but I didn't like the particular response you gave. What's so confusing about this?In post 272, Slaxx wrote:So the proper response to that would be “I’m Town”
Also, people wanted me to try harder and give reads and I did just that. What's wrong with that?
Finally (and this is of most importance to me), why are you making such a fuss about a single vote on you? O am but only one player with one vote, and nobody else is or has been voting you, so what do you have to worry about? In fact, here's your answer: Your overreaction to a mere single vote on you feels over the top and that is what is ponging me hard now.
In post 288, Slaxx wrote:Yikes.In post 285, Eyes without a face wrote:I didn't say that and I would appreciate if you didn't put words in my mouth. However you respond is up to you, but I didn't like the particular response you gave. What's so confusing about this?In post 272, Slaxx wrote:So the proper response to that would be “I’m Town”
Also, people wanted me to try harder and give reads and I did just that. What's wrong with that?
Finally (and this is of most importance to me), why are you making such a fuss about a single vote on you? O am but only one player with one vote, and nobody else is or has been voting you, so what do you have to worry about? In fact, here's your answer: Your overreaction to a mere single vote on you feels over the top and that is what is ponging me hard now.
Your reads list was incredibly opaque and came 19 minutes after you said there wasn’t much content for you to get reads from.
Your vote was really bad, that’s why. I reacted completely reasonably to Eragon having a scumread on me so don’t try to pull that.
snipped assasin's quoteIn post 297, Sleepless Assassin wrote:Eragon, I don't have a good enough memory to remember who posted every single post number and I'm not clicking every single one of your links, so if anything in your catchup is directed at me please address it specifically at me. Your reads list at the end of those posts at least gives me an idea but otherwise it's hard to follow where you stand exactly. Hopefully real time interaction will fix that though.Also, can you summarize your case on Slaxx?<-Scratch that actually. Your back and forth with him is giving me a good idea of it.
Hmm, really? Can you give an example?Eragon wrote:2. NGL I have seen scum “pocket” scum before
Actually, my post addressed it. Slaxx, you said "elaborate" and that's what I had done.Eragon wrote:Ok maybe that’s a bit much yes, but I still think you wait until it’s obvious he doesn’t respond, then ask.
Cause there’s a good possiblity he just didn’t reach that point in thread and was still catching up.
Funny. I had something similar typed out about Eragon's TvS point and then I got to your post. I agree completely. TvS feels like a completely random label and I can't think of any reason why he would feel that way. It looks like he just put it there and ran with it rather than actually seeing it first. Actually though...I typed that out and then saw his reply:Pink Ball wrote:Eragon's catchup is bad in my books. The last post, specially, saying that either me or sleepless is scum and the other town, seems like preparing lynches beforehand. I think there's nothing to come to the conclusion that one of us is town and the other one is scum exclusively. We could both be scum, for example. If Sleepless flipped scum, would I become town because of how Sleepless is scumreading me or because of how I reacted to his scumread on me? No, there's nothing of that. Eragon, on that matter, seems to have the ulterior motive to note this in order to lynch one of us first and the other one when the first one flips town.And now it just looks like I was reading "TvS" the wrong way. So it's that Pink Ball and I are independent scum reads but not scum together. It wasn't something in our discussion that made Eragon go "Oh, one of these two is scum". That actually makes more sense. I feel scatter brained this game. Ugh.Eragon wrote:so, my catchup is bad because you disagree with one post. coolio. good deflection. But, i thought i was pretty clear. I scumread you both individually, but i also don't think you are ever in a team. This happens because I don't think, first of all, scum is bussing in this playlist and game speed. there is no point because before i got to this game coasting was the word and literally nothing was happening. So the fact that sleepless was voting you, and you "FELT" like you were being tunneled is never SvS because even if scum were bussing, the "FEEL" like you were being tunneled wouldn't have happened unless you were faking it. I think the feeling is genuine, and you genuinely felt you were being tunneled. its just that feeling is wolfy. There is some of that. I seem to note this because ITS WHAT I FUCKING THINK. how is it lining up lynches for me thinking its TvS? i have plenty of reasons to believe its TvS, and i feel confident enough in my skill and my reads to push this. how is having a read fucking ultierior motive? if we lynch one of you and they flip scum, im confident in the other being town. nice. If we lynch one of you and they flip town, im confident in the other being scum. nice. as i said. i . have clear scumreads of both of you individually, and i think you are never scumbuddies. I gave clear progression and saying i have no other motive except lining up lynches is wolfy as shit.
wait for me to compile the stuff for assasin at least, and everyone to check in would be nice
but basically this reaction except probably more expletiveIn post 333, Invisibility wrote:what the garbage
it can be a towncred grabIn post 339, Eyes without a face wrote:Explain the motive for scum to L-1 themselves.In post 334, Invisibility wrote:this isnt town this cant be town
In post 340, Eragon wrote:it can be a towncred grabIn post 339, Eyes without a face wrote:Explain the motive for scum to L-1 themselves.In post 334, Invisibility wrote:this isnt town this cant be town
and explain the motive for town to L-1 themselves
its literally what you posted right hereIn post 339, Eyes without a face wrote:Explain the motive for scum to L-1 themselves.In post 334, Invisibility wrote:this isnt town this cant be town
why this?In post 354, Eyes without a face wrote:Why did you deep wolf?In post 352, Invisibility wrote:why did you lamist
90% of the time people dont talk about dumb plays in scum chatIn post 363, Pink Ball wrote:What in the hell just happened
I could only see this coming from town because there's no way this guy doesn't have a partner that told him that was an awful idea. Do the scum has daychat? If they do, I don't think Eyes is scum
wasnt really a cue but its fineIn post 367, Invisibility wrote:that might not have been my cue oh no
but whatever its probably fine
uhh why?In post 372, rooroo wrote:also this is probably town? but whatever
In post 371, Pink Ball wrote:Yeah you're right. By the way we don't have a votecount a long time ago, is there someone who can make an unofficial one? I lost the count and I don't have any tools to make one fast.
If Invisibility just hammered, this are my final thoughts: if Eyes flips red, I think there's a lot of evidence that would put Sleepless Assasin as his partner.