Open 775: Hard-Boiled Eggs [Game Over]
-
-
Hiraki
-
-
Hiraki Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 12372
- Joined: September 16, 2010
-
-
Hiraki Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 12372
- Joined: September 16, 2010
Perhaps later. I am sure the true tells will show soon enough or I will be wrong.In post 39, ejjinami wrote:
Wanna elaborate?In post 31, Hiraki wrote:Feeling pretty good on my 72offsuit SR.-
-
Hiraki Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 12372
- Joined: September 16, 2010
-
-
Hiraki Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 12372
- Joined: September 16, 2010
Experience.In post 63, happyorange wrote:
What makes you say that?In post 59, Hiraki wrote:Don't necessarily agree with the above but it comes from town.-
-
Hiraki Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 12372
- Joined: September 16, 2010
What brought about this?
In post 75, Madoka wrote:What don't you agree with?
This.In post 58, DkKoba wrote:I think the "it'll give mafia info" is bullshit. setup strategy spec is important to hash out early on as to optimize what we can do mechanically.
In post 78, Battle Mage wrote:I'm not convinced yet Orange would stick his neck out like that for no reason if he was scum, much more likely to fade into background agreeing with majority.
Not good.In post 69, Battle Mage wrote:
I completely disagree with most of this.In post 57, happyorange wrote:People should stop talking about roles, it doesn't benefit village and gives the werewolves more information than they deserve about who is or isn't what role. If you feel the need to discuss the setup, do so in a way that doesn't spew you as not X role. Hider outing is a terrible idea, optimal play for hider is to hide behind their strongest townread each night unless that player is vulnerable to a nightkill and if hider outs then it becomes very simple to narrow down who they are going to visit at night. Vigilante is also a lot more power for town than tracker, and the vigilante should be shooting the counterwagon each night, so as long as the vigilante is doing their job there should never be any real risk of the vigilante inadvertently hitting the hider. Detective/psychologist is going to have false positives with a vigilante around but that should never be a serious issue when claims happen, as long as they are sensible and don't out on day 2 or day 3 if they happen to get an early result.
However, reference to werewolves, when it's obvious you know there are no werewolves in the game (because you've read the setup) did make me happy, happyorange. I'd consider this quite a bold open from scum, so giving benefit of doubt.
VI - I take it back.In post 103, Battle Mage wrote:Nah, you're just desperate to vote for me because I'm voting for you, and you're struggling to find any excuse.
Aggression and confidence can be good if you have something strong to back it up. You don't, so seems like it's just an act (which is trait of a scum player). Especially when you opened up with "hello, this is my first non-newbie game", which was about as soft as it gets, and by page 4 you'd moved to stuff like:
Need more proof?In post 104, Battle Mage wrote:It might be your first game, but panicking about 1 vote on Page 4 isn't a good look.-
-
Hiraki Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 12372
- Joined: September 16, 2010
It wasn't a good post.In post 118, 72offsuit wrote:1. What did u mean by not good?
Village Idiot.In post 118, 72offsuit wrote:2. What do u mean by VI i take it back?
Can you help me? I don't see it.
Yeah, I definitely don't see this slot flipping scum right now.In post 122, Allomancer wrote:I don't like the Battle Mage vs DkKoba conflict. Both feel like egotistical players not willing to back down from a challenge. Either could be scum or town from what I've seen. I really don't understand battle mage's argument that because dkkoba said he's new but is also aggressive that means he's scum, though.
Would prefer a better explanation here.In post 129, Aloratom wrote:
I've got my eye on you.In post 124, Looker wrote:
You're ancient and so is Marshall Matthers, lolIn post 44, Aloratom wrote:Don't tell me that I'm that old. And even older than that.
- I know nothing of setup spec, so I stay out of it.
- We need to lynch everyone without an avatar
- @72: Hiraki's avatar is 9S from NieR:Automata. It's a really fun game.
-
-
Hiraki Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 12372
- Joined: September 16, 2010
-
-
Hiraki Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 12372
- Joined: September 16, 2010
-
-
Hiraki Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 12372
- Joined: September 16, 2010
-
-
Hiraki Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 12372
- Joined: September 16, 2010
https://wiki.mafiascum.net/index.php?ti ... lage_IdiotIn post 142, Battle Mage wrote:Hold on....so all that was just a coded way to call me an idiot? keep it classy, and feel free to share some more fascinating insights with the group
Feel free to educate yourself before you think I'm being derogatory.
Sorry, you're right. It's just a good feel. You can think what you want from that.In post 143, Madoka wrote:
Where does he say it's town vs scum?In post 141, Hiraki wrote:He states that it's town vs scum but his wording makes it sound like town v town. I don't see scum making that move too often and, if so, it's calculated. That post feels off the cuffs.
Bingo.In post 147, Iconeum wrote:also why are you pushing allomancer based on setup spec when literally the entire game so far has been exactly that?
In post 156, 72offsuit wrote:This questioning of Allom gives me a fake/forced/pre-prepared vibe. Getting a scum-scum vibe from this interaction.vibe
In post 160, 72offsuit wrote:You are making this hard work to follow the thread.
You're making it much easier.In post 161, 72offsuit wrote:
Hi. I see your Rawr, and reraise to RAAAAAAAAAAAWR!In post 146, Iconeum wrote:Rawr!
Yucky.In post 181, Allomancer wrote:I really don't see any town reasoning behind Dkkoba's recent posts.
VOTE: DkKoba-
-
Hiraki Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 12372
- Joined: September 16, 2010
I don't like this either. When do you vote someone after a simple line of questioning without an answer?In post 185, Iconeum wrote:
then what do you see? this is so superficial it makes me cringeIn post 181, Allomancer wrote:I really don't see any town reasoning behind Dkkoba's recent posts.
VOTE: DkKoba
do you scumread his intention? do you see a scum setting something up?
->what and which posts make you scumread dkkoba?
VOTE: allomancer-
-
Hiraki Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 12372
- Joined: September 16, 2010
-
-
Hiraki Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 12372
- Joined: September 16, 2010
-
-
Hiraki Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 12372
- Joined: September 16, 2010
There's nothing derogatory in the quote. If you're offended by it for some strange reason, that's your problem - not mine.In post 203, Battle Mage wrote:
Did you even read the thing you linked to? I'll reiterate my advice - showing a bit of manners/courtesy goes a long way! <3In post 183, Hiraki wrote:
https://wiki.mafiascum.net/index.php?ti ... lage_IdiotIn post 142, Battle Mage wrote:Hold on....so all that was just a coded way to call me an idiot? keep it classy, and feel free to share some more fascinating insights with the group
Feel free to educate yourself before you think I'm being derogatory.
Conflicted but don't think I can join this wagon.In post 202, Tet wrote:Thoughts on Allo?-
-
Hiraki Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 12372
- Joined: September 16, 2010
Wow, what a great meta dive. You just said I'm bad at scum and good at town. Would it be bad to admit that I am a 100% better scumhunter as scum and 100% worse scumhunter as town? Or would you need to read more than 2 games that I ended on? Pretty annoying to read all of that, might just stop and pin you down as town next time and ignore for the meanwhile.-
-
Hiraki Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 12372
- Joined: September 16, 2010
In post 223, happyorange wrote:This whole game is a soup of ??? but at this rate I'll probably end up voting hiraki at the end of the day, don't know if their weird attempts to gaslight mage by calling them an idiot then insisting they aren't being rude by doing so actually make them a wolf given the way people seem to be behaving in general in this game, but I can see a world where they're going the discredit etc route as a wolf either because they want to make it easier to mislynch mage or because they want to dumpster mage's thread standing. Don't see any reason for them to do it as village other than out of simple mean spiritedness. Don't really know what my read on mage is, think I'd probably be townreading them if it weren't for the peformative way they've been engaging with people. Don't know if they're consciously presenting themselves in a performative manner or if I'm just perceiving their personality that way, or something else.@Mod: Can I quote from the Mafiascum wiki? I know some mods aren't super cool with that.
In post 224, Battle Mage wrote:That's not how it works! Definitely scummy attitude here.
Contradicting yourself right after is pretty neat.In post 226, Battle Mage wrote:Hiraki's attitude to the game isn't a tell - he swears a lot and can be unduly aggressive regardless of alignment.
Play a game with me - before this post, Mage was townreading me even after being "derragatory" to him. Why would I want to do that?In post 223, happyorange wrote:because they want to make it easier to mislynch mage or because they want to dumpster mage's thread standing.
Also - I have never ever said I wanted to mislynch him. If anything, I've made it clear that you should not trust anything he says but just mark him down as town and move on.-
-
Hiraki Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 12372
- Joined: September 16, 2010
-
-
Hiraki Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 12372
- Joined: September 16, 2010
Let's continue on from here.Mafiascum Wiki - https://wiki.mafiascum.net/index.php?title=Village_Idiot wrote:Village Idiot (VI for short) is slang for a player who seems to habitually say or do the wrong things, then not understand the consequences of saying them. Most of the time, this tendency is due to inexperience with the game. Other times, it is due to poor intelligence or social skills on the part of the player. Still other times, the person saying these wrong things really is scum.
In [url=https://forum.mafiascum.net/viewtopic.php?p=11699072#p11699072]post 103[/url], Battle Mage wrote:Aggression and confidence can be good if you have something strong to back it up. You don't, so seems like it's just an act (which is trait of a scum player). Especially when you opened up with "hello, this is my first non-newbie game", which was about as soft as it gets, and by page 4 you'd moved to stuff like:
"I implore people to put pressure on orange and make them explain themselves."
"If something speaks like scum, then it probably is scum."
For above reasons, and the transparent threat to vote for me even though you are apparently convinced that orange is scum, I'd be comfortable lynching you today.In [url=https://forum.mafiascum.net/viewtopic.php?p=11699079#p11699079]post 104[/url], Battle Mage wrote:It might be your first game, but panicking about 1 vote on Page 4 isn't a good look.
All of the above quotes are overconfident, over-assuming, and even down-right wrong at times but come from a town perspective than a scum perspective. This is before Battle Mage calls me out for the "shade" rather than the truth. This isn't something I want to discuss anymore so I'm not going to and I'm going to stick to my rules.In [url=https://forum.mafiascum.net/viewtopic.php?p=11698329#p11698329]post 82[/url], Battle Mage wrote:dkkoba, you're not wrong about the logic, obviously. You might be right about orange, but I'm not convinced for the moment. I think the idea that putting pressure on orange to "explain themselves" is a fools errand - clearly orange can't explain it satisfactorily, so you're setting him up to fail.
I think I'm good on this game atm. I have a townpool that I don't want to mess around with. The following people arenotin that pool and I would be OK with lynching any of them: 72, happy, DrDolittle, Looker, ejji. Would not be surprised if the scumteam is in this range.-
-
Hiraki Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 12372
- Joined: September 16, 2010
-
-
Hiraki Survivor
-
-
Hiraki Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 12372
- Joined: September 16, 2010
No they're not.In post 277, DrDolittle wrote:In post 57, happyorange wrote:People should stop talking about roles, it doesn't benefit village and gives the werewolves more information than they deserve about who is or isn't what role. If you feel the need to discuss the setup, do so in a way that doesn't spew you as not X role. Hider outing is a terrible idea, optimal play for hider is to hide behind their strongest townread each night unless that player is vulnerable to a nightkill and if hider outs then it becomes very simple to narrow down who they are going to visit at night. Vigilante is also a lot more power for town than tracker, and the vigilante should be shooting the counterwagon each night, so as long as the vigilante is doing their job there should never be any real risk of the vigilante inadvertently hitting the hider. Detective/psychologist is going to have false positives with a vigilante around but that should never be a serious issue when claims happen, as long as they are sensible and don't out on day 2 or day 3 if they happen to get an early result.
These are town postsIn post 223, happyorange wrote:This whole game is a soup of ??? but at this rate I'll probably end up voting hiraki at the end of the day, don't know if their weird attempts to gaslight mage by calling them an idiot then insisting they aren't being rude by doing so actually make them a wolf given the way people seem to be behaving in general in this game, but I can see a world where they're going the discredit etc route as a wolf either because they want to make it easier to mislynch mage or because they want to dumpster mage's thread standing. Don't see any reason for them to do it as village other than out of simple mean spiritedness. Don't really know what my read on mage is, think I'd probably be townreading them if it weren't for the peformative way they've been engaging with people. Don't know if they're consciously presenting themselves in a performative manner or if I'm just perceiving their personality that way, or something else.-
-
Hiraki Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 12372
- Joined: September 16, 2010
Never seen someone so butthurt before that people would agree with me lolIn post 281, Battle Mage wrote:
This was a real VI post!In post 280, Hiraki wrote:
No they're not.In post 277, DrDolittle wrote:In post 57, happyorange wrote:People should stop talking about roles, it doesn't benefit village and gives the werewolves more information than they deserve about who is or isn't what role. If you feel the need to discuss the setup, do so in a way that doesn't spew you as not X role. Hider outing is a terrible idea, optimal play for hider is to hide behind their strongest townread each night unless that player is vulnerable to a nightkill and if hider outs then it becomes very simple to narrow down who they are going to visit at night. Vigilante is also a lot more power for town than tracker, and the vigilante should be shooting the counterwagon each night, so as long as the vigilante is doing their job there should never be any real risk of the vigilante inadvertently hitting the hider. Detective/psychologist is going to have false positives with a vigilante around but that should never be a serious issue when claims happen, as long as they are sensible and don't out on day 2 or day 3 if they happen to get an early result.
These are town postsIn post 223, happyorange wrote:This whole game is a soup of ??? but at this rate I'll probably end up voting hiraki at the end of the day, don't know if their weird attempts to gaslight mage by calling them an idiot then insisting they aren't being rude by doing so actually make them a wolf given the way people seem to be behaving in general in this game, but I can see a world where they're going the discredit etc route as a wolf either because they want to make it easier to mislynch mage or because they want to dumpster mage's thread standing. Don't see any reason for them to do it as village other than out of simple mean spiritedness. Don't really know what my read on mage is, think I'd probably be townreading them if it weren't for the peformative way they've been engaging with people. Don't know if they're consciously presenting themselves in a performative manner or if I'm just perceiving their personality that way, or something else.
Very Informative.
-
-
Hiraki Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 12372
- Joined: September 16, 2010
-
-
Hiraki Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 12372
- Joined: September 16, 2010
Actually, yes I will? This isn't epicmafia bub.In post 291, DkKoba wrote:Hiraki you wont need to fight for it with a clear on your side.-
-
Hiraki
-
-
Hiraki Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 12372
- Joined: September 16, 2010
Are you even reading the game?In post 336, Battle Mage wrote:Not keen on either Orange or Allomancer - does anyone have a good reason for voting for them?-
-
Hiraki Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 12372
- Joined: September 16, 2010
-
-
Hiraki Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 12372
- Joined: September 16, 2010
-
-
Hiraki Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 12372
- Joined: September 16, 2010
-
-
Hiraki Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 12372
- Joined: September 16, 2010
ironicIn post 357, DkKoba wrote:Either you point out something I've done that is legitimately "nooby" this game or you can drop it and go back to actually playing, I have no patience for players who think they know better at a social deduction game because they joined forum site at an earlier date.
why call someone else nooby for having a different opinion? that's pretty basic in of itself
FYI - no one can ask me this. Thanks!In post 375, Madoka wrote:I'm not really up for discussing it. You can read my completed game / ask Looker/Hiraki for meta.-
-
Hiraki Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 12372
- Joined: September 16, 2010
This is beautiful. Knew I wasn't wrong here.
-
-
Hiraki Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 12372
- Joined: September 16, 2010
Better than expected posting.In post 438, Aloratom wrote:Explain please.
This is stupid.In post 448, Madoka wrote:What's the purpose of discussing it right now? Philosophy discussion just gives scum a way to post stuff without actually contributing.
This is correct.In post 462, Looker wrote:I feel like this is a lot of drumroll for something that promises to be anticlimactic.
468 to 471 is just one stinky poo poo split into 4 posts.
Thank you. A50 has been redeeming eji, not making him worse. I don't think a flaking player justifies the current response of the current player.In post 473, Iconeum wrote:I wanna say that I respectfully disagree with your ejjilmost scumread, I was townreading that based off of tone and the post related to hider claiming (which didn't benefit scum AT ALL)
Yucky.In post 473, Iconeum wrote:i like the position of most of your reads, kinda
It's called townhunting?In post 500, 72offsuit wrote:The proposed lynch pool of 5 players is way too much, does not feel townie, feels like a survivalist scattershotgun approach. Any lynch, just not me. sort of mindset.
Coincidentally, this is also the first time you've posted real content. Look at that. Why do I need to ask you questions to sort out your slot? Can't I do that without consulting you? All I really need is to convince other people, hopefully townies, that you are scum and then hopefully I'm right. That's the name of this game - it's not about you proving your innocence. That would be my judgment to make.In post 500, 72offsuit wrote:Worse yet, doesn't direct any questions at me or dissect any posts to try to sort out my slot.
The post above it.In post 518, Madoka wrote:
Not a fan of what? I can't remember if I already asked this.In post 139, Hiraki wrote:Ech. Not a fan of that after thinking about it for a moment.
YikesIn post 519, DkKoba wrote:my only solid tr right now is 72-
-
Hiraki Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 12372
- Joined: September 16, 2010
-
-
Hiraki Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 12372
- Joined: September 16, 2010
The better question is why are you TRing him because there's literally nothing about him that reads town. Some null, for sure, but nothing that says town.In post 529, DkKoba wrote:hiraki why is 72 not town, why are you shading my strongest TR?
I thought I was still voting you. Is it scummy to forget?In post 539, 72offsuit wrote:Why did you not know who you were voting?
Only when things are going slow.In post 540, Madoka wrote:He does it often.
Everything in those posts are forced. You can smell it. Why on earth would you ISO every playerIn post 545, Looker wrote:I wouldn't go so far as to say all that. It's just that reads are subjective. And they change.doing an ISO on them? Wouldn't you want to do the analysis FIRST and then go into a reads-list? Everything is just picture perfect there. Feel free to tell me that you've been right about what you feel on a mafia game about almost every player before doing the analysis on them that justbeforehappensto coincide with how they're doing.
Why are you stuck on this?In post 548, Madoka wrote:actually orange said something that gave them away as an alt I think
Strange, overall. This is why you will never be TR'd in my book (the vote is the least concerning part FYI)In post 550, Looker wrote:Wow. No questions asked.
- @Madoka: You said that you liked his tone and that you were going to sleep. You also said you were only voting because Ico made you.
p-edit: Because you never mentioned it. All your stuff is about meeting old friends
559 is a great post, everyone should read it.
Very confused by most of this post. Hopefully there are clarifications.In post 568, Madoka wrote:Currently yea. I'll have a more detailed post in a bit. Actually, I guess I can post what I have currently.
Pass.In post 570, Madoka wrote:Hiraki, you should sheep me since your reads are pretty bad.
Are you even reading the posts?In post 577, 72offsuit wrote:The progression of his read here in Allom doesnt feel genuine to me,
and the one on one interaction with DDL just feels awkward.
Really???In post 583, Madoka wrote:I agree. Currently for me it's [Almost, Looker, ddl] > [ddl, Alo, Allo] or some mix of the two. Everyone in the kinder group I put there because I like their tone but haven't been able to solidify a town read. I also liked Alo's backtrack on BM after reading the context and his assertive agreement with the hider strategy. Your case here is very convincing, however.-
-
Hiraki Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 12372
- Joined: September 16, 2010
-
-
Hiraki Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 12372
- Joined: September 16, 2010
-
-
Hiraki Survivor
-
-
Hiraki Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 12372
- Joined: September 16, 2010
-
-
Hiraki Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 12372
- Joined: September 16, 2010
Do you want to also address why you asked two people, one of which you rated less townie than me, if they'd be up for going after me, without stating anything of your own, rather than any of your town reads, one of which has been against me for the entire game?In post 627, Madoka wrote:Orange and BM are you still open to lynching Hiraki?
You can literally never ever call my reads bad if you can't even keep yours consistent.-
-
Hiraki Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 12372
- Joined: September 16, 2010
-
-
Hiraki Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 12372
- Joined: September 16, 2010
In post 635, Madoka wrote:Well I mean you're a part of it too as you generally play cagey. That's what brought it up in my mind, but ddl is the main culprit.In post 630, Madoka wrote:These games would be so much easier if town just played like town. I never understoid the point of making it unnecessarily difficult.In post 627, Madoka wrote:Orange and BM are you still open to lynching Hiraki?One of these things is not like the others. One of these things doesn't belong. Can you tell which thing is not like the other before the time I finish this song?
-
-
Hiraki Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 12372
- Joined: September 16, 2010
Do I need to?In post 641, Looker wrote:@Hiraki: You didn't specify why I'll never be TR'd in your book or what Almost50 has done to redeem ejjinami-
-
Hiraki
-
-
Hiraki Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 12372
- Joined: September 16, 2010
-
-
Hiraki Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 12372
- Joined: September 16, 2010
-
-
Hiraki Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 12372
- Joined: September 16, 2010
Why is it more scum-inclined to be insincere about changing his mind rather than town-inclined? Do you think he just did a little sprinkle of distaste, when there was nothing happening on the slot, and then shoo'd away from it? I don't disagree with you that it's weird, I even looked into it. I don't think it's worth making this much of a fuss about either though. There are plenty of other things that are actually bad about Looker and this is just a dumb one. If you want to mislynch A51 after we see Looker flip scum, sure. I won't try and stop you.In post 674, Madoka wrote:Let's ignore the discrepancy itself, then, and focus on the fact that she lied: 643, 645. Regardless of the reason why she changed her view on Monkey (change in mind or fake progression), the fact that she lied about her reason shows that it was not sincere.
You are absolutely correct that 72's initial postings are absolute horrible and I haven't been able to shake them off. Especially the Hider CC one. I feel like I noted at least one or two of them early on.-
-
Hiraki Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 12372
- Joined: September 16, 2010
This post started it and it made me question whether or not I was looking at 72 the wrong way. You can go through his ISO there are a slew of these random one-off posts that are questions that have zero importance and are there just to look like they have meaning. You may remember that IIn post 30, 72offsuit wrote:Who have you previously played with?
hateusing meta as a basis for a read but in the early game, I'm okay with it. Here are some of 72's old games.
Newbie 1989 - Town Flip - viewtopic.php?t=82324&f=11&st=0&sk=t&sd ... er_sort=Go
Newbie 1994 - Town Flip - viewtopic.php?t=82538&f=11&st=0&sk=t&sd ... er_sort=Go
Newbie 1990 - Town Flip - viewtopic.php?t=82380&f=11&st=0&sk=t&sd ... er_sort=Go
You'll notice that these are all town flips - not a good test but I'll go with what I got. In all three of these games, 72 seems like an articulate and well-thought out scumhunter. This game? No - not really. I don't think many people think that. And that ISO post really ticks me off as this is bad fabrication because in all of his other games, he seems to actually analyze first and then make the reads second. He even kicks down the door when replacing in one game and puts down a read list in his first post with clear reasoning behind it. Again - nothing case worthy - but it doesn't need to be either. It's clearly well-thought out. His posting in this game seems like darts on a board.
Just readIn post 344, 72offsuit wrote:Town Read: rg
Town Lean: WS, JV
Slight Town Lean: Natsu, Maple
Null with a pinch of Town: Non
Scum Read: Recti and trq
Furthermore the combo of Recti and trq makes sense.
Boom, game solved. And I'm not joking here either.
To be honest, I've never felt more convinced that I've find scum on day one and I think I have a pretty decent track record to date. <3thatand tell me if we're playing with the same player.
Here's the post in this game:
I could go on and on about the articulate differences (of which I think is the most important!) of these two but it's also not worth it because I don't think meta is the end all anyway.In post 487, 72offsuit wrote:Townread
DK
Townlean
Tet
Madoka
Null
Ico
Looker
HO
Null-scum
Hiraki
Scumlean
Allom
Scumread
DDL
Alora
Ejji-
-
Hiraki Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 12372
- Joined: September 16, 2010
Yeah, I was debating whether or not to get into it, I kind of got my writing skills going a little and since you asked, I can. It's a little late here so excuse the stupider thoughts. I still like to think that putting your thoughts down before analysis is super foreboding and I don't get how people don't get that. It is a stupidly common scumtactic for me and something that I actively try to avoid when playing scum (i.e. I'll realize that I am doing it and take a step back in order to look more townie).-
-
Hiraki Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 12372
- Joined: September 16, 2010
-
-
Hiraki Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 12372
- Joined: September 16, 2010
I'd like to start this by addressing how I think optimal scum is played - I don't think you do it by careful meticulous planning. My best scum games have been ones where everyone justvibestogether. Sure, there's a general plan of "don't lynch each other" but other than that, it's very free flow. I still think that is the best way to do things outside of a PR perspective. This is exactly where we are on Day 1. However, I am aware that most people don't really think this way and I consciously think that in my scumhunting.
When I read this post 100 times, 99 times I'm wondering what is the point of this post. Is it to produce content? Yeah, a little. Is it to talk about the hider claim? Sure. But 100 times I feel like there's an underlying complaint here and that's no good for me. Read the following:In post 34, 72offsuit wrote:Hide: every night, you may PM me with the name of someone who you want to hide behind. If that player is a member of the mafia or the vigilante, you will die. If the player you hide behind is targeted for a nightkill by the mafia or vigilante that night, you will die. If you are targeted for a nightkill on a night that you hide behind someone else, that nightkill will not affect you.
Doesnt sound that op. 3 scum. So first night 3/12 = 25 percent chance hide behond scum = insta death.
1/9 chance hide behind town that is being killled thus also die.
Worth noting, i think, is
With a claim, scum knows not to waste a kill opportunity targeting the hider's slot.
A claim for a clear that cant b targeted still sounds +EV.
Now, I know that less than half of the players in this group will be persuaded by this but this ticks me off super hard. This is a complaint through and through. Anyone who is town would be super happy finding something that is "OP", instead this feels like it's a bad sign. If we go on -In post 34, 72offsuit wrote:Doesnt sound that op. 3 scum. So first night 3/12 = 25 percent chance hide behond scum = insta death.
This is borderline scum coaching without a PT. It's subtle and I don't expect anyone to be persuaded by this but I really wanted to hone in why this read has stuck with me since the absolute beginning.In post 34, 72offsuit wrote:1/9 chance hide behind town that is being killled thus also die.
Worth noting, i think, is
With a claim, scum knows not to waste a kill opportunity targeting the hider's slot.
A claim for a clear that cant b targeted still sounds +EV.
I even note that here that the above isn't worth arguing over or making a big stink over but now that we're here, cats out of the bag. The true tells are here, by the way.In post 41, Hiraki wrote:Perhaps later. I am sure the true tells will show soon enough or I will be wrong.
Let's stop here for a second too. If anyone can find any reads instead of analysis from 72 before this point, please let me know. The only thing you get close to is a TvT callout which is just informationIn post 116, 72offsuit wrote:Posts are all Information instead of analysis.
Pretty much only setup speculation. Zero reads. Zero player analysis.withoutanalysis (something that is just as bad, if not worse, than IIoA).
This is anIn post 155, 72offsuit wrote:Allomancer's setup spec was useless, unlike several others which were actually useful eg: tet, Madoka, DK.opinionof his analysis rather than Allomancer actually only giving IIoA. The tell is used incorrectly as noted here. I think Ico even points this out and I agree with him but I am not checking myself at 1:40. I just sort of remembering agreeing from behind the computer when I read his posts at 72.
Again, opinion, not really concrete and not really diving into detail. But it's post 156 - we don't really need to get into that.In post 156, 72offsuit wrote:This questioning of Allom gives me a fake/forced/pre-prepared vibe. Getting a scum-scum vibe from this interaction.
Allom already outed some superficial reads after i pressed him.
We're 200 posts later and 72 is still tunneling on Allomancer? There's no read progression here. I'm literally re-reading his ISO and didn't pick up on this the first time because I already marked him. When 72 flips scum, Allomancer is like super confirmed town.In post 335, 72offsuit wrote:Lynch preferences: 1.Allomancer
Reasons stated earlier areIn post 501, 72offsuit wrote:Allom - reasons stated earlier. Post since then have been pretty much NAI, so still just a scumlean.stillsetup speculation made in post 115 and 116. Allomancer has done a TON since then and 72 is just parking and lurking on the wagon.-
-
Hiraki Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 12372
- Joined: September 16, 2010
It's 130 here. Foreboding was a weird word choice. Bad works, yeah. Just something in general that pings my head to say that slot is not town.In post 685, Iconeum wrote:foreboding means bad?
Thanks. Was going to generally say all of this. I've promised and not delivered as scum only to slip away later.In post 690, Iconeum wrote:
This is simply wrong. Not putting him at L-1 ASAP is bad play. There's no real pressure with L-2. Any lolhammerers will get punished.In post 688, Madoka wrote:No one put anyone at L-1 until they've come back and had a chance to make the case they promised. There are too many lolhammerers on this forum. There's no need for L-1 with more than 2 days left.
You say there's no need with 2 days left, so you want to wait until the last moment?
And what if he claims a PR then? You go for a No-Lynch? You switch last minute and HOPE enough people line up to get a lynch?-
-
Hiraki Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 12372
- Joined: September 16, 2010
Not really addressing my main concern here. What makes Lookertown do it versus Lookerscum do it? I don't have a great grasp on who Looker is but from their posts, I've gotten the following:In post 692, Madoka wrote:It wasn't genuine though and the fact that she had to make up a reason for her change on Monkey after I called her out, indicates that. It's not like she was expecting me to call her out. She had to make up the reason afterwards and thus is the reason why it doesn't line up. If it were town!Looker who simply changed her mind, she simply would have said that. I don't see why you think town would make up a reason?
1) Not very big, kind of short, and really question-y before running away to something that could have been good.
2) Really not informative, kind of going hand in hand with that last point.
3) Super safe.
I don't know if any of these actually change for Lookerscum versus Lookertown. It's a little bit of a mix of a meta read - without reading meta - and an experience read. Posts like these don't give me confidence -
Sure, this is a post in the 120's but a lot has gone on since the beginning of this game to this moment.In post 124, Looker wrote:
You're ancient and so is Marshall Matthers, lolIn post 44, Aloratom wrote:Don't tell me that I'm that old. And even older than that.
- I know nothing of setup spec, so I stay out of it.
- We need to lynch everyone without an avatar
- @72: Hiraki's avatar is 9S from NieR:Automata. It's a really fun game.
Again - I agree with your scumread. I just have problems with the logic that got you there and the complications that may arise when he flips scum (i.e. associations).In post 237, Looker wrote:- This game is a bunch of rabble right now. Overconfidence and loud voices. It's easy to notice Tet and Koba, but not so much Battle Mage
Reeks of actual inexperience on how to deal with these situations. Alts don't make anyone better by covering their name.In post 694, Madoka wrote:No I don't want to wait for the last moment, but it's silly to put them at L-1 when they just promised content. Additionally, there's no rule that says a person needs to be at L-1 to claim. I always found that pretty silly. You should claim if it looks like you're going to get lynched. No need to be in the red zone to do it.
And if they did claim a PR at the last moment that would actually be amazing because the scrambling during those times is where the best reads come from.-
-
Hiraki Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 12372
- Joined: September 16, 2010
They don't? Re-read the role PMs.In post 705, Madoka wrote:I don't get why he would be coaching since they have day talk?
It was the arrogant stuff and your join date is 2020.In post 705, Madoka wrote:Regarding alt thing, I don't know what you mean. I've been playing since 08. Speaking of alt, why did you ask why I was focused on orange being one when I was just answering ddl's question two posts above?
This is all well stated and all but it absolutely does not change my read.In post 708, happyorange wrote:I don't like to respond to people who wolfread me for a bunch of reasons, but the main ones are that
a) I'm always going to be biased given that I have my own opinions about how people should be perceiving me and what were intentions were when saying different things, so trying to get a read on other people from the way they're reading me incorrectly is imo a very unreliable way to form reads and not something I care for doing,
b) engaging with people on why they think I'm a wolf is a good way to muddy the thread with relatively unreadable nonsense, I'm not the right person to convince someone they're wrong about me because from their perspective if I'm a wolf I'm just going to be lying to them and telling them what they want to hear, and the majority of the time when people read you incorrectly there's no amount of things you can tell them about how they're wrong that will make them change their read, it's a different story if they have concerns about you that they ask you about specifically but that's not often the case, most of the time if they're going to realize they're wrong on you they're going to do it on their terms and not yours, trying to make it happen on your terms is a fast track to toxic game environments and burn out,
c) it's a waste of my time when I could be writing about other players, my thoughts on them and other things that would actually help me solve the game, think it's incredibly boring to talk about myself to other people or talk with them about me and doing so doesn't do anything for me, it's not why I play werewolf and never will be.
Here's the only line you actually need to read in that post.In post 708, happyorange wrote:I'll make a post going over my reads next but please actually read the above and start proposing other lynches that actually make sense and aren't the result of lazy tunneling and complacency.
Perhaps later. What is it the matter to you? Do you think you can sway my opinion on what you already did?In post 713, Looker wrote:@Hiraki: "Plenty of things that are bad". Are you going to specify?
I haven't played with Madoka, as far as I know, but we just ended a game where she pulled this same shit. Kind of fueling my TR in some weird way.In post 714, Iconeum wrote:yo madoka are you just scum or?
Unfortunately, this is how Madoka acted in that game as well. I'm not defending but this is literally Madoka thinking. It's annoying and not very logical.In post 728, Iconeum wrote:'scum!me defends orange because of the easy credit i'd get when he flips town'
-> defends orange like a boss
thanks
Not really true.In post 752, Madoka wrote:Like I made a tiny case on you and you start throwing chairs. Imagine if Orange reacted in a similar proportion to your much more extensive case.
*unsheathes katana*In post 781, DkKoba wrote:i'm about to flash wagon you DDL. why won't you vote orange?-
-
Hiraki
-
-
Hiraki Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 12372
- Joined: September 16, 2010
-
-
Hiraki Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 12372
- Joined: September 16, 2010
Those are not my words about this situation.In post 824, Madoka wrote:
Wait you're actually serious? In the words of Hiraki and happyorange: yikes.In post 785, Iconeum wrote:
i prefer madoka at this pointIn post 779, DrDolittle wrote:Any1 wanna flashwagon allomancer? I do
really really disliking his position wrt to 'voting orange to please me'-
-
Hiraki Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 12372
- Joined: September 16, 2010
-
-
Hiraki Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 12372
- Joined: September 16, 2010
imagine having a life?In post 857, 72offsuit wrote:Hiraki conveniently runs away 9 minutes after his post when i wiestion him where i scumread him earlier-
-
Hiraki Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 12372
- Joined: September 16, 2010
-
-
Hiraki Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 12372
- Joined: September 16, 2010
-
-
Hiraki Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 12372
- Joined: September 16, 2010
-
-
-
-