Open 838 – ISITMAINAC [Endgame]
-
-
Jacket
-
-
Jacket Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 527
- Joined: September 16, 2021
-
-
Jacket Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 527
- Joined: September 16, 2021
The generalized gamestate take is in a game as sluggish as this one there's probably a handful of scum in the low-content slots but sorting them is impossible unless they actually start contributing it's more or less a crapshoot. There are situations where it can be active scum while town is apathetic and lurks it out, but it feels like there's a little too much discord between the active players for that to be the case.-
-
Jacket Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 527
- Joined: September 16, 2021
...you realize I'm voting you, right?In post 374, RH9 wrote:
Which one of the more inactive players do you think can be scum?In post 373, Jacket wrote:The generalized gamestate take is in a game as sluggish as this one there's probably a handful of scum in the low-content slots but sorting them is impossible unless they actually start contributing it's more or less a crapshoot. There are situations where it can be active scum while town is apathetic and lurks it out, but it feels like there's a little too much discord between the active players for that to be the case.
And how far have you read? I don't expect you to have read everything because you said that you skimmed. But then, who doesn't skim? I remembered that the first time that I replaced in, I skimmed and ended up with reads which are definitely one of my best. Thus, I'll take your reads as though it is 100% correct.-
-
Jacket Goon
-
-
Jacket Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 527
- Joined: September 16, 2021
-
-
Jacket Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 527
- Joined: September 16, 2021
...why did you copy the reaction of someone who was scum?In post 390, RH9 wrote:
My reaction to was heavily borrowed from the reaction of to in Open 833. But was a member of the groupscum and replaced into a slot which was part of the uninformed majority.In post 389, Galron wrote:Please elucidate, RH9.
However, I'm not a member of the groupscum and hence my self-comparision to when she was VT in Newbie 2080 with you and .
(Now I'm starting to borrow from and in regards to temporarily bolding names.)-
-
Jacket Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 527
- Joined: September 16, 2021
Nothing worth commenting on?In post 387, A Dreary Saturday Evening wrote:
I'm following along but not saying anything.In post 353, Nathann wrote:Re 345 - there we go. That wasn't that difficult, was it.
I have... multiple issues with that post. First is that that kind of reaction test is very bad. Scum is likely to jump onto a weak vote, sure, but you know who else is likely to jump on it? Town. Because it was a weak vote. Voting someone because "I have the most posts, and they're saying they need more from me to sort me" is obviously flawed as hell - you have *the most*, doesn't mean you have *enough*. And most posts =/= most content.
Then, you said that scum is likely to make a case out of a weak vote... which is something I never did. I just mentioned in passing how your reasoning for voting Greeting was horrible (which you admitted) and I didn't even vote you for it. And also you never did end up voting me, you just unvoted Greeting.
That said, I think most of my problems with you now are that of playstyle, not necessarily alignment.
VOTE: A Dreary Saturday Evening
I remember thinking some of their reads were lazy atsomepoint. I probably can't be fucked to effort if half the game isn't playing.-
-
Jacket Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 527
- Joined: September 16, 2021
...the game? It's not that long. I have more than one read. I just don't talk about stuff right away all the time. Right now I'm more interested in poking at things and seeing how people react. And why is it a shit read if you didn't like RH9's posts either?In post 404, Scorpious wrote:
What did you skim to get exactly one scat read?In post 372, Jacket wrote:Skimmed the game. I have a handful of weak-ish townreads and exactly one scumread.
VOTE: RH9-
-
Jacket Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 527
- Joined: September 16, 2021
Oh, nevermind. You can say scum. You don't have to be a weird boomer about it.In post 409, Scorpious wrote:I’m not allowed to reference the slimy buildup on soap by it’s true name, so I’ve been experimenting with other ways to refer to it.
You said your skimming yield exactly 1 read of an evil doer. What was it that you skimmed that led you there?
Sarcastic response to being named as a scumread by RCE in 116 felt off, too over the top a response to very mild pressure. His one serious push has been essentially just parroting Nathann's suspicion of StrangeMatter with 111, but it doesn't feel like there was any real grasping of the reasoning, just aimlessly copying it to look like he had something to do, since he backed almost immediately 126. And since then...he hasn't pushed anywhere? He's just been kind of floating and calling people like Nathann and Galron town, and those reads are...unobjectionable, they don't really advance the game much and they don't really give me any sense the guy is interested in finding scum at all. In contrast to theinactiveplayers not advancing the game, he'sactivebut only really giving the appearance of being here while not doing anything to move the game out of the stagnation it's experiencing.-
-
Jacket Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 527
- Joined: September 16, 2021
I mean, I've read the game. Don't know why you're being a pedant about my word choice. I'm just holding back a little.In post 415, Scorpious wrote:Bells go off in my head when I read “skimmed”. The fact that you are ingesting the game whole and not coming at us with a “read” from a skim makes me lean town on you and scum on Jacket.
Past track record says I'm skeptical.In post 419, Three wrote:Preconceptions from before I replaced in was that between A50 and Salsa, A50 read as more town to me so I wanted his slot. Not because of anything he did that was pro town, I just thought his posts were funny. Salsa's tone always just reads as scummy to me though. I want to see what Jacket does since I think I'll have a better chance of correctly reading him.
Funny though, A50 was one of the slots I didn't like. Figured based on the last game with him it'd be obvious when he's town, and he was...not that, for the time he was in this game. I'll wait and see on you, though.-
-
Jacket Goon
-
-
Jacket Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 527
- Joined: September 16, 2021
-
-
Jacket Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 527
- Joined: September 16, 2021
I've read none of salsabil's posts. And I'm hardly lost.In post 434, Scorpious wrote:I think Jacket replaced in. Got his red pm, and was totally lost because SF had like 2 posts. So he skimmed looking for any mention
Of SF and much to his dismay, found nothing, and is having a tough time generating content because of it. This slot feels… sus, but I’m just a boomer trying to talk like the cool kids.-
-
Jacket Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 527
- Joined: September 16, 2021
-
-
Jacket Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 527
- Joined: September 16, 2021
-
-
Jacket Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 527
- Joined: September 16, 2021
-
-
Jacket Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 527
- Joined: September 16, 2021
423/424 - a single question to RH9 who is getting a lot of attention, and a clarification of something he was saying to Three.In post 451, Greeting wrote:
Which post do you mean?In post 433, Jacket wrote:That last pop-in from Greeting is...not great.
Is that all you have to add to the game right now? Do you have any reads, at all?-
-
Jacket Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 527
- Joined: September 16, 2021
-
-
Jacket Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 527
- Joined: September 16, 2021
I remembered him being fairly obvious town right away in 2242, but I went back and checked and he replaced into that game, so probably not the best comparison, but still, his content here was entirely fluff/trolling, with basically no real attempts to solve, and making weirdly self-conscious posts about not doing anything rather than...actually making game-advancing content, which he had no trouble doing in that other game.In post 463, Three wrote:What made you think A50 can make himself obvtown so early into the game?-
-
Jacket
-
-
Jacket Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 527
- Joined: September 16, 2021
-
-
Jacket Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 527
- Joined: September 16, 2021
I think you're misinterpreting my point here. Which is probably my fault for not being explicit enough.In post 474, Nathann wrote:I'm not sure I like this post, coupled with the vote on RH9 in the previous one. It seems like he's saying that he feels like this isn't the case with active scum and apathetic town, but then he votes one of the more active slots? Not saying that he can't have scumreads inside active players if that's his general view on the gamestate, but it feels odd considering he didn't elaborate on it at all.
I would characterize the following slots as not doing enough to be readable, as of the time I replaced in:
A50
ADSE
Not_Mafia
STD
StrangeMatter
Now, they obviously can't all be scum. But there's probably scum in there, because it does not feel like a game where scum are running the show, and I felt like the people talking were townie enough. (hopefully, anyway - bit me in my ass in my last game, but that was a case where scum were active but just letting the town eat itself alive).
To me those slots were basically all a dart throw. Acceptable compromise but pretty much a blind guess when it comes to whether or not they're scum.
The one player Ididhave a scumread on was RH9, so I chose to push there, rather than someone who was more inactive and nullish.
As it is, I'm doubting myself on that push anyway.-
-
Jacket Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 527
- Joined: September 16, 2021
He said a thing I don't think comes from scum.In post 479, Galron wrote:Also, Jacket, why the unvote?-
-
Jacket Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 527
- Joined: September 16, 2021
So much for being able to read me. If you're expecting me to blow up in response to getting pushed, that's just not going to happen.In post 507, Three wrote:Spoiler:
Hot take: I think this is scum distancing from each other. Scorpius' aggression towards Jacket doesn't read as natural; the moment Jacket replaced in, Scorpius immediately had a bone to pick with him. The attacks he's made feel very over the top, and Scorpius' reasoning for scum reading him feel too weak and manufactured VS how he's actually treating Jacket. Jacket also is barely fighting back and doesn't seem to be showing even a hint of suspicion towards Scorpius despite thinking that the case on him is unfathomable.
Furthermore, Scorpius has decided to further put suspicion on Jacket and is tunneling the "skimming" argument, but doesn't have much else to say about everything else going on in the game. He hasn't even acknowledged mine or anyone else's scum reads on him.
The thing about Scorpious is, his case on me is terrible, nitpicky, and based on a ridiculous theory (I don't read my predecessor as either alignment), but I had sort of liked his posts before that. I have a hard time telling when someone is scum making bad faith attacks on me or town who has the wrong idea. Still trying to work that out.-
-
Jacket Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 527
- Joined: September 16, 2021
I didn't like most of his responses either, but the self-assuredness of 468 didn't really feel like it came from scum.In post 487, Nathann wrote:
Okay, fair enough. Mind telling me what's got you doubting this push now? In my readthrough of the last few pages, I got the feeling RH9 has gotten worse, not better.In post 482, Jacket wrote:As it is, I'm doubting myself on that push anyway.-
-
Jacket Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 527
- Joined: September 16, 2021
See my above answer to Nathann. Is that the only thing you have to talk about after being gone for three days?In post 495, StrangeMatter wrote:
Alright I'm back, I've been way too disconnected from this game much like last time.In post 483, Jacket wrote:
He said a thing I don't think comes from scum.In post 479, Galron wrote:Also, Jacket, why the unvote?
Can you walk me through what you think doesn't come from scum, and why?-
-
Jacket Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 527
- Joined: September 16, 2021
I think about the moment when Greeting basically point blank refused to give reads is when I realized things aren't working the way they are. I'm all for minimalism but there's too many people who are holding their cards close to their chest or refusing to do anything, and the whole game ends up as a staring contest.In post 505, Three wrote:What's wrong with the current game state? It's not particularly active but I think the leading wagons have a good chance of flipping red. Do you town read them?
Right now, Nathann, Galron, CB, Scorp, RH9, and Three are people I don't want to elim, for various reasons. I'd vote any of ADSE/Greeting/N_M/STD/SM.-
-
Jacket Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 527
- Joined: September 16, 2021
-
-
Jacket Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 527
- Joined: September 16, 2021
-
-
Jacket Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 527
- Joined: September 16, 2021
Nothing to do with playstyle, don't know them at all. Theory is that when there's a lot of low activity players, the town ones tend to get pushed to the forefront of discussion because scum will avoid calling out their inactive buddies.In post 528, Scorpious wrote:
As someone not familiar with them. Could you explain why this is expected? Is this just their play style?In post 525, Jacket wrote:VOTE: StrangeMatter
Testing a theory: multiple low-impact posters but they're the one who is getting talked about the least. (Well, besides Not_Mafia, but, well. That's to be expected)-
-
Jacket Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 527
- Joined: September 16, 2021
Do you think he's playing similarly to those games? It feels like from a quick look at both of those he was a lot quicker to get the ball rolling/provide content as scum than he has been here.In post 527, StrangeMatter wrote:
Alright enough of this. It was mostly getting the ball rolling very very early with a meta read, but you've done this (trying to just stay out of everyone's radar) in two of the other games I've played with you. I think it's well within the possibility here still that you would still try to do that as scum in this game and just go under people's radar until later.In post 523, Save The Dragons wrote:why does scum do what i've done so far
Links to the two games here as well.
viewtopic.php?t=86874&f=11&st=0&sk=t&sd ... er_sort=Go
viewtopic.php?t=87863&f=23&st=0&sk=t&sd ... er_sort=Go
You also only linked scum games. Have you compared it to his town game at all? Do you think there's a difference?
Also, is STD literally the only person you're going to have a read on this game day?-
-
Jacket Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 527
- Joined: September 16, 2021
-
-
Jacket Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 527
- Joined: September 16, 2021
Grateful to see my skepticism was unwarranted. I'm still chewing on it, don't expect an immediate response.In post 538, Greeting wrote:
The ball's in your court, mister. Anything on my readslist that piqued your interest?In post 526, Jacket wrote:I'll believe Greeting has reads when I see them.-
-
Jacket Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 527
- Joined: September 16, 2021
Kind of dumb, but I actually townread Greeting demanding engagement with his read list more than the list itself. I mean, A for effort regardless, but the fact that he's not content to just throw that list out and bask in approval for it. Granted, it might have been easier to get conversation if it were done a little sooner, but whatever.
@Greeting:
FWIW, someone reading into their predecessor before replacing in like Three did isn't all that uncommon. Of course, talking about it ingame isn't really alignment indicative.
Your read of CB feels like it should be a scumlean, you keep listing a bunch of stuff that comes across negative but then cap it off by linking two posts and saying "they come from a townie point of view". Do those two posts outweigh the other stuff that much? What is it you actually like about them?
I should probably try to actually explain my read on Scorpious in another post, I haven't really agreed with the reasons people had for suspecting him.
Eh. I feel like this is kind of a lame response, I read most of the stuff and just want to go "yeah, fine". I could nitpick the RH9 read but it's not worth elaborating on.-
-
Jacket Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 527
- Joined: September 16, 2021
I'm kind of shocked anyone could have me as top town right now.
With regard to Scorpious: the big brain Slayer's_Gambit of 345 is the type of play I almost never see scum making. People always end up paranoid of it and scum usually end try to justify their actions in a conventional way, rather than claiming "I was being scummy on purpose!!". His earlier posts had good questioning and a healthy dose of paranoia toward other players, they weren't bad by any means, so it's honestly hard for me to believe he'd make a weak vote "accidentally" and then try to cover it up with that excuse as scum. I don't really get the hate he's getting for that. I didn't like his push on me, but I feel like he could have just been legitimately misinterpreting the post I made when I was entering the game and getting hung up on my word choice.-
-
Jacket Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 527
- Joined: September 16, 2021
You have a poor understanding of what an emotional appeal is. I'm mocking you because you came in talking about how you think you should be able to read me based on one game of experience, even though you misread me pretty terribly in that game, and now you're wrong on me again (assuming you're town).In post 593, Three wrote:Kinda hate the AtE in bold. No I'm not expecting you to blow up and I'm not sure why you think I would.
I think your responses to both of our cases feel extremely muted. You're just saying my read is bad and Scorpius' case is bad, but you're not really explaining why. This is especially egregious with Scorpius, because you both answered each others' questions towards each other with further questions that attack the legitimacy of what the other person is saying. You say you're not sure if Scorpius is acting in bad faith, but in the posts I quoted your responses seem to imply that you do think so.
Why do you think he scum reads you more aggressively than anyone else off of something you yourself think is ridiculous if he is town?
You're saying I have a "muted" response to your cases. Why do you think that makes me more likely to be scum? Your read on me is based largely on trying to tie me to Scorp, which I know is both wrong and completely ridiculous. The idea is that because I'm not responding aggressively to him, I must be scum with him. But I just don't respond to pressure aggressively, and youshouldknow this. You're right that I felt like his attacks on me were trash, but I try not to reflexively OMGUS people, because I feel like that leads to bad reads. I try to work past the frustration of being accused to determine if the person believes what they're saying. Sometimes this ends up being to my detriment.
If Scorp's town, he misinterpreted me saying I "skimmed" as me not really reading the game and analyzing it. I did read the game, I was waiting for a few hours for the mod to actually confirm me. He seemed to be caught up on some theory about me not reading what my predecessor said, which is an expectation of how to play the game that is completely different than how I actually play. Could he make those attacks in service of a scum agenda? I suppose, but right now I doubt it because his posts that are not about me don't feel scum motivated.-
-
Jacket Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 527
- Joined: September 16, 2021
I'm not "looking at the case" you presented because any argument that I am scum because of my interactions with Scorp isIn post 593, Three wrote:Why aren't either of you looking at the case I presented?prima faciewrong, and there's no actual rebuttal to give. I know I'm town, so I can't be scum with Scorp. Having to make arguments in the form of "If I was scum with Scorp, I wouldn't be playing this way" are almost completely useless. Although it's funny to me you seem to be so confident scumbuddies would act this way, given that I have never seen scum interact the way me and Scorp have.
If you're town, this is an incredibly unproductive tunnel to be heading down. Pre-flip associative reads on Day 1 are almost never right. If you want to make a case for why I'm scum independent, go right ahead and try, and I'll tell you why it's wrong.
I do not want to eliminate Scorpious. Strange would be my preferred vote, although most seem to disagree. I don't like that they're hyperfocused on STD to the exclusion of the rest of the game. I'd probably vote ADSE over Scorp if necessary for the deadline.In post 593, Three wrote:I see. So then Strange should go if not Scorpius?
Interesting that both of you shade RH9, and then Strange as well after RC brought up that point about Strange and Salsa. This all feels very weird.
I didn't "shade" RH9, I outright scumread him when I replaced in, although I've changed my mind since then. I have no idea what RCE's point about Strange and Salsa was supposed to be, or why it matters. What are you trying to imply?-
-
Jacket Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 527
- Joined: September 16, 2021
...okay, I didn't realize that was actually what you were doing in that game. I still think your guilt by association reasoning is really bad.In post 595, Three wrote:Shading my read on you here again isn't good, like I have no idea what you mean by saying I'm "clearly falling into the same traps" because this isn't even close to how I read you in Opossum Mafia. There I fake argued with you about a playstyle thing try to get scum to think I would tunnel you so they would leave me alive, here I'm seeing associations with my biggest scum read and weird interactions between you two.-
-
Jacket Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 527
- Joined: September 16, 2021
This is responding to literally almost nothing I actually said.In post 598, Three wrote:You say I have a poor understanding of what an emotional appeal is then immediately admit to mocking me.
I didn't say I should be able to read you off of one game I played with you. I also didn't misread you there. And you're not really explaining how I'm misreading you here either.
If you think I'm wrong about your ties to Scorpius, explain why, because you haven't done that. You don't have to respond aggressively to his accusations, or mine either. But saying nothing more than "your read is bad/unfathomable/ridiculous" doesn't tell me anything and I'm just left with trying to read your tone and interactions.-
-
Jacket Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 527
- Joined: September 16, 2021
-
-
Jacket Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 527
- Joined: September 16, 2021
Occam's razor. I've never seen scum attempt to make that kind of justification for their play. It's possible oneIn post 601, Nathann wrote:
Not sure how I feel about this, and the general townbinning Scorpious for doing that gambit. Like, he's an experienced played, and he said himself he likes doing that gambit to sort. Which means it's not a one-time thing he came up with here, it's something he's used to doing, so it's more likely he'd attempt it regardless of alignment. I don't see what's stopping scum from doing a "gambit" there, in hopes of a townie correctly calling out what was a terrible vote in order to seem proactive.In post 589, Jacket wrote:I'm kind of shocked anyone could have me as top town right now.
With regard to Scorpious: the big brain Slayer's_Gambit of 345 is the type of play I almost never see scum making. People always end up paranoid of it and scum usually end try to justify their actions in a conventional way, rather than claiming "I was being scummy on purpose!!". His earlier posts had good questioning and a healthy dose of paranoia toward other players, they weren't bad by any means, so it's honestly hard for me to believe he'd make a weak vote "accidentally" and then try to cover it up with that excuse as scum. I don't really get the hate he's getting for that. I didn't like his push on me, but I feel like he could have just been legitimately misinterpreting the post I made when I was entering the game and getting hung up on my word choice.
Maybe this isn't that signifcant, considering he never did end up voting me, but eh.coulddo it, but in my estimation unlikely, because those types of plays tend to backfire. If his other posts were terrible I might reconsider, but I had felt, for instance, that 231/235/239 was a strong interrogative sequence that showed he was really intent on sorting Galron.-
-
Jacket Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 527
- Joined: September 16, 2021
Saying "these two people have fishy interactions, they must be scum be scum together" is a guilt by association read. The problem with that read is, if Scorp's town, your reasoning for me being scum falls apart completely.In post 603, Three wrote:Guilt by association...? I just thought your interactions were fishy.-
-
Jacket Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 527
- Joined: September 16, 2021
You have continued to ignore the points I am actually making in order to demand I disprove your case about my interactions with Scorp making us scum together. This is in spite of me repeatedly explaining why I believe trying to address such arguments are beyond useless. I find it increasingly harder to believe that this is coming in good faith, that you are that unable to comprehend what I am saying.In post 607, Three wrote:
This is a direct response though...?In post 600, Jacket wrote:
This is responding to literally almost nothing I actually said.In post 598, Three wrote:You say I have a poor understanding of what an emotional appeal is then immediately admit to mocking me.
I didn't say I should be able to read you off of one game I played with you. I also didn't misread you there. And you're not really explaining how I'm misreading you here either.
If you think I'm wrong about your ties to Scorpius, explain why, because you haven't done that. You don't have to respond aggressively to his accusations, or mine either. But saying nothing more than "your read is bad/unfathomable/ridiculous" doesn't tell me anything and I'm just left with trying to read your tone and interactions.-
-
Jacket Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 527
- Joined: September 16, 2021
Great. So you're full of shit.In post 608, Three wrote:
Are you seriousIn post 605, Jacket wrote:
Saying "these two people have fishy interactions, they must be scum be scum together" is a guilt by association read. The problem with that read is, if Scorp's town, your reasoning for me being scum falls apart completely.In post 603, Three wrote:Guilt by association...? I just thought your interactions were fishy.
Guilt by association requires a flip. I'm pointing out your interactions and giving thoughts on them and explaining my reasoning behind my thoughts. I've made it very explicit that it isn't a "guilt by association" read. Why are you even arguing this?
And obviously my reasoning falls apart there. Because I'm going by interactions. I'm not sure what your point is by saying that.-
-
Jacket Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 527
- Joined: September 16, 2021
-
-
Jacket Goon
-
-
Jacket Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 527
- Joined: September 16, 2021
You have never actually explained why me having a "muted" response to pressure makes me more likely to be scum.In post 614, Three wrote:What did I ignore? Why is this not in good faith to you but a random death tunnel because you said the word "skim" is?
I have tried to explain why I responded to Scorp the way I did, and how this is a trait of how I play, rather than anything alignment indicative. You refused to even touch this point.
I have also already explained why I didn't push back on Scorp right away - when someone pushes me I try to question them to see if I can determine their intentions.
Scorp pushed me for reasons, I explained what I was doing and why his reasons were wrong, he realized this was likely a clash of playstyles between us and backed down. I did not get the sense he was pushing me just for the sake of pushing me. (I can already see you citing this as evidence that we are obviously scum together). Again, this is something I keep explaining.
I have also explained why trying to rebut arguments about interactions can only result in "a bunch of wifom garbage", as Nathann put it. You ignore this to keep claiming I'm refusing to give you a rebuttal when I have repeatedly explained why I believe it is bad reasoning that is worthless to respond to.
I do not believe you could be so dense as to not comprehend what I am saying despite me making the points repeatedly. That is why you are not arguing in good faith.
In post 614, Three wrote:Complete 180. Wow lol.
This is willful misrepresentation. I said that I do not want to eliminate you and that your suspicion of me wasIn post 614, Three wrote:You've been adamant that I'm town though? And said you dislike OMGUS? Is this supposed to make me town read you?probablytown-indicative. This was in part due to a faulty assumption on my part that you had misread me entirely in 2242, which is apparently untrue. I was never strong on you being town and I think it's pretty clear my opinion of you degraded over the course of our interactions as you repeatedly demanded I prove myself to not be scum with a player who hasn't been flipped.
Acting like I was confident you were town is a ridiculous distortion to try to discredit my push back against you. It's also verifiably untrue.-
-
Jacket Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 527
- Joined: September 16, 2021
-
-
Jacket Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 527
- Joined: September 16, 2021
-
-
Jacket Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 527
- Joined: September 16, 2021
Town to scum, obviously. Names only loosely ordered within tiers.In post 621, Scorpious wrote:Which way is this list going?-
-
Jacket Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 527
- Joined: September 16, 2021
-
-
Jacket Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 527
- Joined: September 16, 2021
I feel like they're playing completely differently from that game compared to here.In post 627, Greeting wrote:Also, Newbie 2084 (the second game I played withStrangeMatter) just ended andStrangeMatterwon the game as part of the scumteam. That means they can emulate their null-ish and neutral playstyle well as scum too.-
-
Jacket Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 527
- Joined: September 16, 2021
As in framing it within conventional reasoning, "oh I thought this was scummy because xyz", not "a ha you thought that post was scummy but I did it on purpose AS A TEST". People are much more likely to call bullshit on the latter.In post 624, StrangeMatter wrote:
What do you mean by "in a conventional way" here?In post 589, Jacket wrote:I'm kind of shocked anyone could have me as top town right now.
With regard to Scorpious: the big brain Slayer's_Gambit of 345 is the type of play I almost never see scum making. People always end up paranoid of it andscum usually end try to justify their actions in a conventional way, rather than claiming "I was being scummy on purpose!!". His earlier posts had good questioning and a healthy dose of paranoia toward other players, they weren't bad by any means, so it's honestly hard for me to believe he'd make a weak vote "accidentally" and then try to cover it up with that excuse as scum. I don't really get the hate he's getting for that. I didn't like his push on me, but I feel like he could have just been legitimately misinterpreting the post I made when I was entering the game and getting hung up on my word choice.-
-
Jacket Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 527
- Joined: September 16, 2021
Strange in Newbie 2084: More willing to give opinions on a broad array of topics, more willing to interact with people, but unwilling to be at the forefront of the game, lets the town murder each other while they hang back appearing reasonable.
Here they're more aggressive, more singularly tunneled on one particular player. They won't even give reads on others when pushed to and I feel like as scum they'd be perfectly content to just fabricate reads. I had thought they might have been a frozen newbie who had trouble faking reads but that is self-evidently not the case.-
-
Jacket Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 527
- Joined: September 16, 2021
-
-
Jacket Goon
-
-
Jacket
-
-
Jacket Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 527
- Joined: September 16, 2021
In post 665, Greeting wrote:What a mess. I assume we're left to our own devices to figure out how did each of them die.
That probably explainsIn post 659, Jacket wrote:If there's a vig, please shoot not_mafia.Not_Mafia's death.
And well, the mafia wouldn't kill one of themselves, soCupcake Butterflymust have been the night kill.
So we have at least two vigilantes?
C9++In post 666, Greeting wrote:Do we know how many scums are there? Is it even public knowledge? I'm looking for this information, but I can't seem to find it anywhere.
Roleblocker flip means at least three mafia. Possible one of the kills was an SK, rather than a vig.-
-
Jacket Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 527
- Joined: September 16, 2021
-
-
-