i'm deliberately planning on playing this game trying to get back into my old methodological wall-posting meta, and am going to try to refrain from hyperposting for the most part
VOTE: garmr
is this how you usually play?In post 10, Wake1 wrote:I'll be observing Day 1, and going hardcore Day 2 and on. That's how I roll. I'll still pick at things during Day 1 if they catch my attention. I'm probably going to make a copy/paste post about this for all games I play, because it gets annoying when some ree in light of this information.
your excuse in this game in particular or in games in general?In post 12, BrightEyedFish wrote:EBWOP
My vote is on wake because this was going to be my excuse if I have trouble getting engaged on D1.
oh this is what i was thinking about bef's post; garmr gets some townpoints for nowIn post 15, Garmr wrote:Was that as scum or town?
i don't entirely think this is my meta anymore; ask tchill or robbIn post 18, Hectic wrote:Justifying lurking? You said it yourself in a previous game, you find it harder to hyperpost naturally as scum.
i'm p sure most of those posts were a meme given that he even called out the modIn post 26, Robbnva wrote:Also expecting game advancing posts on page 1 is an unrealistic expectation. Your try hard doesn’t earn you any credit so relax and have fun.
and that it isn't ai or scummy of him; i don't think hectic's p1 string of posts were a vote-worthy offenseIn post 28, Robbnva wrote:Scummiest person so far. The guy who scumleans the mod and people for nai stuff.
VOTE: Hectic
finish the sentence?In post 34, Garmr wrote:This is what I was getting at with bright eyed fish but I didn't want him to be aware I was scum reading him for it. I wanted him
scummy rvs vote
lowkey feels like a perspective slip.In post 45, Robbnva wrote:Try Harding and calming non ai things scummy are like things I’velegitsee scum do.
yeah i was thinking that your reaction is either townie or indicative of you being scum with one or the other (possibly robb?)In post 60, Tchill13 wrote:any decent scum here is gonna pour fire on this flame. Nip it in the bud early.
not a good post; you're basically interacting with the argument by pointing out a largely irrelevant detailIn post 69, Rabid Schnauzer wrote:You haven't noticed that this is against the rules?In post 54, Robbnva wrote:that will ultimately drive me to replace out if his behaviour continues.
i'm a she btwIn post 85, Robbnva wrote:Town contradict themselves. I sort of get what skitter is saying but I just don’t know how he can determine who is genuine and who isn’t. I’m being genuine and go suggest I’m not without any basis just doesn’t make sense.
'legit see scum do' is basically saying: i'm trying to add credibility to this read by comparing what hectic is doing here to what i have actually seen scum do in the pastIn post 86, Robbnva wrote:I don’t understand what the issue of using the word legit is. It’s not a slip and I don’t see how anyone could think it was.In post 84, Hectic wrote:Rob?In post 78, Hectic wrote:Bowl of Cereal - Skitter:I normally write off most "scumslips", but this one is kinda interesting, and I wouldn't mind hearing Rob elaborate on his use of that word there.In post 77, skitter30 wrote:In post 45, Robbnva wrote:
Try Harding and calming non ai things scummy are like things I’ve legit see scum do.
lowkey feels like a perspective slip.
the key part was this part ^In post 89, skitter30 wrote:and it kinda implies you feel like this situation needs some credibility because rn you're bullshitting so you're comparing it to a ~true~ time you've caught scum this way
because ...In post 101, Tchill13 wrote:got my eye on skitter's probing of robb for sure.
oh no, i hope you're ok :/In post 104, Garmr wrote:I took a sezuire so I'm not up for posting will tomorrow.
this is a bad readslist but i'm not sure it's scummy, the self-awareness is lowkey townie, i thinkIn post 150, BrightEyedFish wrote:ob3141 - null, 1 RVS post
Tchill13 - Town lean, his "i've changed" post seems genuine. However, alone it's not AI and could be a ploy.
Garmr - I don't get why he scum reads me but if this game is anything like my other games, I'll probably say something "scummy af" get a wagon on me (usually led by scum)
Robbnva - Null - The amount of posts makes me want to put Robb in the scum pile but I don't like committing too early.
Wake88 - My RVS vote is there now, but I feel fine leaving it there even out of RVS for now
skitter30 - I always think skitter is town and I'm pretty sure I've never played with scum!skitter. Just going on odds RN. Town.
Hectic - Hectic's post fit his name well. Scum lean just for the abrasiveness.
Rabid Schnauzer - I want to put Rabid in the scum pile but as I'm writing this I am getting the feeling that I am just scum reading the most active players.
i don't particularly like this vote; i feel like you took the lynchbait too easilyIn post 161, Hectic wrote:Damn, Fish's reads list is terrible. Haven't got time now but will elaborate later.
VOTE: Fish
dude how is this like anything more than an rvs vote at this point ...In post 176, Tchill13 wrote:If you remove robb and hectic then we're still in RVS and literally nobody is posting.
VOTE: bob
i'm confused why out of the two of them you're trying to sort rabid and put the onus on everyone to figure out what his alignment is when you just made a thing about ignoring the argument because it makes the two of them unreadable due to their playstyleIn post 204, Tchill13 wrote:is rabid genuinely concerned about tchill being wary of easy goers then not taking a stance on robb/hectic? Does he genuinely think scum! robb is gonna make that particular reason why he votes hectic and starts all this crap (shitty reasoning imo)
or is rabid making a lot of noise and trying to get rid of robb here because that'd be a unique play for scum here....
thats the question.
a) the way you and rabid are talking about me is .... very weirdIn post 222, Tchill13 wrote:let the records show BEF is at least worth the use of a night action or skitter's read.In post 220, Rabid Schnauzer wrote:OK.In post 218, Tchill13 wrote:then vote someone not named hectic or robb. Because from where I sit if every player was town here those 2 would be the biggest lynchbait.
VOTE: Tchill13
While rabid is man enough to make HIS OWN read on tchill. devoid of claimed PR's or Goddesses of the skitterarian mythology.
a) again, weird afIn post 240, Tchill13 wrote:unless skitter is indeed town (no basis for this), then skitter gets to decide the game for us.
"if skitter is town" Rabid has done nothing to sort skitter. I dont believe more than 1 question or statement has been pointed at skit from rabid.
why aren't people jumping on this ...In post 76, skitter30 wrote:i have no idea how to read robb, if i can get a read on tchill i'll prob just sheep his read
he posts like that tho, and has some sort of special bef-logicIn post 281, Hectic wrote:Basically, there's not single specific reason in his reads, and a lot of them sound like fabricated bullshit that he's throwing out for the sake of giving out reads.
umIn post 283, Tchill13 wrote:i do concede my point on rabid is silly because i do ultimately tr him, its just a pet peeve of mine.
of the 4 of us id choose hectic to be scum.
w/ garmr (for little to no reason except a guess)
... you didnt take issue with this from last game eitherIn post 264, skitter30 wrote:robb was being awful but in a way that i think is nai for him
i think tchill can prob read him better than i can but i'm not townreading tchill rn so i'm wary of trusting him
What on earth is thisIn post 322, Tchill13 wrote:VOTE: skitterIn post 318, Tchill13 wrote:im gonna go insane w/ ppl thinking im shitty scum.In post 315, skitter30 wrote:i still see robb/tchill
if im scum with robb im the worst scum ever.
last time Skitter assumed i was scum making poor plays skitter was scum.
to assume im scum WITH robb... what a joke. you cant actually believe that unless im WIFOM'ing.
if you think im WIFOM'ing i'd like to know why.
The post i just quoted was literally hundreds of posts before massclaimIn post 326, Tchill13 wrote:you dont get that i wrote you off as astronomically low chance to be that lucky as scum and decided not to pay 100 percent attention to your posts?
You're playing awfully and scummily so what am i supposed to think?In post 327, Tchill13 wrote:youre accusing me of poor scum play now.
So you're just not reading my posts then?In post 337, Tchill13 wrote:im usually extremely inconsistent and if youve made statements similar but im completely igonring youre posts...
then im not seeing the statements. so i cant push you for those statements.
Wait actually i recant this point, i was confusing what you said about robb/hectic and applying it to robb/rabid when that isnt what you were talking aboutIn post 360, Tchill13 wrote:im more comfortable with hectic and robb as a whole. ik their play style somewhat and ik they can play in a manner thats not alignment indicative due to emotion, tunneling, trollling...In post 313, skitter30 wrote:i'm confused why out of the two of them you're trying to sort rabid and put the onus on everyone to figure out what his alignment is when you just made a thing about ignoring the argument because it makes the two of them unreadable due to their playstyle
Rabid i do not have as good a feel for. I do feel that after some sorting i can have a better idea of rabid's slot.
I dont really have anything to say about thisIn post 349, Robbnva wrote:Skitter. Please explain how you can town read rabid for the following
1. Saying I misrepped when I mentioned he ignored the me/hectic discussion and instead commented on a rule violation but doesn’t accuse you or hectic who also did that.
2. Hard Scum reads me after that, twisting everything I do as scummy, then claims he’s tried to sort me and does a 180 on me in the span of 2 hours without any natural progression and won’t answer how/why his read changed.
Let’s start with those. I can find way more things but i want to see how you explain these as town when imo no way town would do either of these.
I literally just said i changed my mind on this, but okIn post 398, Tchill13 wrote:skitt is saying it could be tchill/robb
Robb can you quote exactly where you think rabid misrepped you?In post 395, Robbnva wrote:three people say the same thing, only one gets accused of misrepping and you don't have an issue?In post 392, skitter30 wrote:I dont really have anything to say about this
Rabid can think you might have misrepped him even though that wasnt your intent, your intent doesnt particularly change how he may have read it initially
yes you are scum
Robb i always think you're scummy and have no idea how to read you, so i default to just not. I'm not really pushing you and i havent particularly been trying to engage you eitherIn post 396, Robbnva wrote:you don't find issues with any of those things yet you find me scummy for..... oh you refuse to explain.In post 392, skitter30 wrote:I dont think 1 or 2 are scummy in this context. You're just pulling out things you dont like, doesnt nake them scummy just because you call them that
Like i dont inherently view either of these as scummy tbh. So i dont know how to answer this questio
no sorry. This is your scum game.
scum team is rabid/skitter
everyone can we please lynch one of these two players. I beg of you.
Ok fair enough, i didnt remember this postIn post 408, Robbnva wrote:In post 113, Rabid Schnauzer wrote:You're scum.
You try to misrep me as only coming in on the replace out issue.
Couldnt get it to fitIn post 414, Tchill13 wrote:wheres my quote in your sig skit?
I'm not sure what you think i havent explained at the moment?In post 416, Robbnva wrote:and you do you. cause this is a lie because you already sorted me. You just won't explain how/why you got that read...
In post 411, skitter30 wrote:Ok fair enough, i didnt remember this postIn post 408, Robbnva wrote:In post 113, Rabid Schnauzer wrote:You're scum.
You try to misrep me as only coming in on the replace out issue.
I dont know why he only chose to challenge you on this
@rabid why didnt you comment on me and hectic making the same observation as robb?
if i'm scum irregardless of rabid's alignment, why arent' you voting me?In post 427, Robbnva wrote:don't worry about it skitter. I know now you are either wk'ing rabid (least likely) or scum with him (more likely)
why would that be happening here and not in the scum pt?In post 455, BrightEyedFish wrote:Hectic's 344 feels an awful lot like coaching to me...
robb - scummy
actually i'm not super much liking bobIn post 476, bob3141 wrote:dont why but you feel off this game garmr, you push on tchill felt off. You made mistakes in regards to teh claimed vote timings. And not realy a case for why teh bef unvote actual made tchill scum.
Plus you usual do a few more walls
First time ive actual not town read you
VOTE: Garmr
your mindset is consistent in a way that i find townie.In post 488, Tchill13 wrote:why and how am i town
why and how is garmr town.
garmr is vibing way different than the other game i played with him and he was town.
Oh sorry 374In post 496, Rabid Schnauzer wrote:Were you referring to a different post than 376 here?In post 493, skitter30 wrote:- i also initially disliked that you were treating me and rabid's 'sheep someone else on player X' thing differently, but when you explained in 376 how you interact with different players differently depending on what you think of their skill level, it made some more sense
Op says scum have daytalkIn post 495, BrightEyedFish wrote:Before I wrote that I checked the OP and didn't see anything about scum having day talk. That's why I think it could be coaching.In post 481, skitter30 wrote:why would that be happening here and not in the scum pt?In post 455, BrightEyedFish wrote:Hectic's 344 feels an awful lot like coaching to me...
bef is still townie
I distance better than that as scum, thank youIn post 507, Rabid Schnauzer wrote:If she and tchill are scum, then yes, the switch makes sense, precisely because he is at risk of a lynch going through.
i don't understand why you think that it's scummy for garmr to mention in this post that he thinks tchill is scummyIn post 520, bob3141 wrote:So again how does skitter unvotign make tchill in that respect scum enough for you to justify mention him being off in the same context
i don't know why you think this is more likely than he just thought of both things at the same time and point them in the same postIn post 527, bob3141 wrote:They attach x to teh end a to make people think they are connected. But are infact in related facts or opinions.
I dont understand itIn post 542, Tchill13 wrote:whats wrong with it.In post 524, skitter30 wrote:i don't like your garmr push
he's essentially saying the things that are giving me bad gut vibes on garmr. a lot to do with my experience with garmr.
I dont particularly agree with tchill's approach to the game but his actions line up with the approach he's purporting to take to this game, so i think he's kinda townieIn post 546, Garmr wrote:When he jumped off he voted wake instead of me or hectic. If he was actually concerned with getting reads ect like his trying to portray himself he wouldn't park his slot on a lurker. If he voted me then instead of after I found issue with it or he voted hectic I wouldn't have a problem as he would be wrong but at least consistent. It's like his playing safe instead of finding scum.In post 517, skitter30 wrote:Garmr what's bothering u about tchill?
Another reason I don't think bob and tchill are scum together as well because of tchill stating his willingness to vote bob in a way like his setting up the lynch.